Player Profile / Cyberlux Corporation

Brett David Rosen & RB Capital Partners, Inc.

DOJ / SEC Defendant · Securities Fraud & Money Laundering Charges · Cyberlux Named Issuer

Brett David Rosen is a co-managing partner of RB Capital Partners, Inc. and sole director of Seapoint Capital Partners, Inc. and Rosen Capital LLC. He is also known as Brett Hackspacher. The federal grand jury indictment, filed January 16, 2026 and unsealed January 21, 2026, charges Rosen, Deborah Rachel Rosen, and RB Capital Partners with conspiracy to commit securities fraud, conspiracy to launder monetary instruments, and money laundering under 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h) and § 1957.

Bottom Line

What this profile says up front

01
Brett David Rosen (aka Brett Hackspacher) and Deborah Rachel Rosen (aka Deborah Rachel Braun) were indicted January 16, 2026 on charges including conspiracy to commit securities fraud and conspiracy to launder monetary instruments; RB Capital Partners, Inc. is named as a corporate defendant.
02
Cyberlux Corporation (OTC: CYBL) is named as an issuer in the charged securities fraud conduct — not as a defendant, but as a vehicle through which the charged scheme is alleged to have operated.
03
The indictment describes a pattern of convertible note financing, coordinated promotional activity, and stock liquidation across multiple microcap issuers; the August 2023 contract announcement coincided with a period described as material to the charged promotional conduct involving CYBL.
04
Operation Alpha — Cyberlux's publicly framed expansion strategy — was the promotional vehicle; its most prominent voice promoted CYBL across multiple platforms without disclosing, according to the record, that he was a paid promoter.
Role in the Record

The securities enforcement layer that intersects the contract record

Brett David Rosen is a co-managing partner of RB Capital Partners, Inc. and sole director of Seapoint Capital Partners, Inc. and Rosen Capital LLC. He is also known as Brett Hackspacher. The federal grand jury indictment, filed January 16, 2026 and unsealed January 21, 2026, charges Rosen, Deborah Rachel Rosen, and RB Capital Partners with conspiracy to commit securities fraud, conspiracy to launder monetary instruments, and money laundering under 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h) and § 1957.

Cyberlux Corporation is named as an issuer in the charged conduct. That designation — issuer, not defendant — means the government's theory places Cyberlux's stock and its public disclosures within the mechanism of the alleged scheme without asserting Cyberlux itself committed the charged crimes. The distinction matters for understanding how the securities layer intersects the contract record.

The SEC filed a parallel civil complaint on the same date as the indictment. David M. Massey is named in the SEC action. All charges and allegations in the indictment and complaint are unproven; Rosen is presumed innocent. The findings below are drawn from publicly filed court documents only.

Key Numbers

The numbers that frame the profile

Indictment filed
Jan 16, 2026
Unsealed Jan 21 · S.D. Cal.
Cyberlux role
Named issuer
Not a defendant in the criminal action
Charges include
Fraud + AML
Securities fraud · Money laundering
CYBL cash (FY2025)
$326,958
Against $64.1M total liabilities
RB Capital structure
3 entities
RB Capital · Seapoint · Rosen Capital
Analytical Findings

What the record establishes

01 BEDROCK

The federal indictment: charges and defendants

The August 2024 grand jury indictment, Case No. 3:26-cr-00192-DMS (S.D. Cal.), charges Brett David Rosen, Deborah Rachel Rosen, and RB Capital Partners, Inc. with: conspiracy to commit securities fraud under 18 U.S.C. § 371 and 15 U.S.C. §§ 78j(b), 78ff; conspiracy to launder monetary instruments under 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h); and money laundering under 18 U.S.C. § 1957. Criminal forfeiture under 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c) is also charged. All charges are allegations. Rosen is presumed innocent.

Source: U.S. v. Rosen et al., 3:26-cr-00192-DMS · Federal indictment filed Jan 16, 2026, unsealed Jan 21, 2026Source:
02 BEDROCK

Cyberlux named as an issuer in the charged conduct

The indictment names Cyberlux Corporation (OTC: CYBL) as an issuer in the charged securities fraud conduct. Cyberlux is not named as a criminal defendant. The government's theory, as stated in the charging documents, places Cyberlux's stock within the promotional and financing scheme alleged to have operated across multiple microcap issuers. The specific nature and scope of Cyberlux's role as a named issuer is detailed in the indictment and the parallel SEC complaint.

Source: U.S. v. Rosen et al., indictment · SEC v. Rosen et al., 3:26-cv-00361 (S.D. Cal.)Source:
03 BEDROCK

The SEC civil complaint and David Massey

The SEC filed a parallel civil complaint on January 21, 2026 against the same defendants. David M. Massey is named in the SEC action and related securities network materials. The SEC complaint covers the civil enforcement dimensions of the alleged scheme, including disgorgement and penalties. The complaint, like the indictment, contains allegations not yet adjudicated.

Source: SEC v. Rosen et al., 3:26-cv-00361 · SEC complaint filed Jan 21, 2026Source:
04 ROCK

RB Capital's convertible note relationship with Cyberlux

RB Capital Partners, Inc. had a financing relationship with Cyberlux Corporation involving convertible notes — instruments that allow a lender to convert debt into equity shares at a defined price or discount. This mechanism, described in prior coverage and court records, placed RB Capital in a position where the price and volume of CYBL stock directly affected the value of its Cyberlux position. The full scope and timing of that relationship is documented in court filings from the RB Capital v. Cyberlux proceeding in S.D. Cal.

Source: RB Capital Partners, Inc. v. Cyberlux Corporation, SDCAL casdce-24-01434 · Prior coverage linking note and stock recordSource:
05 ROCK

Operation Alpha and the contract announcement timing

Operation Alpha was Cyberlux's publicly framed expansion strategy and the promotional vehicle through which CYBL was promoted across OTC investor platforms including Twitter, InvestorHub, and StockTwits during the contract period. The August 2023 contract announcement was, according to the record and prior coverage, the promotional catalyst for a period of significant retail investor activity in CYBL. The most prominent promoter, according to the record, did not disclose a paid promotional relationship. Whether Operation Alpha's activities were properly disclosed as paid promotion is a question the record raises but has not fully answered.

Source: Interpleader record · Prior coverage · OTC market filings · Indictment contextSource:
Open Questions

What the record does not explain

Q01
What was the full nature and timeline of RB Capital Partners' financing relationship with Cyberlux, and how did convertible note conversions interact with CYBL stock price movements?
Q02
Were the promotional activities around the August 2023 contract announcement disclosed as paid promotion to the platforms on which they appeared?
Q03
To what extent does the indictment's description of the charged scheme involving CYBL as an issuer overlap with the contract advance payment period and the disbursement record?
Q04
What is the current status of the criminal proceedings, and has a trial date been set?
Q05
What role, if any, did the contract announcement or the advance payment play in the promotional ecosystem described in the charged conduct?
Q06
What is the relationship between Rosen Capital LLC, Seapoint Capital Partners, and the Cyberlux financing arrangements documented in the S.D. Cal. civil record?