The evidence/CXF-S-1CEFFC5CA279

Context source · CXF-S-1CEFFC5CA279

Defendants’ designation of clerk’s record — 46-tab appellate reference map

Original sourceFiled July 1, 2025 designation notice in Harris County 2024-48085; index of requested record contents, not the 2,230-page record itself.
Open full document ↗
SHA-256 1ceffc5ca2793c4240a7…7 pages · 195 KB

DISTILLATES

What the source contains

Each card carries the governed distillate name from the database. Open the quoted anchor before relying on the interpretation.

claimallegation

Cyberlux and Schmidt file this designation of the clerk’s record on July 1, 2025 at 2:30 PM, signed /s/ Alexander J. Pennetti, with counsel’

Cyberlux and Schmidt file this designation of the clerk’s record on July 1, 2025 at 2:30 PM, signed /s/ Alexander J. Pennetti, with counsel’s same-day service certificate.

Read the anchor · page 1
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085 ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC, § § Plaintiff/Judgment-Creditor § § v. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS § CYBERLUX CORPORATION and § MARK D. SCHMIDT, Individually, § § Defendant/Judgment Debtors. § 129TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF DESIGNATION FOR CLERK’S RECORD TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: NOW COME Defendants Cyberlux Corporation (“Cyberlux”) and Mark D. Schmidt, Individually (collectively “Defendants”) and file this Notice of Designation for Clerk’s Record. Tab Description App. No. 1 2024.07.30 Plaintiffs' Petition to Enforce Foreign Judgment 0001-0008 2 2024.08.23 Defendants' Motion to Vacate and Motion to Stay 0009-0287 3 2024.10.28 Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Motion to Vacate and Motion to Stay 0288-0363 4 2024.10.31 Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Vacate and Motion to Stay 0364-0365 5 2024.11.01 Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration 0366-0390 6 2024.11.07 Defendants' Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration 0391-0417 7 2024.11.12 Plaintiffs' Amended Reply in Support of Motion for Reconsideration 0418-0481 8 2024.11.15 Defendants' Motion to Extend Stay of Enforcement 0482-0512 9 2024.11.15 Proposed Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Extend Stay of Enforcement 0513 7/1/2025 2:30 PM Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County Envelope No. 102650844 By: Tonisha Ricks Filed: 7/1/2025 2:30 PM UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
claimallegation

The notice lists 46 tabs with contiguous appendix numbering 0001–2230. Those numbers identify a designated compilation, not this seven-page

The notice lists 46 tabs with contiguous appendix numbering 0001–2230. Those numbers identify a designated compilation, not this seven-page PDF’s extent, 2,230 separately reviewed source pages or 46 independent evidentiary sources.

Read the anchor · page 1
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085 ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC, § § Plaintiff/Judgment-Creditor § § v. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS § CYBERLUX CORPORATION and § MARK D. SCHMIDT, Individually, § § Defendant/Judgment Debtors. § 129TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF DESIGNATION FOR CLERK’S RECORD TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: NOW COME Defendants Cyberlux Corporation (“Cyberlux”) and Mark D. Schmidt, Individually (collectively “Defendants”) and file this Notice of Designation for Clerk’s Record. Tab Description App. No. 1 2024.07.30 Plaintiffs' Petition to Enforce Foreign Judgment 0001-0008 2 2024.08.23 Defendants' Motion to Vacate and Motion to Stay 0009-0287 3 2024.10.28 Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Motion to Vacate and Motion to Stay 0288-0363 4 2024.10.31 Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Vacate and Motion to Stay 0364-0365 5 2024.11.01 Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration 0366-0390 6 2024.11.07 Defendants' Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration 0391-0417 7 2024.11.12 Plaintiffs' Amended Reply in Support of Motion for Reconsideration 0418-0481 8 2024.11.15 Defendants' Motion to Extend Stay of Enforcement 0482-0512 9 2024.11.15 Proposed Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Extend Stay of Enforcement 0513 7/1/2025 2:30 PM Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County Envelope No. 102650844 By: Tonisha Ricks Filed: 7/1/2025 2:30 PM UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
claimallegation

Tabs 1–9 map July–November 2024 petition, vacation/stay litigation, reconsideration papers and extension motion. Tab 4 labels an October 31

Tabs 1–9 map July–November 2024 petition, vacation/stay litigation, reconsideration papers and extension motion. Tab 4 labels an October 31 order granting vacation/stay at 0364–0365; tab 9 expressly labels a proposed extension order at 0513. The index alone does not verify operative contents.

Read the anchor · page 1
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085 ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC, § § Plaintiff/Judgment-Creditor § § v. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS § CYBERLUX CORPORATION and § MARK D. SCHMIDT, Individually, § § Defendant/Judgment Debtors. § 129TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF DESIGNATION FOR CLERK’S RECORD TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: NOW COME Defendants Cyberlux Corporation (“Cyberlux”) and Mark D. Schmidt, Individually (collectively “Defendants”) and file this Notice of Designation for Clerk’s Record. Tab Description App. No. 1 2024.07.30 Plaintiffs' Petition to Enforce Foreign Judgment 0001-0008 2 2024.08.23 Defendants' Motion to Vacate and Motion to Stay 0009-0287 3 2024.10.28 Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Motion to Vacate and Motion to Stay 0288-0363 4 2024.10.31 Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Vacate and Motion to Stay 0364-0365 5 2024.11.01 Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration 0366-0390 6 2024.11.07 Defendants' Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration 0391-0417 7 2024.11.12 Plaintiffs' Amended Reply in Support of Motion for Reconsideration 0418-0481 8 2024.11.15 Defendants' Motion to Extend Stay of Enforcement 0482-0512 9 2024.11.15 Proposed Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Extend Stay of Enforcement 0513 7/1/2025 2:30 PM Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County Envelope No. 102650844 By: Tonisha Ricks Filed: 7/1/2025 2:30 PM UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
claimallegation

Tabs 10–26 map December enforcement papers and January 2025 receivership/property-entry disputes. Tab 14 labels a December 9 denial of stay/

Tabs 10–26 map December enforcement papers and January 2025 receivership/property-entry disputes. Tab 14 labels a December 9 denial of stay/extension at 0538–0540; tab 21 locates the January 16 hearing record at 0629–0765, tab 22 an admitted exhibit at 0766–0815, and tab 23 a January 17 receiver oath at 0816–0820. None of these underlying papers is embedded.

Read the anchor · page 2
- 2 - Tab Description App. No. 10 2024.12.02 Plaintiffs' Opposition to Judgment-Debtors' Motion to Extend Stay of Execution 0514-0522 11 2024.12.02 Plaintiffs' Request for Abstract of Judgment 0523 12 2024.12.02 Plaintiffs' Request for Writ of Execution 0524 13 2024.12.05 Defendants' Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Judgment- Debtors' Motion to Extend Stay of Execution 0525-0537 14 2024.12.09 Order Denying Defendants' Motion for Stay and for Extension of Stay 0538-0540 15 2025.01.09 Application for Turnover After Judgment and for Appointment of Receiver 0541-0587 16 2025.01.09 Plaintiffs' Motion to Enter Property of Defendant Cyberlux Corporation 0588-0593 17 2025.01.10 Defendants' Letter to Clerk re Plaintiffs' Request for Writ of Execution 0594-0596 18 2025.01.13 Defendants' Response to Plaintiffs' Application for Turnover After Judgment and for Appointment of Receiver 0597-0604 19 2025.01.13 Defendants' Response to Plaintiffs' Motion to Enter Property of Defendant Cyberlux Corporation 0605-0618 20 2025.01.14 Plaintiffs' Response to Judgment-Debtors' Response in Opposition to Motion Requesting Property Inspection 0619-0628 21 Court Reporter's Record of January 16, 2025 Hearing 0629-0765 22 2025.01.16 Plaintiffs' Exhibit 2 admitted into evidence at the January 16, 2025 hearing on Application for Turnover After Judgment and for Appointment of Receiver 0766-0815 23 2025.01.17 Oath of Receiver 0816-0820 24 2025.01.21 Defendants' Letter Brief 0821-0891 25 2025.01.22 Plaintiffs' Response Letter Brief 0892-0903 26 2025.01.23 Defendants' Supplemental Letter Brief 0904-0906 UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
claimallegation

Tabs 27–39 map emergency stay/bond requests, April letter brief, May order and June objections and receiver filings. The May 22 appointment

Tabs 27–39 map emergency stay/bond requests, April letter brief, May order and June objections and receiver filings. The May 22 appointment order is mapped to 1184–1215; June 2 Schwab notice to 1216–1219; June 3 individual-exclusion motion to 1220–1642; June 11 final report/accounting/disbursement/termination motion to 1930–1942. Index naming does not prove termination was granted.

Read the anchor · page 3
- 3 - Tab Description App. No. 27 2025.01.27 Defendants' Emergency Motion to Stay, or in the Alternative, Motion to Set Amount of Security to Suspend, Turnover and Appointment of Receiver; Motion to Set Bond for Potential Receiver; and Motion for Emergency Hearing 0907-0920 28 2025.04.05 Letter Brief re Appointment of Receiver 0921-1183 29 2025.05.22 Order Appointing Receiver 1184-1215 30 2025.06.02 C. Schwab Notice to M. Schmidt 1216-1219 31 2025.06.03 Defendants' Emergency Motion to Correct Order Appointing Receiver to Exclude Mark D. Schmidt, His Wife, and Their Property from the Imposition of the Receivership 1220-1642 32 2025.06.05 Defendants' Objections to Court's Order Appointing Receiver Dated May 22, 2025 1643-1724 33 2025.06.06 Defendants' Emergency Motion to Stay or Otherwise Suspend Order Appointing Receiver 1725-1746 34 2025.06.08 Receiver's Response to Defendants' Objections, Emergency Motion for Stay, and Receiver's Request for Sanctions 1747-1896 35 2025.06.08 Receiver's Proposed Order Overruling Defendants' Objections, Denying Defendants' Motion for Stay, and Granting Receiver's Request for Sanctions 1897-1899 36 2025.06.09 Defendants' Proposed Amended Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Stay or Otherwise Suspend Order Appointing Receiver 1900-1902 37 2025.06.11 Defendants' Reply in Support of Emergency Motion to Stay or Otherwise Suspend Order Appointing Receiver 1903-1929 38 2025.06.11 Receiver's Final Report, Final Accounting, Motion for Disbursement, and Motion to Terminate Receivership 1930-1942 39 2025.06.12 Defendants' Objection to Receiver's Report and Order to Distribute Funds 1943-2130 UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
claimallegation

Several entries explicitly identify proposed orders, including receiver sanctions/denial at 1897–1899, defendants’ amended stay proposal at

Several entries explicitly identify proposed orders, including receiver sanctions/denial at 1897–1899, defendants’ amended stay proposal at 1900–1902 and receiver’s June 12 proposed denial at 2131–2132. The latter title is visibly truncated at Motion to St. Proposed entries must not be treated as signed rulings.

Read the anchor · page 3
- 3 - Tab Description App. No. 27 2025.01.27 Defendants' Emergency Motion to Stay, or in the Alternative, Motion to Set Amount of Security to Suspend, Turnover and Appointment of Receiver; Motion to Set Bond for Potential Receiver; and Motion for Emergency Hearing 0907-0920 28 2025.04.05 Letter Brief re Appointment of Receiver 0921-1183 29 2025.05.22 Order Appointing Receiver 1184-1215 30 2025.06.02 C. Schwab Notice to M. Schmidt 1216-1219 31 2025.06.03 Defendants' Emergency Motion to Correct Order Appointing Receiver to Exclude Mark D. Schmidt, His Wife, and Their Property from the Imposition of the Receivership 1220-1642 32 2025.06.05 Defendants' Objections to Court's Order Appointing Receiver Dated May 22, 2025 1643-1724 33 2025.06.06 Defendants' Emergency Motion to Stay or Otherwise Suspend Order Appointing Receiver 1725-1746 34 2025.06.08 Receiver's Response to Defendants' Objections, Emergency Motion for Stay, and Receiver's Request for Sanctions 1747-1896 35 2025.06.08 Receiver's Proposed Order Overruling Defendants' Objections, Denying Defendants' Motion for Stay, and Granting Receiver's Request for Sanctions 1897-1899 36 2025.06.09 Defendants' Proposed Amended Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Stay or Otherwise Suspend Order Appointing Receiver 1900-1902 37 2025.06.11 Defendants' Reply in Support of Emergency Motion to Stay or Otherwise Suspend Order Appointing Receiver 1903-1929 38 2025.06.11 Receiver's Final Report, Final Accounting, Motion for Disbursement, and Motion to Terminate Receivership 1930-1942 39 2025.06.12 Defendants' Objection to Receiver's Report and Order to Distribute Funds 1943-2130 UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
claimallegation

Tabs 41–46 identify June 12 objections, the June 9/11/12 hearing record at 2139–2218, June 18 notice of appeal at 2219–2222 and three statut

Tabs 41–46 identify June 12 objections, the June 9/11/12 hearing record at 2139–2218, June 18 notice of appeal at 2219–2222 and three statutory references ending at 2230. The notice does not contain those transcript pages, appellate disposition or statutory text.

Read the anchor · page 4
- 4 - Tab Description App. No. 40 2025.06.12 Receiver's Proposed Order Denying Motion to St 2131-2132 41 2025.06.12 Defendants' Objections to Receiver's Proposed Order Denying Stay 2133-2138 42 Court Reporter's Record of June 9, 11, and 12, 2025 Hearing 2139-2218 43 2025.06.18 Defendants' Notice of Appeal 2219-2222 44 Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rein. Code Ann. § 31.002 2223-2224 45 Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rein. Code Ann. § 51.014 2225-2228 46 Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221 2229-2230 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Alexander J. Pennetti Douglas S. Lang State Bar No. 11895500 Alexander J. Pennetti State Bar No. 24110208 THOMPSON COBURN LLP 2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 3200 Dallas, Texas 75201 Tel Phone: (972) 629-7100 Fax: (972) 629-7171 dlang@thompsoncoburn.com apennetti@thompsoncoburn.com Attorneys for Defendants Cyberlux Corporation and Mark D. Schmidt UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
claimallegation

Automated service records identify Paula Gentry filing for Alex Pennetti, envelope 102650844, July 1 at 2:30:58 PM transmissions and SENT st

Automated service records identify Paula Gentry filing for Alex Pennetti, envelope 102650844, July 1 at 2:30:58 PM transmissions and SENT statuses reported as of 3:55 PM CST. Berleth appears both as associated party and case contact; other names repeat. This is not a list of unique independent acknowledgements or proof of reading.

Read the anchor · page 6
Automated Certificate of eService This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system. The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules. Paula Gentry on behalf of Alex Pennetti Bar No. 24110208 pgentry@thompsoncoburn.com Envelope ID: 102650844 Filing Code Description: Notice Filing Description: Cyberluxs Notice of Designation of Clerks Record Status as of 7/1/2025 3:55 PM CST Associated Case Party: Robert Berleth Name Robert W.Berleth BarNumber Email rberleth@berlethlaw.com TimestampSubmitted 7/1/2025 2:30:58 PM Status SENT Case Contacts Name Robert W.Berleth David A.Walton LaDonna Arey Sandra Meiners Linda Carranza Laurie DeBardeleben Shawn Grady Shawn Grady Roxanna Lock Travis Vargo Micah Jackson Sheli Davis Paula Gentry Lena Brasher Frankie Huff Records Department Hannah Petrea Michael Poynter BarNumber Email rberleth@berlethlaw.com dwalton@bellnunnally.com LArey@bellnunnally.com smeiners@thompsoncoburn.com lcarranza@thompsoncoburn.com ldebardeleben@thompsoncoburn.com shawn@gradycollectionlaw.com shawn@gradycollectionlaw.com rlock@thompsoncoburn.com tvargo@vargolawfirm.com mjackson@berlethlaw.com sdavis@berlethlaw.com pgentry@thompsoncoburn.com lbrasher@thompsoncoburn.com fhuff@thompsoncoburn.com Records@bellnunnally.com hpetrea@bellnunnally.com mpoynter@vargolawfirm.com TimestampSubmitted 7/1/2025 2:30:58 PM 7/1/2025 2:30:58 PM 7/1/2025 2:30:58 PM 7/1/2025 2:30:58 PM 7/1/2025 2:30:58 PM 7/1/2025 2:30:58 PM 7/1/2025 2:30:58 PM 7/1/2025 2:30:58 PM 7/1/2025 2:30:58 PM 7/1/2025 2:30:58 PM 7/1/2025 2:30:58 PM 7/1/2025 2:30:58 PM 7/1/2025 2:30:58 PM 7/1/2025 2:30:58 PM 7/1/2025 2:30:58 PM 7/1/2025 2:30:58 PM 7/1/2025 2:30:58 PM 7/1/2025 2:30:58 PM Status SENT SENT SENT SENT SENT SENT SENT SENT SENT SENT SENT SENT SENT SENT SENT SENT SENT SENT UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
entityobservation

Alexander J. Pennetti

Read the anchor · page 4
- 4 - Tab Description App. No. 40 2025.06.12 Receiver's Proposed Order Denying Motion to St 2131-2132 41 2025.06.12 Defendants' Objections to Receiver's Proposed Order Denying Stay 2133-2138 42 Court Reporter's Record of June 9, 11, and 12, 2025 Hearing 2139-2218 43 2025.06.18 Defendants' Notice of Appeal 2219-2222 44 Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rein. Code Ann. § 31.002 2223-2224 45 Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rein. Code Ann. § 51.014 2225-2228 46 Tex. Gov't Code Ann. § 22.221 2229-2230 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Alexander J. Pennetti Douglas S. Lang State Bar No. 11895500 Alexander J. Pennetti State Bar No. 24110208 THOMPSON COBURN LLP 2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 3200 Dallas, Texas 75201 Tel Phone: (972) 629-7100 Fax: (972) 629-7171 dlang@thompsoncoburn.com apennetti@thompsoncoburn.com Attorneys for Defendants Cyberlux Corporation and Mark D. Schmidt UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
inferenceinference

The designation is a useful retrieval map for the receivership dispute, especially the hearing, appointment order and individual-account mat

The designation is a useful retrieval map for the receivership dispute, especially the hearing, appointment order and individual-account materials, but completeness requires matching the actual designated compilation by page range and source identity.

otherattribution

Complete supplied 7-page source reviewed at SHA-256 1ceffc5ca2793c4240a7c2acfb82ede9e13ec2f8136765eb01e1d93e86337f82. Source assertions, ori

Complete supplied 7-page source reviewed at SHA-256 1ceffc5ca2793c4240a7c2acfb82ede9e13ec2f8136765eb01e1d93e86337f82. Source assertions, original visual features, filing/communication context and identified missing attachments are retained. All seven pages read and all four index pages visually compared: version_7fea2757442f4491bcae1aab070fdea8, SHA256 1ceffc5ca2793c4240a7c2acfb82ede9e13ec2f8136765eb01e1d93e86337f82. Original text and bytes preserved.

Read the anchor · page 1
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085 ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC § IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC, § § Plaintiff/Judgment-Creditor § § v. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS § CYBERLUX CORPORATION and § MARK D. SCHMIDT, Individually, § § Defendant/Judgment Debtors. § 129TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF DESIGNATION FOR CLERK’S RECORD TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT: NOW COME Defendants Cyberlux Corporation (“Cyberlux”) and Mark D. Schmidt, Individually (collectively “Defendants”) and file this Notice of Designation for Clerk’s Record. Tab Description App. No. 1 2024.07.30 Plaintiffs' Petition to Enforce Foreign Judgment 0001-0008 2 2024.08.23 Defendants' Motion to Vacate and Motion to Stay 0009-0287 3 2024.10.28 Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Motion to Vacate and Motion to Stay 0288-0363 4 2024.10.31 Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Vacate and Motion to Stay 0364-0365 5 2024.11.01 Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration 0366-0390 6 2024.11.07 Defendants' Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration 0391-0417 7 2024.11.12 Plaintiffs' Amended Reply in Support of Motion for Reconsideration 0418-0481 8 2024.11.15 Defendants' Motion to Extend Stay of Enforcement 0482-0512 9 2024.11.15 Proposed Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Extend Stay of Enforcement 0513 7/1/2025 2:30 PM Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County Envelope No. 102650844 By: Tonisha Ricks Filed: 7/1/2025 2:30 PM UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
questionquestion

Does the actual filed clerk’s record contain every designated tab and the stated appendix ranges, with proposed and signed orders correctly

Does the actual filed clerk’s record contain every designated tab and the stated appendix ranges, with proposed and signed orders correctly distinguished?

distillateallegation

CONNECT

Reviewed relationships

The canvas follows the database: source to DISTIL record, DISTIL record to knowledge object, then reviewed relationship. Position alone means nothing.

Tabs 27–39 map emergency stay/bond requests, April letter brief, May order and June objections and receiver filings. The May 22 appointment order is mapped to 1184–1215; June 2 Schwab notice to 1216–1219; June 3 individual-exclusion motion to 1220–1642; June 11 final report/accounting/disbursement/termination motion to 1930–1942. Index naming does not prove termination was granted.supportsCyberlux and Schmidt move to modify, correct or reform the May 22, 2025 receivership order to exclude Schmidt, his wife and their property, relying on an asserted January 16 bench ruling. The motion is filed June 3, 2025 at 4:56 PM and bears Pennetti’s /s/ signature for defendants.

Tab 31 identifies the same dated individual-exclusion motion, but its 423-page designated span is a larger compilation than the ten-page motion-and-service source reviewed as item 47.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
Tabs 1–9 map July–November 2024 petition, vacation/stay litigation, reconsideration papers and extension motion. Tab 4 labels an October 31 order granting vacation/stay at 0364–0365; tab 9 expressly labels a proposed extension order at 0513. The index alone does not verify operative contents.supportsDoes the actual filed clerk’s record contain every designated tab and the stated appendix ranges, with proposed and signed orders correctly distinguished?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The notice lists 46 tabs with contiguous appendix numbering 0001–2230. Those numbers identify a designated compilation, not this seven-page PDF’s extent, 2,230 separately reviewed source pages or 46 independent evidentiary sources.supportsAre 2,230 pages of evidence contained in this source?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
Tabs 10–26 map December enforcement papers and January 2025 receivership/property-entry disputes. Tab 14 labels a December 9 denial of stay/extension at 0538–0540; tab 21 locates the January 16 hearing record at 0629–0765, tab 22 an admitted exhibit at 0766–0815, and tab 23 a January 17 receiver oath at 0816–0820. None of these underlying papers is embedded.supportsThe designation is a useful retrieval map for the receivership dispute, especially the hearing, appointment order and individual-account materials, but completeness requires matching the actual designated compilation by page range and source identity.

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
Tabs 41–46 identify June 12 objections, the June 9/11/12 hearing record at 2139–2218, June 18 notice of appeal at 2219–2222 and three statutory references ending at 2230. The notice does not contain those transcript pages, appellate disposition or statutory text.supportsAre 2,230 pages of evidence contained in this source?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
Tabs 27–39 map emergency stay/bond requests, April letter brief, May order and June objections and receiver filings. The May 22 appointment order is mapped to 1184–1215; June 2 Schwab notice to 1216–1219; June 3 individual-exclusion motion to 1220–1642; June 11 final report/accounting/disbursement/termination motion to 1930–1942. Index naming does not prove termination was granted.supportsThe designation is a useful retrieval map for the receivership dispute, especially the hearing, appointment order and individual-account materials, but completeness requires matching the actual designated compilation by page range and source identity.

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
Several entries explicitly identify proposed orders, including receiver sanctions/denial at 1897–1899, defendants’ amended stay proposal at 1900–1902 and receiver’s June 12 proposed denial at 2131–2132. The latter title is visibly truncated at Motion to St. Proposed entries must not be treated as signed rulings.supportsDoes the actual filed clerk’s record contain every designated tab and the stated appendix ranges, with proposed and signed orders correctly distinguished?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
Tabs 27–39 map emergency stay/bond requests, April letter brief, May order and June objections and receiver filings. The May 22 appointment order is mapped to 1184–1215; June 2 Schwab notice to 1216–1219; June 3 individual-exclusion motion to 1220–1642; June 11 final report/accounting/disbursement/termination motion to 1930–1942. Index naming does not prove termination was granted.supportsDoes the actual filed clerk’s record contain every designated tab and the stated appendix ranges, with proposed and signed orders correctly distinguished?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The notice lists 46 tabs with contiguous appendix numbering 0001–2230. Those numbers identify a designated compilation, not this seven-page PDF’s extent, 2,230 separately reviewed source pages or 46 independent evidentiary sources.supportsDoes the actual filed clerk’s record contain every designated tab and the stated appendix ranges, with proposed and signed orders correctly distinguished?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
Tabs 41–46 identify June 12 objections, the June 9/11/12 hearing record at 2139–2218, June 18 notice of appeal at 2219–2222 and three statutory references ending at 2230. The notice does not contain those transcript pages, appellate disposition or statutory text.supportsDoes the actual filed clerk’s record contain every designated tab and the stated appendix ranges, with proposed and signed orders correctly distinguished?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
Tabs 10–26 map December enforcement papers and January 2025 receivership/property-entry disputes. Tab 14 labels a December 9 denial of stay/extension at 0538–0540; tab 21 locates the January 16 hearing record at 0629–0765, tab 22 an admitted exhibit at 0766–0815, and tab 23 a January 17 receiver oath at 0816–0820. None of these underlying papers is embedded.supportsDoes the actual filed clerk’s record contain every designated tab and the stated appendix ranges, with proposed and signed orders correctly distinguished?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
Tabs 41–46 identify June 12 objections, the June 9/11/12 hearing record at 2139–2218, June 18 notice of appeal at 2219–2222 and three statutory references ending at 2230. The notice does not contain those transcript pages, appellate disposition or statutory text.supportsThe designation is a useful retrieval map for the receivership dispute, especially the hearing, appointment order and individual-account materials, but completeness requires matching the actual designated compilation by page range and source identity.

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
The notice lists 46 tabs with contiguous appendix numbering 0001–2230. Those numbers identify a designated compilation, not this seven-page PDF’s extent, 2,230 separately reviewed source pages or 46 independent evidentiary sources.supportsThe designation is a useful retrieval map for the receivership dispute, especially the hearing, appointment order and individual-account materials, but completeness requires matching the actual designated compilation by page range and source identity.

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%

WEIGH

Explained weighting

A score appears only when its components and change threshold are published.

No published WEIGH run

The active Website Edition contains no applied score snapshot for this source or its connected objects. That means not assessed—not zero.