April 23 assignment acknowledgement — retained payment release and struck trust paragraph
Original sourceHII covering letter and Cyberlux-signed acknowledgement; visible strikeout governs source transcription, while contract/legal effects remain separate.
Each card carries the governed distillate name from the database. Open the quoted anchor before relying on the interpretation.
quotationattribution
Cyberlux releases its Assigned Payment claims against HII and covenants not to sue on those claims.
Read the anchor · page 3
Mission Technologies
Issued by: Mission Technologies Command Media
2
HII Proprietary
A division of HII
EXHIBIT A
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND RELEASE
1. Cyberlux Corporation (“Cyberlux”) acknowledges and expressly consents to HII Mission Technologies Corp.
(“HII”) paying to Legalist LLC (“Legalist”) all amounts that otherwise become due and owing to Cyberlux under Subcontract
No. P000043846 (the “Subcontract”) after the date of execution of this Exhibit A until such time HII receives written notice
from Cyberlux or Legalist to cease such payments to Legalist, in lieu of payment to Cyberlux under the Subcontract (the
“Assigned Payments”).
2. Cyberlux acknowledges and agrees that the Assigned Payments once made to Legalist will be in complete
and final satisfaction, dollar for dollar, of amounts otherwise due to Cyberlux under the Subcontract, consistent with Virginia
Code § 8.9A-406 and/or other applicable law.
3. Cyberlux expressly authenticates Instrument of Assignment dated March 27, 2024 (the “Assignment”) and
acknowledges and agrees that it has assigned the Assigned Payments to Legalist.
4. Cyberlux, in consideration of the payments received by Cyberlux from Legalist and other good and valuable
consideration received, hereby unconditionally waives and releases all claims, rights, liens, demands, and causes of action it
may have or ever had against HII, its agents, employees, successors, assigns, or affiliates (collectively, “HII Released Parties”)
relating to or arising out of the Assigned Payments, including, but not limited to, those under the Subcontract (the “HII Released
Claims”). Cyberlux covenants not to sue the HII Released Parties on or for any of the HII Released Claims. Cyberlux agrees
to indemnify, defend and hold harmless HII from and against any and all claims arising out of the Assigned Payments.
5. [BEGIN STRUCK-THROUGH TEXT] Cyberlux expressly acknowledges and agrees that all funds previously advanced and/or paid to Cyberlux
under the Subcontract and any and all property acquired therewith, including, but not limited to, those funds advanced and
property acquired, under Request to Initiate Purchase No. 1003.23.001 V2, constitute, are, and always have been
Government property, held in trust for the benefit of the Government, pursuant to Section 6.5 of the Subcontract Statement
of Work, and not Cyberlux property. Cyberlux further acknowledges and agrees that such Government property is “property
in which Buyer has or may acquire an interest” that shall be delivered to Buyer in the event of a termination of the Subcontract,
all pursuant to Section 32.1 of the Subcontract. [END STRUCK-THROUGH TEXT]
[The initial payment received by Cyberlux occurred before Cyberlux entered
into the Legalist arrangement and, therefore, is not subject to any claims by Legalist.]
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-2 Filed 08/04/25 Page 3 of 4 PageID# 520
claimallegation
EDVA41-2 Exhibit2 filed August4,2025 contains an April23,2024 HII letter and ExhibitA acknowledgement. Mark D. Schmidt’s signature appears f
EDVA41-2 Exhibit2 filed August4,2025 contains an April23,2024 HII letter and ExhibitA acknowledgement. Mark D. Schmidt’s signature appears for Cyberlux, but the signature date and notarial fields are blank. The HII letter has no named signatory or visible signature. Its April23 date does not independently establish when Schmidt signed.
Read the anchor · page 1
EXHIBIT 2
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-2 Filed 08/04/25 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 518
claimallegation
HII says it received Legalist SPV III, LP’s April5 letter concerning a March27 assignment. HII asks Cyberlux to authenticate the assignment,
HII says it received Legalist SPV III, LP’s April5 letter concerning a March27 assignment. HII asks Cyberlux to authenticate the assignment, consent to future amounts otherwise due being paid to Legalist until written cessation notice, and release assigned-payment claims. It notes the enclosed notice was not signed by Cyberlux. The referenced April5 letter and underlying assignment are not present in this four-page copy.
Read the anchor · page 2
Mission Technologies
Issued by: Mission Technologies Command Media
1
HII Proprietary
A division of HII
April 23, 2024
Cyberlux Corporation (“Cyberlux”)
800 Park Offices Drive, Suite 3209
Research Triangle, NC 27709
Attention: Mark Schmidt
Subject: Assignment of Accounts Receivable
References: Subcontract No.: P000043846 (the “Subcontract”)
Dear Mr. Schmidt,
HII Mission Technologies Corp. (“HII”) recently received the enclosed letter dated April 5, 2024 from Legalist SPV III, LP
(“Legalist”).
The notice states that Cyberlux has granted a security interest in, and assigned, its accounts receivable to Legalist pursuant
to an Instrument of Assignment (the “Assignment”) appearing to be attached as Exhibit C to a Government Purchase Order
Financing Agreement dated as of March 27, 2024. As a result, Legalist directs HII to pay to Legalist all “amounts ordinarily
payable to [Cyberlux] under the [Subcontract].” Although the enclosed letter is not signed by Cyberlux, it states that “[i]t is
acknowledged that Cyberlux will hold HII harmless if Legalist does not remit all funds to Cyberlux after satisfying all
outstanding obligations to Legalist.”
Please confirm by executing the acknowledgment attached as Exhibit A that: (1) the Assignment is authentic, valid, and
entered into by Cyberlux; (2) that you consent to HII’s payment to Legalist of all amounts that otherwise become due and
owing to Cyberlux under the Subcontract until such time HII receives written notice from Cyberlux or Legalist to cease such
payments to Legalist, with all such payments to Legalist being in complete and final satisfaction, dollar for dollar, of amounts
otherwise due to Cyberlux under the Subcontract in lieu of payment to Cyberlux under the Subcontract (the “Assigned
Payments”); and (3) that Cyberlux waives and releases any claims it may have against HII related to or arising out of the
Assigned Payments.
Please contact me promptly if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Enclosure and Attachment
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-2 Filed 08/04/25 Page 2 of 4 PageID# 519
claimallegation
Paragraphs1–3 consent to payment of amounts otherwise due and owing after execution, provide dollar-for-dollar satisfaction once paid, and a
Paragraphs1–3 consent to payment of amounts otherwise due and owing after execution, provide dollar-for-dollar satisfaction once paid, and authenticate the March27 instrument. Paragraph1 calls the payee Legalist LLC, whereas the cover calls it Legalist SPV III, LP. The different entity labels require clarification; this review does not silently merge them or infer that any amount was actually due or paid.
Read the anchor · page 3
Mission Technologies
Issued by: Mission Technologies Command Media
2
HII Proprietary
A division of HII
EXHIBIT A
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND RELEASE
1. Cyberlux Corporation (“Cyberlux”) acknowledges and expressly consents to HII Mission Technologies Corp.
(“HII”) paying to Legalist LLC (“Legalist”) all amounts that otherwise become due and owing to Cyberlux under Subcontract
No. P000043846 (the “Subcontract”) after the date of execution of this Exhibit A until such time HII receives written notice
from Cyberlux or Legalist to cease such payments to Legalist, in lieu of payment to Cyberlux under the Subcontract (the
“Assigned Payments”).
2. Cyberlux acknowledges and agrees that the Assigned Payments once made to Legalist will be in complete
and final satisfaction, dollar for dollar, of amounts otherwise due to Cyberlux under the Subcontract, consistent with Virginia
Code § 8.9A-406 and/or other applicable law.
3. Cyberlux expressly authenticates Instrument of Assignment dated March 27, 2024 (the “Assignment”) and
acknowledges and agrees that it has assigned the Assigned Payments to Legalist.
4. Cyberlux, in consideration of the payments received by Cyberlux from Legalist and other good and valuable
consideration received, hereby unconditionally waives and releases all claims, rights, liens, demands, and causes of action it
may have or ever had against HII, its agents, employees, successors, assigns, or affiliates (collectively, “HII Released Parties”)
relating to or arising out of the Assigned Payments, including, but not limited to, those under the Subcontract (the “HII Released
Claims”). Cyberlux covenants not to sue the HII Released Parties on or for any of the HII Released Claims. Cyberlux agrees
to indemnify, defend and hold harmless HII from and against any and all claims arising out of the Assigned Payments.
5. [BEGIN STRUCK-THROUGH TEXT] Cyberlux expressly acknowledges and agrees that all funds previously advanced and/or paid to Cyberlux
under the Subcontract and any and all property acquired therewith, including, but not limited to, those funds advanced and
property acquired, under Request to Initiate Purchase No. 1003.23.001 V2, constitute, are, and always have been
Government property, held in trust for the benefit of the Government, pursuant to Section 6.5 of the Subcontract Statement
of Work, and not Cyberlux property. Cyberlux further acknowledges and agrees that such Government property is “property
in which Buyer has or may acquire an interest” that shall be delivered to Buyer in the event of a termination of the Subcontract,
all pursuant to Section 32.1 of the Subcontract. [END STRUCK-THROUGH TEXT]
[The initial payment received by Cyberlux occurred before Cyberlux entered
into the Legalist arrangement and, therefore, is not subject to any claims by Legalist.]
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-2 Filed 08/04/25 Page 3 of 4 PageID# 520
claimallegation
Retained paragraph4 releases Cyberlux claims against HII and its defined released parties relating to or arising from Assigned Payments, inc
Retained paragraph4 releases Cyberlux claims against HII and its defined released parties relating to or arising from Assigned Payments, includes a covenant not to sue on those claims, and an indemnify/defend/hold-harmless promise for claims arising from Assigned Payments. Its scope remains the defined payment arrangement rather than every unrelated HII claim.
Read the anchor · page 3
Mission Technologies
Issued by: Mission Technologies Command Media
2
HII Proprietary
A division of HII
EXHIBIT A
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND RELEASE
1. Cyberlux Corporation (“Cyberlux”) acknowledges and expressly consents to HII Mission Technologies Corp.
(“HII”) paying to Legalist LLC (“Legalist”) all amounts that otherwise become due and owing to Cyberlux under Subcontract
No. P000043846 (the “Subcontract”) after the date of execution of this Exhibit A until such time HII receives written notice
from Cyberlux or Legalist to cease such payments to Legalist, in lieu of payment to Cyberlux under the Subcontract (the
“Assigned Payments”).
2. Cyberlux acknowledges and agrees that the Assigned Payments once made to Legalist will be in complete
and final satisfaction, dollar for dollar, of amounts otherwise due to Cyberlux under the Subcontract, consistent with Virginia
Code § 8.9A-406 and/or other applicable law.
3. Cyberlux expressly authenticates Instrument of Assignment dated March 27, 2024 (the “Assignment”) and
acknowledges and agrees that it has assigned the Assigned Payments to Legalist.
4. Cyberlux, in consideration of the payments received by Cyberlux from Legalist and other good and valuable
consideration received, hereby unconditionally waives and releases all claims, rights, liens, demands, and causes of action it
may have or ever had against HII, its agents, employees, successors, assigns, or affiliates (collectively, “HII Released Parties”)
relating to or arising out of the Assigned Payments, including, but not limited to, those under the Subcontract (the “HII Released
Claims”). Cyberlux covenants not to sue the HII Released Parties on or for any of the HII Released Claims. Cyberlux agrees
to indemnify, defend and hold harmless HII from and against any and all claims arising out of the Assigned Payments.
5. [BEGIN STRUCK-THROUGH TEXT] Cyberlux expressly acknowledges and agrees that all funds previously advanced and/or paid to Cyberlux
under the Subcontract and any and all property acquired therewith, including, but not limited to, those funds advanced and
property acquired, under Request to Initiate Purchase No. 1003.23.001 V2, constitute, are, and always have been
Government property, held in trust for the benefit of the Government, pursuant to Section 6.5 of the Subcontract Statement
of Work, and not Cyberlux property. Cyberlux further acknowledges and agrees that such Government property is “property
in which Buyer has or may acquire an interest” that shall be delivered to Buyer in the event of a termination of the Subcontract,
all pursuant to Section 32.1 of the Subcontract. [END STRUCK-THROUGH TEXT]
[The initial payment received by Cyberlux occurred before Cyberlux entered
into the Legalist arrangement and, therefore, is not subject to any claims by Legalist.]
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-2 Filed 08/04/25 Page 3 of 4 PageID# 520
claimallegation
All substantive paragraph5 language declaring prior advances and acquired property always Government property held in trust under SOW6.5, an
All substantive paragraph5 language declaring prior advances and acquired property always Government property held in trust under SOW6.5, and requiring termination delivery under32.1, is visibly struck through. Only the bracketed sentence that the initial payment preceded the Legalist arrangement and is not subject to Legalist claims remains unstruck. Native text alone conceals this distinction. The deleted language must not be treated as an operative trust admission in this copy.
Read the anchor · page 3
Mission Technologies
Issued by: Mission Technologies Command Media
2
HII Proprietary
A division of HII
EXHIBIT A
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND RELEASE
1. Cyberlux Corporation (“Cyberlux”) acknowledges and expressly consents to HII Mission Technologies Corp.
(“HII”) paying to Legalist LLC (“Legalist”) all amounts that otherwise become due and owing to Cyberlux under Subcontract
No. P000043846 (the “Subcontract”) after the date of execution of this Exhibit A until such time HII receives written notice
from Cyberlux or Legalist to cease such payments to Legalist, in lieu of payment to Cyberlux under the Subcontract (the
“Assigned Payments”).
2. Cyberlux acknowledges and agrees that the Assigned Payments once made to Legalist will be in complete
and final satisfaction, dollar for dollar, of amounts otherwise due to Cyberlux under the Subcontract, consistent with Virginia
Code § 8.9A-406 and/or other applicable law.
3. Cyberlux expressly authenticates Instrument of Assignment dated March 27, 2024 (the “Assignment”) and
acknowledges and agrees that it has assigned the Assigned Payments to Legalist.
4. Cyberlux, in consideration of the payments received by Cyberlux from Legalist and other good and valuable
consideration received, hereby unconditionally waives and releases all claims, rights, liens, demands, and causes of action it
may have or ever had against HII, its agents, employees, successors, assigns, or affiliates (collectively, “HII Released Parties”)
relating to or arising out of the Assigned Payments, including, but not limited to, those under the Subcontract (the “HII Released
Claims”). Cyberlux covenants not to sue the HII Released Parties on or for any of the HII Released Claims. Cyberlux agrees
to indemnify, defend and hold harmless HII from and against any and all claims arising out of the Assigned Payments.
5. [BEGIN STRUCK-THROUGH TEXT] Cyberlux expressly acknowledges and agrees that all funds previously advanced and/or paid to Cyberlux
under the Subcontract and any and all property acquired therewith, including, but not limited to, those funds advanced and
property acquired, under Request to Initiate Purchase No. 1003.23.001 V2, constitute, are, and always have been
Government property, held in trust for the benefit of the Government, pursuant to Section 6.5 of the Subcontract Statement
of Work, and not Cyberlux property. Cyberlux further acknowledges and agrees that such Government property is “property
in which Buyer has or may acquire an interest” that shall be delivered to Buyer in the event of a termination of the Subcontract,
all pursuant to Section 32.1 of the Subcontract. [END STRUCK-THROUGH TEXT]
[The initial payment received by Cyberlux occurred before Cyberlux entered
into the Legalist arrangement and, therefore, is not subject to any claims by Legalist.]
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-2 Filed 08/04/25 Page 3 of 4 PageID# 520
claimallegation
Paragraph6 selects Virginia law without its conflicts principles. The printed Cyberlux block names Mark D. Schmidt CEO and Manager and Duly
Paragraph6 selects Virginia law without its conflicts principles. The printed Cyberlux block names Mark D. Schmidt CEO and Manager and Duly Authorized Agent. Signature appearance is direct evidence of the supplied execution image, not cryptographic validation, completed notarisation or the contents of the original SOW.
Read the anchor · page 4
Mission Technologies
Issued by: Mission Technologies Command Media
3
HII Proprietary
A division of HII
6. This Acknowledgment and Release shall be governed by and construed in accordance with Virginia law,
without reference to its conflicts of laws principles.
Cyberlux Corporation
By:
Name: Mark D. Schmidt, CEO
Its: Manager and Duly Authorized Agent
STATE OF _______________________
AT LARGE
The foregoing instrument was sworn to before me in ____________, __________, this ____ day of ________, 2024, by
__________________________________.
Notary Public
My commission expires:
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-2 Filed 08/04/25 Page 4 of 4 PageID# 521
[Visual execution note: Mark D. Schmidt signature appears on Cyberlux By line. Date/state/venue/notary/commission fields remain blank.]
otherattribution
Cyberlux agrees to indemnify, defend and hold HII harmless against claims arising from Assigned Payments.
Read the anchor · page 3
Mission Technologies
Issued by: Mission Technologies Command Media
2
HII Proprietary
A division of HII
EXHIBIT A
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND RELEASE
1. Cyberlux Corporation (“Cyberlux”) acknowledges and expressly consents to HII Mission Technologies Corp.
(“HII”) paying to Legalist LLC (“Legalist”) all amounts that otherwise become due and owing to Cyberlux under Subcontract
No. P000043846 (the “Subcontract”) after the date of execution of this Exhibit A until such time HII receives written notice
from Cyberlux or Legalist to cease such payments to Legalist, in lieu of payment to Cyberlux under the Subcontract (the
“Assigned Payments”).
2. Cyberlux acknowledges and agrees that the Assigned Payments once made to Legalist will be in complete
and final satisfaction, dollar for dollar, of amounts otherwise due to Cyberlux under the Subcontract, consistent with Virginia
Code § 8.9A-406 and/or other applicable law.
3. Cyberlux expressly authenticates Instrument of Assignment dated March 27, 2024 (the “Assignment”) and
acknowledges and agrees that it has assigned the Assigned Payments to Legalist.
4. Cyberlux, in consideration of the payments received by Cyberlux from Legalist and other good and valuable
consideration received, hereby unconditionally waives and releases all claims, rights, liens, demands, and causes of action it
may have or ever had against HII, its agents, employees, successors, assigns, or affiliates (collectively, “HII Released Parties”)
relating to or arising out of the Assigned Payments, including, but not limited to, those under the Subcontract (the “HII Released
Claims”). Cyberlux covenants not to sue the HII Released Parties on or for any of the HII Released Claims. Cyberlux agrees
to indemnify, defend and hold harmless HII from and against any and all claims arising out of the Assigned Payments.
5. [BEGIN STRUCK-THROUGH TEXT] Cyberlux expressly acknowledges and agrees that all funds previously advanced and/or paid to Cyberlux
under the Subcontract and any and all property acquired therewith, including, but not limited to, those funds advanced and
property acquired, under Request to Initiate Purchase No. 1003.23.001 V2, constitute, are, and always have been
Government property, held in trust for the benefit of the Government, pursuant to Section 6.5 of the Subcontract Statement
of Work, and not Cyberlux property. Cyberlux further acknowledges and agrees that such Government property is “property
in which Buyer has or may acquire an interest” that shall be delivered to Buyer in the event of a termination of the Subcontract,
all pursuant to Section 32.1 of the Subcontract. [END STRUCK-THROUGH TEXT]
[The initial payment received by Cyberlux occurred before Cyberlux entered
into the Legalist arrangement and, therefore, is not subject to any claims by Legalist.]
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-2 Filed 08/04/25 Page 3 of 4 PageID# 520
entityobservation
HII Mission Technologies Corp.
Read the anchor · page 2
Mission Technologies
Issued by: Mission Technologies Command Media
1
HII Proprietary
A division of HII
April 23, 2024
Cyberlux Corporation (“Cyberlux”)
800 Park Offices Drive, Suite 3209
Research Triangle, NC 27709
Attention: Mark Schmidt
Subject: Assignment of Accounts Receivable
References: Subcontract No.: P000043846 (the “Subcontract”)
Dear Mr. Schmidt,
HII Mission Technologies Corp. (“HII”) recently received the enclosed letter dated April 5, 2024 from Legalist SPV III, LP
(“Legalist”).
The notice states that Cyberlux has granted a security interest in, and assigned, its accounts receivable to Legalist pursuant
to an Instrument of Assignment (the “Assignment”) appearing to be attached as Exhibit C to a Government Purchase Order
Financing Agreement dated as of March 27, 2024. As a result, Legalist directs HII to pay to Legalist all “amounts ordinarily
payable to [Cyberlux] under the [Subcontract].” Although the enclosed letter is not signed by Cyberlux, it states that “[i]t is
acknowledged that Cyberlux will hold HII harmless if Legalist does not remit all funds to Cyberlux after satisfying all
outstanding obligations to Legalist.”
Please confirm by executing the acknowledgment attached as Exhibit A that: (1) the Assignment is authentic, valid, and
entered into by Cyberlux; (2) that you consent to HII’s payment to Legalist of all amounts that otherwise become due and
owing to Cyberlux under the Subcontract until such time HII receives written notice from Cyberlux or Legalist to cease such
payments to Legalist, with all such payments to Legalist being in complete and final satisfaction, dollar for dollar, of amounts
otherwise due to Cyberlux under the Subcontract in lieu of payment to Cyberlux under the Subcontract (the “Assigned
Payments”); and (3) that Cyberlux waives and releases any claims it may have against HII related to or arising out of the
Assigned Payments.
Please contact me promptly if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Enclosure and Attachment
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-2 Filed 08/04/25 Page 2 of 4 PageID# 519
entityobservation
Cyberlux Corporation
Read the anchor · page 2
Mission Technologies
Issued by: Mission Technologies Command Media
1
HII Proprietary
A division of HII
April 23, 2024
Cyberlux Corporation (“Cyberlux”)
800 Park Offices Drive, Suite 3209
Research Triangle, NC 27709
Attention: Mark Schmidt
Subject: Assignment of Accounts Receivable
References: Subcontract No.: P000043846 (the “Subcontract”)
Dear Mr. Schmidt,
HII Mission Technologies Corp. (“HII”) recently received the enclosed letter dated April 5, 2024 from Legalist SPV III, LP
(“Legalist”).
The notice states that Cyberlux has granted a security interest in, and assigned, its accounts receivable to Legalist pursuant
to an Instrument of Assignment (the “Assignment”) appearing to be attached as Exhibit C to a Government Purchase Order
Financing Agreement dated as of March 27, 2024. As a result, Legalist directs HII to pay to Legalist all “amounts ordinarily
payable to [Cyberlux] under the [Subcontract].” Although the enclosed letter is not signed by Cyberlux, it states that “[i]t is
acknowledged that Cyberlux will hold HII harmless if Legalist does not remit all funds to Cyberlux after satisfying all
outstanding obligations to Legalist.”
Please confirm by executing the acknowledgment attached as Exhibit A that: (1) the Assignment is authentic, valid, and
entered into by Cyberlux; (2) that you consent to HII’s payment to Legalist of all amounts that otherwise become due and
owing to Cyberlux under the Subcontract until such time HII receives written notice from Cyberlux or Legalist to cease such
payments to Legalist, with all such payments to Legalist being in complete and final satisfaction, dollar for dollar, of amounts
otherwise due to Cyberlux under the Subcontract in lieu of payment to Cyberlux under the Subcontract (the “Assigned
Payments”); and (3) that Cyberlux waives and releases any claims it may have against HII related to or arising out of the
Assigned Payments.
Please contact me promptly if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Enclosure and Attachment
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-2 Filed 08/04/25 Page 2 of 4 PageID# 519
entityobservation
Legalist SPV III, LP
Read the anchor · page 2
Mission Technologies
Issued by: Mission Technologies Command Media
1
HII Proprietary
A division of HII
April 23, 2024
Cyberlux Corporation (“Cyberlux”)
800 Park Offices Drive, Suite 3209
Research Triangle, NC 27709
Attention: Mark Schmidt
Subject: Assignment of Accounts Receivable
References: Subcontract No.: P000043846 (the “Subcontract”)
Dear Mr. Schmidt,
HII Mission Technologies Corp. (“HII”) recently received the enclosed letter dated April 5, 2024 from Legalist SPV III, LP
(“Legalist”).
The notice states that Cyberlux has granted a security interest in, and assigned, its accounts receivable to Legalist pursuant
to an Instrument of Assignment (the “Assignment”) appearing to be attached as Exhibit C to a Government Purchase Order
Financing Agreement dated as of March 27, 2024. As a result, Legalist directs HII to pay to Legalist all “amounts ordinarily
payable to [Cyberlux] under the [Subcontract].” Although the enclosed letter is not signed by Cyberlux, it states that “[i]t is
acknowledged that Cyberlux will hold HII harmless if Legalist does not remit all funds to Cyberlux after satisfying all
outstanding obligations to Legalist.”
Please confirm by executing the acknowledgment attached as Exhibit A that: (1) the Assignment is authentic, valid, and
entered into by Cyberlux; (2) that you consent to HII’s payment to Legalist of all amounts that otherwise become due and
owing to Cyberlux under the Subcontract until such time HII receives written notice from Cyberlux or Legalist to cease such
payments to Legalist, with all such payments to Legalist being in complete and final satisfaction, dollar for dollar, of amounts
otherwise due to Cyberlux under the Subcontract in lieu of payment to Cyberlux under the Subcontract (the “Assigned
Payments”); and (3) that Cyberlux waives and releases any claims it may have against HII related to or arising out of the
Assigned Payments.
Please contact me promptly if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Enclosure and Attachment
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-2 Filed 08/04/25 Page 2 of 4 PageID# 519
entityobservation
Legalist LLC
Read the anchor · page 3
Mission Technologies
Issued by: Mission Technologies Command Media
2
HII Proprietary
A division of HII
EXHIBIT A
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT AND RELEASE
1. Cyberlux Corporation (“Cyberlux”) acknowledges and expressly consents to HII Mission Technologies Corp.
(“HII”) paying to Legalist LLC (“Legalist”) all amounts that otherwise become due and owing to Cyberlux under Subcontract
No. P000043846 (the “Subcontract”) after the date of execution of this Exhibit A until such time HII receives written notice
from Cyberlux or Legalist to cease such payments to Legalist, in lieu of payment to Cyberlux under the Subcontract (the
“Assigned Payments”).
2. Cyberlux acknowledges and agrees that the Assigned Payments once made to Legalist will be in complete
and final satisfaction, dollar for dollar, of amounts otherwise due to Cyberlux under the Subcontract, consistent with Virginia
Code § 8.9A-406 and/or other applicable law.
3. Cyberlux expressly authenticates Instrument of Assignment dated March 27, 2024 (the “Assignment”) and
acknowledges and agrees that it has assigned the Assigned Payments to Legalist.
4. Cyberlux, in consideration of the payments received by Cyberlux from Legalist and other good and valuable
consideration received, hereby unconditionally waives and releases all claims, rights, liens, demands, and causes of action it
may have or ever had against HII, its agents, employees, successors, assigns, or affiliates (collectively, “HII Released Parties”)
relating to or arising out of the Assigned Payments, including, but not limited to, those under the Subcontract (the “HII Released
Claims”). Cyberlux covenants not to sue the HII Released Parties on or for any of the HII Released Claims. Cyberlux agrees
to indemnify, defend and hold harmless HII from and against any and all claims arising out of the Assigned Payments.
5. [BEGIN STRUCK-THROUGH TEXT] Cyberlux expressly acknowledges and agrees that all funds previously advanced and/or paid to Cyberlux
under the Subcontract and any and all property acquired therewith, including, but not limited to, those funds advanced and
property acquired, under Request to Initiate Purchase No. 1003.23.001 V2, constitute, are, and always have been
Government property, held in trust for the benefit of the Government, pursuant to Section 6.5 of the Subcontract Statement
of Work, and not Cyberlux property. Cyberlux further acknowledges and agrees that such Government property is “property
in which Buyer has or may acquire an interest” that shall be delivered to Buyer in the event of a termination of the Subcontract,
all pursuant to Section 32.1 of the Subcontract. [END STRUCK-THROUGH TEXT]
[The initial payment received by Cyberlux occurred before Cyberlux entered
into the Legalist arrangement and, therefore, is not subject to any claims by Legalist.]
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-2 Filed 08/04/25 Page 3 of 4 PageID# 520
entityobservation
Mark D. Schmidt
Read the anchor · page 4
Mission Technologies
Issued by: Mission Technologies Command Media
3
HII Proprietary
A division of HII
6. This Acknowledgment and Release shall be governed by and construed in accordance with Virginia law,
without reference to its conflicts of laws principles.
Cyberlux Corporation
By:
Name: Mark D. Schmidt, CEO
Its: Manager and Duly Authorized Agent
STATE OF _______________________
AT LARGE
The foregoing instrument was sworn to before me in ____________, __________, this ____ day of ________, 2024, by
__________________________________.
Notary Public
My commission expires:
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-2 Filed 08/04/25 Page 4 of 4 PageID# 521
[Visual execution note: Mark D. Schmidt signature appears on Cyberlux By line. Date/state/venue/notary/commission fields remain blank.]
inferenceinference
This copy preserves a payment-directed release and a pre-Legalist initial-payment exclusion while deleting the proposed trust acknowledgemen
This copy preserves a payment-directed release and a pre-Legalist initial-payment exclusion while deleting the proposed trust acknowledgement. That deletion does not itself decide title under the original subcontract or reveal who requested it or why.
otherattribution
Complete supplied 4-page source reviewed at SHA-256 3bff35bb21b40861e3c4bdf39d17cc0d0a1a3c612666a4a66359906d5c8ae7fe. Source assertions, ori
Complete supplied 4-page source reviewed at SHA-256 3bff35bb21b40861e3c4bdf39d17cc0d0a1a3c612666a4a66359906d5c8ae7fe. Source assertions, original visual features, filing/communication context and identified missing attachments are retained. Exact version_f3799193671c4edfa37d7506e8e95f5d; SHA256 3bff35bb21b40861e3c4bdf39d17cc0d0a1a3c612666a4a66359906d5c8ae7fe. All4pages read, operative3pages visually checked. Strikeout explicitly marked in readable transcription; original source bytes and pre-review text preserved.
Read the anchor · page 1
EXHIBIT 2
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-2 Filed 08/04/25 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 518
questionquestion
What original SOW, revision communications and fully authenticated execution chain establish the source of the strikeout and any continuing
What original SOW, revision communications and fully authenticated execution chain establish the source of the strikeout and any continuing Government property terms?
questionquestion
Which Legalist legal entity is the intended payee and which amounts became due, were paid or were excluded under the acknowledgement?
distillateallegation
CONNECT
Reviewed relationships
The canvas follows the database: source to DISTIL record, DISTIL record to knowledge object, then reviewed relationship. Position alone means nothing.
Paragraph6 selects Virginia law without its conflicts principles. The printed Cyberlux block names Mark D. Schmidt CEO and Manager and Duly Authorized Agent. Signature appearance is direct evidence of the supplied execution image, not cryptographic validation, completed notarisation or the contents of the original SOW.supportsDoes this signed copy retain the Government-trust admission in paragraph5?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
All substantive paragraph5 language declaring prior advances and acquired property always Government property held in trust under SOW6.5, and requiring termination delivery under32.1, is visibly struck through. Only the bracketed sentence that the initial payment preceded the Legalist arrangement and is not subject to Legalist claims remains unstruck. Native text alone conceals this distinction. The deleted language must not be treated as an operative trust admission in this copy.supportsThis copy preserves a payment-directed release and a pre-Legalist initial-payment exclusion while deleting the proposed trust acknowledgement. That deletion does not itself decide title under the original subcontract or reveal who requested it or why.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
All substantive paragraph5 language declaring prior advances and acquired property always Government property held in trust under SOW6.5, and requiring termination delivery under32.1, is visibly struck through. Only the bracketed sentence that the initial payment preceded the Legalist arrangement and is not subject to Legalist claims remains unstruck. Native text alone conceals this distinction. The deleted language must not be treated as an operative trust admission in this copy.supportsDoes this signed copy retain the Government-trust admission in paragraph5?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Retained paragraph4 releases Cyberlux claims against HII and its defined released parties relating to or arising from Assigned Payments, includes a covenant not to sue on those claims, and an indemnify/defend/hold-harmless promise for claims arising from Assigned Payments. Its scope remains the defined payment arrangement rather than every unrelated HII claim.supportsThis copy preserves a payment-directed release and a pre-Legalist initial-payment exclusion while deleting the proposed trust acknowledgement. That deletion does not itself decide title under the original subcontract or reveal who requested it or why.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
HII says it received Legalist SPV III, LP’s April5 letter concerning a March27 assignment. HII asks Cyberlux to authenticate the assignment, consent to future amounts otherwise due being paid to Legalist until written cessation notice, and release assigned-payment claims. It notes the enclosed notice was not signed by Cyberlux. The referenced April5 letter and underlying assignment are not present in this four-page copy.supportsWhich Legalist legal entity is the intended payee and which amounts became due, were paid or were excluded under the acknowledgement?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
All substantive paragraph5 language declaring prior advances and acquired property always Government property held in trust under SOW6.5, and requiring termination delivery under32.1, is visibly struck through. Only the bracketed sentence that the initial payment preceded the Legalist arrangement and is not subject to Legalist claims remains unstruck. Native text alone conceals this distinction. The deleted language must not be treated as an operative trust admission in this copy.supportsWhat original SOW, revision communications and fully authenticated execution chain establish the source of the strikeout and any continuing Government property terms?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
EDVA41-2 Exhibit2 filed August4,2025 contains an April23,2024 HII letter and ExhibitA acknowledgement. Mark D. Schmidt’s signature appears for Cyberlux, but the signature date and notarial fields are blank. The HII letter has no named signatory or visible signature. Its April23 date does not independently establish when Schmidt signed.supportsWhat original SOW, revision communications and fully authenticated execution chain establish the source of the strikeout and any continuing Government property terms?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Paragraphs1–3 consent to payment of amounts otherwise due and owing after execution, provide dollar-for-dollar satisfaction once paid, and authenticate the March27 instrument. Paragraph1 calls the payee Legalist LLC, whereas the cover calls it Legalist SPV III, LP. The different entity labels require clarification; this review does not silently merge them or infer that any amount was actually due or paid.supportsWhich Legalist legal entity is the intended payee and which amounts became due, were paid or were excluded under the acknowledgement?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Paragraph6 selects Virginia law without its conflicts principles. The printed Cyberlux block names Mark D. Schmidt CEO and Manager and Duly Authorized Agent. Signature appearance is direct evidence of the supplied execution image, not cryptographic validation, completed notarisation or the contents of the original SOW.supportsWhat original SOW, revision communications and fully authenticated execution chain establish the source of the strikeout and any continuing Government property terms?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Paragraphs1–3 consent to payment of amounts otherwise due and owing after execution, provide dollar-for-dollar satisfaction once paid, and authenticate the March27 instrument. Paragraph1 calls the payee Legalist LLC, whereas the cover calls it Legalist SPV III, LP. The different entity labels require clarification; this review does not silently merge them or infer that any amount was actually due or paid.supportsThis copy preserves a payment-directed release and a pre-Legalist initial-payment exclusion while deleting the proposed trust acknowledgement. That deletion does not itself decide title under the original subcontract or reveal who requested it or why.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
All substantive paragraph5 language declaring prior advances and acquired property always Government property held in trust under SOW6.5, and requiring termination delivery under32.1, is visibly struck through. Only the bracketed sentence that the initial payment preceded the Legalist arrangement and is not subject to Legalist claims remains unstruck. Native text alone conceals this distinction. The deleted language must not be treated as an operative trust admission in this copy.supportsWhich Legalist legal entity is the intended payee and which amounts became due, were paid or were excluded under the acknowledgement?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
WEIGH
Explained weighting
A score appears only when its components and change threshold are published.
No published WEIGH run
The active Website Edition contains no applied score snapshot for this source or its connected objects. That means not assessed—not zero.