Evidence Record

IP HII EDVA 00483 Doc. 0183 Main

1. Plaintiff HII Mission Technologies Corp.'s ("HII") predecessor entered into a subcontract with Cyberlux, which is incorporated in Nevada and has its principal place of business in North Carolina. ECF 41, 11 4, 17,...

Type
document
Court
EDVA
Case
HII v. Cyberlux interpleader
Docket
3:25-cv-00483
Pages
13
Lines
426
SHA-256
57fccba839a9

DISTIL analysis

DISTIL Run
Profile
Standard
Version
1
Doc Type
Legal Memorandum - Motion for Summary Judgment
Total Nodes
29
Node Legend
Entity (ENT)
Event (EVT)
Claim (CLM)
Anchor (ANC)
Omission (OMI)
Tension (TEN)
Tell (TEL)
Inference (INF)
Hypothesis (HYP)
Stage 1
Index
Orientation · No nodes
Document Classification
Legal Memorandum - Motion for Summary Judgment United States Department of Justice Federal Tax Lien Priority Dispute in Interpleader Action 2010-2026 (tax periods and litigation)
tax_lien_priorityinterpleader_distributionsecured_creditor_conflictgovernment_contract_termination
Analytical Frame
Government creditor priority claim in multi-party interpleader
Analytical Summary
The United States Department of Justice filed a motion for summary judgment in an interpleader action involving approximately $23.7 million in disputed funds held by HII Mission Technologies Corp. after terminating a subcontract with Cyberlux Corporation. The United States asserts perfected federal tax liens totaling $1,153,457 against Cyberlux for unpaid employment taxes and penalties spanning 2010-2023. The government argues it has priority over all creditors except Legalist SPV III, L.P., which holds a $13.2 million secured claim. The United States contends that because both claims can be fully satisfied from the interpleaded funds, and no other creditor has properly perfected security interests predating the NFTLs, summary judgment should be granted. The filing includes detailed priority analysis under 26 U.S.C. §§ 6321-6323, particularly addressing Legalist's advances made within and beyond the 45-day statutory window following NFTL filings.
Key Points
  • United States seeks $1,153,457 plus interest from interpleaded funds for unpaid Cyberlux tax liabilities
  • Tax liens perfected via NFTLs filed in North Carolina on three dates: August 21, 2017; October 10, 2023; April 30, 2024
  • Legalist has partial priority for $2.8 million advanced within 45-day statutory window after final NFTL
  • Sufficient funds ($23.7M) exist to pay both United States ($1.15M) and Legalist ($13.2M) in full
  • All other creditors lack perfected security interests predating the federal tax liens
  • Cyberlux failed to pay employment taxes (Forms 940, 941) and incurred penalties under 26 USC § 6721
  • HII terminated subcontract with Cyberlux on May 17, 2024, triggering payment dispute among creditors
Stage 2
Core — Entities, Events, Claims
17 nodes
ENT-001
Entity
United States of America
Federal government acting as creditor through the Internal Revenue Service, asserting tax liens against Cyberlux Corporation for unpaid employment taxes and penalties totaling $1,153,457 as of April 13, 2026.
Page 1 — The United States of America submits this memorandum of law in support of its motion for summary judgment.
ENT-002
Entity
Cyberlux Corporation
Nevada-incorporated corporation with principal place of business in North Carolina. Defendant in interpleader action. Failed to pay federal employment taxes across multiple periods from 2010-2023, resulting in IRS liens totaling over $1.15 million.
Page 1, 2 — Cyberlux, which is incorporated in Nevada and has its principal place of business in North Carolina
ENT-003
Entity
HII Mission Technologies Corp.
Interpleader plaintiff and government contractor. HII's predecessor entered into subcontract with Cyberlux for work supporting a prime contract with Department of the Navy and General Services Administration. Terminated subcontract on May 17, 2024, and deposited $23,736,937.56 in disputed funds into court registry.
Page 1, 2 — Plaintiff HII Mission Technologies Corp.'s ("HII") predecessor entered into a subcontract with Cyberlux... Under the subcontract, Cyberlux would support HII's work under a prime contract with the Department of the Navy and General Services Administration.
ENT-004
Entity
Legalist SPV III, L.P.
Secured creditor claiming $13,204,742.88 plus interest as of March 9, 2026. Entered into Government Purchase Order Financing Agreement with Cyberlux on March 27, 2024, providing $3 million line of credit. Perfected security interest via UCC filing in Nevada on April 1, 2024. Made multiple disbursements to Cyberlux between April 2024 and June 2025.
Page 4, 5 — Legalist and Cyberlux entered into a Government Purchase Order Financing Agreement... In that agreement, Legalist agreed to provide Cyberlux a $3,000,000 line of credit... On April 1, 2024, Legalist perfected this security interest by filing a UCC Filing Statement in Nevada
ENT-005
Entity
IRS Revenue Officer Carol Davis
IRS Revenue Officer who provided declaration documenting Cyberlux's unpaid tax liabilities, assessment dates, NFTL filing dates, and total balance owed as of April 13, 2026.
Page 2 — Declaration of IRS Revenue Officer Carol Davis (Ex. 1)
EVT-001
Event
Subcontract Termination
On May 17, 2024, HII terminated its subcontract with Cyberlux. Under the subcontract terms, HII became obligated to pay Cyberlux a percentage of the subcontract price corresponding to work performed prior to termination, plus certain expenses.
Page 2 — On May 17, 2024, HII terminated the subcontract with Cyberlux and, pursuant to the subcontract, became obligated to pay Cyberlux "a percentage of the Subcontract price corresponding with the percentage of the terminated work actually performed prior to the notice of termination," plus certain expenses.
EVT-002
Event
IRS Tax Assessments Against Cyberlux
Between April 11, 2011 and February 26, 2024, the IRS assessed multiple tax liabilities and penalties against Cyberlux Corporation for unpaid employment taxes (Forms 940 and 941) and failure-to-file penalties (26 USC § 6721). Total assessments span tax periods from 2010 to 2023.
Page 2, 3 — Specifically, a delegate of the Secretary of the Treasury assessed the following unpaid tax liabilities (IRS Forms 940 and 941) and penalties (26 USC § 6721) against Cyberlux Corporation
EVT-003
Event
Filing of Notices of Federal Tax Lien
The IRS filed three sets of Notices of Federal Tax Lien with the North Carolina Secretary of State on three dates: August 21, 2017 (for 26 USC § 6721 penalties); October 10, 2023 (for certain Form 940/941 taxes); and April 30, 2024 (for remaining Form 940/941 taxes). These filings perfected the federal tax liens against Cyberlux's property.
Page 3, 4 — The IRS filed Notices of Federal Tax Lien ("NFTLs") memorializing the liens with the North Carolina Secretary of State... The NFTLs were filed on the dates set forth in the fourth column of paragraph 7.
EVT-004
Event
Legalist-Cyberlux Financing Agreement
On March 27, 2024, Legalist and Cyberlux entered into a Government Purchase Order Financing Agreement in which Legalist agreed to provide a $3,000,000 line of credit. Cyberlux conveyed to Legalist a continuing lien on and security interest in all assets including contract rights and accounts receivable.
Page 4 — On March 27, 2024, Legalist and Cyberlux entered into a Government Purchase Order Financing Agreement... In that agreement, Legalist agreed to provide Cyberlux a $3,000,000 line of credit. In exchange, Cyberlux conveyed to Legalist a "continuing lien on and security interest in all assets of Borrower, including" contract rights and accounts receivable.
EVT-005
Event
Legalist UCC Filing
On April 1, 2024, Legalist perfected its security interest by filing a UCC Filing Statement in Nevada, where Cyberlux is incorporated. This occurred three days after the financing agreement and 29 days before the final IRS NFTL filing.
Page 4 — On April 1, 2024, Legalist perfected this security interest by filing a UCC Filing Statement in Nevada, where Cyberlux is incorporated.
EVT-006
Event
Legalist Disbursements to Cyberlux
Between April 9, 2024 and June 9, 2025, Legalist made 14 separate disbursements to Cyberlux totaling the full line of credit plus additional amounts. Critical dates: $2.8 million was advanced within 45 days of the April 30, 2024 NFTL; remaining advances occurred after the 45-day statutory window.
Page 5, 11 — Legalist disbursed the following amounts on the following dates: 4/9/2024: $1,800,000.00, 4/19/2024: $500,000.00... 5/2/2024: $500,000.00... 6/26/2024: $142,000.00, 7/5/2024: $53,000.00, 7/16/2024: $2,500,000.00, 8/2/2024: $650,000.00, 8/27/2024: $535,000.00, 10/3/2024: $150,000.00, 10/3/2024: $120,000.00, 6/3/2025: $2,755,100.10, 6/9/2025: $345,000.00
EVT-007
Event
Interpleader Deposit Order
On February 20, 2026, the Court granted HII's Motion for Interpleader Deposit and directed HII to deposit $23,736,937.56 into the Court's Registry Investment System. HII complied on March 6, 2026, and was dismissed from the lawsuit.
Page 2 — On February 20, 2026, this Court granted HII's Motion for Interpleader Deposit and directed HII to deposit $23,736,937.56 (the "Disputed Funds") into the Court's Registry Investment System... On March 6, 2026, HII interpleaded the Disputed Funds as directed and was dismissed from this lawsuit.
CLM-001
Claim
United States Priority Over All Creditors Except Legalist
The United States asserts that its tax liens have priority over all other creditors in the lawsuit except Legalist SPV III, L.P., as to which the United States has partial priority. Because claims of the United States ($1.1 million) and Legalist ($13 million) can be fully paid from interpleaded funds ($23 million), there is no genuine dispute and the United States is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
Page 1 — There is no dispute that the United States' tax liens have priority to all other creditors in this lawsuit, except one, Legalist SPV III, L.P., as to which the United States has partial priority. Because the claims of the United States' (just over $1.1 million) and Legalist (just over $13 million) can be fully paid from the interpleaded funds (over $23 million), and because there is no genuine dispute of material fact that the United States has priority as to all other creditors, the United States is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
CLM-002
Claim
United States Perfected Tax Liens
The United States claims it holds perfected tax liens on the Disputed Funds totaling $1,153,457 as of April 13, 2026, plus accruing interest. These liens arose under 26 U.S.C. § 6321 when Cyberlux failed to pay assessed taxes after notice and demand, and were perfected via NFTLs properly filed with the North Carolina Secretary of State under § 6323.
Page 2 — Cyberlux did not pay its taxes and, as a result, the United States has liens on Cyberlux's property, including the Disputed Funds, in the amount of $1,153,457, plus accruing interest.
CLM-003
Claim
Legalist Partial Priority Based on 45-Day Window
Under 26 U.S.C. § 6323(d), Legalist has priority for $2,800,000 that was disbursed within 45 days of the April 30, 2024 NFTL filing. This includes advances made on April 9, April 19, and May 2, 2024. Advances made after June 15, 2024 (46 days after the NFTL) are subordinate to the United States' tax liens.
Page 11 — As shown here, $2,800,000 of disbursements were made within 45 days of the April 30, 2024, NFTL. As a result, under § 6323(d), Legalist's claim for that $2,800,000 has priority to the tax liens memorialized in the United States' April 30, 2024, NFTL.
CLM-004
Claim
Legalist Total Claim Amount
Legalist asserts that as of March 9, 2026, Cyberlux owes it $13,204,742.88, plus interest accruing from that date. This claim is based on the Government Purchase Order Financing Agreement and subsequent disbursements.
Page 5 — Legalist asserts that, as of March 9, 2026, Cyberlux owes it $13,204,742.88, plus interest accruing from that date.
CLM-005
Claim
No Other Creditors Have Priority
The United States asserts that aside from Legalist, no other creditor claims a secured interest or lien that rivals the United States' liens. All other creditor interests were perfected after the NFTLs and are therefore subordinate.
Page 5, 11 — Aside from Legalist, no other creditor claims a secured interest or lien that rivals the United States' liens... As the facts set forth in section II.c, above, make clear, no other creditor has a claim that rivals those of the United States.
Stage 3
In Situ — Quotations, Tells, Tensions, Questions
7 nodes
TEN-001
Tension
Legalist's 45-Day Window Defense
The 45-day statutory window under 26 U.S.C. § 6323(d) creates a significant tension in priority determination. While Legalist perfected its security interest before the final NFTL, the statute allows it to claim priority only for advances made within 45 days of the NFTL filing. This means Legalist's later disbursements totaling over $10 million (made after June 15, 2024) are potentially subordinate despite holding a perfected security interest, creating a split-priority scenario.
Page 10 — Paragraph d of § 6323, however, creates a limited exception to the rule that a secured lender must "part[] with money" to prevail over a NFTL, providing for a 45-day window, after the filing of the NFTL, within which the secured creditor may disburse money to the taxpayer and still retain priority.
TEN-002
Tension
ARG Group's Late-Filed Priority Claim
The ARG Group initially stated it did not have a perfected secured interest, but five weeks after the interrogatory deadline, served new answers claiming a secured interest with priority dating to February 28, 2022 or September 8, 2023. The government notes ARG has not alleged recording any security interest or produced a UCC Filing Statement predating the NFTLs, creating a credibility and procedural compliance issue.
Page 6 — On April 14, 2026, over five weeks after the deadline to serve interrogatory answers (ECF 149), ARG served new, inconsistent answers to this interrogatory, claiming a secured interest in the Disputed Funds with a "priority date" of February 28, 2022 or, "at worst," September 8, 2023. ARG does not allege it recorded any security interest, nor has it produced a UCC Filing Statement that predates the NFTLs.
QUO-001
Quotation
First in Time, First in Right Principle
The government invokes the fundamental common-law priority principle governing federal tax liens to establish its temporal superiority over most creditors.
Page 8 — Absent provision to the contrary, [federal tax lien] priority for purposes of federal law is governed by the common-law principle that 'the first in time is the first in right.'
QUO-002
Quotation
Broad Reach of Tax Liens
Supreme Court language establishing the expansive scope of federal tax liens is cited to support the government's claim to the interpleaded funds.
Page 7, 8 — This language "is broad and reveals on its face that Congress meant to reach every interest in property that a taxpayer might have." Drye v. United States, 528 U.S. 49, 56 (1999).
QUO-003
Quotation
Security Interest Definition
Critical statutory language defining when a security interest exists for purposes of defeating a federal tax lien, emphasizing the requirement that the secured party must have actually advanced money.
Page 9, 10 — A security interest exists at any time ... [only] to the extent that, at such time, the holder has parted with money or money's worth." 26 U.S.C. § 6323(h)(1)
QST-001
Question
Receiver's Judicial Lien Priority Status
The Receiver claims a judicial lien resulting from an April 1, 2025 order, which post-dates all NFTLs. The government brief does not explicitly address whether this judicial lien has any priority, or how receiver appointment interacts with pre-existing federal tax liens. Does the receiver stand in the shoes of Cyberlux or have independent standing?
Page 5 — The Receiver claims a judicial lien as a result of an April 1, 2025, order appointing a receiver.
QST-002
Question
Treatment of Interest Accruals in Distribution
While the government seeks $1,153,457 as of April 13, 2026, plus interest accruing until disbursement date, the memorandum does not specify the interest rate or provide a calculation methodology. Similarly, Legalist's claim includes interest from March 9, 2026. How will competing interest accruals be calculated and prioritized in the final distribution order?
Page 4 — By virtue of the unpaid assessments described in paragraph 7, above, as of April 13, 2026, Cyberlux Corporation is indebted to the United States in the amount of $1,153,457, plus interest that will continue to accrue according to statute.
Stage 4
Interpretive — Inferences, Omissions, Patterns
5 nodes
INF-001
Inference
Sufficient Funds Eliminate Priority Dispute
The government's argument that the priority dispute between itself and Legalist is immaterial because sufficient funds exist to pay both creditors in full is strategically significant. This framing reduces the legal complexity and focuses the court on subordinate creditors who lack proper perfection, making summary judgment more likely.
Page 9 — The priority dispute between Legalist and the United States is immaterial because there are sufficient interpleaded funds to pay both creditors in full.
INF-002
Inference
Strategic NFTL Filing Sequence
The three different NFTL filing dates (2017, 2023, 2024) for different tax periods creates a tiered priority structure that the government exploits in its argument. By establishing the August 2017 NFTL for $40,882 in penalties as having first priority before any other creditor existed, the government ensures at least partial payment regardless of subsequent creditor actions.
Page 10 — Because the IRS filed three different Notices of Federal Tax Lien for different Cyberlux liabilities at three different times, the United States has three different priority dates: August 21, 2017, October 10, 2023, and April 30, 2024.
INF-003
Inference
Cyberlux Financial Distress Timeline
The pattern of unpaid employment taxes spanning 2010-2023, followed by Legalist's high-interest financing agreement in 2024, HII's subcontract termination in May 2024, and ultimate interpleader action suggests Cyberlux experienced prolonged financial difficulty that escalated to insolvency by mid-2024. The company's failure to pay trust fund taxes (employee withholdings) is particularly significant as these are considered the most serious tax violations.
Page 3 — Specifically, a delegate of the Secretary of the Treasury assessed the following unpaid tax liabilities (IRS Forms 940 and 941) and penalties (26 USC § 6721) against Cyberlux Corporation: [spanning tax periods from 6/30/2010 through 12/31/2023]
OMI-001
Omission
No Discussion of Cyberlux's Position
The memorandum presents facts about Cyberlux's tax liabilities and the creditor claims but does not include any argument, defense, or explanation from Cyberlux itself regarding the tax debts or the priority disputes. This absence is notable given that Cyberlux is the debtor whose assets are being distributed. The document presents the matter as if Cyberlux's position is irrelevant or non-existent.
Page — [No direct supporting text - this is an omission]
OMI-002
Omission
Limited Analysis of Government Contract Termination Reasons
While the document mentions HII terminated the subcontract on May 17, 2024, there is no discussion of why the termination occurred or whether it was for cause, convenience, or default. This omission may be strategic to avoid complicating the priority analysis, but understanding the termination reason could provide context for Cyberlux's financial collapse and the creditor claims.
Page 2 — On May 17, 2024, HII terminated the subcontract with Cyberlux

Extracted text

13 pages · 20716 characters

IP HII EDVA 00483 Doc. 0183 Main — Formatted Extract

Type: document
Court: EDVA
Matter: HII v. Cyberlux interpleader
Docket: 3:25-cv-00483
Filing Header

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Richmond Division

HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. ) ) Case No. 3:25-cv-00483-JAG

Interpleader Plaintiff, ) )

V. ) ) CYBERLUX CORPORATION, et al., ) )

Defendants.

) )

UNITED STATES' MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

The United States of America submits this memorandum of law in support of its motion for summary judgment.

I. INTRODUCTION

There is no dispute that the United States' tax liens have priority to all other creditors in this lawsuit, except one, Legalist SPV III, L.P., as to which the United States has partial priority. Because the claims of the United States' (just over $1.1 million) and Legalist (just over $13 million) can be fully paid from the interpleaded funds (over $23 million), and because there is no genuine dispute of material fact that the United States has priority as to all other creditors, the United States is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

II. UNDISPUTED MATERIAL FACTS
1.
Plaintiff HII Mission Technologies Corp.'s ("HII") predecessor entered into a subcontract with Cyberlux, which is incorporated in Nevada and has its principal place of business in North Carolina. ECF 41, 11 4, 17, 18 . Under the subcontract, Cyberlux would

support HII's work under a prime contract with the Department of the Navy and General Services Administration. ECF 41, 1 18.

2.
On May 17, 2024, HII terminated the subcontract with Cyberlux and, pursuant to the subcontract, became obligated to pay Cyberlux "a percentage of the Subcontract price corresponding with the percentage of the terminated work actually performed prior to the notice of termination," plus certain expenses. Id., 11 21-22.
3.
HII commenced this action in interpleader, naming defendant Cyberlux Corporation and Cyberlux's creditors. Id., 11. HII sought to deposit certain sums owed to Cyberlux and to which various Cyberlux creditors had made claims. Id., 12.
4.
On February 20, 2026, this Court granted HII's Motion for Interpleader Deposit and directed HII to deposit $23,736,937.56 (the "Disputed Funds") into the Court's Registry Investment System. ECF 150.
5.
On March 6, 2026, HII interpleaded the Disputed Funds as directed and was dismissed from this lawsuit. March 6, 2026, Docket Entry reflecting deposit; see also ECF 153 (order acknowledging the deposit and dismissing HII).

a. Facts relevant to the United States' claim.

6.
Cyberlux did not pay its taxes and, as a result, the United States has liens on Cyberlux's property, including the Disputed Funds, in the amount of $1,153,457, plus accruing interest. See generally Declaration of IRS Revenue Officer Carol Davis (Ex. 1).
7.
Specifically, a delegate of the Secretary of the Treasury assessed the following unpaid tax liabilities (IRS Forms 940 and 941) and penalties (26 USC § 6721) against Cyberlux Corporation:

Assessment Type

Tax Period Ending

Assessment Date

NFTL Filing Date

Balance1 (as of April 13, 2026)

IRS Form 9412

6/30/2010

5/13/2013

4/30/2024

$87,454

IRS Form 941

12/31/2010

4/11/2011

4/30/2024

$149,003

IRS Form 941

12/31/2012

4/01/2013

4/30/2024

$872,811

IRS Form 941

12/31/2021

9/5/2022

10/10/2023

$2,625

IRS Form 940

12/31/2022

2/27/2023

10/10/2023

$321

IRS Form 940

12/31/2023

2/26/2024

4/30/2024

$361

26
USC § 67213

12/31/2013

10/24/2016

8/21/2017

$40,882

TOTAL BALANCE

$1,153,457.00

Id., 15.

8.
True and correct copies of account transcripts memorializing these liabilities are attached to Revenue Officer Davis's Declaration as Attachment A thereto.
9.
A delegate of the Secretary of the Treasury gave notice of these assessments to Cyberlux Corporation and made demand upon it for payment of those assessments. Despite notice and demand for payment, Cyberlux Corporation has failed or refused to pay the full amounts due and owing for these assessments. As a result, under 26 U.S.C. § 6321, the unpaid assessment amounts are a lien in favor of the United States upon all property and rights to property belonging to Cyberlux Corporation, including upon the interpleaded proceeds. Id., 17.
10.
The IRS filed Notices of Federal Tax Lien ("NFTLs") memorializing the liens with the North Carolina Secretary of State. Id., 18. The NFTLs were filed on the dates set forth
1
This includes assessment amount plus accruals (interest and penalties) accruing through April 13, 2026.
2
IRS Forms 941 are used to report withheld employee income tax and withheld employee and employer Social Security and Medicare tax. IRS Forms 940 are used to report an employer's Federal Unemployment Tax Act taxes.
3
These are penalties for failure to file returns.

in the fourth column of paragraph 7. True and correct copies of those NFTLs are attached to Revenue Officer Davis's Declaration as Attachment B thereto.

11.
By virtue of the unpaid assessments described in paragraph 7, above, as of April 13, 2026, Cyberlux Corporation is indebted to the United States in the amount of $1,153,457, plus interest that will continue to accrue according to statute. Id., 19.
b. Facts relevant to Legalist's claim
12.
On March 27, 2024, Legalist and Cyberlux entered into a Government Purchase Order Financing Agreement. Legalist Ans. to Interrogatory B (Ex. 2); Gov. Purchase Ord. Financing Agr., Ex. 3 at LEGALIST000021.4
13.
In that agreement, Legalist agreed to provide Cyberlux a $3,000,000 line of credit. Ex. 3 at LEGALIST000021. In exchange, Cyberlux conveyed to Legalist a "continuing lien on and security interest in all assets of Borrower, including" contract rights and accounts receivable. Id. at LEGALIST000022.
14.
On April 1, 2024, Legalist perfected this security interest by filing a UCC Filing Statement in Nevada, where Cyberlux is incorporated. Ex. 3, at LEGALIST000017. Legalist did not provide the $3,000,000 at the time it signed the contract. Rather, Legalist disbursed the following amounts on the following dates:
4
Legalist and Cyberlux amended the Government Purchase Order Financing Agreement on July 13, 2024, see Ex. 3 at LEGALIST000039, and on April 29, 2025. See Ex. 3 at LEGALIST000007. Because both amendments occurred after all NFTLs, they are not relevant to any priority dispute between Legalist and the United States.

· 4/9/2024: $1,800,000.00

· 4/19/2024: $500,000.00

· 4/30/2024: This is the date the final IRS NFTL was filed.

· 5/2/2024: $500,000.00

· 6/15/2024: This date is 46 days after the filing of all NFTLs. As explained below, advances after this date are subordinate to the IRS tax liens.

· 6/26/2024: $142,000.00

· 7/5/2024: $53,000.00

· 7/16/2024: $2,500,000.00

· 8/2/2024: $650,000.00

· 8/27/2024: $535,000.00

· 10/3/2024: $150,000.00

· 10/3/2024: $120,000.00

· 6/3/2025: $2,755,100.10

· 6/9/2025: $345,000.001

Legalist Ans. to Interrogatory G (Ex. 2). Legalist asserts that, as of March 9, 2026, Cyberlux owes it $13,204,742.88, plus interest accruing from that date. Id. at A.

c. Facts relevant to other Cyberlux creditor claims.
15.
Aside from Legalist, no other creditor claims a secured interest or lien that rivals the United States' liens.
16.
6. The Receiver claims a judicial lien as a result of an April 1, 2025, order appointing a receiver. Ex. 4 at p. EX4000002, 1d & EX4000006, 1 10.
17.
Thin Air Gear, LLC asserts a perfected lien as of August 29, 2025 or, "at worst," December 19, 2025. Ex. 4 at p. EX4000024.
18.
Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation claims a security interest through its filing of a Writ of Fieri Facias on September 24, 2025 and an equitable lien arising on December 30, 2024. Ex. 4 at p. EX4000026-27.
19.
Assure Global LLC d/b/a WeShield, Roman Investments PR LLC, MAS USA MGT LLC, and Michael Sinensky claim a perfected security interest as of October 23, 2025. Ex. 4 at p. EX4000030.
20.
Atlantic Waive Holdings, LLC and Secure Community, LLC, which has advised undersigned counsel that it does not contest the United States' priority, claims they perfected a security interest through the filing of UCC Financing Statements, but the statement filed in Nevada (the state of Cyberlux's incorporation) was not filed until March 20, 2026. Ex. 4 at p. EX4000031.
21.
Fairwinds Technologies, LLC does not claim a security interest. Ex. 4 at p. EX4000034, T d.
22.
The ARG Group, LLC "does not believe it has a perfected, secured security interest in all or any portion of the proceeds." Ex. 4 at p. EX4000036, 1 d.5
III. LEGAL STANDARDS
Summary Judgment Standard

"Under Rule 56(a), summary judgment is appropriate 'if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.' The relevant inquiry in a summary judgment analysis is 'whether the evidence presents a sufficient disagreement to require submission to a jury or whether it is so one-sided that one party must prevail as a matter of law." Moore-King v. Cnty. of Chesterfield, Va., 819 F. Supp. 2d 604, 610 (E.D. Va. 2011), aff'd, 708 F.3d 560 (4th Cir. 2013) (quoting Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(a) and Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 251-52 (1986)).

5
On April 14, 2026, over five weeks after the deadline to serve interrogatory answers (ECF 149), ARG served new, inconsistent answers to this interrogatory, claiming a secured interest in the Disputed Funds with a "priority date" of February 28, 2022 or, "at worst," September 8, 2023. ARG does not allege it recorded any security interest, nor has it produced a UCC Filing Statement that predates the NFTLs. Absent such perfection, ARG's interest, if any, is subordinate to the United States'. 26 U.S.C. § 6323.
Interpleader Standard

"An interpleader action typically involves two stages. First, the court must determine whether the plaintiff "has properly invoked interpleader .... " Allstate Life Ins. Co. v. Ellett, No. 2:14CV372, 2015 WL 500171, at *2 (E.D. Va. Feb. 4, 2015) (internal citations and quotations omitted). "In the second stage, a scheduling order is issued and the case continues between the claimants to determine their respective rights." Id. (internal quotation omitted). This motion concerns the second stage of an interpleader, i.e., the respective rights of the United States and other Cyberlux creditors.

Government Contracting Law

As ordered by the Court (ECF 158), undersigned counsel has reviewed statutes pertaining to government contracting in connection with this dispute and believes the resolution of the priority of the United States tax liens is governed by the Internal Revenue Code and specifically, as discussed in greater detail below, 26 U.S.C. §§ 6321-6323.

IV. ARGUMENT

This Court should disburse $1,153,457, as of April 13, 2026, plus interest accruing after that date, from the Disputed Funds to the United States. The United States has perfected tax liens on the Disputed Funds in that amount, and the liens have priority as to all other creditors, with the exception of certain of Legalist's claims.

A. The United States has perfected liens on the Disputed Fund.

Under 26 U.S.C. § 6321, if a person liable to pay tax neglects to do so after demand, the amount (including interest and statutory additions) "shall be a lien in favor of the United States upon all property and rights to property, whether real or personal, belonging to such person." This language "is broad and reveals on its face that Congress meant to reach every interest in

property that a taxpayer might have." Drye v. United States, 528 U.S. 49, 56 (1999). This lien "shall arise at the time the assessment is made .... " 26 U.S.C. § 6322.

Here, after notice and demand for payment, Cyberlux failed to pay the tax owed, and a lien arose in favor of the United States. Davis Decl. (Ex. 1), 17.

The lien is not valid against other creditors, however, unless notice of the lien is filed. 26 U.S.C. § 6323(a). To ensure a lien on personal property is valid as to such other creditors, the IRS must file the notice in the office within the state in which the personal property is situated, as designated by the laws of that state. § 6323(f)(1)(A)(ii). The personal property of a corporation is deemed to be situated in the state of the principal executive office of the business. 26 U.S.C. § 6323(f)(2)(B).

Here, Cyberlux's principal place of business is in North Carolina. Am. Compl. ECF 41, 14. Under North Carolina law, notices of federal tax lien upon a corporation's personal property must be filed with the North Carolina Secretary of State. N.C. Gen. Stat. Ann. § 44-68.12(c)(1). Here, the Notices of Federal Tax Lien were indeed filed with the North Carolina Secretary of State. Davis Decl. (Ex. 1), 18 & Attachment B thereto. As a result, as of the dates set forth in column four of paragraph II.7, the United States held perfected liens on all of Cyberlux's "property and rights to property," including Cyberlux's rights to the Disputed Funds.

B. The United States' liens have partial priority as to Legalist's claims.

1.
There is no genuine dispute that the Disputed Funds can fully pay the United States and Legalist.

"Absent provision to the contrary, [federal tax lien] priority for purposes of federal law is governed by the common-law principle that 'the first in time is the first in right." U.S. By & Through I.R.S. v. McDermott, 507 U.S. 447, 449 (1993) (quoting United States v. New Britain, 347 U.S. 81, 85 (1954)).

Here, aside from Legalist, no claimant holds a security interest or lien in the Disputed Funds that was perfected prior to the NFTLs set forth in paragraph II.7, above. The Disputed Funds total $23,736,937.56. As of March 9, 2026, Legalist claims it is owed $13,204,742.88, plus interest. Legalist Ans. to Interrogatory G (Ex. 2). The United States is owed $1,153,457, as of April 13, 2026, plus interest. Davis Decl. (Ex. 1), 15. The priority dispute between Legalist and the United States is immaterial because there are sufficient interpleaded funds to pay both creditors in full.

2.
Should the priority of the United States' and Legalist's claim be put at issue, the United States should be fully paid after Legalist is paid $2.8 million.

Should the priorty of the United States' and Legalist's interests be put at issue, the United States asserts, for the reasons that follow, the following order of priority:

Priority

Creditor

Claim Amount

USA

$40,882

USA

$2,937.49

Legalist

$2,800,000

USA

$1,106,083.54

Section 6323 of the Internal Revenue Code governs the relative priority of the United States and Legalist's claims. Under 26 U.S.C. § 6323(a), a federal tax lien "shall not be valid as against any purchaser, holder of a security interest, mechanic's lienor, or judgment lien creditor until notice thereof which meets the requirements of subsection (f) has been filed by the Secretary." (emphasis added). The term "security interest" means, in pertinent part, "any interest in property acquired by contract for the purpose of securing payment or performance of an obligation or indemnifying against loss or liability. A security interest exists at any time ... [only] to the extent that, at such time, the holder has parted with money or money's worth." 26

U.S.C. § 6323(h)(1) (emphasis added). Under this general rule, Legalist must have "parted with money" for its security interest to prevail over the tax liens.

Paragraph d of § 6323, however, creates a limited exception to the rule that a secured lender must "part[] with money" to prevail over a NFTL, providing for a 45-day window, after the filing of the NFTL, within which the secured creditor may disburse money to the taxpayer and still retain priority. 26 U.S.C. § 6323(d).

Because the IRS filed three different Notices of Federal Tax Lien for different Cyberlux liabilities at three different times, the United States has three different priority dates: August 21, 2017, October 10, 2023, and April 30, 2024.

On August 21, 2017, the IRS perfected its lien on Cyberlux's $40,882 debt for 26 U.S.C. § 6721 penalties, and this lien has first priority as to all other claims, as neither Legalist nor any other creditor were yet "holders of a security interest" or otherwise perfected as of this date. Davis Decl. (Ex. 1), 15.

On October 10, 2023, the IRS perfected its lien on Cyberlux's $2,937.49 debts for certain Form 940 ($321) and Form 941 ($2,625) taxes, and this lien has second priority as to all other claims, as neither Legalist nor any other creditor were yet "holders of a security interest" or otherwise perfected as of this date. Id.

On March 27, 2024, Legalist and Cyberlux entered into the Government Purchase Order Financing Agreement, under which Legalist agreed to advance $3,000,000 to Cyberlux. Legalist Ans. to Interrogatory B (Ex. 2); Ex. 3 at LEGALIST000021. On April 1, 2024, Legalist perfected this security interest by filing UCC Filing Statements in Nevada, where Cyberlux is incorporated. Ex. 3 at LEGALIST000017.

On April 30, 2024, as noted, the IRS filed its third and final NFTL, perfecting its lien on $1,109,629 in liabilities. Davis Decl. (Ex. 1), 15.

Under the financing agreement, Legalist disbursed the following funds on the following dates:

· 4/9/2024: $1,800,000.00

· 4/19/2024: $500,000.00

· 4/30/2024: This is the date the final IRS NFTL was filed.

· 5/2/2024: $500,000.00

· 6/15/2024: This date is 46 days after the filing of the final NFTL.

· 6/26/2024: $142,000.00

· 7/5/2024: $53,000.00

· 7/16/2024: $2,500,000.00

· 8/2/2024: $650,000.00

· 8/27/2024: $535,000.00

· 10/3/2024: $150,000.00

· 10/3/2024: $120,000.00

· 6/3/2025: $2,755,100.10 6/9/2025: $345,000.001

Legalist Ans. to Interrogatory G (Ex. 2).

As shown here, $2,800,000 of disbursements were made within 45 days of the April 30, 2024, NFTL. As a result, under § 6323(d), Legalist's claim for that $2,800,000 has priority to the tax liens memorialized in the United States' April 30, 2024, NFTL. Following disbursement of those sums to Legalist, however, the liens memorialized in the April 30, 2024 NFTL, in the amount of $1,109,629, should be fully paid from the Disputed Funds.

C. The United States' lien has priority as to all other claims.

As the facts set forth in section II.c, above, make clear, no other creditor has a claim that rivals those of the United States. As a result, the United States should be fully paid.

V. CONCLUSION

For these reasons, the United States requests that $1,153,457, as of April 13, 2026, plus interest accruing until the date of disbursement, be paid to the United States from the Disputed Funds.

Date: April 15, 2026

Respectfully submitted,

BRETT A. SHUMATE Assistant Attorney General

JOSHUA WU Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Tax Litigation Branch

/s/ William J. Harrington WILLIAM J. HARRINGTON ELIZABETH PRUITT Trial Attorneys, Civil Division

Tax Litigation Branch U.S. Department of Justice Post Office Box 227 Washington, DC 20044

Tel: (202) 353-1882

Fax: (202) 514-6866 William.J.Harrington@usdoj.gov Elizabeth.Pruitt@usdoj.gov

-and-

TODD BLANCHE Acting Attorney General

/s/ Jonathan H. Hambrick JONATHAN H. HAMBRICK VSB NO. 37590

Assistant United States Attorney

Eastern District of Virginia 919 E. Main Street, Suite 1900 Richmond, VA 23219 Phone: (804) 819-5400 Fax: (804) 771-2316 E-mail: jay.h.hambrick@usdoj.gov Counsel to the United States

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I certify that on April 15, 2026, I electronically filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of Court using the CM/ECF system, which will send notification of such filing to all counsel of record.

/s/ William J. Harrington

WILLIAM J. HARRINGTON ELIZABETH PRUITT Trial Attorneys, Civil Division Tax Litigation Branch U.S. Department of Justice Post Office Box 227 Washington, DC 20044 Tel: (202) 353-1882 Fax: (202) 514-6866 William.J.Harrington@usdoj.gov Elizabeth.Pruitt@usdoj.gov

Original source file

No source file is attached yet. The record is ready for the PDF/media link when the attachment importer is connected.
File
ip-hii-edva-00483-doc-0183-main.pdf
Source UID
source:57fccba839a9d1b4a85220dbe7ea170d581046407c9a43d0138fc53bfbf497ad
Full SHA-256
57fccba839a9d1b4a85220dbe7ea170d581046407c9a43d0138fc53bfbf497ad