Evidence Record

Exhibit 2 – Order

6/5/2025 12:13 PM Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County Envelope No. 101664202 By: Shanelle Taylor Filed: 6/5/2025 12:13 PM

Type
exhibit
Pages
9
Lines
377
SHA-256
8a76c1c83c3c

DISTIL analysis

DISTIL Run
Profile
Standard
Version
1
Doc Type
Email Thread with Court Filing Certificate
Total Nodes
37
Node Legend
Entity (ENT)
Event (EVT)
Claim (CLM)
Anchor (ANC)
Omission (OMI)
Tension (TEN)
Tell (TEL)
Inference (INF)
Hypothesis (HYP)
Stage 1
Index
Orientation · No nodes
Document Classification
Email Thread with Court Filing Certificate Multiple attorneys in ongoing litigation Post-judgment collection enforcement, receivership appointment dispute January 17-28, 2025; filed June 5, 2025
multi-party_disputecourt_ordered_discoverypayment_amount_contestedreceivership_challenge
Analytical Frame
Legal correspondence regarding deposition scheduling, payoff calculations, and procedural objections
Analytical Summary
This document is an email thread from January 2025 in Harris County litigation, marked as Exhibit 2 and filed June 5, 2025. The correspondence involves attorneys Travis Vargo (judgment creditor's counsel), Alex Pennetti and Katharine Clark (judgment debtor's counsel), discussing court-ordered depositions, disputed payoff amounts, and discovery deadlines. Vargo provides a payoff spreadsheet for Cyberlux but notes it excludes substantial collection fees and costs. The parties dispute what amount is owed under a settlement agreement and struggle to coordinate deposition schedules for witnesses including Schmidt, Watts Jr., Robinson, Welter, Peterson, and Keithly. Defense counsel requests extensions and supporting documentation for the claimed payoff amount, while plaintiff's counsel insists on proceeding with court-ordered depositions within tight timeframes. The document also includes an automated certificate showing the filing relates to defendants' objection to a receiver appointment order dated May 22, 2025.
Key Points
  • Travis Vargo provides payoff spreadsheet for Cyberlux but excludes collection fees/costs claimed as substantial
  • Parties dispute total amount owed under settlement agreement and what payments have been credited
  • Court ordered depositions of multiple witnesses within tight timeframe causing scheduling conflicts
  • Defense counsel requests payoff letter with supporting documentation before depositions proceed
  • Document filed June 5, 2025 as exhibit to defendants' objection to receiver appointment order
Stage 2
Core — Entities, Events, Claims
23 nodes
ENT-001
Entity
Travis Vargo
Attorney representing judgment creditors in collection action, from Vargo Law Firm, PC
Page 2 — Travis B. Vargo Vargo Law Firm, PC (713) 524-2441 - Office
ENT-002
Entity
Alex Pennetti
Attorney at Thompson Coburn LLP representing judgment debtors/defendants
Page 3 — Alex Pennetti apennetti@thompsoncoburn.com P: 972 629 7168 F: 972 629 7171 Thompson Coburn LLP 2100 Ross Avenue Suite 3200 Dallas, TX 75201
ENT-003
Entity
Katharine B. Clark
Attorney at Thompson Coburn LLP representing judgment debtors/defendants
Page 5 — Katharine Battaia Clark kclark@thompsoncoburn.com P. 972 629 7114 F: 972 629 7171 Thompson Coburn LLP 2100 Ross Avenue Suite 3200 Dallas, TX 75201
ENT-004
Entity
Judge Gomez
Judge presiding over the Harris County case, 129th Civil District Court
Page 6 — It is also being filed today per the Judge's request... last Thursday... as ordered by the Judge
ENT-005
Entity
Cyberlux
Entity subject to payoff calculation in the litigation
Page 2 — Payoff Cyberlux v 2.xlsx
ENT-006
Entity
Mr. Schmidt
Witness subject to court-ordered deposition
Page 5, 6 — January 28 (all day) - Mr. Schmidt
ENT-007
Entity
Mr. Watts Jr.
Witness subject to court-ordered deposition
Page 5, 6 — January 29 (morning 9am-12pm, I have a hearing at 1:30) - Mr. Watts Jr.
ENT-008
Entity
Mr. Robinson
Witness subject to deposition with coordination issues between Texas and Virginia
Page 4, 5, 6 — January 30 (all day) - Mr. Robinson... We also received word from Virginia that someone else besides you has sought Mr. Robinson's availability for the Texas action
ENT-009
Entity
Messrs. Welter, Peterson, and Keithly
Three witnesses whose depositions may be needed regarding payoff calculations
Page 3 — without a payoff letter and supporting documentation, we need to depose Messrs. Welter, Peterson, and Keithly
EVT-001
Event
Email sent with payoff spreadsheet
Travis Vargo sent email on January 28, 2025 at 3:41 PM with attached Cyberlux payoff spreadsheet
Page 2 — Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2025 3:41 PM... See attached... Payoff Cyberlux v 2.xlsx
EVT-002
Event
Court hearing ordering depositions
Court hearing occurred on Thursday, January 16, 2025 where Judge Gomez ordered depositions and requested an order
Page 6 — order of turnover and appointment of receiver that Judge Gomez requested last Thursday... last night... the Judge's orders last night
EVT-003
Event
Proposed deposition schedule sent
On January 17, 2025, Travis Vargo proposed deposition schedule for three witnesses over three days
Page 6 — From: Travis Vargo Sent: Friday, January 17, 2025 2:16 PM... I also propose the following deposition schedule in accordance with the Judge's orders last night: · January 28 (all day) - Mr. Schmidt . January 29 (morning 9am-12pm, I have a hearing at 1:30) - Mr. Watts Jr. . January 30 (all day) - Mr. Robinson
EVT-004
Event
Non-response to deposition proposals
By January 27, 2025, Travis Vargo had received no response to his deposition schedule proposals sent January 17
Page 5 — Below I sought the following depositions per the attached Order... I received no response, no alternative dates, nothing. Please respond or we are going to notice these depositions per our schedules.
EVT-005
Event
Order objections deadline
Defendants' objections to proposed order were due Monday, January 20, 2025
Page 5 — We had noted that our objects were due today, Monday. Attached is the proposed form of order by Defendants, marked with track changes.
EVT-006
Event
Document filed as Exhibit 2
This email thread was filed on June 5, 2025 at 12:13 PM as Exhibit 2 by Shanelle Taylor with Harris County District Clerk
Page 1 — 6/5/2025 12:13 PM Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County Envelope No. 101664202 By: Shanelle Taylor Filed: 6/5/2025 12:13 PM
EVT-007
Event
Receiver appointment order issued
Court issued an Order Appointing Receiver dated May 22, 2025, which defendants objected to
Page 8, 9 — Filing Description: Defendants Objection to Court s Order Appointing Receiver Dated May 22 2025
CLM-001
Claim
Payoff excludes collection fees and costs
Vargo states the payoff calculation does not include collection fees and costs entitled under settlement agreement, understood to be a substantial sum
Page 2 — Here is a pay-off that I prepared based on documents that I've seen. This does not include collection fees and costs that my client is entitled to under the settlement agreement, which I understand to be a substantial sum.
CLM-002
Claim
Payoff requires investigation and confirmation
Vargo states he needs to investigate collection fees amount, declare it, provide support, and confirm spreadsheet with client
Page 2 — Obviously, I need to investigate this number, declare it, and provide support for it. I also need to confirm this spreadsheet with my client.
CLM-003
Claim
Payment credits requested
Vargo requests evidence of any payments not shown in spreadsheet for proper credit consideration
Page 2 — If your client made payments that are not shown on tab 2, please send me evidence of the payment so that I can discuss it with my client and provide proper credit, if applicable.
CLM-004
Claim
No authority to move court deadline
Vargo states he has no authority to move court-ordered deadline and client opposes due to continued filings necessitating responses
Page 2 — I don't have authority to move a court ordered deadline. My client also opposes in light of your client's continued filings that necessitate responses from my firm.
CLM-005
Claim
Existing dispute over amount owed
Pennetti states there is an existing dispute over what is owed under the judgment
Page 3 — Given the existing dispute over what is owed, without a payoff letter and supporting documentation, we need to depose Messrs. Welter, Peterson, and Keithly.
CLM-006
Claim
Plaintiffs credit amounts against judgment
Pennetti notes that plaintiffs have been crediting amounts received or collected against the judgment
Page 3 — But as you told the Court, the plaintiffs have been crediting amounts received or collected against the judgment, so I would imagine a payoff history and payoff amount is something that can be provided relatively easily
CLM-007
Claim
Threat of show cause hearing
Vargo threatens to seek show cause hearing if defense does not attend noticed depositions
Page 5 — Please respond or we are going to notice these depositions per our schedules. If you do not attend, we will seek a show cause.
Stage 3
In Situ — Quotations, Tells, Tensions, Questions
9 nodes
QUO-001
Quotation
Vargo on collection fees exclusion
Direct quote from Travis Vargo explaining what the payoff calculation excludes
Page 2 — This does not include collection fees and costs that my client is entitled to under the settlement agreement, which I understand to be a substantial sum.
QUO-002
Quotation
Pennetti on payoff documentation need
Direct quote from Alex Pennetti requesting payoff letter and documentation
Page 3 — Do you have any update on the payoff letter and supporting documentation that we discussed last week? Given the existing dispute over what is owed, without a payoff letter and supporting documentation, we need to depose Messrs. Welter, Peterson, and Keithly.
QUO-003
Quotation
Vargo show cause threat
Direct quote from Vargo threatening procedural consequences for non-attendance
Page 5 — I received no response, no alternative dates, nothing. Please respond or we are going to notice these depositions per our schedules. If you do not attend, we will seek a show cause.
TEN-001
Tension
Tight timeframe vs. need for documentation
Tension between court-ordered tight discovery timeframe and defense's need for supporting documentation before depositions
Page 3 — With the tight timeframe, we need to proceed with the depositions of the three court-ordered witnesses first... Do you have any update on the payoff letter and supporting documentation that we discussed last week?
TEN-002
Tension
Robinson deposition coordination confusion
Confusion over who is coordinating Robinson deposition with different counsel providing different timelines
Page 3, 4 — We also received word from Virginia that someone else besides you has sought Mr. Robinson's availability for the Texas action, and they have given him a different timeline for response than you do below... let us know on Mr. Robinson because I'm not clear on whether we're trying to coordinate everyone or if you guys want to depose him twice.
TEN-003
Tension
Unilateral scheduling vs. coordination
Tension between plaintiff's counsel's unilateral scheduling approach and defense request for coordination
Page 3, 5 — I received no response, no alternative dates, nothing. Please respond or we are going to notice these depositions per our schedules... With the tight timeframe, we need to proceed with the depositions of the three court-ordered witnesses first. I'm working on those dates
QST-001
Question
What is the actual amount owed?
Central disputed question: what is the total payoff amount including all fees, costs, and properly credited payments?
Page 2, 3 — This does not include collection fees and costs that my client is entitled to under the settlement agreement, which I understand to be a substantial sum... Given the existing dispute over what is owed, without a payoff letter and supporting documentation, we need to depose Messrs. Welter, Peterson, and Keithly.
QST-002
Question
Which payments have been credited?
Disputed factual question about which payments defendants have made and whether they appear on creditor's records
Page 2 — If your client made payments that are not shown on tab 2, please send me evidence of the payment so that I can discuss it with my client and provide proper credit, if applicable.
QST-003
Question
Are depositions necessary if payoff provided?
Procedural question: if adequate payoff documentation is provided, can witness depositions be avoided?
Page 3 — I would imagine a payoff history and payoff amount is something that can be provided relatively easily, which would mean those depositions wouldn't be necessary.
Stage 4
Interpretive — Inferences, Omissions, Patterns
5 nodes
INF-001
Inference
Substantial undisclosed collection fees
The use of 'substantial sum' and need for investigation suggests collection fees may significantly increase the total amount owed beyond the spreadsheet calculation
Page 2 — This does not include collection fees and costs that my client is entitled to under the settlement agreement, which I understand to be a substantial sum. Obviously, I need to investigate this number, declare it, and provide support for it.
INF-002
Inference
Defense seeking to narrow deposition scope
Defense counsel's emphasis on payoff documentation suggests strategy to limit or avoid depositions of financial witnesses
Page 3 — Given the existing dispute over what is owed, without a payoff letter and supporting documentation, we need to depose Messrs. Welter, Peterson, and Keithly... I would imagine a payoff history and payoff amount is something that can be provided relatively easily, which would mean those depositions wouldn't be necessary.
INF-003
Inference
Aggressive plaintiff timeline tactics
Plaintiff's counsel's refusal to extend deadlines and threat of show cause suggests aggressive enforcement posture to pressure settlement or compliance
Page 2, 5 — I don't have authority to move a court ordered deadline. My client also opposes in light of your client's continued filings that necessitate responses from my firm... If you do not attend, we will seek a show cause.
OMI-001
Omission
No response to initial deposition proposals
Defense counsel provided no response, alternative dates, or acknowledgment to plaintiff's January 17 deposition schedule proposals
Page 5 — Below I sought the following depositions per the attached Order... I received no response, no alternative dates, nothing.
OMI-002
Omission
Missing collection fees calculation details
Vargo acknowledges needing to investigate and declare collection fees amount but provides no estimate or methodology in the email
Page 2 — This does not include collection fees and costs that my client is entitled to under the settlement agreement, which I understand to be a substantial sum. Obviously, I need to investigate this number, declare it, and provide support for it.

Extracted text

9 pages · 14717 characters

Exhibit 2 - Order — Formatted Extract

Type: exhibit
Filing Header

6/5/2025 12:13 PM Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County Envelope No. 101664202 By: Shanelle Taylor Filed: 6/5/2025 12:13 PM

Unofficial Copy Office on Marilyn Burgess District Clerk

EXHIBIT 2

Archived: Thursday, June 5, 2025 9:32:05 AM From: Travis Vargo

Mail received time: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 21:42:20

Sent: Tue, 28 Jan 2025 21:41:56

To: Pennetti, Alex Clark, Katharine B. Cc: 'shawn@gradycollectionlaw.com' Subject: RE: Order Importance: Normal Sensitivity: None Attachments: Payoff Cyberlux v 2.xlsx :selected:

RECEIVED FROM EXTERNAL SENDER - USE CAUTION

See attached. Travis B. Vargo Vargo Law Firm, PC (713) 524-2441 - Office

From: Travis Vargo Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2025 3:41 PM To: Pennetti, Alex <APennetti@thompsoncoburn.com>;clark, Katharine B. < KClark@thompsoncoburn.com> Cc: 'shawn@gradycollectionlaw.com' <shawn@gradycollectionlaw.com> Subject: RE: Order

Alex,

Here is a pay-off that I prepared based on documents that I've seen. This does not include collection fees and costs that my client is entitled to under the settlement agreement, which I understand to be a substantial sum. Obviously, I need to investigate this number, declare it, and provide support for it. I also need to confirm this spreadsheet with my client. In the meantime, please let me know your thoughts. If your client made payments that are not shown on tab 2, please send me evidence of the payment so that I can discuss it with my client and provide proper credit, if applicable.

Yes, provide dates for the court ordered depositions please.

I don't have authority to move a court ordered deadline. My client also opposes in light of your client's continued filings that necessitate responses from my firm.

Travis B. Vargo Vargo Law Firm, PC (713) 524-2441 - Office

From: Pennetti, Alex <APennetti@thompsoncoburn.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2025 3:03 PM To: Travis Vargo <tvargo@vargolawfirm.com>; Clark, Katharine B. < KClark@thompsoncoburn.com> Cc: 'shawn@gradycollectionlaw.com' <shawn@gradycollectionlaw.com> Subject: RE: Order

ofclans de & Office t & Marilyn Burgess District Clerk

Hi, Travis.

With the tight timeframe, we need to proceed with the depositions of the three court-ordered witnesses first. I'm working on those dates, as Katie said. For the other two, as Katie asked, let us know on Mr. Robinson because I'm not clear on whether we're trying to coordinate everyone or if you guys want to depose him twice.

Do you have any update on the payoff letter and supporting documentation that we discussed last week? Given the existing dispute over what is owed, without a payoff letter and supporting documentation, we need to depose Messrs. Welter, Peterson, and Keithly.

If we need to pursue the depositions of Messrs. Robinson, Watts, Welter, Peterson, and Keithly,perhaps we can schedule a full week to conduct these. But as you told the Court, the plaintiffs have been crediting amounts received or collected against the judgment, so I would imagine a payoff history and payoff amount is something that can be provided relatively easily, which would mean those depositions wouldn't be necessary.

Also, may we have until next Friday, 2/7, to serve discovery responses?

Best,

Alex Pennetti apennetti@thompsoncoburn.com P: 972 629 7168 F: 972 629 7171

Thompson Coburn LLP 2100 Ross Avenue Suite 3200 Dallas, TX 75201 www.thompsoncoburn.com

From: Taylor, Shanelle (DCO) <shanelle.taylor@hcdistrictclerk.com>

Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2025 11:29 AM

To: 'Travis Vargo' <tvargo@vargolawfirm.com>; Clark, Katharine B. < KClark@thompsoncoburn.com> Cc: Pennetti, Alex <APennetti@thompsoncoburn.com>; 'shawn@gradycollectionlaw.com' <shawn@gradycollectionlaw.com>; 'Robert Berleth' <rberleth@berlethlaw.com> Subject: RE: Order Importance: High

RECEIVED FROM EXTERNAL SENDER - USE CAUTION

Good Morning,

Can you please remove court staff from this email.

Thank you,

** PLEASE CONFIRM ALL LAW DAY HEARINGS ARE SET WITH THE COURT BEFORE YOU FILE NOTICE **

mmofficial Dry Office karaf Marilyn Burgess Districttar chceli

DISTRICT CLERK

Shanelle Taylor Lead Clerk, 129th Civil District Court MARILYN BURGESS, Harris County District Clerk 201 Caroline, Floor 10| Houston, TX 77002

(832)
927-2500

From: Travis Vargo <tvargo@vargolawfirm.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2025 11:16 AM To: Clark, Katharine B. < KClark@thompsoncoburn.com> Cc: Pennetti, Alex <APennetti@thompsoncoburn.com>; 'shawn@gradycollectionlaw.com' <shawn@gradycollectionlaw.com>; 'Robert Berleth' <rberleth@berlethlaw.com>; Taylor, Shanelle (DCO) <shanelle.taylor@hcdistric@terk.com>

Subject: RE: Order Importance: High

[WARNING] This email originated outside HCDCO. DO NOT CLICK links or attachments unless you know the content is safe.

Alex,

Please provide availability or conflicts for the depositions. Given lawyer calendars, we should not wait any longer to schedule.

PS - The only lawyers in Texas representing the Judgment Creditors are on this email.

Travis B. Vargo Vargo Law Firm, PC (713) 524-2441 - Office

From: Clark, Katharine B. < KClark@thompsoncoburn.com> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2025 10:44 PM To: Travis Vargo <tvargo@vargolawfirm.com> Cc: Pennetti, Alex <APennetti@thompsoncoburn.com>; 'shawn@gradycollectionlaw.com' <shawn@gradycollectionlaw.com>; 'Robert Berleth' <rberleth@berlethlaw.com>; 'shanelle.taylor@hcdistrictclerk.com' <shanelle.taylor@hcdistrictclerk.com> Subject: Re: Order

Alex will respond, as he has been working on confirming availability of the three witnesses for the depositions that the court ordered occur within the next few weeks.

We also received word from Virginia that someone else besides you has sought Mr. Robinson's availability for the Texas action, and they have given him a different timeline for response than you do below.

From: Travis Vargo <tvargo@vargolawfirm.com> Sent: Monday, January 27, 2025 5:20:50 PM To: Clark, Katharine B. < KClark@thompsoncoburn.com> Cc: Pennetti, Alex <APennetti@thompsoncoburn.com>; 'shawn@gradycollectionlaw.com' <shawn@gradycollectionlaw.com>; 'Robert Berleth' <rberleth@berlethlaw.com>; 'shanelle.taylor@hcdistrictclerk.com' <shanelle.taylor@hcdistrictclerk.com> Subject: RE: Order

RECEIVED FROM EXTERNAL SENDER - USE CAUTION

300
BLATHERpy', fice of Marily to Burgess Diict Cliente

Katharine,

Below I sought the following depositions per the attached Order:

· January 28 (all day) - Mr. Schmidt

. January 29 (morning 9am-12pm, I have a hearing at 1:30) - Mr. Watts Jr.

· January 30 (all day) - Mr. Robinson

I received no response, no alternative dates, nothing. Please respond or we are going to notice these depositions per our schedules. If you do not attend, we will seek a show cause.

Thanks. Travis B. Vargo Vargo Law Firm, PC (713) 524-2441 - Office

From: Clark, Katharine B. < KClark@thompsoncoburn.com>

Sent: Monday, January 20, 2025 5:55 PM

To: Travis Vargo <tvargo@vargolawfirm.com> Cc: Pennetti, Alex <APennetti@thompsoncoburn.com>; 'shawn@gradycollectionlaw.com' <shawn@gradycollectionlaw.com>; 'Robert Berleth' <rberleth@berlethlaw.com>; 'shanelle.taylor@hcdistrictclerk.com' <shanelle.taylor@hcdistrictclerk.com> Subject: RE: Order

Ms. Taylor -

It was our understanding the Court requested that we present authorities to assist the Court in his review of any proposed order edits, and so attached is Defendants' letter brief submitted in support of Defendants' proposed form of Order, which I submitted via e-mail earlier today. We will also be filing this on the docket. However, because today is a holiday for our law firm, we may not have sufficient staff to do so. If we do not file today, we will do so first thing tomorrow morning.

Sincerely,

Katharine Battaia Clark kclark@thompsoncoburn.com P. 972 629 7114 F: 972 629 7171

Thompson Coburn LLP 2100 Ross Avenue Suite 3200 Dallas, TX 75201 www.thompsoncoburn.com

From: Clark, Katharine B. Sent: Monday, January 20, 2025 3:00 PM To: Travis Vargo <tvargo@vargolawfirm.com> Cc: Pennetti, Alex <APennetti@thompsoncoburn.com>; shawn@gradycollectionlaw.com; Robert Berleth <rberleth@berlethlaw.com>; shanelle.taylor@hcdistrictclerk.com

Subject: RE: Order

Ms. Taylor -

We had noted that our objects were due today, Monday. Attached is the proposed form of order by Defendants, marked with track changes. We will be filing a letter brief, as well, in support of these proposed changes.

unofficial Copy Office de laterilyn Burgess District Clerk

Sincerely,

Katharine Battaia Clark kclark@thompsoncoburn.com P: 972 629 7114 F: 972 629 7171

Thompson Coburn LLP 2100 Ross Avenue Suite 3200 Dallas, TX 75201 www.thompsoncoburn.com

From: Travis Vargo <tvargo@vargolawfirm.com>

Sent: Monday, January 20, 2025 2:55 PM To: shanelle.taylor@hcdistrictclerk.com Cc: Clark, Katharine B. < KClark@thompsoncoburn.com>; Pennetti, Alex <APennetti@thompsoncoburn.com>; shawn@gradycollectionlaw.com; Robert Berleth <rberleth@berlethlaw.com> Subject: FW: Order

RECEIVED FROM EXTERNAL SENDER - USE CAUTION

Shanelle,

Please see attached MS word version of the order of turnover and appointment of receiver that Judge Gomez requested last Thursday. It is also being filed today per the Judge's request.

It was sent to the Judgment Debtor's counsel Friday as ordered by the Judge. No objections or changes were received.

Travis B. Vargo Vargo Law Firm, PC (713) 524-2441 - Office

From: Travis Vargo

Sent: Friday, January 17, 2025 2:16 PM

To: kclark@thompsoncoburn.com;apennetti@thompsoncoburn.com Cc: Robert Berleth <rberleth@berlethlaw.com>; shawn@gradycollectionlaw.com Subject: Order

Counsel,

Please see attached. trimmed this order down to the bear minimum. I hope we can agree to a form. Please respond by 11am Monday if you have track changes so that we can try to work it out or otherwise advise the court concerning our disagreement and file the versions.

I also propose the following deposition schedule in accordance with the Judge's orders last night:

· January 28 (all day) - Mr. Schmidt

. January 29 (morning 9am-12pm, I have a hearing at 1:30) - Mr. Watts Jr.

. January 30 (all day) - Mr. Robinson

Have a nice weekend.

hamm copy Office of Medyn Burgess District Clerk

Travis B. Vargo Vargo Law Firm, PC 12012 Wickchester, Suite 670 Houston, TX 77079 (713) 524-2441 - Office (832) 779-8838 - Fax

Confidentiality Notice: The contents of this electronic message, and any attachment to it, contain information which may be confidential and/or privileged. This information is intended only for the addressed recipients and access by anyone else is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of this electronic message or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic message in error, please immediately reply to the sender that you have received the message in error, and destroy all copies of it. Further, nothing in the above message is intended to and does not constitute tax advice. All information transmitted herein should be disclosed to your tax preparer for advice. Lastly, pursuant to the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, you are advised that this office is deemed to be a debt collector and any information obtained may be used for that purpose.

Unofficial Copy Office of Marilyn Burgess DistriCome mest %

Automated Certificate of eService

This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system. The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules.

Frankie Huff on behalf of Alex Pennetti Bar No. 24110208 fhuff@thompsoncoburn.com Envelope ID: 101664202

Filing Code Description: Motion (No Fee)

Filing Description: Defendants Objection to Court s Order Appointing Receiver Dated May 22 2025 Status as of 6/5/2025 3:44 PM CST

Case Contacts

Name

BarNumber

Email

TimestampSubmitted

Status

David A.Walton

dwalton@bellnunnally.com

6/5/2025 12:13:55 PM

SENT

LaDonna Arey

LArey@bellnunnally.com

6/5/2025 12:13:55 PM

SENT

Sandra Meiners

smeiners@thompsoncoburn.com

6/5/2025 12:13:55 PM

SENT

Travis Vargo

tvargo@vargolawfirm.com

6/5/2025 12:13:55 PM

SENT

Laurie DeBardeleben

Idebardeleben@thompsoncoburn.com

6/5/2025 12:13:55 PM

SENT

Roxanna Lock

rlock@thompsoncoburn.com

6/5/2025 12:13:55 PM

SENT

Shawn Grady

shawn@gradycollectionlaw.com

6/5/2025 12:13:55 PM

SENT

Shawn Grady

shawn@gradycollectionlaw.com

6/5/2025 12:13:55 PM

SENT

Jeff Brown

jbrown@thompsoncoburn.com

6/5/2025 12:13:55 PM

SENT

Records Department

Records@bellnunnally.com

6/5/2025 12:13:55 PM

SENT

Micah Jackson

mjackson@berlethlaw.com

6/5/2025 12:13:55 PM

SENT

Sheli Davis

sdavis@berlethlaw.com

6/5/2025 12:13:55 PM

SENT

Paula Gentry

pgentry@thompsoncoburn.com

6/5/2025 12:13:55 PM

SENT

Lena Brasher

lbrasher@thompsoncoburn.com

6/5/2025 12:13:55 PM

SENT

Frankie Huff

fhuff@thompsoncoburn.com

6/5/2025 12:13:55 PM

SENT

Tristian Harris

tharris@berlethlaw.com

6/5/2025 12:13:55 PM

SENT

Corinne Martin

cmartin@berlethlaw.com

6/5/2025 12:13:55 PM

SENT

Hannah Fischer

hfischer@thompsoncoburn.com

6/5/2025 12:13:55 PM

SENT

Hannah Petrea

hpetrea@bellnunnally.com

6/5/2025 12:13:55 PM

SENT

Michael Poynter

mpoynter@vargolawfirm.com

6/5/2025 12:13:55 PM

SENT

Bernadette Martin

bernadette@gradycollectionlaw.com

6/5/2025 12:13:55 PM

SENT

Bernadette Martin

bernadette@gradycollectionlaw.com

6/5/2025 12:13:55 PM

SENT

Automated Certificate of eService

This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system. The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules.

Frankie Huff on behalf of Alex Pennetti Bar No. 24110208 fhuff@thompsoncoburn.com Envelope ID: 101664202

Filing Code Description: Motion (No Fee)

Filing Description: Defendants Objection to Court s Order Appointing Receiver Dated May 22 2025 Status as of 6/5/2025 3:44 PM CST

Case Contacts

Bernadette Martin

bernadette@gradycollectionlaw.com

6/5/2025 12:13:55 PM

SENT

Alex Pennetti

apennetti@thompsoncoburn.com

6/5/2025 12:13:55 PM

SENT

Douglas S.Lang

dlang@thompsoncoburn.com

6/5/2025 12:13:55 PM

SENT

Katharine Clark

kclark@thompsoncoburn.com

6/5/2025 12:13:55 PM

SENT

Edward W.Gray, Jr.

EGray@thompsoncoburn.com

6/5/2025 12:13:55 PM

SENT

Jocelin A. Tapia

jtapia@thompsoncoburn.com

6/5/2025 12:13:55 PM

SENT

Greg Nieman

gnieman@bellnunnally.com

6/5/2025 12:13:55 PM

SENT

Jemisha Gandhi

jgandhi@bellnunnally.com

6/5/2025 12:13:55 PM

SENT

David M.Keithly

dkeithly@mortensontaggart.com

6/5/2025 12:13:55 PM

SENT

Original source file

No source file is attached yet. The record is ready for the PDF/media link when the attachment importer is connected.
File
aw-harris-awh-2024-48085-doc-120929912.pdf
Source UID
source:8a76c1c83c3c99879564ee77638d5f2061eadfbc9a5a567fb04617d86b04def4
Full SHA-256
8a76c1c83c3c99879564ee77638d5f2061eadfbc9a5a567fb04617d86b04def4