Evidence Record

Exhibit 4

1. Social Security benefits and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) (42 U.S.C. § 407).

Type
exhibit
Court
EDVA
Case
HII v. Cyberlux interpleader
Docket
3:25-cv-00483
Pages
9
Lines
437
SHA-256
8a4c6468633e

DISTIL analysis

DISTIL Run
Profile
Standard
Version
1
Doc Type
Garnishment Summons with Writ of Fieri Facias
Total Nodes
38
Node Legend
Entity (ENT)
Event (EVT)
Claim (CLM)
Anchor (ANC)
Omission (OMI)
Tension (TEN)
Tell (TEL)
Inference (INF)
Hypothesis (HYP)
Stage 1
Index
Orientation · No nodes
Document Classification
Garnishment Summons with Writ of Fieri Facias Fairfax Circuit Court Debt Collection / Judgment Enforcement 2023-06-28 to 2025-08-04
court_orderwage_garnishmentjudgment_enforcementmulti_jurisdictional
Analytical Frame
Civil litigation garnishment proceeding
Analytical Summary
This is a garnishment summons filed in Fairfax Circuit Court on March 7, 2025, as part of ongoing judgment enforcement against Cyberlux Corporation. Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community, LLC are seeking to collect $1,444,543.11 from a Richmond City Circuit Court judgment dated June 28, 2023. The garnishee is HII Mission Technologies Corp., suggesting the judgment creditors believe HII owes money to Cyberlux. The original judgment amount was $1,572,500.00 with substantial interest, attorney's fees totaling $610,346.17, and credits already applied of $1,034,745.26. The case demonstrates aggressive post-judgment collection efforts across multiple Virginia jurisdictions, with service attempted through registered agents in both Virginia and Nevada.
Key Points
  • Garnishment summons issued March 7, 2025 in Fairfax Circuit Court targeting HII Mission Technologies Corp.
  • Total balance due of $1,444,543.11 based on original judgment of $1,572,500.00 from Richmond City Circuit Court
  • Attorney fees of $610,346.17 included in garnishment amount
  • Credits of $1,034,745.26 already applied to judgment
  • Return date of May 30, 2025 set for garnishee response
Stage 2
Core — Entities, Events, Claims
18 nodes
ENT-001
Entity
Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC
Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC - judgment creditor in garnishment proceeding, represented by Chap Petersen & Associates, PLC
Page 2 — JUDGMENT CREDITOR: Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community, LLC
ENT-002
Entity
Secure Community, LLC
Secure Community, LLC - co-judgment creditor in garnishment proceeding alongside Atlantic Wave Holdings
Page 2 — JUDGMENT CREDITOR: Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community, LLC
ENT-003
Entity
Cyberlux Corporation
Cyberlux Corporation - judgment debtor with registered agent at CT Corporation System in Carson City, Nevada. EIN 912048978.
Page 2 — JUDGMENT DEBTOR: Cyberlux Corporation Address: C T Corporation System R/A, 701 S. Carson St., Ste. 200, Carson City, NV 89701 SSN: EIN 912048978
ENT-004
Entity
HII Mission Technologies Corp.
HII Mission Technologies Corp. - garnishee named in the proceeding, served through CT Corporation System registered agent in Glen Allen, Virginia
Page 2 — GARNISHEE: HII Mission Technologies Corp. Address: Serve: CT Corporation System, R/A Review Date: JUL 1 1 2025 4701 Cox Rd., Ste 285, Glen Allen, VA, 23060
ENT-005
Entity
Chap Petersen & Associates, PLC
Chap Petersen & Associates, PLC - law firm representing judgment creditors, located at 3970 Chain Bridge Rd., Fairfax VA 22030
Page 2 — JUDGMENT CREDITOR'S ATTORNEY: J. Chapman Petersen, VSB 37225 / Federico J. Zablah, VSB 96031 Address: Chap Petersen & Associates, PLC Va. Bar #: 37255 & 96031 3970 Chain Bridge Rd., Fairfax, VA 22030 Phone: (571) 459-2512
ENT-006
Entity
J. Chapman Petersen
J. Chapman Petersen - Virginia State Bar #37225, attorney for judgment creditors at Chap Petersen & Associates
Page 2 — JUDGMENT CREDITOR'S ATTORNEY: J. Chapman Petersen, VSB 37225 / Federico J. Zablah, VSB 96031
ENT-007
Entity
Federico J. Zablah
Federico J. Zablah - Virginia State Bar #96031, attorney for judgment creditors at Chap Petersen & Associates
Page 2 — JUDGMENT CREDITOR'S ATTORNEY: J. Chapman Petersen, VSB 37225 / Federico J. Zablah, VSB 96031
ENT-008
Entity
Fairfax Circuit Court
Fairfax Circuit Court - court issuing garnishment summons, located at 4110 Chain Bridge Road, Fairfax, VA 22030
Page 2, 8 — FAIRFAX CIRCUIT COURT GARNISHMENT SUMMONS
ENT-009
Entity
Richmond City Circuit Court
Richmond City Circuit Court - court that rendered the original judgment on June 28, 2023, judgment number 663616
Page 2 — Judgment Number: 663616 Date of Judgment: 06/28/2023 Place of Judgment: Richmond City Circuit Court
ENT-010
Entity
Christopher J. Falcon
Christopher J. Falcon - Clerk of Fairfax Circuit Court, signed the garnishment summons and writ of fieri facias
Page 3, 9 — CHRISTOPHER J. FALCON, CLERK By: Deputy Clerk
EVT-001
Event
Richmond City Circuit Court Judgment
Richmond City Circuit Court rendered judgment #663616 against Cyberlux Corporation on June 28, 2023, in favor of Atlantic Wave Holdings LLC for $1,572,500.00 principal plus interest, costs, attorney fees, and sanctions
Page 2 — Judgment Number: 663616 Date of Judgment: 06/28/2023 Place of Judgment: Richmond City Circuit Court STATEMENT Judgment Principal 1,572,500.00
EVT-002
Event
Garnishment Summons Issuance
Fairfax Circuit Court issued garnishment summons on March 7, 2025, in case CL-2025-3413, targeting HII Mission Technologies Corp. as garnishee to collect outstanding judgment debt from Cyberlux Corporation
Page 2, 3 — CL- 2025 3413 - MAR 0 7 2025 Date of Issuance of Summon
EVT-003
Event
Writ of Fieri Facias Delivery
Writ of Fieri Facias delivered on March 7, 2025, commanding authorized officers to make $1,572,500.00 plus interest, costs, attorney fees, and sanctions from Cyberlux Corporation's goods and chattels
Page 3, 9 — MAR 0 7 2025 Date of Delivery of Writ of Fieri Facias WRIT OF FIERI FACIAS JUDGMENT NO 663616 GARNISHMENT LAW NO CL20250003413
EVT-004
Event
Federal Court Filing
Document filed as Exhibit 4 in federal case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG on August 4, 2025, in the Eastern District of Virginia
Page 1 — Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-4 Filed 08/04/25 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 524 EXHIBIT 4
CLM-001
Claim
Total Balance Due: $1,444,543.11
Judgment creditors assert total balance due of $1,444,543.11 as of garnishment filing, calculated from judgment principal $1,572,500.00, interest $241,742.20, attorney's fees $610,346.17, garnishment costs $54,700.00, minus credits of $1,034,745.26
Page 2 — STATEMENT Judgment Principal 1,572,500.00 Interest $241,742.20 Attorney's Fees $610,346.17 Garnishment Costs $54,700.00 Credits ($1,034,745.26) Total Balance Due $ 1,444,543.11
CLM-002
Claim
Attorney Fees: $610,346.17
Judgment creditors claim attorney's fees of $610,346.17 as part of the garnishment amount, separate from the original judgment costs
Page 2 — Attorney's Fees $610,346.17
CLM-003
Claim
Credits Applied: $1,034,745.26
Credits totaling $1,034,745.26 have been applied against the original judgment amount, reducing the balance due
Page 2 — Credits ($1,034,745.26)
CLM-004
Claim
Writ Command Amount
Writ of Fieri Facias commands collection of $1,572,500.00 principal plus 12% annual interest from 06/28/23, costs of $351.00, attorney fees $177,126.19, and sanctions of $3,895.00 and $6,842.50
Page 9 — BE MADE THE SUM OF AMOUNT OF 1,572,500.00 PLUS INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 12% PER ANNUM FROM 06/28/23, COSTS 351.00, ATTY FEES 177,126.19 PLUS SANCTIONS OF 3,895.00 AND 6,842.50
Stage 3
In Situ — Quotations, Tells, Tensions, Questions
12 nodes
QUO-001
Quotation
Court Command to Officers
Direct court command to officers regarding garnishment execution and service requirements
Page 2 — TO ANY AUTHORIZED OFFICER: You are hereby commanded to serve this summons on the judgment debtor and the garnishee.
QUO-002
Quotation
Garnishee Instructions
Court's instruction to garnishee regarding response obligations with three options: file written answer, deliver payment, or appear in court
Page 2 — TO THE GARNISHEE: You are hereby commanded to: (1) file a written answer with: Circuit Court of Fairfax County, 4110 Chain Bridge Road, Fairfax, VA 22030 Attn: Civil Case Processing OR (2) deliver payment to this court payable to "CLERK, CIRCUIT COURT," OR (3) appear before this court on the return date and time shown on this summons
TLL-001
Tell
Return Date: May 30, 2025
Garnishment summons specifies return date of May 30, 2025 at 9:00 a.m., establishing the deadline for garnishee response
Page 2 — Return Date: MAY 3 0 2025 at 9:00 a.m.
TLL-002
Tell
Review Date: July 11, 2025
Document indicates review date of July 11, 2025 associated with garnishee HII Mission Technologies Corp.
Page 2 — Review Date: JUL 1 1 2025
TLL-003
Tell
Interest Rate: 12% Per Annum
Judgment accrues interest at 12% per annum from the date of judgment (June 28, 2023)
Page 9 — AMOUNT OF 1,572,500.00 PLUS INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 12% PER ANNUM FROM 06/28/23
TLL-004
Tell
Garnishment Type: Non-Wage Debt
Garnishment targets 'some other debt due or property of the judgment debtor specifically Any monies owed to the judgment debtor' rather than wages or salary
Page 2 — This is a garnishment against (check only one) [ ] judgment debtor's wages, salary or other compensation ] some other debt due or property of the judgment debtor specifically Any monies owed to the judgment debtor [
TLL-005
Tell
Service Filing Stamp
Civil intake filing stamp dated March 6, 2025 at 10:40 AM appears on the document, indicating administrative processing one day before official issuance
Page 2 — MAR6 A 10:40 CIVIL INTAKE FILED
TEN-001
Tension
Discrepancy in Attorney Fee Amounts
Two different attorney fee amounts appear in the document: $610,346.17 in the garnishment statement versus $177,126.19 in the writ of fieri facias, creating ambiguity about the correct amount being sought
Page 2, 9 — Attorney's Fees $610,346.17 [from page 2] ATTY FEES 177,126.19 [from page 9]
TEN-002
Tension
Timing: Intake Before Issuance
Document shows civil intake filing on March 6, 2025, but official issuance date is March 7, 2025, suggesting standard administrative processing lag
Page 2, 3 — MAR6 A 10:40 CIVIL INTAKE FILED [vs] MAR 0 7 2025 Date of Issuance of Summon
QST-001
Question
What debt does HII owe to Cyberlux?
The garnishment targets HII Mission Technologies Corp. as garnishee, implying HII owes money to Cyberlux Corporation, but the nature, amount, or basis of this debt is not specified in the document
Page 2 — GARNISHEE: HII Mission Technologies Corp. [and] This is a garnishment against (check only one) [ ] judgment debtor's wages, salary or other compensation ] some other debt due or property of the judgment debtor specifically Any monies owed to the judgment debtor
QST-002
Question
What is the relationship between state garnishment and federal case?
Document appears as Exhibit 4 in federal case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG, but the nature of the federal proceeding and its relationship to the state garnishment action is not explained
Page 1 — Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-4 Filed 08/04/25 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 524 EXHIBIT 4
QST-003
Question
How were $1,034,745.26 in credits applied?
Substantial credits of $1,034,745.26 have been applied against the judgment, representing approximately 66% of the original principal, but the source, timing, or method of these credits is not documented
Page 2 — Credits ($1,034,745.26)
Stage 4
Interpretive — Inferences, Omissions, Patterns
8 nodes
INF-001
Inference
Suggests ongoing HII-Cyberlux business relationship
The selection of HII Mission Technologies Corp. as garnishee implies judgment creditors believe HII has a financial obligation to Cyberlux, likely from a contract, purchase order, or ongoing business relationship predating the judgment
Page 2 — GARNISHEE: HII Mission Technologies Corp. [and] some other debt due or property of the judgment debtor specifically Any monies owed to the judgment debtor
INF-002
Inference
Aggressive multi-jurisdictional collection strategy
Creditors are pursuing collection through garnishment in Fairfax County for a Richmond City judgment, targeting a Nevada-registered corporation through a Virginia entity, demonstrating sophisticated and aggressive post-judgment collection tactics across multiple jurisdictions
Page 2 — Place of Judgment: Richmond City Circuit Court [filed in] FAIRFAX CIRCUIT COURT [targeting] Cyberlux Corporation Address: C T Corporation System R/A, 701 S. Carson St., Ste. 200, Carson City, NV 89701 [via] HII Mission Technologies Corp. Address: Serve: CT Corporation System, R/A 4701 Cox Rd., Ste 285, Glen Allen, VA, 23060
INF-003
Inference
Substantial prior collection success
The $1,034,745.26 in credits represents approximately 66% of the original $1,572,500.00 principal, suggesting creditors have already achieved significant collection success through prior enforcement actions or voluntary payments
Page 2 — Judgment Principal 1,572,500.00 [versus] Credits ($1,034,745.26)
INF-004
Inference
Attorney fees exceed original costs substantially
Attorney fees of $610,346.17 represent approximately 39% of the original judgment principal, suggesting extensive post-judgment collection efforts, litigation, or fee accumulation over nearly two years since the June 2023 judgment
Page 2 — Judgment Principal 1,572,500.00 [versus] Attorney's Fees $610,346.17 [with judgment date] Date of Judgment: 06/28/2023 [and garnishment date] MAR 0 7 2025
INF-005
Inference
Federal litigation involvement likely
The filing of this state garnishment document as Exhibit 4 in federal case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG (filed August 4, 2025, after the May 30 return date) suggests potential federal court involvement, possibly through removal, bankruptcy, or collateral challenges to the state collection efforts
Page 1, 2 — Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-4 Filed 08/04/25 Page 1 of 9 PageID# 524 EXHIBIT 4 [with state return date] Return Date: MAY 3 0 2025
OMI-001
Omission
No service return information recorded
Document includes extensive service return templates for both garnishee and judgment debtor, but no actual service information is recorded, suggesting either service had not yet occurred when document was filed or the return information was deliberately withheld from this exhibit
Page 3 — RETURNS: The following garnishee was served, according to law, as indicated below, unless not found. [all checkboxes empty] RETURNS: The judgment debtor was served, according to law, as indicated below, unless not found [all checkboxes empty]
OMI-002
Omission
No explanation of credit sources
Document lists substantial credits of $1,034,745.26 but provides no detail about whether these came from prior garnishments, voluntary payments, asset seizures, or other collection methods
Page 2 — Credits ($1,034,745.26)
OMI-003
Omission
Nature of underlying dispute not described
Document provides no information about the nature of the original dispute that led to the $1.57M judgment, the claims involved, or the factual basis for the liability
Page 2 — Judgment Number: 663616 Date of Judgment: 06/28/2023 Place of Judgment: Richmond City Circuit Court

Extracted text

9 pages · 20188 characters

Exhibit 4 — Formatted Extract

Type: exhibit
Court: EDVA
Matter: HII v. Cyberlux interpleader
Docket: 3:25-cv-00483
EXHIBIT 4

Filed 08/04/25

Document 41-4 FAIRFAX CIRCUIT COURT GARNISHMENT SUMMONS

Clear

Virginia Code §§8.01-511, 512, 512.3 JUDGMENT CREDITOR:

Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community, LLC

CL-

2025
3413

-

Address:

Chap Petersen & Associates, PLC

Phone:

3970
Chain Bridge Rd., Fairfax VA 22030

JUDGMENT CREDITOR'S ATTORNEY:

J. Chapman Petersen, VSB 37225 / Federico J. Zablah, VSB 96031

Address:

Chap Petersen & Associates, PLC

Va. Bar #:

37255
& 96031
3970
Chain Bridge Rd., Fairfax, VA 22030

Phone:

(571)
459-2512

Versus

JUDGMENT DEBTOR:

Cyberlux Corporation

Address:

C T Corporation System R/A, 701 S. Carson St., Ste. 200, Carson City, NV 89701

SSN:

EIN 912048978

Return Date: MAY 3 0 2025 at 9:00 a.m. This is a garnishment against (check only one) [ ] judgment debtor's wages, salary or other compensation ] some other debt due or property of the judgment debtor specifically Any monies owed to the judgment debtor :selected: [

GARNISHEE:

HII Mission Technologies Corp.

Address:

Serve: CT Corporation System, R/A

Review Date:

JUL 1 1 2025

4701
Cox Rd., Ste 285, Glen Allen, VA, 23060
STATEMENT

Judgment Principal

1,572,500.00

Maximum Portion of Disposable Earnings Subject to Garnishment

Interest

$241,742.20

[ ]50% [ ] 55% [ :unselected: :unselected:

] 60% [ :unselected:

] 65 (If :unselected:

not specified, then

50%)

:unselected:

Judgment Costs

[ ] State Taxes, 100% :unselected:

DISTOFORJ.

CIVIL MAR6

Attorney's Fees

$610,346.17

If none of the above are checked, then

§34-29(a) applies.

Garnishment Costs

$54,700.00

FILED

Credits

($1,034,745.26)

[ ] SUPPORT :unselected:

A

INTAKE

Late Fees

FALLS

Total Balance Due

$ 1,444,543.11

10:40 The Garnishee shall rely on this amount.

Judgment Number:

Date of Judgment:

06/28/2023

Place of Judgment:

Richmond City Circuit Court

TO ANY AUTHORIZED OFFICER: You are hereby commanded to serve this summons on the judgment debtor and the garnishee.

TO THE GARNISHEE: You are hereby commanded to:

(1)
file a written answer with: Circuit Court of Fairfax County, 4110 Chain Bridge Road, Fairfax, VA 22030 Attn: Civil Case Processing

OR (2) deliver payment to this court payable to "CLERK, CIRCUIT COURT," OR (3) appear before this court on the return date and time shown on this summons to answer the Suggestion for Summons in Garnishment of the judgment creditor that, by reason of the lien of writ of fieri facias, there is a liability as shown in the statement upon the garnishee.

As garnishee, you shall withhold from the judgment debtor any sums of money to which the judgment debtor is or may be entitled from you during the period between the date of service of this summons on you and the date for your appearance in court, subject to the following limitations:

(1)
The maximum amount which may be garnished is the "Total Balance Due" as shown on this summons.
(2)
You shall not be liable to the judgment creditor for any property not specified in this summons.
(3)
If the sums of money being garnished are earnings of the judgment debtor, then the provision of

Document &14cuTiled 08/04/25

"Maximum Portion of Disposable Earnings Subject to Garnishment" shall apply.

If a garnishment summons is served on an employer having one thousand or more employees, then money to which the judgment debtor is or may be entitled from his or her employer shall be considered those wages, salaries, commissions or other earnings which, following service on the garnishee- employer, are determined and are payable to the judgment debtor under the garnishee-employer's normal payroll procedure with a reasonable time allowance for making a timely return by mail to this court.

MAR 0 7 2025

Date of Issuance of Summon

MAR 0 7 2025

Date of Delivery of Writ of Fieri Facias To Sheriff or any authorized Officer if different from Date of Issuance of this Summons.

CHRISTOPHER J. FALCON, CLERK

By: Deputy Clerk

Creditor / Attorney Signature

Attorney Bar #

RETURNS: The following garnishee was served, according to law, as indicated below, unless not found.

HII Mission Technologies Corp.

GARNISHEE

:unselected: PERSONAL SERVICE :unselected: FEDERAL SERVICE*

Being unable to make personal service, a copy was delivered in the following manner: :unselected: Served on registered agent of the corporation. List name and title:

[] :unselected: Delivered to family member (not temporary sojourner or guest) age 16 or older at usual place of abode of party named above after giving information of its purport. List name, age of recipient, and relation of recipient to party named above.

[] [ ] :unselected: Posted on front door or such other door as appears to be the main entrance of usual place of abode, address listed above. (Other authorized recipient not found.) :unselected: [] Delivered to a person found in charge of usual place of business or employment during business hours and giving information of its purpose. :unselected: Served on the Secretary of the Commonwealth :unselected: Served on the Clerk of the State Corporation Commission, pursuant to § 8.01-513. :unselected: Not found :unselected: Copy mailed to judgment debtor after serving the garnishee on date of service unless a different date of mailing is shown.

DATE OF MAILING

SERVING OFFICER AND/OR CLERK

for GARNISHEE.

DATE OF SERVICE

The garnishee, when a federal agency, may be served either personally or by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested. [] :unselected: Certified mail

DATE OF SERVICE

RETURNS: The judgment debtor was served, according to law, as indicated below, unless not found, with a copy of both this summons and the § 8.01-512.4 form.

JUDGMENT DEBTOR Cyberlux Corporation

ADDRESS

C T Corporation System R/A,

701
S. Carson St., Ste. 200, Carson City, NV 89701

[] :unselected: PERSONAL SERVICE

[] :unselected: Being unable to make personal service, a copy was delivered in the following manner: [] Delivered to family member (not temporary sojourner or guest) age 16 or older at usual place of abode of party named above after giving information of its purport. List name, age of recipient, and relation of recipient to party named above.

[] :unselected: Posted on front door or such other door as appears to be the main entrance of usual place of abode, address listed above. (Other authorized recipient not found.)

[] :unselected: Served on Secretary of the Commonwealth.

[] :unselected: Not found

SERVING OFFICER

for DEBTOR.

DATE OF SERVICE

Clear

Filed 08/04/25

The following statement is not the law but is an interpretation of the law which is intended to assist those who must respond to this garnishment. You may rely on this only for general guidance because the law itself is the final word. (Read the law, §34-29 of the Code of Virginia for a full explanation. A copy of §34-29 is available in the Clerk's Office. If you do not understand the law, call a lawyer for help.)

An employer may take as much as 25 percent of an employee's disposable earnings to satisfy this garnishment. But if any employee makes the minimum wage or less for his week's earnings, the employee will ordinarily get to keep 40 times the minimum hourly wage.

But an employer may withhold a different amount of money from that above if:

(1)
The employee must pay child support or spousal support and was ordered to do so by a court procedure or other legal procedure. No more than 65 percent of an employee's earnings may be withheld for support;
(2)
Money is withheld by order of a bankruptcy court; or
(3)
Money is withheld for a tax debt.

"Disposable earnings" means the money an employee makes "after taxes" and after other amounts required by law to be withheld are satisfied. Earnings can be salary, hourly wages, commissions, bonuses, or otherwise, whether paid directly to the employee or not.

If an employee tries to transfer, assign or in any way give his earnings to another person to avoid the garnishment, it will not be legal; earnings are still earnings.

Financial Institutions that receive an employee's paycheck by direct deposit do not have to determine what part of a person's earnings can be garnished.

§ 34-29. Maximum portion of disposable earnings subject to garnishment.

(a) Except as provided in subsections (b) and (b1), the maximum part of the aggregate disposable earnings of an individual for any workweek that is subjected to garnishment may not exceed the lesser of the following amounts:

(1)
Twenty-five per centum of his disposable earnings for that week, or
(2)
The amount by which his disposable earnings for that week exceed 40 times the federal minimum hourly wage prescribed by 29 U.S.C § 206 (a) (1) of the Virginia Minimum hourly wage prescribed by § 40.1-28.10 whichever is greater, in effect at the time earnings are payable.

In the case of earnings for any pay period other than a week, the State Commissioner of Labor and Industry shall by regulation prescribe a multiple of the federal or Virginia minimum hourly wage equivalent in effect to that set forth in this section.

The restrictions of subsection (a) do not apply in the case of:

(b) (1) Any order for the support of any person issued by a court of competent jurisdiction or in accordance with an administrative procedure that is established by state law, affords substantial due process, and is subject to judicial review.

(2)
Any order of any court of bankruptcy under Chapter XIII of the Bankruptcy Act.
(3)
Any debt due for any state or federal tax.

(b1) The maximum part of the aggregate disposable earnings of an individual for any workweek that is subject to garnishment to enforce any order for the support of any person shall not exceed:

(1)
Sixty percent of such individual's disposable earnings for that week; or
(2)
If such individual is supporting a spouse or dependent child other than the spouse or child with respect to whose support such order was issued, 50 percent of such individual's disposable earnings for that week.

The 50 percent specified in clause (2) shall be 55 percent and the sixty percent specified in subsection (1) .shall be 65 percent if and to the extent that such earnings are subject to garnishment to enforce an order for support for a period that is more than 12 weeks prior to the beginning of such workweek.

(c) No court of the Commonwealth and no state agency or officer may make, execute, or enforce any order or process in violation of this section.

The exemptions allowed herein shall be granted to any person so entitled without any further proceedings. For the purposes of this section:

(d)

(1)
The term "earnings" means compensation paid or payable for personal services, whether denominated as wages, salary, commission, bonus, payments to an independent contractor, or otherwise, whether paid directly to the individual or deposited with another entity or person on behalf of and traceable to the individual, and includes periodic payments pursuant to a pension or retirement program,
(2)
The term "disposable earnings" means that part of the earnings of any individual remaining after the deduction from those earnings of any amounts required by law to be withheld, and
(3)
The term "garnishment' means any legal or equitable procedure through which the earnings of any individual are required to be withheld for payment of any debt.

(e) Every assignment, sale, transfer, pledge or mortgage of the wages or salary of an individual that is exempted by this section, to the extent of the exemption provided by this section, shall be void and unenforceable by any process of law.

(f) No employer may discharge any employee by reason of the fact that his earnings have been subjected to garnishment for any one indebtedness.

(g) A depository wherein earnings have been deposited on behalf of and traceable to an individual shall not be required to determine the portion of such earnings that are subject to garnishment.

The attached Summons in Garnishment or Notice of Lien has been issued on request of a creditor who holds a judgment against you. The Summons may cause your property or wages to be held or taken to pay the judgment.

The law provides that certain property and wages cannot be taken in garnishment. Such property is said to be exempted. A summary of some of the major exemptions is set forth in the request for hearing form. There is no exemption solely because you are having difficulty paying your debts.

If you claim an exemption, you should (i) fill out the claim for exemption form and (ii) deliver or mail the form to the clerk's office of this court.

You have a right to a hearing within seven business days from the date you file your claim with the court. If the creditor is asking that your wages be withheld, the method of computing the amount of wages that are exempt from garnishment by law is indicated on the Summons in Garnishment attached. You do not need to file a claim for exemption to receive this exemption, but if you believe the wrong amount is being withheld, you may file a claim for exemption.

On the day of the hearing, you should come to court ready to explain why your property is exempted, and you should bring any documents that may help you prove your case. If you do not come to court at the designated time and prove that your property is exempt, you may lose some of your rights.

If you do not claim an exemption and do not otherwise contest the garnishment, you are not required to appear in court on the return date on the Garnishment Summons.

It may be helpful for you to seek the advice of an attorney in this matter.

THE REQUEST FOR HEARING FORM IS PRINTED ON THE REVERSE OF THIS FORM.

REQUEST FOR HEARING - GARNISHMENT/LIEN EXEMPTION CLAIM Commonwealth of Virginia VA. CODE § 8.01-512.4

Case No.

2025
3413

Fairfax County Circuit Court

COURT NAME

Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community, LLC V.

Cyberlux Corporation

JUDGMENT DEBTOR

JUDGMENT CREDITOR

and HII Mission Technologies Corp.

GARNISHEE

I claim that the exemption(s) from garnishment or lien that are checked below apply in this case:

MAJOR EXEMPTIONS UNDER FEDERAL AND STATE LAW [There is no exemption solely because you are having difficulty paying your bills.
1.
Social Security benefits and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) (42 U.S.C. § 407).
2.
Veterans' benefits (38 U.S.C. § 5301).
3.
Federal civil service retirement benefits (5 U.S.C. § 8346).
4.
Annuities to survivors of federal judges (28 U.S.C. § 376(n) ).
5.
Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (33 U.S.C. § 916).
6.
Black Lung benefits.

CLE 2025 MAR -6 A 10: 41

PAX. VA UIT COURT

ER J. FALCON

CIVIL INTAKE FILED

Exemptions listed under 1 through 6 above may not be applicable in child support and alimony cases (42 U.S.C. § 659).

7.
Seaman's, master's or fisherman's wages, except for child support or spousal support and maintenance (46 U.S.C. § 11109).
8.
Unemployment compensation benefits (§ 60.2-600, Code of Virginia). This exemption may not be applicable in child support cases (§ 60.2-608, Code of Virginia).
9.
Amounts in excess of portions of wages subject to garnishment (§ 34-29, Code of Virginia).
10.
Public assistance payments (§ 63.2-506, Code of Virginia).
11.
Homestead exemption of $5,000 in cash, or $10,000 if the householder is 65 years of age or older, and in addition, real or personal property used as the principal residence of the householder or householder's dependents not exceeding $50,000 in value. (§ 34-4, Code of Virginia). This exemption may not be claimed in certain cases, such as payment of child or spousal support (§ 34-5, Code of Virginia).
12.
Property of disabled veterans - additional $10,000 cash (§ 34-4.1, Code of Virginia).
13.
Worker's Compensation benefits (§ 65.2-531, Code of Virginia).
14.
Growing crops (§ 8.01-489, Code of Virginia).
15.
Benefits from group life insurance policies (§ 38.2-3339, Code of Virginia).
16.
Proceeds from industrial sick benefits insurance (§ 38.2-3549, Code of Virginia).
17.
Assignments of certain salary and wages (§ 8.01-525.10, Code of Virginia).
18.
Benefits for victims of crime (§ 19.2-368.12, Code of Virginia).
19.
Proceeds from funeral trusts (§ 54.1-2823, Code of Virginia).
20.
Certain retirement benefits (§ 34-34, Code of Virginia).
21.
Child support payments (§ 20-108.1, Code of Virginia).
22.
Support for dependent children (§ 34-4.2, Code of Virginia). To claim this exemption, an affidavit that complies with the requirements of subsection B of § 34-4.2 and two items of proof showing entitlement to this exemption must be attached to this exemption form. (The affidavit, form DC-449, AFFIDAVIT CONCERNING DEPENDENT CHILDREN AND HOUSEHOLD INCOME, is available at http://www.vacourts.gov/forms/district/dc449.pdf or the clerk's office.)
23.
Other (describe exemption): $

I request a court hearing to decide the validity of my claim. Notice of hearing should be given to me at:

ADDRESS

TELEPHONE NUMBER

The statements made in this request are true to the best of my knowledge and belief.

DATE

FAIRFAX CIRCUIT COURT 4110 Chain Bridge Road Fairfax, VA 22030

INSTRUCTIONS TO GARNISHEES

1.
If you ARE holding funds to which the debtor is entitled, you shall remit those funds to the Court by the Return Date.

Payment must be payable to "Clerk, Fairfax Circuit Court."

2.
If you ARE NOT holding funds to which the debtor is entitled, you must file a written answer so stating with the Court by the Return Date.
3.
Please note the Return Date shown on the Garnishment Summons. You may not withhold from the Judgment Debtor any funds to which the Debtor becomes entitled after the Return Date.
4.
Please note the At Law Case Number in the upper right corner of the Garnishment Summons. To ensure proper credit of your remittance, please reference this number on your check.
5.
To verify funds currently being held by the Court, please contact the Accounting Section of the Fairfax Circuit Court at 703-246-4363 or 703-246-4126.
6.
For further information regarding the Garnishment process, please contact the Clerk's Office, Civil Intake Division at 703-246-4358.

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY WRIT OF FIERI FACIAS

JUDGMENT NO 663616

GARNISHMENT LAW NO CL20250003413

CASE FILE NO CL20220003862 TO ANY AUTHORIZED OFFICER WE COMMAND YOU THAT OUT OF THE GOODS AND CHATTELS OF *** CYBERLUX CORPORATION, ET AL *** BE MADE THE SUM OF

AMOUNT OF 1,572,500.00 PLUS INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 12% PER ANNUM FROM 06/28/23, COSTS 351.00, ATTY FEES 177,126.19 PLUS SANCTIONS OF 3,895.00 AND 6,842.50 WHICH ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS LLC LATE BEFORE THE RICHMOND CITY CIRCUIT COURT RECOVERED ON 06/28/2023 AGAINST

*** CYBERLUX CORPORATION, ET AL *** AS APPEARS TO US OF RECORD.

YOU ARE FURTHER COMMANDED TO MAKE YOUR RETURN THEREON TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY, VIRGINIA AT ITS COURT HOUSE ON 06/05/2025 NEXT RENDERED UNTO SAID ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS LLC OF THE DEBT AND COSTS OF $47.50. AND NOTIFY THE PERSON ENTITLED TO RECEIVE SUCH MONEY, IF SUCH PERSON IS KNOWN AND IF ANY MONEY IS RECEIVED AS REQUIRED BY LAW.

GIVEN UNDER MY HAND THIS 7TH DAY OF MARCH, 2025.

CHRISTOPHER J. FALCON, CLERK

BY:

DEPUTY CLERK

Original source file

No source file is attached yet. The record is ready for the PDF/media link when the attachment importer is connected.
File
ip-hii-edva-00483-doc-0041-exhibit-4.pdf
Source UID
source:8a4c6468633e60bd5194c2193e52fbda6588063c9e79ecc7e4237e825495b81f
Full SHA-256
8a4c6468633e60bd5194c2193e52fbda6588063c9e79ecc7e4237e825495b81f