Player Profile / Cyberlux Corporation

ARG Group, LLC

20% Profit-Share Claimant · Priority Interpleader Actor · Intermediary Layer

ARG Group, LLC is classified in the interpleader record under the commission and intermediary stack — the layer of parties claiming a share of the HII subcontract proceeds based on pre-existing arrangements with Cyberlux. ARG's 20% profit-sharing claim, at $14,118,618.61 plus interest, represents the single largest claim in the interpleader and by itself accounts for approximately 60% of the $23.7M corpus.

Bottom Line

What this profile says up front

01
ARG Group claims a 20% profit-sharing entitlement against the interpleader corpus — the single largest claim at $14,118,618.61 plus interest — representing approximately 60 cents of every dollar in the court-held fund.
02
FAR 52.203-5 required Cyberlux to certify at the time of the subcontract award that no contingent fee arrangement existed with any party retained to solicit or secure the contract; the record does not establish whether ARG's arrangement was disclosed in that certification.
03
ITAR Part 130 requires disclosure to the State Department of commissions or fees paid in connection with the sale of a defense article where the amount exceeds $500,000; ARG's claimed 20% of a $78.857M Foreign Military Financing contract exceeds that threshold by a substantial margin.
04
The factual basis for ARG's 20% entitlement — what services were rendered, under what agreement, and when that agreement was executed relative to the August 2023 subcontract award — does not appear in full in any public filing.
Role in the Record

The largest single claimant in a fund that cannot satisfy the full commission stack

ARG Group, LLC is classified in the interpleader record under the commission and intermediary stack — the layer of parties claiming a share of the HII subcontract proceeds based on pre-existing arrangements with Cyberlux. ARG's 20% profit-sharing claim, at $14,118,618.61 plus interest, represents the single largest claim in the interpleader and by itself accounts for approximately 60% of the $23.7M corpus.

The commission stack as a whole — ARG at 20%, Montague at approximately 5%, WeShield, and Fairwinds at 8% — produces combined claims that approach or exceed the interpleader corpus before accounting for secured creditors, judgment creditors, or any drone-manufacturing costs. The arithmetic is the story.

The findings below are drawn from interpleader filings, the ARG v. Cyberlux Durham court record, and regulatory materials. They are analytical, not findings of liability.

Key Numbers

The numbers that frame the profile

ARG claim amount
$14.12M+
Plus interest · Largest single claim
Claimed share
20%
Of contract proceeds
Corpus available
$23.74M
Total interpleader fund
ARG claim as % of corpus
~60%
Before all other claimants
ITAR 130 threshold
$500K
ARG claim exceeds by 28x
Analytical Findings

What the record establishes

01 BEDROCK

The claim: 20% profit-share, $14.12M plus interest

ARG Group has filed a claim in the E.D. Va. interpleader asserting entitlement to 20% of the Cyberlux/HII subcontract proceeds under a profit-sharing or distribution agreement. The filed claim amount is $14,118,618.61 plus interest. This is the largest single claim in the interpleader proceeding and, at approximately 60% of the corpus, cannot be satisfied in full alongside the other filed claims.

Source: Interpleader filings, E.D. Va. 3:25-cv-00483 · ARG v. Cyberlux, Durham, N.C. recordSource:
02 ROCK

FAR 52.203-5 and the certification question

FAR 52.203-5 requires a contractor to certify, at the time of award, that it has not employed or retained any company or person — other than a full-time bona fide employee — to solicit or secure a government contract, and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any contingent fee for such purpose. ARG's claimed 20% profit-sharing entitlement, if it arose from an arrangement to solicit or facilitate the HII contract, falls within the scope of that prohibition unless properly certified. Whether the arrangement was disclosed in the FAR 52.203-5 certification does not appear in any public filing.

Source: FAR 52.203-5 · HII subcontract award record · Interpleader claim documentationSource:
03 ROCK

ITAR Part 130 and the State Department disclosure question

ITAR Part 130 (22 C.F.R. Part 130) requires disclosure to the State Department of any political contributions, fees, or commissions paid or offered in connection with the sale of a defense article or defense service where the total amount exceeds $500,000. The K8 UAS is a defense article sold under Foreign Military Financing. ARG's claimed 20% commission against a $78.857M contract exceeds the $500,000 threshold by approximately 28 times. Whether the arrangement was disclosed to the State Department does not appear in any public filing.

Source: 22 C.F.R. Part 130 · ITAR broker registration requirements · Interpleader claim recordSource:
04 SAND

The nature and timing of the arrangement

The record reflects that ARG Group's 20% entitlement is based on a distribution or profit-sharing agreement with Cyberlux. The specific services underlying that arrangement — what ARG did, in what capacity, and in what jurisdictions — and the date on which the agreement was executed relative to the August 2023 subcontract award are not fully established in publicly available filings. Denis Kalenja is identified in the interpleader record as associated with ARG Group.

Source: Interpleader filings, Doc 0041 Exhibit 3 · ARG v. Cyberlux Durham NC Exhibit 2 · Interpleader claim recordSource:
Open Questions

What the record does not explain

Q01
What specific services did ARG Group provide that give rise to a 20% profit-sharing entitlement on a Foreign Military Financing defense contract?
Q02
When was the ARG profit-sharing agreement executed, and was it in place before or after Cyberlux was awarded the HII subcontract?
Q03
Was ARG's arrangement disclosed in the FAR 52.203-5 certification at the time of the August 2023 subcontract award?
Q04
Was ARG or Denis Kalenja registered as a foreign military sales broker with the State Department as required under ITAR Part 130?
Q05
Was the ARG arrangement reported to the State Department under ITAR Part 130 given the K8's status as a defense article under Foreign Military Financing?
Q06
What is the relationship between Denis Kalenja and Mark Schmidt, and when did it begin?
Q07
On what priority theory does ARG assert its claim ranks ahead of the judgment creditors and secured lenders also competing for the corpus?