Evidence Record
Order Signed Staying Proceedings
at the time of imaging This instrument is of poor quality RECORDER'S MEMORANDUM
DISTIL analysis
DISTIL Run
Profile
Standard
Version
1
Doc Type
court_clerk_memorandum_with_returned_mail
Total Nodes
17
Node Legend
Entity (ENT)
Event (EVT)
Claim (CLM)
Anchor (ANC)
Omission (OMI)
Tension (TEN)
Tell (TEL)
Inference (INF)
Hypothesis (HYP)
Stage 1
Index
Orientation · No nodes
Document Classification
court_clerk_memorandum_with_returned_mail Harris County District Clerk, Marilyn Burgess civil_litigation_texas 2024-10-31 to 2024-12-02
service_failureaddress_issuemultiple_court_ordersreturn_to_sender
Analytical Frame
procedural_service_failure_notification
Analytical Summary
This court clerk's memorandum documents a failed service attempt in Harris County case 2024-48085, Atlantic Wave Holdings LLC vs. Cyberlux Corporation. The document shows a returned first-class mail envelope sent to Raleigh, NC with postal markings indicating 'Return to Sender - No Mail Receptacle - Unable to Forward' dated 11/24/24. The clerk's office notified Cyberlux Corporation at a Carson City, NC address about two court orders signed on 10/31/2024: one denying a motion to set aside order, and another staying proceedings. The tension between the attempted Raleigh service and the Carson City notification raises questions about correct address information and whether the defendant received notice of significant court actions.
Key Points
- Mail sent to Raleigh, NC was returned as undeliverable on 11/24/24
- Two significant court orders were signed on 10/31/2024
- Notification was sent to Cyberlux Corporation at Carson City, NC address
- Case involves Atlantic Wave Holdings LLC as plaintiff against Cyberlux Corporation
- Orders included denial of motion to set aside order and stay of proceedings
Stage 2
Core — Entities, Events, Claims
9 nodes
ENT-001
Entity
Harris County District Clerk - Marilyn Burgess
Harris County District Clerk office under Marilyn Burgess, located at 201 Caroline, P.O. Box 4651, Houston, Texas 77210-4651, phone 832-927-5800
Page 1, 2 — MARILYN BURGESS HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK P.O. Box 4651 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77210-4651
ENT-002
Entity
Atlantic Wave Holdings LLC
Atlantic Wave Holdings LLC, plaintiff in Harris County case 2024-48085
Page 2 — ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS LLC VS. CYBERLUX CORPORATION
ENT-003
Entity
Cyberlux Corporation
Cyberlux Corporation, defendant in Harris County case 2024-48085, with address listed as 701 S. Carson St., Carson City, NC 27709
Page 2 — CYBERLUX CORPORATION 701 S. CARSON ST. CARSON CITY, NC 27709
ENT-004
Entity
Case 2024-48085, Court 129
Harris County civil case number 2024-48085, assigned to Court 129, Atlantic Wave Holdings LLC vs. Cyberlux Corporation
Page 2 — CASE 202448085 CRT 129
EVT-001
Event
Court Order Denying Motion - Oct 31, 2024
On October 31, 2024, court signed order denying motion to set aside order in case 2024-48085
Page 2 — BE ADVISED ON 10/31/2024 THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITY OCCURED. ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS LLC VS. CYBERLUX CORPORATION ORDER SGNED DENYING MOTION TO SET ASIDE ORDER
EVT-002
Event
Court Order Staying Proceedings - Oct 31, 2024
On October 31, 2024, court signed order staying proceedings in case 2024-48085
Page 2 — BE ADVISED ON 10/31/2024 THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITY OCCURED. ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS LLC VS. CYBERLUX CORPORATION ORDER SIGNED STAYING PROCEEDINGS
EVT-003
Event
Mail Return - Nov 24, 2024
First-class mail returned to sender on November 24, 2024, marked 'No Mail Receptacle - Unable to Forward' from Raleigh NC 275 address
Page 1 — RETURN TO SENDER NO MAIO RECEPTACLE UNABLE TO FORWARD 0011/24/24
EVT-004
Event
District Clerk Filing - Dec 2, 2024
Recorder's memorandum filed with Harris County District Clerk on December 2, 2024 at 1:82 PM, documenting service attempt failure
Page 1 — FILED DISTRICT CLERC MARILYN BITJES> HARRIS CO INCX TEXAS 2024 DEC -2 PM 182 12-02-24
CLM-001
Claim
Service Attempted via First-Class Mail
Service was requested and attempted via first-class mail with postage of $000.54
Page 1 — SERVICE19 NOV 2024PM REQUESTED FIRST- CLASS MAIL AUTO · IVI $000.54' US POSTAGE
Stage 3
In Situ — Quotations, Tells, Tensions, Questions
5 nodes
QUO-001
Quotation
Document Quality Warning
Note on document quality and imaging conditions
Page 1 — at the time of imaging This instrument is of poor quality
QUO-002
Quotation
Postal Return Markings
Postal service markings explaining reason for non-delivery
Page 1 — RETURN TO SENDER NO MAIO RECEPTACLE UNABLE TO FORWARD
TEN-001
Tension
Address Discrepancy
Mail was sent to Raleigh NC 275 but returned, while clerk notification lists Cyberlux at Carson City, NC 27709 address
Page 1, 2 — RETURN RALEIGH NC 275 ... CYBERLUX CORPORATION 701 S. CARSON ST. CARSON CITY, NC 27709
QST-001
Question
Service Effectiveness Question
Did Cyberlux Corporation receive notice of the court orders given the returned mail and potential address issues?
Page 1, 2 — RETURN TO SENDER NO MAIO RECEPTACLE UNABLE TO FORWARD 0011/24/24
QST-002
Question
Correct Service Address Question
What is the correct service address for Cyberlux Corporation - the Raleigh address where mail was returned, or the Carson City address listed on the notification?
Page 1, 2 — RETURN RALEIGH NC 275 ... CYBERLUX CORPORATION 701 S. CARSON ST. CARSON CITY, NC 27709
Stage 4
Interpretive — Inferences, Omissions, Patterns
3 nodes
INF-001
Inference
Service of Process Failure
The returned mail suggests service of process may not have been successfully completed for critical court orders, potentially affecting defendant's due process rights
Page 1, 2 — RETURN TO SENDER NO MAIO RECEPTACLE UNABLE TO FORWARD
INF-002
Inference
Timing Significance
The timing gap between court orders (Oct 31), service attempt (Nov 19), mail return (Nov 24), and filing (Dec 2) suggests multiple weeks where defendant may not have been aware of significant procedural developments
Page 1, 2 — BE ADVISED ON 10/31/2024 THE FOLLOWING ACTIVITY OCCURED ... SERVICE19 NOV 2024PM ... 0011/24/24 ... 2024 DEC -2 PM 182
OMI-001
Omission
Missing Alternative Service Attempts
Document does not indicate whether alternative service methods were attempted after mail was returned, or whether plaintiff was notified of service failure
Page 1, 2 — RETURN TO SENDER NO MAIO RECEPTACLE UNABLE TO FORWARD 0011/24/24
Extracted text
2 pages · 1179 charactersFiling Header
P-2
at the time of imaging This instrument is of poor quality RECORDER'S MEMORANDUM
CLERC BITJES> INCX TEXAS
PM 182
FILED
CO
DISTRICT MARILYN
DEC
HARRIS
12-02-24
70
astrict Clerk
SIXXYA * DIST
MARILYN BURGESS HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK P.O. Box 4651 HOUSTON, TEXAS 77210-4651
RETURN RALEIGH NC 275
quad cht
SERVICE19 NOV 2024PM REQUESTED
FIRST- CLASS MAIL AUTO · IVI $000.54'
US POSTAGE
X
COUNTYL
2024- 48085
NIXIP 23/275 DE 1141
RETURN TO SENDER NO MAIO RECEPTACLE UNABLE TO FORWARD
0011/24/24 ZACS <-
BC: 77210465151 £2780-01168-24-24
77210>4651 JBHZSSB 27
Unoffi
Marilyn Burgess HARRIS COUNTY DISTRICT CLERK
201
Caroline | P.O. Box 4651 | Houston, Texas 77210-4651 | 832-927-5800 | www.hcdistrictclerk.com
CYBERLUX CORPORATION 701 S. CARSON ST. CARSON CITY, NC 27709
Unofficial Copy Office of Marilyn Burgess District Clerk
Original source file
No source file is attached yet. The record is ready for the PDF/media link when the attachment importer is connected.
- File
- aw-harris-awh-2024-48085-doc-117858429.pdf
- Source UID
- source:7de979d957a8064cf622e1d2b664f554917f18717daaff3c5950b8fcdc82686a
- Full SHA-256
- 7de979d957a8064cf622e1d2b664f554917f18717daaff3c5950b8fcdc82686a