Player Profile / Cyberlux Corporation

Chuck Watts / Watts Law PLLC

Named Defendant · Special Counsel to Cyberlux · Former Greensboro City Attorney · 60M+ Shares

Chuck Watts is the principal of Watts Law PLLC and served as Special Counsel to Cyberlux Corporation while simultaneously holding the position of city attorney for Greensboro, North Carolina.

Bottom Line

What this profile says up front

01
Chuck Watts served simultaneously as Greensboro, North Carolina's city attorney — a public position — and as Special Counsel to Cyberlux Corporation; the dual role is not characterized as having been disclosed to the city council during his public tenure.
02
Cyberlux's OTC annual filing records three share issuances to Charles D. Watts totalling 60,384,615 common shares between July and October 2021 — all labeled as debt settlement for legal fees at $0.01 per share, all restricted — placing Watts as an equity holder in Cyberlux during his simultaneous public employment as city attorney.
03
The October 8, 2021 issuance of 50 million shares to Watts occurs on the exact same date as a coordinated SPA tranche to Ferrell, Siddiq, DeNicola, and Saxena — a date that sits squarely within the Operation Alpha share distribution window identified in the OTC filing record.
Role in the Record

Chuck Watts is the principal of Watts Law PLLC and served as Special Counsel to ...

Chuck Watts is the principal of Watts Law PLLC and served as Special Counsel to Cyberlux Corporation while simultaneously holding the position of city attorney for Greensboro, North Carolina.

Version 2 of this profile incorporates material new information from the Cyberlux OTC annual filings: three share issuances to Watts totalling 60,384,615 shares between July and October 2021, all labeled as debt settlement for legal fees. These issuances place Watts as a Cyberlux equity holder during his concurrent public employment — a fact not previously addressed in any public filing reviewed for this brief.

Watts is a named defendant in Curtin v. Watts et al. Because that litigation is active, the findings below are drawn exclusively from publicly filed court documents, OTC regulatory filings, and HII's interpleader record. No characterisation of intent is made. The legal insulation doctrine applies with full force.

The findings below are limited to what the record establishes. The open questions section frames what the record does not resolve. This profile will be updated as the M.D.N.C. proceedings develop.

Key Numbers

The numbers that frame the profile

Total shares (OTC filing)
60.4M
3 tranches · 2021 · debt settlement
Price per share
$0.01
All three tranches · restricted
Legal status
Named defendant
M.D.N.C. 1:25-cv-00782
Largest tranche
50M shares
Oct 8, 2021 · same date as SPA cohort
Dual role period
2021–2025
City attorney + Cyberlux Special Counsel
Source Tables

Documented source record

Source table

Date Shares $/share Filed Basis Restricted Source
July 14, 2021 5,000,000 $0.01 Debt Settlement Legal Fees Yes FY2022 Annual (as Charles D. Watts, JR)
July 21, 2021 5,384,615 $0.01 Debt Settlement Legal Fees Yes FY2022 Annual (same date as Ferrell ×2, SPA cohort)
October 8, 2021 50,000,000 $0.01 Debt Settlement Yes FY2022 Annual (same date as Ferrell, Siddiq, DeNicola, Saxena SPA tranches)
Total 60,384,615 $0.01 Debt settlement · all restricted Yes
Analytical Findings

What the record establishes

01 BEDROCK

OTC filing record: 60.4M shares in three tranches

Cyberlux Corporation's FY2022 OTC annual report records three share issuances to Charles D. Watts (or Charles D. Watts, JR): 5,000,000 shares on July 14, 2021 (debt settlement legal fees); 5,384,615 shares on July 21, 2021 (debt settlement legal fees); and 50,000,000 shares on October 8, 2021 (debt settlement). All three are restricted, all at $0.01 per share. Total: 60,384,615 shares. These are primary documents — Cyberlux's own regulatory filings.

Source: Cyberlux FY2022 OTC Annual Report · OTC Markets shareholder issuance recordSource:
02 BEDROCK

Timing: issuances coincide with Operation Alpha SPA distribution dates

The July 21, 2021 Watts issuance (5,384,615 shares) occurs on the same date as the first coordinated SPA tranches to Ferrell (×2), Siddiq, DeNicola, McClintock, Udvig, Fulkerson, Coote, Corlew, Dawson, and Wynn. The October 8, 2021 Watts issuance (50,000,000 shares) occurs on the same date as the third SPA tranches to Ferrell, Siddiq, DeNicola, and Saxena. The coincidence of dates is documented in the OTC filing record; no inference about its significance is drawn.

Source: Cyberlux FY2022 OTC Annual Report · Operation Alpha Network profile (BR-EVIDENTIARY-OPALPHA-0526-v1)Source:
03 BEDROCK

Named defendant in M.D.N.C. active litigation

Chuck Watts and Watts Law PLLC are named defendants in Curtin v. Watts et al., Civil Action No. 1:25-cv-00782, pending in the Middle District of North Carolina. The complaint alleges intentional interference with business expectancy and economic relationships. These are allegations before a court, not adjudicated findings.

Source: Curtin v. Watts et al., 1:25-cv-00782 (M.D.N.C.) · First Amended ComplaintSource:
04 ROCK

The dual role: public city attorney and Cyberlux equity holder

Watts held the position of Greensboro city attorney — a public role — while simultaneously serving as Special Counsel to Cyberlux and holding 60.4 million Cyberlux shares received as debt settlement for legal fees. Whether this equity stake was disclosed to the city council, and whether it created conflicts under North Carolina State Bar professional conduct rules, does not appear in any public filing.

Source: Curtin v. Watts complaint · Greensboro public record · Cyberlux FY2022 OTC Annual ReportSource:
05 BEDROCK

HII's interpleader filing references Watts as Cyberlux's agent in intentional misconduct context

HII's motion for relief in interpleader (E.D. Va. Doc 0144, p.17) explicitly references the Curtin complaint's allegations that Cyberlux and 'its agent, Chuck Watts' engaged in 'intentional misconduct, negligence, or fraud' — language cited as the basis for HII seeking to recoup attorneys' fees under the subcontract indemnification clause.

Source: HII Interpleader Doc 0144, p.17 · Curtin v. Watts complaint ¶ 25, ¶ 50Source:
06 ROCK

Retirement timing relative to public coverage

Watts retired from his position as Greensboro city attorney effective immediately following publication of investigative coverage identifying his dual role as city attorney and Cyberlux Special Counsel.

Source: Prior Jackson Holt coverage · Greensboro public record · July 2025Source:
Open Questions

What the record does not explain

Q01
Was Watts' equity stake in Cyberlux — 60,384,615 shares received as debt settlement — disclosed to the Greensboro City Council during his tenure as city attorney?
Q02
Did Watts' concurrent roles as city attorney and Cyberlux equity holder and Special Counsel create conflicts of interest under North Carolina State Bar Rules of Professional Conduct?
Q03
What legal services gave rise to the debt that was settled through the share issuances — what work was performed, for what period, and at what rate?
Q04
Were the October 8, 2021 share issuances to Watts and the SPA cohort (Ferrell, Siddiq, DeNicola, Saxena) on the same date coordinated in any way, or are they independent transactions that happened to close simultaneously?
Q05
What conduct is specifically alleged in the Curtin complaint as constituting the 'coordinated, malicious conduct' attributed to Cyberlux and Watts jointly?
Q06
Has Watts retained the 60.4 million shares, and if so, what is their current status and value?
Q07
What is the current procedural posture of Curtin v. Watts et al., and what discovery has been ordered?