Evidence Record
Exhibit A
ADVANCED NAVIGATION & POSITIONING CORPORATION, Judgment Creditor, V. CYBERLUX CORPORATION, Judgment Debtor and
DISTIL analysis
DISTIL Run
Profile
Standard
Version
1
Doc Type
Court Order - Final Order and Garnishment Discharge
Total Nodes
24
Node Legend
Entity (ENT)
Event (EVT)
Claim (CLM)
Anchor (ANC)
Omission (OMI)
Tension (TEN)
Tell (TEL)
Inference (INF)
Hypothesis (HYP)
Stage 1
Index
Orientation · No nodes
Document Classification
Court Order - Final Order and Garnishment Discharge Circuit Court for Fairfax County, Virginia (Judge Christie Leary) Civil litigation - Garnishment proceeding arising from judgment enforcement, interpleader discharge 2025-2026 (judgment enforcement period, final order March 2026)
final_dispositiongarnishment_dischargeinterpleader_referencemulti_party_agreement
Analytical Frame
Procedural resolution of third-party garnishment claim through interpleader mechanism
Analytical Summary
This Final Order from the Fairfax County Circuit Court (Case No. CL2025-16055, entered March 2026) discharges HII Mission Technologies Corp. from liability in a garnishment action brought by Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation against judgment debtor Cyberlux Corporation. The discharge results from HII's deposit of disputed funds into an interpleader action and HII's subsequent discharge from that separate proceeding. The order references a prior Stay Order from January 13, 2026, and dismisses the garnishment action with prejudice as to HII. All three parties—judgment creditor ANPC, garnishee HII, and judgment debtor Cyberlux—are represented by counsel and have consented to the disposition.
Key Points
- HII Mission Technologies Corp. discharged from garnishment liability
- Discharge based on deposit of disputed funds in interpleader action and discharge from that action
- Garnishment action dismissed with prejudice as to HII
- All parties represented and in agreement
- References prior Stay Order dated January 13, 2026
Stage 2
Core — Entities, Events, Claims
12 nodes
ENT-001
Entity
Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation
Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation - Judgment Creditor in garnishment proceeding, seeking to collect on judgment against Cyberlux Corporation through garnishment of HII Mission Technologies Corp.
Page 2 — ADVANCED NAVIGATION & POSITIONING CORPORATION, Judgment Creditor
ENT-002
Entity
Cyberlux Corporation
Cyberlux Corporation - Judgment Debtor against whom Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation holds an enforceable judgment, subject of garnishment proceedings.
Page 2 — CYBERLUX CORPORATION, Judgment Debtor
ENT-003
Entity
HII Mission Technologies Corp.
HII Mission Technologies Corp. - Garnishee in proceeding, third party alleged to hold funds belonging to judgment debtor Cyberlux Corporation. Deposited disputed funds into interpleader action and was subsequently discharged.
Page 2 — HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP., Garnishee
ENT-004
Entity
Circuit Court for Fairfax County
Circuit Court for Fairfax County, Virginia - Court with jurisdiction over garnishment proceeding, presided over by Judge Christie Leary.
Page 2 — IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR FAIRFAX COUNTY
ENT-005
Entity
Judge Christie Leary
Christie Leary - Circuit Court Judge for Fairfax County who signed the Final Order on March 19, 2026.
Page 2 — Circuit Court Judge, Fairfax County
EVT-001
Event
Garnishment summons issued to HII
Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation requested and obtained garnishment summons issued to HII Mission Technologies Corp. arising from judgment against Cyberlux Corporation.
Page 2 — This matter is before the Court on the garnishment summons requested by Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation and issued to HII Mission Technologies Corp. ("HII") arising out of a judgment entered against Cyberlux Corporation.
EVT-002
Event
Stay Order entered January 13, 2026
Court entered a Stay Order on January 13, 2026, which defined 'Disputed Funds' and 'Interpleader Action' referenced in the Final Order.
Page 2 — In accordance with the Order entered in this action on January 13, 2026 (the "Stay Order"), the Parties represent and agree
EVT-003
Event
HII deposits disputed funds in interpleader action
HII Mission Technologies Corp. deposited the Disputed Funds (as defined in the Stay Order) into an Interpleader Action, constituting one basis for discharge from liability.
Page 2 — HII is hereby discharged from any liability in this action as a result of: (i) HII's deposit of the Disputed Funds (as defined in the Stay Order) in the Interpleader Action (as defined in the Stay Order)
EVT-004
Event
HII discharged from interpleader action
HII Mission Technologies Corp. was discharged from the Interpleader Action, constituting the second basis for discharge from garnishment liability.
Page 2 — HII is hereby discharged from any liability in this action as a result of: (i) HII's deposit of the Disputed Funds (as defined in the Stay Order) in the Interpleader Action (as defined in the Stay Order) and (ii) HII's discharge from the Interpleader Action.
EVT-005
Event
Final Order entered and action dismissed
Circuit Court entered Final Order on March 19, 2026, dismissing garnishment action with prejudice as to HII Mission Technologies Corp.
Page 2 — Therefore, this action is DISMISSED, with prejudice as to HII. This the day of March, 2026.
EVT-006
Event
Order filed in federal court as exhibit
The state court Final Order was filed as Exhibit A (Document 193-1) in federal case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG on April 22, 2026.
Page 1 — Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 193-1 Filed 04/22/26 Page 1 of 3 PageID# 4206
CLM-001
Claim
HII discharged from garnishment liability
Parties represent and agree that HII Mission Technologies Corp. is discharged from any liability in the garnishment action based on its deposit of disputed funds and discharge from interpleader action.
Page 2 — the Parties represent and agree that HII is hereby discharged from any liability in this action as a result of: (i) HII's deposit of the Disputed Funds (as defined in the Stay Order) in the Interpleader Action (as defined in the Stay Order) and (ii) HII's discharge from the Interpleader Action.
Stage 3
In Situ — Quotations, Tells, Tensions, Questions
7 nodes
QUO-001
Quotation
Dismissal language
Direct language from Final Order dismissing garnishment action with prejudice as to HII.
Page 2 — Therefore, this action is DISMISSED, with prejudice as to HII.
TLL-001
Tell
Parties in agreement on discharge
The order explicitly indicates all parties represent and agree to HII's discharge, suggesting consensual resolution rather than contested adjudication.
Page 2 — the Parties represent and agree that HII is hereby discharged from any liability
TLL-002
Tell
Counsel signature attestations
Document includes signature blocks from counsel for all three parties with 'WE ASK FOR THIS' and 'SEEN AND AGREED' language, indicating consent order format.
Page 3 — WE ASK FOR THIS: [...] SEEN AND AGREED:
QST-001
Question
What are the Disputed Funds?
The Final Order references 'Disputed Funds' as defined in the Stay Order from January 13, 2026, but does not specify the amount or nature of these funds in this document.
Page 2 — HII's deposit of the Disputed Funds (as defined in the Stay Order)
QST-002
Question
What is the Interpleader Action?
The order references an 'Interpleader Action' (as defined in the Stay Order) but does not provide case number, court, or other identifying information in this document.
Page 2 — in the Interpleader Action (as defined in the Stay Order)
QST-003
Question
What is the underlying judgment?
The order references 'a judgment entered against Cyberlux Corporation' but does not specify the amount, basis, or date of the underlying judgment being enforced.
Page 2 — arising out of a judgment entered against Cyberlux Corporation
QST-004
Question
What is the related federal case?
This state court order was filed as an exhibit in federal case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG, but the relationship between the federal and state proceedings is not explained in this document.
Page 1, 2, 3 — Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 193-1 Filed 04/22/26
Stage 4
Interpretive — Inferences, Omissions, Patterns
5 nodes
INF-001
Inference
Interpleader as dispute resolution mechanism
The use of an interpleader action suggests multiple claimants asserted rights to the funds held by HII, and the interpleader mechanism allowed HII to deposit funds and exit while claimants resolved competing claims.
Page 2 — HII is hereby discharged from any liability in this action as a result of: (i) HII's deposit of the Disputed Funds (as defined in the Stay Order) in the Interpleader Action (as defined in the Stay Order) and (ii) HII's discharge from the Interpleader Action.
INF-002
Inference
Consensual resolution among all parties
The 'represent and agree' language combined with signature blocks from all three parties' counsel indicates this was a negotiated resolution rather than contested adjudication, suggesting all parties found the interpleader resolution acceptable.
Page 2, 3 — the Parties represent and agree that HII is hereby discharged [...] WE ASK FOR THIS: [...] SEEN AND AGREED:
INF-003
Inference
Strategic use of garnishment in judgment enforcement
ANPC's attempt to garnish HII as a third party holding Cyberlux assets suggests standard judgment enforcement tactics when a judgment debtor lacks readily attachable assets or when funds are held by third parties.
Page 2 — the garnishment summons requested by Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation and issued to HII Mission Technologies Corp. ("HII") arising out of a judgment entered against Cyberlux Corporation.
OMI-001
Omission
No monetary details disclosed
The order contains no information about the amount of the underlying judgment, the value of the disputed funds, or any financial details of the claims, making it impossible to assess the economic stakes from this document alone.
Page 2 — HII's deposit of the Disputed Funds (as defined in the Stay Order)
OMI-002
Omission
Stay Order not included
The Final Order incorporates key definitions and procedural history from the January 13, 2026 Stay Order by reference, but that order is not included as part of this exhibit, requiring reference to separate court records.
Page 2 — In accordance with the Order entered in this action on January 13, 2026 (the "Stay Order")
Extracted text
3 pages · 2351 charactersEXHIBIT A
VIRGINIA:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR FAIRFAX COUNTY
ADVANCED NAVIGATION & POSITIONING CORPORATION, Judgment Creditor, V. CYBERLUX CORPORATION, Judgment Debtor and
HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP.,
Garnishee.
MAR 19 2026
FILED CIVIL MAIL
CHRISTOPHER J. FALCON CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX, VA
Case No. CL2025-16055
FINAL ORDER
This matter is before the Court on the garnishment summons requested by Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation and issued to HII Mission Technologies Corp. ("HII") arising out of a judgment entered against Cyberlux Corporation.
In accordance with the Order entered in this action on January 13, 2026 (the "Stay Order"), the Parties represent and agree that HII is hereby discharged from any liability in this action as a result of: (i) HII's deposit of the Disputed Funds (as defined in the Stay Order) in the Interpleader Action (as defined in the Stay Order) and (ii) HII's discharge from the Interpleader Action. Therefore, this action is DISMISSED, with prejudice as to HII.
This the day of March, 2026.
ChutoDay Christie Leary 2026.04.10 11:25:13-04'00'
Circuit Court Judge, Fairfax County
WE ASK FOR THIS:
Jan
Joel D. Schwartz (VSB No. 97979) PARKER POE ADAMS & BERNSTEIN LLP 900 7th Street NW, Suite 700 Washington, DC 20001 Telephone: (202) 854-2811 Facsimile: (202) 217-2771 Email: joelschwartz@parkerpoe.com
Counsel for Judgment Creditor Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation
ClarBox
Clark J. Belote (VSB No. 87310) Ahmed E. Mohamed Khalil (VSB No. 98315) Kaufman & Canoles, P.C. 150 W. Main Street, Suite 2100 Norfolk, VA 23510 Telephone: (757) 624-3000 Fax: (888) 360-9092 clark.belote@kaufcan.com ahmed.khalil@kaufcan.com Counsel for Garnishee HII Mission Technologies Corp.
SEEN AND AGREED:
Any Refuge w/permission
Jimmy F. Robinson, Jr. (VSB No. 73622) Ogletree Deakins Riverfront Plaza - West Tower 901 East Byrd Street, Suite 1300 Richmond, VA 23219 Telephone: (804) 663-2336 Fax: (855) 843-1809 jimmy.robinson@.ogletree.com
Counsel for Judgment Debtor Cyberlux Corporation
Original source file
No source file is attached yet. The record is ready for the PDF/media link when the attachment importer is connected.
- File
- ip-hii-edva-00483-doc-0193-exhibit-1.pdf
- Source UID
- source:1f4d70887c5ee205a41f77b8f0206b6ee6a83957c198d8bd01c4cdf15ca8adc2
- Full SHA-256
- 1f4d70887c5ee205a41f77b8f0206b6ee6a83957c198d8bd01c4cdf15ca8adc2