Each card carries the governed distillate name from the database. Open the quoted anchor before relying on the interpretation.
observationobservation
Richmond CL22-3882 handwritten-4;ECF180-4;June2023 signed entry.
Read the anchor · page 1
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 180-4
Filed 04/15/26
Page 1 of 3 PagelD# 3859
EXHIBIT
VIRGINIA:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC
AND SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC
Plaintiffs,
Case No: CL22-3882 - 4
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually
Defendants.
AMENDED FINAL ORDER AND JUDGEMENT
BEFORE THE COURT is a Motion for Entry of an Amended Final Order and Judgment
by Plaintiffs ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC AND SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC, and
agreed to by Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION and MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually,
and as the authorized representative for CYBERLUX CORPORATION, and
IT APPEARING to the Court that the parties hereto have reached a settlement agreement
that resolves the current need for continuing litigation.
UPON CONSIDERATION of the pleadings, the evidence, argument of counsel, the
consent of the parties, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and
DECREED that judgement is GRANTED in favor of Plaintiffs ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS,
LLC and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC, and against Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION
and MARK D. SCHMIDT, jointly and severally, as follows:
The Court awards Plaintiffs the sum of ONE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED
SEVENTY-TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1,572,500) in
compensatory damages, jointly and severally, against Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 180-4
Filed 04/15/26
Page 1 of 3 PagelD# 3859
EXHIBIT
VIRGINIA:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC
AND SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC
Plaintiffs,
Case No: CL22-3882 - 4
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually
Defendants.
AMENDED FINAL ORDER AND JUDGEMENT
BEFORE THE COURT is a Motion for Entry of an Amended Final Order and Judgment
by Plaintiffs ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC AND SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC, and
agreed to by Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION and MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually,
and as the authorized representative for CYBERLUX CORPORATION, and
IT APPEARING to the Court that the parties hereto have reached a settlement agreement
that resolves the current need for continuing litigation.
UPON CONSIDERATION of the pleadings, the evidence, argument of counsel, the
consent of the parties, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and
DECREED that judgement is GRANTED in favor of Plaintiffs ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS,
LLC and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC, and against Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION
and MARK D. SCHMIDT, jointly and severally, as follows:
The Court awards Plaintiffs the sum of ONE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED
SEVENTY-TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1,572,500) in
compensatory damages, jointly and severally, against Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION
claimallegation
ECF180-4, filed15 April2026, reproduces a three-page Amended Final Order and Judgement in Richmond CL22-3882 with handwritten suffix-4. The
ECF180-4, filed15 April2026, reproduces a three-page Amended Final Order and Judgement in Richmond CL22-3882 with handwritten suffix-4. The order bears Judge Jacqueline S. McClenney’s signature and clerk-copy attestation; June2023 entry is handwritten, with day appearing22 but requiring certified-docket confirmation rather than OCR certainty.
Read the anchor · page 1
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 180-4
Filed 04/15/26
Page 1 of 3 PagelD# 3859
EXHIBIT
VIRGINIA:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC
AND SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC
Plaintiffs,
Case No: CL22-3882 - 4
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually
Defendants.
AMENDED FINAL ORDER AND JUDGEMENT
BEFORE THE COURT is a Motion for Entry of an Amended Final Order and Judgment
by Plaintiffs ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC AND SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC, and
agreed to by Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION and MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually,
and as the authorized representative for CYBERLUX CORPORATION, and
IT APPEARING to the Court that the parties hereto have reached a settlement agreement
that resolves the current need for continuing litigation.
UPON CONSIDERATION of the pleadings, the evidence, argument of counsel, the
consent of the parties, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and
DECREED that judgement is GRANTED in favor of Plaintiffs ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS,
LLC and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC, and against Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION
and MARK D. SCHMIDT, jointly and severally, as follows:
The Court awards Plaintiffs the sum of ONE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED
SEVENTY-TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1,572,500) in
compensatory damages, jointly and severally, against Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION
claimallegation
The Court grants Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community, LLC$1,572,500 compensatory damages jointly and severally against Cyberlux
The Court grants Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community, LLC$1,572,500 compensatory damages jointly and severally against Cyberlux Corporation and Mark D. Schmidt. It records parties’ consent and a separate settlement resolving the current need for litigation. This is an awarded historical amount, not an account of later unpaid balance.
Read the anchor · page 1
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 180-4
Filed 04/15/26
Page 1 of 3 PagelD# 3859
EXHIBIT
VIRGINIA:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC
AND SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC
Plaintiffs,
Case No: CL22-3882 - 4
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually
Defendants.
AMENDED FINAL ORDER AND JUDGEMENT
BEFORE THE COURT is a Motion for Entry of an Amended Final Order and Judgment
by Plaintiffs ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC AND SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC, and
agreed to by Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION and MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually,
and as the authorized representative for CYBERLUX CORPORATION, and
IT APPEARING to the Court that the parties hereto have reached a settlement agreement
that resolves the current need for continuing litigation.
UPON CONSIDERATION of the pleadings, the evidence, argument of counsel, the
consent of the parties, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and
DECREED that judgement is GRANTED in favor of Plaintiffs ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS,
LLC and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC, and against Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION
and MARK D. SCHMIDT, jointly and severally, as follows:
The Court awards Plaintiffs the sum of ONE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED
SEVENTY-TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1,572,500) in
compensatory damages, jointly and severally, against Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION
claimallegation
Paragraphc awards costs including reasonable attorney fees of$177,126.19, plus sanctions$3,895 and$6,842.50, and12% annual post-judgment int
Paragraphc awards costs including reasonable attorney fees of$177,126.19, plus sanctions$3,895 and$6,842.50, and12% annual post-judgment interest from entry on damages incurred. The affidavits and previous sanctions orders are referenced but absent. The interest base should be derived from operative wording and later rulings, not silently assumed to include every component.
Read the anchor · page 2
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 180-4 Filed 04/15/26 Page 2 of 3 PagelD# 3860
and MARK D. SCHMIDT, to resolve the claims alleged in Plaintiffs' Complaint and certain other
claims as agreed to by the parties pursuant to the parties' separate agreement.
b.
The parties agree that this Final Judgement shall not be dischargeable in bankruptcy
to the fullest extent permissible at law, and Defendants hereby waive all rights of reconsideration
or appeal. Nor shall it be subject to any contribution or reduced through the payments) of any
other parties in this matter. Rather it shall be the sole obligation of Defendants.
c.
That the Plaintiffs be awarded all of their costs, including reasonable attorney's fees
of $177,126.19 per the parties' settlement agreement, evidenced by affidavits, and consented to by
defendants, plus sanctions of $3,895.00 and $6,842.50, as provided by the Court's previous Orders,
and post judgment interest at the rate of 12% per annum, as provided in the parties' agreement,
from the date of entry of this order on the damages incurred in this matter.
d.
That the parties have agreed to a security interest and lien interest in all property of
Defendants in favor of Plaintiffs until all sums are paid, and such security interest may be further
memorialized through the filing of appropriate UCC-1 forms and the filing of appropriate Liens.
e.
Plaintiffs' Complaint is hereby dismissed without prejudice. THIS CAUSE IS
ENDED.
ENTERED this L_ day of
→ 2023.
ши
Hon/ Jacqueline S. McClenney, Presiding Judge
Cireuit Court for the City of Richmond
Teste: EDWARD F JEWETT, CLERK
[Visual: judge signature at Jacqueline S. McClenney block; clerk-copy attestation signed. Entry month June2023; handwritten day appears22, not conclusively resolved from this copy.]
claimallegation
Paragraphb records the parties’ agreement to nondischargeability to the fullest extent permissible at law, defendants’ waiver of reconsidera
Paragraphb records the parties’ agreement to nondischargeability to the fullest extent permissible at law, defendants’ waiver of reconsideration/appeal, and language against contribution or reduction through other parties’ payments. It does not contain an independent bankruptcy-court adjudication or establish how later credits must be treated.
Read the anchor · page 2
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 180-4 Filed 04/15/26 Page 2 of 3 PagelD# 3860
and MARK D. SCHMIDT, to resolve the claims alleged in Plaintiffs' Complaint and certain other
claims as agreed to by the parties pursuant to the parties' separate agreement.
b.
The parties agree that this Final Judgement shall not be dischargeable in bankruptcy
to the fullest extent permissible at law, and Defendants hereby waive all rights of reconsideration
or appeal. Nor shall it be subject to any contribution or reduced through the payments) of any
other parties in this matter. Rather it shall be the sole obligation of Defendants.
c.
That the Plaintiffs be awarded all of their costs, including reasonable attorney's fees
of $177,126.19 per the parties' settlement agreement, evidenced by affidavits, and consented to by
defendants, plus sanctions of $3,895.00 and $6,842.50, as provided by the Court's previous Orders,
and post judgment interest at the rate of 12% per annum, as provided in the parties' agreement,
from the date of entry of this order on the damages incurred in this matter.
d.
That the parties have agreed to a security interest and lien interest in all property of
Defendants in favor of Plaintiffs until all sums are paid, and such security interest may be further
memorialized through the filing of appropriate UCC-1 forms and the filing of appropriate Liens.
e.
Plaintiffs' Complaint is hereby dismissed without prejudice. THIS CAUSE IS
ENDED.
ENTERED this L_ day of
→ 2023.
ши
Hon/ Jacqueline S. McClenney, Presiding Judge
Cireuit Court for the City of Richmond
Teste: EDWARD F JEWETT, CLERK
[Visual: judge signature at Jacqueline S. McClenney block; clerk-copy attestation signed. Entry month June2023; handwritten day appears22, not conclusively resolved from this copy.]
claimallegation
Paragraphd records a security/lien interest in all defendants’ property until all sums are paid, allowing further UCC-1/lien memorialisation
Paragraphd records a security/lien interest in all defendants’ property until all sums are paid, allowing further UCC-1/lien memorialisation. No filing, perfection date or priority over competing claimants is demonstrated by this copy alone.
Read the anchor · page 2
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 180-4 Filed 04/15/26 Page 2 of 3 PagelD# 3860
and MARK D. SCHMIDT, to resolve the claims alleged in Plaintiffs' Complaint and certain other
claims as agreed to by the parties pursuant to the parties' separate agreement.
b.
The parties agree that this Final Judgement shall not be dischargeable in bankruptcy
to the fullest extent permissible at law, and Defendants hereby waive all rights of reconsideration
or appeal. Nor shall it be subject to any contribution or reduced through the payments) of any
other parties in this matter. Rather it shall be the sole obligation of Defendants.
c.
That the Plaintiffs be awarded all of their costs, including reasonable attorney's fees
of $177,126.19 per the parties' settlement agreement, evidenced by affidavits, and consented to by
defendants, plus sanctions of $3,895.00 and $6,842.50, as provided by the Court's previous Orders,
and post judgment interest at the rate of 12% per annum, as provided in the parties' agreement,
from the date of entry of this order on the damages incurred in this matter.
d.
That the parties have agreed to a security interest and lien interest in all property of
Defendants in favor of Plaintiffs until all sums are paid, and such security interest may be further
memorialized through the filing of appropriate UCC-1 forms and the filing of appropriate Liens.
e.
Plaintiffs' Complaint is hereby dismissed without prejudice. THIS CAUSE IS
ENDED.
ENTERED this L_ day of
→ 2023.
ши
Hon/ Jacqueline S. McClenney, Presiding Judge
Cireuit Court for the City of Richmond
Teste: EDWARD F JEWETT, CLERK
[Visual: judge signature at Jacqueline S. McClenney block; clerk-copy attestation signed. Entry month June2023; handwritten day appears22, not conclusively resolved from this copy.]
claimallegation
Paragraphe dismisses Plaintiffs’ Complaint without prejudice and ends the cause. The dismissal coexists with the money judgment and is not a
Paragraphe dismisses Plaintiffs’ Complaint without prejudice and ends the cause. The dismissal coexists with the money judgment and is not a cancellation or satisfaction of the award.
Read the anchor · page 2
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 180-4 Filed 04/15/26 Page 2 of 3 PagelD# 3860
and MARK D. SCHMIDT, to resolve the claims alleged in Plaintiffs' Complaint and certain other
claims as agreed to by the parties pursuant to the parties' separate agreement.
b.
The parties agree that this Final Judgement shall not be dischargeable in bankruptcy
to the fullest extent permissible at law, and Defendants hereby waive all rights of reconsideration
or appeal. Nor shall it be subject to any contribution or reduced through the payments) of any
other parties in this matter. Rather it shall be the sole obligation of Defendants.
c.
That the Plaintiffs be awarded all of their costs, including reasonable attorney's fees
of $177,126.19 per the parties' settlement agreement, evidenced by affidavits, and consented to by
defendants, plus sanctions of $3,895.00 and $6,842.50, as provided by the Court's previous Orders,
and post judgment interest at the rate of 12% per annum, as provided in the parties' agreement,
from the date of entry of this order on the damages incurred in this matter.
d.
That the parties have agreed to a security interest and lien interest in all property of
Defendants in favor of Plaintiffs until all sums are paid, and such security interest may be further
memorialized through the filing of appropriate UCC-1 forms and the filing of appropriate Liens.
e.
Plaintiffs' Complaint is hereby dismissed without prejudice. THIS CAUSE IS
ENDED.
ENTERED this L_ day of
→ 2023.
ши
Hon/ Jacqueline S. McClenney, Presiding Judge
Cireuit Court for the City of Richmond
Teste: EDWARD F JEWETT, CLERK
[Visual: judge signature at Jacqueline S. McClenney block; clerk-copy attestation signed. Entry month June2023; handwritten day appears22, not conclusively resolved from this copy.]
claimallegation
The request endorsement lists W. Benjamin Pace and Justin S. Feinman of Williams Mullen as plaintiffs’ counsel. Seen-and-agreed signatures a
The request endorsement lists W. Benjamin Pace and Justin S. Feinman of Williams Mullen as plaintiffs’ counsel. Seen-and-agreed signatures appear for Schmidt individually/as Cyberlux president and Charles Watts Jr as special counsel for defendants. These support recorded consent, without independently authenticating every signature.
Read the anchor · page 3
Case3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document180-4 Filed04/15/26 Page3of3 PageID3861.
WE ASK FOR THIS: [signature at counsel block] W. Benjamin Pace (VSB No.48633); Justin S. Feinman (VSB No.88511); WILLIAMS MULLEN, PC;200 South10th Street,16th Floor,Richmond,Virginia23219;804.420.6442;wpace@williamsmullen.com;jfeinman@williamsmullen.com;Counsel for Plaintiffs.
SEEN and AGREED: [visible Mark D. Schmidt signature] Mark D. Schmidt and Cyberlux Corporation;800 Park Offices Drive,Suite3209,Research Triangle Park,NC27709;by Mark D. Schmidt, individually and as President of Cyberlux Corporation.
[Visible signature] Charles Watts, Jr, in his capacity as Special Counsel for Cyberlux Corporation and Mark D. Schmidt.
[Original printed page15.]
claimallegation
The awarded principal matches the$1,572,500 settlement principal reviewed in queue56; awarded$177,126.19 costs differ from the settlement’s$
The awarded principal matches the$1,572,500 settlement principal reviewed in queue56; awarded$177,126.19 costs differ from the settlement’s$188,700 cap because a cap is not itself an award. Separate sanctions remain additional components. The principal must not be added again as a second independent debt when linking settlement and judgment.
Read the anchor · page 1
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 180-4
Filed 04/15/26
Page 1 of 3 PagelD# 3859
EXHIBIT
VIRGINIA:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC
AND SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC
Plaintiffs,
Case No: CL22-3882 - 4
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually
Defendants.
AMENDED FINAL ORDER AND JUDGEMENT
BEFORE THE COURT is a Motion for Entry of an Amended Final Order and Judgment
by Plaintiffs ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC AND SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC, and
agreed to by Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION and MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually,
and as the authorized representative for CYBERLUX CORPORATION, and
IT APPEARING to the Court that the parties hereto have reached a settlement agreement
that resolves the current need for continuing litigation.
UPON CONSIDERATION of the pleadings, the evidence, argument of counsel, the
consent of the parties, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and
DECREED that judgement is GRANTED in favor of Plaintiffs ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS,
LLC and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC, and against Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION
and MARK D. SCHMIDT, jointly and severally, as follows:
The Court awards Plaintiffs the sum of ONE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED
SEVENTY-TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1,572,500) in
compensatory damages, jointly and severally, against Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION
entityobservation
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC
Read the anchor · page 1
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 180-4
Filed 04/15/26
Page 1 of 3 PagelD# 3859
EXHIBIT
VIRGINIA:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC
AND SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC
Plaintiffs,
Case No: CL22-3882 - 4
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually
Defendants.
AMENDED FINAL ORDER AND JUDGEMENT
BEFORE THE COURT is a Motion for Entry of an Amended Final Order and Judgment
by Plaintiffs ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC AND SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC, and
agreed to by Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION and MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually,
and as the authorized representative for CYBERLUX CORPORATION, and
IT APPEARING to the Court that the parties hereto have reached a settlement agreement
that resolves the current need for continuing litigation.
UPON CONSIDERATION of the pleadings, the evidence, argument of counsel, the
consent of the parties, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and
DECREED that judgement is GRANTED in favor of Plaintiffs ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS,
LLC and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC, and against Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION
and MARK D. SCHMIDT, jointly and severally, as follows:
The Court awards Plaintiffs the sum of ONE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED
SEVENTY-TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1,572,500) in
compensatory damages, jointly and severally, against Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION
entityobservation
SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC
Read the anchor · page 1
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 180-4
Filed 04/15/26
Page 1 of 3 PagelD# 3859
EXHIBIT
VIRGINIA:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC
AND SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC
Plaintiffs,
Case No: CL22-3882 - 4
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually
Defendants.
AMENDED FINAL ORDER AND JUDGEMENT
BEFORE THE COURT is a Motion for Entry of an Amended Final Order and Judgment
by Plaintiffs ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC AND SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC, and
agreed to by Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION and MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually,
and as the authorized representative for CYBERLUX CORPORATION, and
IT APPEARING to the Court that the parties hereto have reached a settlement agreement
that resolves the current need for continuing litigation.
UPON CONSIDERATION of the pleadings, the evidence, argument of counsel, the
consent of the parties, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and
DECREED that judgement is GRANTED in favor of Plaintiffs ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS,
LLC and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC, and against Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION
and MARK D. SCHMIDT, jointly and severally, as follows:
The Court awards Plaintiffs the sum of ONE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED
SEVENTY-TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1,572,500) in
compensatory damages, jointly and severally, against Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION
entityobservation
CYBERLUX CORPORATION
Read the anchor · page 1
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 180-4
Filed 04/15/26
Page 1 of 3 PagelD# 3859
EXHIBIT
VIRGINIA:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC
AND SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC
Plaintiffs,
Case No: CL22-3882 - 4
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually
Defendants.
AMENDED FINAL ORDER AND JUDGEMENT
BEFORE THE COURT is a Motion for Entry of an Amended Final Order and Judgment
by Plaintiffs ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC AND SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC, and
agreed to by Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION and MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually,
and as the authorized representative for CYBERLUX CORPORATION, and
IT APPEARING to the Court that the parties hereto have reached a settlement agreement
that resolves the current need for continuing litigation.
UPON CONSIDERATION of the pleadings, the evidence, argument of counsel, the
consent of the parties, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and
DECREED that judgement is GRANTED in favor of Plaintiffs ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS,
LLC and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC, and against Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION
and MARK D. SCHMIDT, jointly and severally, as follows:
The Court awards Plaintiffs the sum of ONE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED
SEVENTY-TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1,572,500) in
compensatory damages, jointly and severally, against Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION
entityobservation
MARK D. SCHMIDT
Read the anchor · page 1
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 180-4
Filed 04/15/26
Page 1 of 3 PagelD# 3859
EXHIBIT
VIRGINIA:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC
AND SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC
Plaintiffs,
Case No: CL22-3882 - 4
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually
Defendants.
AMENDED FINAL ORDER AND JUDGEMENT
BEFORE THE COURT is a Motion for Entry of an Amended Final Order and Judgment
by Plaintiffs ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC AND SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC, and
agreed to by Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION and MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually,
and as the authorized representative for CYBERLUX CORPORATION, and
IT APPEARING to the Court that the parties hereto have reached a settlement agreement
that resolves the current need for continuing litigation.
UPON CONSIDERATION of the pleadings, the evidence, argument of counsel, the
consent of the parties, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and
DECREED that judgement is GRANTED in favor of Plaintiffs ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS,
LLC and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC, and against Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION
and MARK D. SCHMIDT, jointly and severally, as follows:
The Court awards Plaintiffs the sum of ONE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED
SEVENTY-TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1,572,500) in
compensatory damages, jointly and severally, against Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION
entityobservation
Jacqueline S. McClenney
Read the anchor · page 2
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 180-4 Filed 04/15/26 Page 2 of 3 PagelD# 3860
and MARK D. SCHMIDT, to resolve the claims alleged in Plaintiffs' Complaint and certain other
claims as agreed to by the parties pursuant to the parties' separate agreement.
b.
The parties agree that this Final Judgement shall not be dischargeable in bankruptcy
to the fullest extent permissible at law, and Defendants hereby waive all rights of reconsideration
or appeal. Nor shall it be subject to any contribution or reduced through the payments) of any
other parties in this matter. Rather it shall be the sole obligation of Defendants.
c.
That the Plaintiffs be awarded all of their costs, including reasonable attorney's fees
of $177,126.19 per the parties' settlement agreement, evidenced by affidavits, and consented to by
defendants, plus sanctions of $3,895.00 and $6,842.50, as provided by the Court's previous Orders,
and post judgment interest at the rate of 12% per annum, as provided in the parties' agreement,
from the date of entry of this order on the damages incurred in this matter.
d.
That the parties have agreed to a security interest and lien interest in all property of
Defendants in favor of Plaintiffs until all sums are paid, and such security interest may be further
memorialized through the filing of appropriate UCC-1 forms and the filing of appropriate Liens.
e.
Plaintiffs' Complaint is hereby dismissed without prejudice. THIS CAUSE IS
ENDED.
ENTERED this L_ day of
→ 2023.
ши
Hon/ Jacqueline S. McClenney, Presiding Judge
Cireuit Court for the City of Richmond
Teste: EDWARD F JEWETT, CLERK
[Visual: judge signature at Jacqueline S. McClenney block; clerk-copy attestation signed. Entry month June2023; handwritten day appears22, not conclusively resolved from this copy.]
entityobservation
W. Benjamin Pace
Read the anchor · page 3
Case3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document180-4 Filed04/15/26 Page3of3 PageID3861.
WE ASK FOR THIS: [signature at counsel block] W. Benjamin Pace (VSB No.48633); Justin S. Feinman (VSB No.88511); WILLIAMS MULLEN, PC;200 South10th Street,16th Floor,Richmond,Virginia23219;804.420.6442;wpace@williamsmullen.com;jfeinman@williamsmullen.com;Counsel for Plaintiffs.
SEEN and AGREED: [visible Mark D. Schmidt signature] Mark D. Schmidt and Cyberlux Corporation;800 Park Offices Drive,Suite3209,Research Triangle Park,NC27709;by Mark D. Schmidt, individually and as President of Cyberlux Corporation.
[Visible signature] Charles Watts, Jr, in his capacity as Special Counsel for Cyberlux Corporation and Mark D. Schmidt.
[Original printed page15.]
entityobservation
Justin S. Feinman
Read the anchor · page 3
Case3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document180-4 Filed04/15/26 Page3of3 PageID3861.
WE ASK FOR THIS: [signature at counsel block] W. Benjamin Pace (VSB No.48633); Justin S. Feinman (VSB No.88511); WILLIAMS MULLEN, PC;200 South10th Street,16th Floor,Richmond,Virginia23219;804.420.6442;wpace@williamsmullen.com;jfeinman@williamsmullen.com;Counsel for Plaintiffs.
SEEN and AGREED: [visible Mark D. Schmidt signature] Mark D. Schmidt and Cyberlux Corporation;800 Park Offices Drive,Suite3209,Research Triangle Park,NC27709;by Mark D. Schmidt, individually and as President of Cyberlux Corporation.
[Visible signature] Charles Watts, Jr, in his capacity as Special Counsel for Cyberlux Corporation and Mark D. Schmidt.
[Original printed page15.]
entityobservation
Charles Watts, Jr
Read the anchor · page 3
Case3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document180-4 Filed04/15/26 Page3of3 PageID3861.
WE ASK FOR THIS: [signature at counsel block] W. Benjamin Pace (VSB No.48633); Justin S. Feinman (VSB No.88511); WILLIAMS MULLEN, PC;200 South10th Street,16th Floor,Richmond,Virginia23219;804.420.6442;wpace@williamsmullen.com;jfeinman@williamsmullen.com;Counsel for Plaintiffs.
SEEN and AGREED: [visible Mark D. Schmidt signature] Mark D. Schmidt and Cyberlux Corporation;800 Park Offices Drive,Suite3209,Research Triangle Park,NC27709;by Mark D. Schmidt, individually and as President of Cyberlux Corporation.
[Visible signature] Charles Watts, Jr, in his capacity as Special Counsel for Cyberlux Corporation and Mark D. Schmidt.
[Original printed page15.]
eventattribution
Signed order entered in June2023; handwritten day appears22, confirmation pending.
Read the anchor · page 2
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 180-4 Filed 04/15/26 Page 2 of 3 PagelD# 3860
and MARK D. SCHMIDT, to resolve the claims alleged in Plaintiffs' Complaint and certain other
claims as agreed to by the parties pursuant to the parties' separate agreement.
b.
The parties agree that this Final Judgement shall not be dischargeable in bankruptcy
to the fullest extent permissible at law, and Defendants hereby waive all rights of reconsideration
or appeal. Nor shall it be subject to any contribution or reduced through the payments) of any
other parties in this matter. Rather it shall be the sole obligation of Defendants.
c.
That the Plaintiffs be awarded all of their costs, including reasonable attorney's fees
of $177,126.19 per the parties' settlement agreement, evidenced by affidavits, and consented to by
defendants, plus sanctions of $3,895.00 and $6,842.50, as provided by the Court's previous Orders,
and post judgment interest at the rate of 12% per annum, as provided in the parties' agreement,
from the date of entry of this order on the damages incurred in this matter.
d.
That the parties have agreed to a security interest and lien interest in all property of
Defendants in favor of Plaintiffs until all sums are paid, and such security interest may be further
memorialized through the filing of appropriate UCC-1 forms and the filing of appropriate Liens.
e.
Plaintiffs' Complaint is hereby dismissed without prejudice. THIS CAUSE IS
ENDED.
ENTERED this L_ day of
→ 2023.
ши
Hon/ Jacqueline S. McClenney, Presiding Judge
Cireuit Court for the City of Richmond
Teste: EDWARD F JEWETT, CLERK
[Visual: judge signature at Jacqueline S. McClenney block; clerk-copy attestation signed. Entry month June2023; handwritten day appears22, not conclusively resolved from this copy.]
eventattribution
Order copy filed as ECF180-4.
Read the anchor · page 1
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 180-4
Filed 04/15/26
Page 1 of 3 PagelD# 3859
EXHIBIT
VIRGINIA:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC
AND SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC
Plaintiffs,
Case No: CL22-3882 - 4
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually
Defendants.
AMENDED FINAL ORDER AND JUDGEMENT
BEFORE THE COURT is a Motion for Entry of an Amended Final Order and Judgment
by Plaintiffs ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC AND SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC, and
agreed to by Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION and MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually,
and as the authorized representative for CYBERLUX CORPORATION, and
IT APPEARING to the Court that the parties hereto have reached a settlement agreement
that resolves the current need for continuing litigation.
UPON CONSIDERATION of the pleadings, the evidence, argument of counsel, the
consent of the parties, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and
DECREED that judgement is GRANTED in favor of Plaintiffs ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS,
LLC and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC, and against Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION
and MARK D. SCHMIDT, jointly and severally, as follows:
The Court awards Plaintiffs the sum of ONE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED
SEVENTY-TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1,572,500) in
compensatory damages, jointly and severally, against Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION
inferenceinference
Settlement principal and judgment principal represent linked stages of the same obligation, not additive recoveries. Costs award, sanctions,
Settlement principal and judgment principal represent linked stages of the same obligation, not additive recoveries. Costs award, sanctions, interest and later credits require a component ledger.
inferenceinference
An entered award and collateral-recognition wording do not resolve current satisfaction or competing priority in a later interpleader.
otherattribution
Complete supplied 3-page source reviewed at SHA-256 183827948643039c2fac6c24809b93ff6da11fefc4032e7873448198c09cb78f. Source assertions, ori
Complete supplied 3-page source reviewed at SHA-256 183827948643039c2fac6c24809b93ff6da11fefc4032e7873448198c09cb78f. Source assertions, original visual features, filing/communication context and identified missing attachments are retained. All three native-stamp pages, own full images and page2 entry-detail crop read. Fingerprinted Vision OCR compared to images; signatures, financial amounts and handwritten-date uncertainty preserved. Compared principal/cap to own accepted queue56 review, not independent new-debt evidence.
Read the anchor · page 1
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 180-4
Filed 04/15/26
Page 1 of 3 PagelD# 3859
EXHIBIT
VIRGINIA:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC
AND SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC
Plaintiffs,
Case No: CL22-3882 - 4
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually
Defendants.
AMENDED FINAL ORDER AND JUDGEMENT
BEFORE THE COURT is a Motion for Entry of an Amended Final Order and Judgment
by Plaintiffs ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC AND SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC, and
agreed to by Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION and MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually,
and as the authorized representative for CYBERLUX CORPORATION, and
IT APPEARING to the Court that the parties hereto have reached a settlement agreement
that resolves the current need for continuing litigation.
UPON CONSIDERATION of the pleadings, the evidence, argument of counsel, the
consent of the parties, and for good cause shown, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and
DECREED that judgement is GRANTED in favor of Plaintiffs ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS,
LLC and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC, and against Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION
and MARK D. SCHMIDT, jointly and severally, as follows:
The Court awards Plaintiffs the sum of ONE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED
SEVENTY-TWO THOUSAND AND FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($1,572,500) in
compensatory damages, jointly and severally, against Defendants CYBERLUX CORPORATION
questionquestion
What certified docket confirms the handwritten entry day and any later amendment, satisfaction or interest-base ruling?
questionquestion
What dated payment/credit ledger reconciles principal, fees, sanctions and interest without double counting settlement amounts?
questionquestion
Which actual lien/UCC filings and property-title records establish perfection, collateral ownership and competing priority?
distillatequestion
CONNECT
Reviewed relationships
The canvas follows the database: source to DISTIL record, DISTIL record to knowledge object, then reviewed relationship. Position alone means nothing.
The Court grants Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community, LLC$1,572,500 compensatory damages jointly and severally against Cyberlux Corporation and Mark D. Schmidt. It records parties’ consent and a separate settlement resolving the current need for litigation. This is an awarded historical amount, not an account of later unpaid balance.referencesSection2 specifies$1,200,000 IP consideration less$277,500 paid=$922,500 balance, plus$650,000 consulting balance, total$1,572,500 plus4(d)costs. Defendants promise simultaneous endorsement of immediate joint-and-several consent judgment. Referenced ExhibitA/entered judgment is absent from this12-page filing despite browser print footers1–11of15.
Same principal and parties link accepted queue56 settlement to this judgment; no duplicate debt.
Paragraphe dismisses Plaintiffs’ Complaint without prejudice and ends the cause. The dismissal coexists with the money judgment and is not a cancellation or satisfaction of the award.supportsWhat certified docket confirms the handwritten entry day and any later amendment, satisfaction or interest-base ruling?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Paragraphc awards costs including reasonable attorney fees of$177,126.19, plus sanctions$3,895 and$6,842.50, and12% annual post-judgment interest from entry on damages incurred. The affidavits and previous sanctions orders are referenced but absent. The interest base should be derived from operative wording and later rulings, not silently assumed to include every component.supportsWhat dated payment/credit ledger reconciles principal, fees, sanctions and interest without double counting settlement amounts?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Paragraphd records a security/lien interest in all defendants’ property until all sums are paid, allowing further UCC-1/lien memorialisation. No filing, perfection date or priority over competing claimants is demonstrated by this copy alone.supportsWhich actual lien/UCC filings and property-title records establish perfection, collateral ownership and competing priority?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Paragraphc awards costs including reasonable attorney fees of$177,126.19, plus sanctions$3,895 and$6,842.50, and12% annual post-judgment interest from entry on damages incurred. The affidavits and previous sanctions orders are referenced but absent. The interest base should be derived from operative wording and later rulings, not silently assumed to include every component.supportsWhat certified docket confirms the handwritten entry day and any later amendment, satisfaction or interest-base ruling?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Paragraphe dismisses Plaintiffs’ Complaint without prejudice and ends the cause. The dismissal coexists with the money judgment and is not a cancellation or satisfaction of the award.supportsAn entered award and collateral-recognition wording do not resolve current satisfaction or competing priority in a later interpleader.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The Court grants Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community, LLC$1,572,500 compensatory damages jointly and severally against Cyberlux Corporation and Mark D. Schmidt. It records parties’ consent and a separate settlement resolving the current need for litigation. This is an awarded historical amount, not an account of later unpaid balance.supportsSettlement principal and judgment principal represent linked stages of the same obligation, not additive recoveries. Costs award, sanctions, interest and later credits require a component ledger.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Paragraphc awards costs including reasonable attorney fees of$177,126.19, plus sanctions$3,895 and$6,842.50, and12% annual post-judgment interest from entry on damages incurred. The affidavits and previous sanctions orders are referenced but absent. The interest base should be derived from operative wording and later rulings, not silently assumed to include every component.supportsSettlement principal and judgment principal represent linked stages of the same obligation, not additive recoveries. Costs award, sanctions, interest and later credits require a component ledger.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The awarded principal matches the$1,572,500 settlement principal reviewed in queue56; awarded$177,126.19 costs differ from the settlement’s$188,700 cap because a cap is not itself an award. Separate sanctions remain additional components. The principal must not be added again as a second independent debt when linking settlement and judgment.supportsSettlement principal and judgment principal represent linked stages of the same obligation, not additive recoveries. Costs award, sanctions, interest and later credits require a component ledger.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
ECF180-4, filed15 April2026, reproduces a three-page Amended Final Order and Judgement in Richmond CL22-3882 with handwritten suffix-4. The order bears Judge Jacqueline S. McClenney’s signature and clerk-copy attestation; June2023 entry is handwritten, with day appearing22 but requiring certified-docket confirmation rather than OCR certainty.supportsWhat did this order award, and what remains unproved?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
ECF180-4, filed15 April2026, reproduces a three-page Amended Final Order and Judgement in Richmond CL22-3882 with handwritten suffix-4. The order bears Judge Jacqueline S. McClenney’s signature and clerk-copy attestation; June2023 entry is handwritten, with day appearing22 but requiring certified-docket confirmation rather than OCR certainty.supportsWhat certified docket confirms the handwritten entry day and any later amendment, satisfaction or interest-base ruling?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The awarded principal matches the$1,572,500 settlement principal reviewed in queue56; awarded$177,126.19 costs differ from the settlement’s$188,700 cap because a cap is not itself an award. Separate sanctions remain additional components. The principal must not be added again as a second independent debt when linking settlement and judgment.supportsWhat dated payment/credit ledger reconciles principal, fees, sanctions and interest without double counting settlement amounts?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Paragraphe dismisses Plaintiffs’ Complaint without prejudice and ends the cause. The dismissal coexists with the money judgment and is not a cancellation or satisfaction of the award.supportsWhat did this order award, and what remains unproved?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Paragraphd records a security/lien interest in all defendants’ property until all sums are paid, allowing further UCC-1/lien memorialisation. No filing, perfection date or priority over competing claimants is demonstrated by this copy alone.supportsAn entered award and collateral-recognition wording do not resolve current satisfaction or competing priority in a later interpleader.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The Court grants Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community, LLC$1,572,500 compensatory damages jointly and severally against Cyberlux Corporation and Mark D. Schmidt. It records parties’ consent and a separate settlement resolving the current need for litigation. This is an awarded historical amount, not an account of later unpaid balance.supportsAn entered award and collateral-recognition wording do not resolve current satisfaction or competing priority in a later interpleader.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Paragraphc awards costs including reasonable attorney fees of$177,126.19, plus sanctions$3,895 and$6,842.50, and12% annual post-judgment interest from entry on damages incurred. The affidavits and previous sanctions orders are referenced but absent. The interest base should be derived from operative wording and later rulings, not silently assumed to include every component.supportsWhat did this order award, and what remains unproved?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The Court grants Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community, LLC$1,572,500 compensatory damages jointly and severally against Cyberlux Corporation and Mark D. Schmidt. It records parties’ consent and a separate settlement resolving the current need for litigation. This is an awarded historical amount, not an account of later unpaid balance.supportsWhat did this order award, and what remains unproved?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The Court grants Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community, LLC$1,572,500 compensatory damages jointly and severally against Cyberlux Corporation and Mark D. Schmidt. It records parties’ consent and a separate settlement resolving the current need for litigation. This is an awarded historical amount, not an account of later unpaid balance.supportsWhat dated payment/credit ledger reconciles principal, fees, sanctions and interest without double counting settlement amounts?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Paragraphd records a security/lien interest in all defendants’ property until all sums are paid, allowing further UCC-1/lien memorialisation. No filing, perfection date or priority over competing claimants is demonstrated by this copy alone.supportsWhat did this order award, and what remains unproved?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
WEIGH
Explained weighting
A score appears only when its components and change threshold are published.
No published WEIGH run
The active Website Edition contains no applied score snapshot for this source or its connected objects. That means not assessed—not zero.