Isely May 30 creditor certification to HII — admitted debts and disputed estimates
Original sourceSigned corporate certification to contract counterparty, later federal exhibit; debtor acknowledgements and settlement estimates with explicit qualifications.
Each card carries the governed distillate name from the database. Open the quoted anchor before relying on the interpretation.
quotationattribution
Cyberlux acknowledges the specified Legalist balance and AWH/SC judgment in its signed creditor certification.
Read the anchor · page 2
30 May 2025
HII Mission Technologies Corp.
8350 Broad St., Suite 1400,
McLean, VA 22102
Attention: Mr. Tim McAtee, Sr. Director, Subcontracts and Procurement
Subject: Certification of creditor amounts owed
Reference: May 28, 2025 Letter from HII to Cyberlux
Dear Mr. McAtee.
Pursuant to Modification No. 4 to Subcontract No. P000043846 (the “Agreement”) by and between HII Mission Technologies Corp. (“HII”) and Cyberlux Corporation (“Cyberlux”), and in accordance with Section 5(f) of the Agreement, this letter certifies to the amounts Cyberlux owes to the following creditors:
Legalist SPV III, LP – $7,762,932.96 including accrued interest and fees (as of April 30, 2025)
Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community, LLC: Judgement of $912,000.00 [1]
Thin Air Gear: approximately $390,000.00 [2]
AeroTek, Inc.: approximately $200,000 to $250,000 [3]
ARG Group, LLC: $0. There is no amount due ARG Group from Cyberlux
RB Capital Partners: approximately $4,100,000 [4]
We trust that you find this certification in order. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned directly.
Sincerely,
[signature]
Larson Jay Isely
Chief Operating Officer
1 Cyberlux notes the $1.445M Garnishment Summons from the Circuit Court of Fairfax County, Virginia presented to HII on or around March 11, 2025 is for an amount that is greater than the judgement amount included herein. The difference relates to amounts that are still unadjudicated and have not been awarded to the plaintiffs by a court of competent jurisdiction. Cyberlux believes that any final adjudication of the claims will result in aggregate payments that are less than the Garnishment Summons.
2 Not adjudicated; amount owed reflects Cyberlux’s expectations following preliminary conversations between the parties around a settlement.
3 Not adjudicated; amount owed reflects Cyberlux estimate as settlement conversations are ongoing.
4 Not adjudicated; amount owed reflects Cyberlux estimation based on settlement discussions, particularly around timing of payments.
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-3 Filed 08/04/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 523
claimallegation
The August 4, 2025 federal Exhibit 3 contains Isely’s signed May 30 letter to HII, responding to May 28 correspondence under Modification 4,
The August 4, 2025 federal Exhibit 3 contains Isely’s signed May 30 letter to HII, responding to May 28 correspondence under Modification 4, Subcontract P000043846, section 5(f). Isely signs as Chief Operating Officer. The cited modification and request are not attached.
Read the anchor · page 1
EXHIBIT 3
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-3 Filed 08/04/25 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 522
claimallegation
Cyberlux certifies Legalist SPV III, LP $7,762,932.96 including accrued interest and fees as of April 30, 2025, and Atlantic Wave/Secure Com
Cyberlux certifies Legalist SPV III, LP $7,762,932.96 including accrued interest and fees as of April 30, 2025, and Atlantic Wave/Secure Community judgment $912,000.00. These are debtor acknowledgements in a dated certification, not proof that payment occurred.
Read the anchor · page 2
30 May 2025
HII Mission Technologies Corp.
8350 Broad St., Suite 1400,
McLean, VA 22102
Attention: Mr. Tim McAtee, Sr. Director, Subcontracts and Procurement
Subject: Certification of creditor amounts owed
Reference: May 28, 2025 Letter from HII to Cyberlux
Dear Mr. McAtee.
Pursuant to Modification No. 4 to Subcontract No. P000043846 (the “Agreement”) by and between HII Mission Technologies Corp. (“HII”) and Cyberlux Corporation (“Cyberlux”), and in accordance with Section 5(f) of the Agreement, this letter certifies to the amounts Cyberlux owes to the following creditors:
Legalist SPV III, LP – $7,762,932.96 including accrued interest and fees (as of April 30, 2025)
Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community, LLC: Judgement of $912,000.00 [1]
Thin Air Gear: approximately $390,000.00 [2]
AeroTek, Inc.: approximately $200,000 to $250,000 [3]
ARG Group, LLC: $0. There is no amount due ARG Group from Cyberlux
RB Capital Partners: approximately $4,100,000 [4]
We trust that you find this certification in order. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned directly.
Sincerely,
[signature]
Larson Jay Isely
Chief Operating Officer
1 Cyberlux notes the $1.445M Garnishment Summons from the Circuit Court of Fairfax County, Virginia presented to HII on or around March 11, 2025 is for an amount that is greater than the judgement amount included herein. The difference relates to amounts that are still unadjudicated and have not been awarded to the plaintiffs by a court of competent jurisdiction. Cyberlux believes that any final adjudication of the claims will result in aggregate payments that are less than the Garnishment Summons.
2 Not adjudicated; amount owed reflects Cyberlux’s expectations following preliminary conversations between the parties around a settlement.
3 Not adjudicated; amount owed reflects Cyberlux estimate as settlement conversations are ongoing.
4 Not adjudicated; amount owed reflects Cyberlux estimation based on settlement discussions, particularly around timing of payments.
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-3 Filed 08/04/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 523
claimallegation
Cyberlux estimates Thin Air approximately $390,000, AeroTek $200,000–$250,000 and RB Capital approximately $4.1 million. Footnotes call each
Cyberlux estimates Thin Air approximately $390,000, AeroTek $200,000–$250,000 and RB Capital approximately $4.1 million. Footnotes call each unadjudicated and tie the amounts to preliminary or ongoing settlement conversations and, for RB, payment timing. These are debtor estimates, not executed settlements or adjudicated totals.
Read the anchor · page 2
30 May 2025
HII Mission Technologies Corp.
8350 Broad St., Suite 1400,
McLean, VA 22102
Attention: Mr. Tim McAtee, Sr. Director, Subcontracts and Procurement
Subject: Certification of creditor amounts owed
Reference: May 28, 2025 Letter from HII to Cyberlux
Dear Mr. McAtee.
Pursuant to Modification No. 4 to Subcontract No. P000043846 (the “Agreement”) by and between HII Mission Technologies Corp. (“HII”) and Cyberlux Corporation (“Cyberlux”), and in accordance with Section 5(f) of the Agreement, this letter certifies to the amounts Cyberlux owes to the following creditors:
Legalist SPV III, LP – $7,762,932.96 including accrued interest and fees (as of April 30, 2025)
Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community, LLC: Judgement of $912,000.00 [1]
Thin Air Gear: approximately $390,000.00 [2]
AeroTek, Inc.: approximately $200,000 to $250,000 [3]
ARG Group, LLC: $0. There is no amount due ARG Group from Cyberlux
RB Capital Partners: approximately $4,100,000 [4]
We trust that you find this certification in order. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned directly.
Sincerely,
[signature]
Larson Jay Isely
Chief Operating Officer
1 Cyberlux notes the $1.445M Garnishment Summons from the Circuit Court of Fairfax County, Virginia presented to HII on or around March 11, 2025 is for an amount that is greater than the judgement amount included herein. The difference relates to amounts that are still unadjudicated and have not been awarded to the plaintiffs by a court of competent jurisdiction. Cyberlux believes that any final adjudication of the claims will result in aggregate payments that are less than the Garnishment Summons.
2 Not adjudicated; amount owed reflects Cyberlux’s expectations following preliminary conversations between the parties around a settlement.
3 Not adjudicated; amount owed reflects Cyberlux estimate as settlement conversations are ongoing.
4 Not adjudicated; amount owed reflects Cyberlux estimation based on settlement discussions, particularly around timing of payments.
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-3 Filed 08/04/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 523
claimallegation
Cyberlux certifies ARG Group $0 and says no amount is due. This is an express debtor denial, not an adjudication extinguishing ARG’s claim.
Read the anchor · page 2
30 May 2025
HII Mission Technologies Corp.
8350 Broad St., Suite 1400,
McLean, VA 22102
Attention: Mr. Tim McAtee, Sr. Director, Subcontracts and Procurement
Subject: Certification of creditor amounts owed
Reference: May 28, 2025 Letter from HII to Cyberlux
Dear Mr. McAtee.
Pursuant to Modification No. 4 to Subcontract No. P000043846 (the “Agreement”) by and between HII Mission Technologies Corp. (“HII”) and Cyberlux Corporation (“Cyberlux”), and in accordance with Section 5(f) of the Agreement, this letter certifies to the amounts Cyberlux owes to the following creditors:
Legalist SPV III, LP – $7,762,932.96 including accrued interest and fees (as of April 30, 2025)
Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community, LLC: Judgement of $912,000.00 [1]
Thin Air Gear: approximately $390,000.00 [2]
AeroTek, Inc.: approximately $200,000 to $250,000 [3]
ARG Group, LLC: $0. There is no amount due ARG Group from Cyberlux
RB Capital Partners: approximately $4,100,000 [4]
We trust that you find this certification in order. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned directly.
Sincerely,
[signature]
Larson Jay Isely
Chief Operating Officer
1 Cyberlux notes the $1.445M Garnishment Summons from the Circuit Court of Fairfax County, Virginia presented to HII on or around March 11, 2025 is for an amount that is greater than the judgement amount included herein. The difference relates to amounts that are still unadjudicated and have not been awarded to the plaintiffs by a court of competent jurisdiction. Cyberlux believes that any final adjudication of the claims will result in aggregate payments that are less than the Garnishment Summons.
2 Not adjudicated; amount owed reflects Cyberlux’s expectations following preliminary conversations between the parties around a settlement.
3 Not adjudicated; amount owed reflects Cyberlux estimate as settlement conversations are ongoing.
4 Not adjudicated; amount owed reflects Cyberlux estimation based on settlement discussions, particularly around timing of payments.
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-3 Filed 08/04/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 523
claimallegation
The AWH/SC footnote contrasts the $912,000 judgment with a $1.445 million Fairfax garnishment summons presented to HII around March 11, sayi
The AWH/SC footnote contrasts the $912,000 judgment with a $1.445 million Fairfax garnishment summons presented to HII around March 11, saying the difference remains unadjudicated and predicting lower aggregate final payments. It does not deny the certified judgment amount or prove the garnishment invalid.
Read the anchor · page 2
30 May 2025
HII Mission Technologies Corp.
8350 Broad St., Suite 1400,
McLean, VA 22102
Attention: Mr. Tim McAtee, Sr. Director, Subcontracts and Procurement
Subject: Certification of creditor amounts owed
Reference: May 28, 2025 Letter from HII to Cyberlux
Dear Mr. McAtee.
Pursuant to Modification No. 4 to Subcontract No. P000043846 (the “Agreement”) by and between HII Mission Technologies Corp. (“HII”) and Cyberlux Corporation (“Cyberlux”), and in accordance with Section 5(f) of the Agreement, this letter certifies to the amounts Cyberlux owes to the following creditors:
Legalist SPV III, LP – $7,762,932.96 including accrued interest and fees (as of April 30, 2025)
Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community, LLC: Judgement of $912,000.00 [1]
Thin Air Gear: approximately $390,000.00 [2]
AeroTek, Inc.: approximately $200,000 to $250,000 [3]
ARG Group, LLC: $0. There is no amount due ARG Group from Cyberlux
RB Capital Partners: approximately $4,100,000 [4]
We trust that you find this certification in order. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned directly.
Sincerely,
[signature]
Larson Jay Isely
Chief Operating Officer
1 Cyberlux notes the $1.445M Garnishment Summons from the Circuit Court of Fairfax County, Virginia presented to HII on or around March 11, 2025 is for an amount that is greater than the judgement amount included herein. The difference relates to amounts that are still unadjudicated and have not been awarded to the plaintiffs by a court of competent jurisdiction. Cyberlux believes that any final adjudication of the claims will result in aggregate payments that are less than the Garnishment Summons.
2 Not adjudicated; amount owed reflects Cyberlux’s expectations following preliminary conversations between the parties around a settlement.
3 Not adjudicated; amount owed reflects Cyberlux estimate as settlement conversations are ongoing.
4 Not adjudicated; amount owed reflects Cyberlux estimation based on settlement discussions, particularly around timing of payments.
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-3 Filed 08/04/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 523
entityobservation
Larson Jay Isely
Read the anchor · page 2
30 May 2025
HII Mission Technologies Corp.
8350 Broad St., Suite 1400,
McLean, VA 22102
Attention: Mr. Tim McAtee, Sr. Director, Subcontracts and Procurement
Subject: Certification of creditor amounts owed
Reference: May 28, 2025 Letter from HII to Cyberlux
Dear Mr. McAtee.
Pursuant to Modification No. 4 to Subcontract No. P000043846 (the “Agreement”) by and between HII Mission Technologies Corp. (“HII”) and Cyberlux Corporation (“Cyberlux”), and in accordance with Section 5(f) of the Agreement, this letter certifies to the amounts Cyberlux owes to the following creditors:
Legalist SPV III, LP – $7,762,932.96 including accrued interest and fees (as of April 30, 2025)
Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community, LLC: Judgement of $912,000.00 [1]
Thin Air Gear: approximately $390,000.00 [2]
AeroTek, Inc.: approximately $200,000 to $250,000 [3]
ARG Group, LLC: $0. There is no amount due ARG Group from Cyberlux
RB Capital Partners: approximately $4,100,000 [4]
We trust that you find this certification in order. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned directly.
Sincerely,
[signature]
Larson Jay Isely
Chief Operating Officer
1 Cyberlux notes the $1.445M Garnishment Summons from the Circuit Court of Fairfax County, Virginia presented to HII on or around March 11, 2025 is for an amount that is greater than the judgement amount included herein. The difference relates to amounts that are still unadjudicated and have not been awarded to the plaintiffs by a court of competent jurisdiction. Cyberlux believes that any final adjudication of the claims will result in aggregate payments that are less than the Garnishment Summons.
2 Not adjudicated; amount owed reflects Cyberlux’s expectations following preliminary conversations between the parties around a settlement.
3 Not adjudicated; amount owed reflects Cyberlux estimate as settlement conversations are ongoing.
4 Not adjudicated; amount owed reflects Cyberlux estimation based on settlement discussions, particularly around timing of payments.
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-3 Filed 08/04/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 523
entityobservation
Tim McAtee
Read the anchor · page 2
30 May 2025
HII Mission Technologies Corp.
8350 Broad St., Suite 1400,
McLean, VA 22102
Attention: Mr. Tim McAtee, Sr. Director, Subcontracts and Procurement
Subject: Certification of creditor amounts owed
Reference: May 28, 2025 Letter from HII to Cyberlux
Dear Mr. McAtee.
Pursuant to Modification No. 4 to Subcontract No. P000043846 (the “Agreement”) by and between HII Mission Technologies Corp. (“HII”) and Cyberlux Corporation (“Cyberlux”), and in accordance with Section 5(f) of the Agreement, this letter certifies to the amounts Cyberlux owes to the following creditors:
Legalist SPV III, LP – $7,762,932.96 including accrued interest and fees (as of April 30, 2025)
Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community, LLC: Judgement of $912,000.00 [1]
Thin Air Gear: approximately $390,000.00 [2]
AeroTek, Inc.: approximately $200,000 to $250,000 [3]
ARG Group, LLC: $0. There is no amount due ARG Group from Cyberlux
RB Capital Partners: approximately $4,100,000 [4]
We trust that you find this certification in order. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned directly.
Sincerely,
[signature]
Larson Jay Isely
Chief Operating Officer
1 Cyberlux notes the $1.445M Garnishment Summons from the Circuit Court of Fairfax County, Virginia presented to HII on or around March 11, 2025 is for an amount that is greater than the judgement amount included herein. The difference relates to amounts that are still unadjudicated and have not been awarded to the plaintiffs by a court of competent jurisdiction. Cyberlux believes that any final adjudication of the claims will result in aggregate payments that are less than the Garnishment Summons.
2 Not adjudicated; amount owed reflects Cyberlux’s expectations following preliminary conversations between the parties around a settlement.
3 Not adjudicated; amount owed reflects Cyberlux estimate as settlement conversations are ongoing.
4 Not adjudicated; amount owed reflects Cyberlux estimation based on settlement discussions, particularly around timing of payments.
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-3 Filed 08/04/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 523
entityobservation
Cyberlux Corporation
Read the anchor · page 2
30 May 2025
HII Mission Technologies Corp.
8350 Broad St., Suite 1400,
McLean, VA 22102
Attention: Mr. Tim McAtee, Sr. Director, Subcontracts and Procurement
Subject: Certification of creditor amounts owed
Reference: May 28, 2025 Letter from HII to Cyberlux
Dear Mr. McAtee.
Pursuant to Modification No. 4 to Subcontract No. P000043846 (the “Agreement”) by and between HII Mission Technologies Corp. (“HII”) and Cyberlux Corporation (“Cyberlux”), and in accordance with Section 5(f) of the Agreement, this letter certifies to the amounts Cyberlux owes to the following creditors:
Legalist SPV III, LP – $7,762,932.96 including accrued interest and fees (as of April 30, 2025)
Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community, LLC: Judgement of $912,000.00 [1]
Thin Air Gear: approximately $390,000.00 [2]
AeroTek, Inc.: approximately $200,000 to $250,000 [3]
ARG Group, LLC: $0. There is no amount due ARG Group from Cyberlux
RB Capital Partners: approximately $4,100,000 [4]
We trust that you find this certification in order. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned directly.
Sincerely,
[signature]
Larson Jay Isely
Chief Operating Officer
1 Cyberlux notes the $1.445M Garnishment Summons from the Circuit Court of Fairfax County, Virginia presented to HII on or around March 11, 2025 is for an amount that is greater than the judgement amount included herein. The difference relates to amounts that are still unadjudicated and have not been awarded to the plaintiffs by a court of competent jurisdiction. Cyberlux believes that any final adjudication of the claims will result in aggregate payments that are less than the Garnishment Summons.
2 Not adjudicated; amount owed reflects Cyberlux’s expectations following preliminary conversations between the parties around a settlement.
3 Not adjudicated; amount owed reflects Cyberlux estimate as settlement conversations are ongoing.
4 Not adjudicated; amount owed reflects Cyberlux estimation based on settlement discussions, particularly around timing of payments.
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-3 Filed 08/04/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 523
entityobservation
HII Mission Technologies Corp.
Read the anchor · page 2
30 May 2025
HII Mission Technologies Corp.
8350 Broad St., Suite 1400,
McLean, VA 22102
Attention: Mr. Tim McAtee, Sr. Director, Subcontracts and Procurement
Subject: Certification of creditor amounts owed
Reference: May 28, 2025 Letter from HII to Cyberlux
Dear Mr. McAtee.
Pursuant to Modification No. 4 to Subcontract No. P000043846 (the “Agreement”) by and between HII Mission Technologies Corp. (“HII”) and Cyberlux Corporation (“Cyberlux”), and in accordance with Section 5(f) of the Agreement, this letter certifies to the amounts Cyberlux owes to the following creditors:
Legalist SPV III, LP – $7,762,932.96 including accrued interest and fees (as of April 30, 2025)
Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community, LLC: Judgement of $912,000.00 [1]
Thin Air Gear: approximately $390,000.00 [2]
AeroTek, Inc.: approximately $200,000 to $250,000 [3]
ARG Group, LLC: $0. There is no amount due ARG Group from Cyberlux
RB Capital Partners: approximately $4,100,000 [4]
We trust that you find this certification in order. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned directly.
Sincerely,
[signature]
Larson Jay Isely
Chief Operating Officer
1 Cyberlux notes the $1.445M Garnishment Summons from the Circuit Court of Fairfax County, Virginia presented to HII on or around March 11, 2025 is for an amount that is greater than the judgement amount included herein. The difference relates to amounts that are still unadjudicated and have not been awarded to the plaintiffs by a court of competent jurisdiction. Cyberlux believes that any final adjudication of the claims will result in aggregate payments that are less than the Garnishment Summons.
2 Not adjudicated; amount owed reflects Cyberlux’s expectations following preliminary conversations between the parties around a settlement.
3 Not adjudicated; amount owed reflects Cyberlux estimate as settlement conversations are ongoing.
4 Not adjudicated; amount owed reflects Cyberlux estimation based on settlement discussions, particularly around timing of payments.
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-3 Filed 08/04/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 523
entityobservation
Legalist SPV III, LP
Read the anchor · page 2
30 May 2025
HII Mission Technologies Corp.
8350 Broad St., Suite 1400,
McLean, VA 22102
Attention: Mr. Tim McAtee, Sr. Director, Subcontracts and Procurement
Subject: Certification of creditor amounts owed
Reference: May 28, 2025 Letter from HII to Cyberlux
Dear Mr. McAtee.
Pursuant to Modification No. 4 to Subcontract No. P000043846 (the “Agreement”) by and between HII Mission Technologies Corp. (“HII”) and Cyberlux Corporation (“Cyberlux”), and in accordance with Section 5(f) of the Agreement, this letter certifies to the amounts Cyberlux owes to the following creditors:
Legalist SPV III, LP – $7,762,932.96 including accrued interest and fees (as of April 30, 2025)
Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community, LLC: Judgement of $912,000.00 [1]
Thin Air Gear: approximately $390,000.00 [2]
AeroTek, Inc.: approximately $200,000 to $250,000 [3]
ARG Group, LLC: $0. There is no amount due ARG Group from Cyberlux
RB Capital Partners: approximately $4,100,000 [4]
We trust that you find this certification in order. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned directly.
Sincerely,
[signature]
Larson Jay Isely
Chief Operating Officer
1 Cyberlux notes the $1.445M Garnishment Summons from the Circuit Court of Fairfax County, Virginia presented to HII on or around March 11, 2025 is for an amount that is greater than the judgement amount included herein. The difference relates to amounts that are still unadjudicated and have not been awarded to the plaintiffs by a court of competent jurisdiction. Cyberlux believes that any final adjudication of the claims will result in aggregate payments that are less than the Garnishment Summons.
2 Not adjudicated; amount owed reflects Cyberlux’s expectations following preliminary conversations between the parties around a settlement.
3 Not adjudicated; amount owed reflects Cyberlux estimate as settlement conversations are ongoing.
4 Not adjudicated; amount owed reflects Cyberlux estimation based on settlement discussions, particularly around timing of payments.
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-3 Filed 08/04/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 523
inferenceinference
The certification distinguishes acknowledged debt from discounted settlement expectations; summing every line as a settled total would erase
The certification distinguishes acknowledged debt from discounted settlement expectations; summing every line as a settled total would erase its express qualifications.
omissiongap
The referenced May28 request, Modification4, creditor agreements and payment records are absent.
Read the anchor · page 1
EXHIBIT 3
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-3 Filed 08/04/25 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 522
otherattribution
Complete supplied 2-page source reviewed at SHA-256 0469276eaa25d31da15298acf55cbeda9015d5a5d35d867b5b9364ad66230a78. Source assertions, ori
Complete supplied 2-page source reviewed at SHA-256 0469276eaa25d31da15298acf55cbeda9015d5a5d35d867b5b9364ad66230a78. Source assertions, original visual features, filing/communication context and identified missing attachments are retained. Exact version_93d5adfba47343ba98ee05f09f42fcb7; SHA256 0469276eaa25d31da15298acf55cbeda9015d5a5d35d867b5b9364ad66230a78. Both pages read, entire substantive page visually inspected and transcribed; August4 filing and May30 authored letter remain distinct.
Read the anchor · page 1
EXHIBIT 3
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-3 Filed 08/04/25 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 522
questionquestion
What creditor acceptances, settlement instruments and subsequent payment ledger reconcile these certified figures with the asserted claims?
distillateallegation
CONNECT
Reviewed relationships
The canvas follows the database: source to DISTIL record, DISTIL record to knowledge object, then reviewed relationship. Position alone means nothing.
The summons states principal$1,572,500, interest$241,742.20, attorneys’ fees$610,346.17, garnishment costs$54,700 and credits$1,034,745.26, correctly producing$1,444,543.11. Judgment-cost and late-fee lines are blank. The printed components are creditor demand figures, not a new adjudication of all fees or a complete payment ledger.supportsThe AWH/SC footnote contrasts the $912,000 judgment with a $1.445 million Fairfax garnishment summons presented to HII around March 11, saying the difference remains unadjudicated and predicting lower aggregate final payments. It does not deny the certified judgment amount or prove the garnishment invalid.
Specific demand matches the rounded1.445million process referenced by the debtor, without resolving its objection.
ARG says HII initially paid Cyberlux $38,700,600 September8,2023 and identifies a $25,769,369.03 final payment; it claims Schmidt acknowledged its entitlement and directed three partial payments totalling$375,000. ARG alleges full performance and unpaid remainder, describing its April24,2025 Durham action and Cyberlux denials. No bank records or underlying answer are attached.qualifiesCyberlux certifies ARG Group $0 and says no amount is due. This is an express debtor denial, not an adjudication extinguishing ARG’s claim.
Cyberlux estimates Thin Air approximately $390,000, AeroTek $200,000–$250,000 and RB Capital approximately $4.1 million. Footnotes call each unadjudicated and tie the amounts to preliminary or ongoing settlement conversations and, for RB, payment timing. These are debtor estimates, not executed settlements or adjudicated totals.qualifiesThe creditor survey describes Thin Air’s $365,049.42 claim with monthly 1.5% late fees and April 30 clerk default; Legalist’s February 7 intervention claiming $7,313,627.17 and $4,364.46 daily fees; Aerotek’s $204,705.45 payroll claim followed by April 11 order for $235,411.27; RB’s $5,686,960 claim; and ARG’s unquantified distributor claim. Clerk default is not itself default judgment; pleaded and ordered figures are not interchangeable.
Later debtor settlement estimates differ from creditor claim survey; neither is a reconciled payable ledger.
The AWH/SC footnote contrasts the $912,000 judgment with a $1.445 million Fairfax garnishment summons presented to HII around March 11, saying the difference remains unadjudicated and predicting lower aggregate final payments. It does not deny the certified judgment amount or prove the garnishment invalid.supportsWhat creditor acceptances, settlement instruments and subsequent payment ledger reconcile these certified figures with the asserted claims?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Cyberlux certifies ARG Group $0 and says no amount is due. This is an express debtor denial, not an adjudication extinguishing ARG’s claim.supportsAre the six lines settled creditor balances?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Cyberlux certifies ARG Group $0 and says no amount is due. This is an express debtor denial, not an adjudication extinguishing ARG’s claim.supportsThe certification distinguishes acknowledged debt from discounted settlement expectations; summing every line as a settled total would erase its express qualifications.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The AWH/SC footnote contrasts the $912,000 judgment with a $1.445 million Fairfax garnishment summons presented to HII around March 11, saying the difference remains unadjudicated and predicting lower aggregate final payments. It does not deny the certified judgment amount or prove the garnishment invalid.supportsThe certification distinguishes acknowledged debt from discounted settlement expectations; summing every line as a settled total would erase its express qualifications.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Cyberlux certifies Legalist SPV III, LP $7,762,932.96 including accrued interest and fees as of April 30, 2025, and Atlantic Wave/Secure Community judgment $912,000.00. These are debtor acknowledgements in a dated certification, not proof that payment occurred.supportsWhat creditor acceptances, settlement instruments and subsequent payment ledger reconcile these certified figures with the asserted claims?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Cyberlux certifies Legalist SPV III, LP $7,762,932.96 including accrued interest and fees as of April 30, 2025, and Atlantic Wave/Secure Community judgment $912,000.00. These are debtor acknowledgements in a dated certification, not proof that payment occurred.supportsAre the six lines settled creditor balances?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The August 4, 2025 federal Exhibit 3 contains Isely’s signed May 30 letter to HII, responding to May 28 correspondence under Modification 4, Subcontract P000043846, section 5(f). Isely signs as Chief Operating Officer. The cited modification and request are not attached.supportsThe referenced May28 request, Modification4, creditor agreements and payment records are absent.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Cyberlux certifies Legalist SPV III, LP $7,762,932.96 including accrued interest and fees as of April 30, 2025, and Atlantic Wave/Secure Community judgment $912,000.00. These are debtor acknowledgements in a dated certification, not proof that payment occurred.supportsThe certification distinguishes acknowledged debt from discounted settlement expectations; summing every line as a settled total would erase its express qualifications.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Cyberlux estimates Thin Air approximately $390,000, AeroTek $200,000–$250,000 and RB Capital approximately $4.1 million. Footnotes call each unadjudicated and tie the amounts to preliminary or ongoing settlement conversations and, for RB, payment timing. These are debtor estimates, not executed settlements or adjudicated totals.supportsWhat creditor acceptances, settlement instruments and subsequent payment ledger reconcile these certified figures with the asserted claims?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Cyberlux estimates Thin Air approximately $390,000, AeroTek $200,000–$250,000 and RB Capital approximately $4.1 million. Footnotes call each unadjudicated and tie the amounts to preliminary or ongoing settlement conversations and, for RB, payment timing. These are debtor estimates, not executed settlements or adjudicated totals.supportsThe certification distinguishes acknowledged debt from discounted settlement expectations; summing every line as a settled total would erase its express qualifications.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Cyberlux estimates Thin Air approximately $390,000, AeroTek $200,000–$250,000 and RB Capital approximately $4.1 million. Footnotes call each unadjudicated and tie the amounts to preliminary or ongoing settlement conversations and, for RB, payment timing. These are debtor estimates, not executed settlements or adjudicated totals.supportsAre the six lines settled creditor balances?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Cyberlux estimates Thin Air approximately $390,000, AeroTek $200,000–$250,000 and RB Capital approximately $4.1 million. Footnotes call each unadjudicated and tie the amounts to preliminary or ongoing settlement conversations and, for RB, payment timing. These are debtor estimates, not executed settlements or adjudicated totals.supportsThe referenced May28 request, Modification4, creditor agreements and payment records are absent.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The AWH/SC footnote contrasts the $912,000 judgment with a $1.445 million Fairfax garnishment summons presented to HII around March 11, saying the difference remains unadjudicated and predicting lower aggregate final payments. It does not deny the certified judgment amount or prove the garnishment invalid.supportsAre the six lines settled creditor balances?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Cyberlux certifies ARG Group $0 and says no amount is due. This is an express debtor denial, not an adjudication extinguishing ARG’s claim.supportsWhat creditor acceptances, settlement instruments and subsequent payment ledger reconcile these certified figures with the asserted claims?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
WEIGH
Explained weighting
A score appears only when its components and change threshold are published.
No published WEIGH run
The active Website Edition contains no applied score snapshot for this source or its connected objects. That means not assessed—not zero.