WeShield / Assure Global LLC
Commission Claimant · Security Interest Claimant · ITAR / FAR Exposure Layer
Assure Global LLC, doing business as WeShield, is classified in the interpleader record under the commission and intermediary stack — parties claiming a share of the HII subcontract proceeds based on pre-existing arrangements with Cyberlux. WeShield's claim encompasses both commission entitlement and an asserted security interest, making it structurally distinct from the other commission claimants.
What this profile says up front
A commission and security claimant with two competing characterizations of the same payment
Assure Global LLC, doing business as WeShield, is classified in the interpleader record under the commission and intermediary stack — parties claiming a share of the HII subcontract proceeds based on pre-existing arrangements with Cyberlux. WeShield's claim encompasses both commission entitlement and an asserted security interest, making it structurally distinct from the other commission claimants.
Michael Sinensky appears across WeShield, Roman Investments, and MAS USA claim materials. The Vintfeld Declaration is the primary source document anchoring WeShield's claim in the interpleader record.
The findings below are analytical observations drawn from interpleader filings, the Welter Declaration, and regulatory materials. They are not findings of liability.
The numbers that frame the profile
What the record establishes
Commission and security interest claim in the interpleader
WeShield/Assure Global LLC has filed a claim in the E.D. Va. interpleader asserting both commission entitlement and a security interest against the corpus. The claim amount is documented at $2.5M plus interest. The combination of a commission claim and a security interest positions WeShield differently from the other commission-only claimants: it asserts both a contractual and a property right against the same fund.
The Vintfeld Declaration: evidentiary anchor for the claim
The Vintfeld Declaration is the primary document in the interpleader record setting out the basis for WeShield's claim. It appears across 31 documents in the corpus. The declaration's specifics regarding the nature of WeShield's arrangement with Cyberlux — what services were provided, under what agreement, and when — are the foundation of the claim's validity.
The competing payment characterizations
A payment from Cyberlux to WeShield was characterized in interpleader and related proceedings as a consulting fee. Welter Declaration materials — filed in the Atlantic Wave Holdings litigation and capturing the advance payment disbursement record — connect the same payment to a strip club liability settlement. The two characterizations are in direct tension. The record does not resolve which characterization is accurate, and no court has adjudicated the question.
ITAR Part 130 and FAR 52.203-5 questions
WeShield's commission entitlement, if arising from an arrangement to solicit or facilitate the HII contract, falls within the scope of FAR 52.203-5's certification requirement. The K8 is a defense article under Foreign Military Financing; WeShield's claim against a $78.857M contract exceeds ITAR Part 130's $500,000 disclosure threshold. Whether either disclosure requirement was satisfied does not appear in any public filing.
Roman Investments and MAS USA connections
Roman Investments and MAS USA appear in the interpleader record in the same claim cluster as WeShield, with Michael Sinensky associated across all three. The nature of the relationships between these entities and their respective roles relative to the Cyberlux/HII contract proceeds are documented in a single interpleader filing (Doc 0194). The public record does not fully establish the structure or purpose of these related entities.