Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 197-10 Filed04/22/26 Page1of2 PageID4349.
Case No.1:25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB Document27 filed08/29/25 USDC Colorado pg1of2. [Exhibit label handwritten A-9.]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No.25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB
THIN AIR GEAR, LLC, Plaintiff,
v.
CYBERLUX CORPORATION d/b/a CATALYST MACHINEWORKS, LLC, Defendant.
FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.
Pursuant to the [D.26] Order entered by Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on August29,2025, it is
ORDERED that the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell [D.25] is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED as an Order of the Court. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment [D.18] is GRANTED. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the parties proposed Order Granting Stipulation for Final Judgment [D.21] is DENIED AS MOOT. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded $1,224,275.14 in damages. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant.
This case is closed.
observationobservation
$1,224,275.14 damages.
Read the anchor · page 1
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 197-10 Filed04/22/26 Page1of2 PageID4349.
Case No.1:25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB Document27 filed08/29/25 USDC Colorado pg1of2. [Exhibit label handwritten A-9.]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No.25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB
THIN AIR GEAR, LLC, Plaintiff,
v.
CYBERLUX CORPORATION d/b/a CATALYST MACHINEWORKS, LLC, Defendant.
FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.
Pursuant to the [D.26] Order entered by Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on August29,2025, it is
ORDERED that the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell [D.25] is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED as an Order of the Court. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment [D.18] is GRANTED. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the parties proposed Order Granting Stipulation for Final Judgment [D.21] is DENIED AS MOOT. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded $1,224,275.14 in damages. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant.
This case is closed.
claimallegation
The two-page Colorado Final Judgment in25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB is Document27 filed29August2025, later exhibited as EDVA197-10 on22April2026 with
The two-page Colorado Final Judgment in25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB is Document27 filed29August2025, later exhibited as EDVA197-10 on22April2026 with handwritten A-9 label. It is issued for the Court under Clerk Jeffrey P. Colwell by s/D. Clement, Deputy Clerk.
Read the anchor · page 1
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 197-10 Filed04/22/26 Page1of2 PageID4349.
Case No.1:25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB Document27 filed08/29/25 USDC Colorado pg1of2. [Exhibit label handwritten A-9.]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No.25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB
THIN AIR GEAR, LLC, Plaintiff,
v.
CYBERLUX CORPORATION d/b/a CATALYST MACHINEWORKS, LLC, Defendant.
FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.
Pursuant to the [D.26] Order entered by Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on August29,2025, it is
ORDERED that the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell [D.25] is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED as an Order of the Court. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment [D.18] is GRANTED. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the parties proposed Order Granting Stipulation for Final Judgment [D.21] is DENIED AS MOOT. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded $1,224,275.14 in damages. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant.
This case is closed.
claimallegation
The caption names THIN AIR GEAR, LLC as plaintiff and CYBERLUX CORPORATION d/b/a CATALYST MACHINEWORKS, LLC as defendant. Preserve this plea
The caption names THIN AIR GEAR, LLC as plaintiff and CYBERLUX CORPORATION d/b/a CATALYST MACHINEWORKS, LLC as defendant. Preserve this pleaded/judgment capacity rather than invent a separate additional judgment debtor.
Read the anchor · page 1
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 197-10 Filed04/22/26 Page1of2 PageID4349.
Case No.1:25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB Document27 filed08/29/25 USDC Colorado pg1of2. [Exhibit label handwritten A-9.]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No.25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB
THIN AIR GEAR, LLC, Plaintiff,
v.
CYBERLUX CORPORATION d/b/a CATALYST MACHINEWORKS, LLC, Defendant.
FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.
Pursuant to the [D.26] Order entered by Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on August29,2025, it is
ORDERED that the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell [D.25] is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED as an Order of the Court. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment [D.18] is GRANTED. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the parties proposed Order Granting Stipulation for Final Judgment [D.21] is DENIED AS MOOT. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded $1,224,275.14 in damages. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant.
This case is closed.
claimallegation
Pursuant to Judge Gordon P. Gallagher’s August29Order[D.26], the judgment affirms and adopts Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell’s R
Pursuant to Judge Gordon P. Gallagher’s August29Order[D.26], the judgment affirms and adopts Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell’s Recommendation[D.25] and grants plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment[D.18]. Those underlying documents are referenced but not attached.
Read the anchor · page 1
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 197-10 Filed04/22/26 Page1of2 PageID4349.
Case No.1:25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB Document27 filed08/29/25 USDC Colorado pg1of2. [Exhibit label handwritten A-9.]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No.25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB
THIN AIR GEAR, LLC, Plaintiff,
v.
CYBERLUX CORPORATION d/b/a CATALYST MACHINEWORKS, LLC, Defendant.
FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.
Pursuant to the [D.26] Order entered by Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on August29,2025, it is
ORDERED that the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell [D.25] is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED as an Order of the Court. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment [D.18] is GRANTED. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the parties proposed Order Granting Stipulation for Final Judgment [D.21] is DENIED AS MOOT. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded $1,224,275.14 in damages. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant.
This case is closed.
claimallegation
The judgment awards plaintiff$1,224,275.14 damages against defendant and closes the case. It separately denies the proposed Order Granting S
The judgment awards plaintiff$1,224,275.14 damages against defendant and closes the case. It separately denies the proposed Order Granting Stipulation for Final Judgment[D.21] as moot; that denial does not negate the damages award.
Read the anchor · page 1
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 197-10 Filed04/22/26 Page1of2 PageID4349.
Case No.1:25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB Document27 filed08/29/25 USDC Colorado pg1of2. [Exhibit label handwritten A-9.]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No.25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB
THIN AIR GEAR, LLC, Plaintiff,
v.
CYBERLUX CORPORATION d/b/a CATALYST MACHINEWORKS, LLC, Defendant.
FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.
Pursuant to the [D.26] Order entered by Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on August29,2025, it is
ORDERED that the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell [D.25] is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED as an Order of the Court. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment [D.18] is GRANTED. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the parties proposed Order Granting Stipulation for Final Judgment [D.21] is DENIED AS MOOT. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded $1,224,275.14 in damages. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant.
This case is closed.
claimallegation
This judgment contains no itemised damages calculation, separate fee award, interest computation, payment credit or present satisfaction ent
This judgment contains no itemised damages calculation, separate fee award, interest computation, payment credit or present satisfaction entry. Its adjudicated amount must remain distinct from Thin Air Gear’s earlier$392,563.78 certified claim reviewed in queue55; without a component ledger their relationship cannot be reduced to additive debt or unexplained overstatement.
Read the anchor · page 1
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 197-10 Filed04/22/26 Page1of2 PageID4349.
Case No.1:25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB Document27 filed08/29/25 USDC Colorado pg1of2. [Exhibit label handwritten A-9.]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No.25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB
THIN AIR GEAR, LLC, Plaintiff,
v.
CYBERLUX CORPORATION d/b/a CATALYST MACHINEWORKS, LLC, Defendant.
FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.
Pursuant to the [D.26] Order entered by Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on August29,2025, it is
ORDERED that the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell [D.25] is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED as an Order of the Court. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment [D.18] is GRANTED. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the parties proposed Order Granting Stipulation for Final Judgment [D.21] is DENIED AS MOOT. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded $1,224,275.14 in damages. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant.
This case is closed.
entityobservation
THIN AIR GEAR, LLC
Read the anchor · page 1
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 197-10 Filed04/22/26 Page1of2 PageID4349.
Case No.1:25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB Document27 filed08/29/25 USDC Colorado pg1of2. [Exhibit label handwritten A-9.]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No.25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB
THIN AIR GEAR, LLC, Plaintiff,
v.
CYBERLUX CORPORATION d/b/a CATALYST MACHINEWORKS, LLC, Defendant.
FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.
Pursuant to the [D.26] Order entered by Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on August29,2025, it is
ORDERED that the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell [D.25] is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED as an Order of the Court. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment [D.18] is GRANTED. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the parties proposed Order Granting Stipulation for Final Judgment [D.21] is DENIED AS MOOT. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded $1,224,275.14 in damages. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant.
This case is closed.
entityobservation
CYBERLUX CORPORATION
Read the anchor · page 1
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 197-10 Filed04/22/26 Page1of2 PageID4349.
Case No.1:25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB Document27 filed08/29/25 USDC Colorado pg1of2. [Exhibit label handwritten A-9.]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No.25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB
THIN AIR GEAR, LLC, Plaintiff,
v.
CYBERLUX CORPORATION d/b/a CATALYST MACHINEWORKS, LLC, Defendant.
FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.
Pursuant to the [D.26] Order entered by Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on August29,2025, it is
ORDERED that the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell [D.25] is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED as an Order of the Court. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment [D.18] is GRANTED. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the parties proposed Order Granting Stipulation for Final Judgment [D.21] is DENIED AS MOOT. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded $1,224,275.14 in damages. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant.
This case is closed.
entityobservation
CATALYST MACHINEWORKS, LLC
Read the anchor · page 1
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 197-10 Filed04/22/26 Page1of2 PageID4349.
Case No.1:25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB Document27 filed08/29/25 USDC Colorado pg1of2. [Exhibit label handwritten A-9.]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No.25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB
THIN AIR GEAR, LLC, Plaintiff,
v.
CYBERLUX CORPORATION d/b/a CATALYST MACHINEWORKS, LLC, Defendant.
FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.
Pursuant to the [D.26] Order entered by Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on August29,2025, it is
ORDERED that the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell [D.25] is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED as an Order of the Court. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment [D.18] is GRANTED. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the parties proposed Order Granting Stipulation for Final Judgment [D.21] is DENIED AS MOOT. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded $1,224,275.14 in damages. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant.
This case is closed.
entityobservation
Gordon P. Gallagher
Read the anchor · page 1
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 197-10 Filed04/22/26 Page1of2 PageID4349.
Case No.1:25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB Document27 filed08/29/25 USDC Colorado pg1of2. [Exhibit label handwritten A-9.]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No.25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB
THIN AIR GEAR, LLC, Plaintiff,
v.
CYBERLUX CORPORATION d/b/a CATALYST MACHINEWORKS, LLC, Defendant.
FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.
Pursuant to the [D.26] Order entered by Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on August29,2025, it is
ORDERED that the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell [D.25] is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED as an Order of the Court. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment [D.18] is GRANTED. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the parties proposed Order Granting Stipulation for Final Judgment [D.21] is DENIED AS MOOT. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded $1,224,275.14 in damages. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant.
This case is closed.
entityobservation
Maritza Dominguez Braswell
Read the anchor · page 1
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 197-10 Filed04/22/26 Page1of2 PageID4349.
Case No.1:25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB Document27 filed08/29/25 USDC Colorado pg1of2. [Exhibit label handwritten A-9.]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No.25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB
THIN AIR GEAR, LLC, Plaintiff,
v.
CYBERLUX CORPORATION d/b/a CATALYST MACHINEWORKS, LLC, Defendant.
FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.
Pursuant to the [D.26] Order entered by Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on August29,2025, it is
ORDERED that the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell [D.25] is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED as an Order of the Court. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment [D.18] is GRANTED. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the parties proposed Order Granting Stipulation for Final Judgment [D.21] is DENIED AS MOOT. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded $1,224,275.14 in damages. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant.
This case is closed.
entityobservation
JEFFREY P. COLWELL
Read the anchor · page 2
Case3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document197-10 Filed04/22/26 Page2of2 PageID4350.
Case No.1:25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB Document27 filed08/29/25 USDC Colorado pg2of2.
Dated at Grand Junction, Colorado this29th day of August2025.
FOR THE COURT:
JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK
By: s/D. Clement
Deputy Clerk
entityobservation
D. Clement
Read the anchor · page 2
Case3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document197-10 Filed04/22/26 Page2of2 PageID4350.
Case No.1:25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB Document27 filed08/29/25 USDC Colorado pg2of2.
Dated at Grand Junction, Colorado this29th day of August2025.
FOR THE COURT:
JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK
By: s/D. Clement
Deputy Clerk
eventattribution
Final judgment issued and filed.
Read the anchor · page 1
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 197-10 Filed04/22/26 Page1of2 PageID4349.
Case No.1:25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB Document27 filed08/29/25 USDC Colorado pg1of2. [Exhibit label handwritten A-9.]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No.25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB
THIN AIR GEAR, LLC, Plaintiff,
v.
CYBERLUX CORPORATION d/b/a CATALYST MACHINEWORKS, LLC, Defendant.
FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.
Pursuant to the [D.26] Order entered by Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on August29,2025, it is
ORDERED that the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell [D.25] is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED as an Order of the Court. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment [D.18] is GRANTED. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the parties proposed Order Granting Stipulation for Final Judgment [D.21] is DENIED AS MOOT. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded $1,224,275.14 in damages. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant.
This case is closed.
eventattribution
Judgment reproduced as EDVA197-10.
Read the anchor · page 1
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 197-10 Filed04/22/26 Page1of2 PageID4349.
Case No.1:25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB Document27 filed08/29/25 USDC Colorado pg1of2. [Exhibit label handwritten A-9.]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No.25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB
THIN AIR GEAR, LLC, Plaintiff,
v.
CYBERLUX CORPORATION d/b/a CATALYST MACHINEWORKS, LLC, Defendant.
FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.
Pursuant to the [D.26] Order entered by Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on August29,2025, it is
ORDERED that the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell [D.25] is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED as an Order of the Court. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment [D.18] is GRANTED. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the parties proposed Order Granting Stipulation for Final Judgment [D.21] is DENIED AS MOOT. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded $1,224,275.14 in damages. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant.
This case is closed.
inferenceinference
Default judgment and denial-as-moot of the proposed stipulation are compatible procedural dispositions; damages remain awarded.
inferenceinference
The larger judicial award and prior certification require a chronology/component comparison, not a second additive claim or an assumed incon
The larger judicial award and prior certification require a chronology/component comparison, not a second additive claim or an assumed inconsistency in principal.
otherattribution
Complete supplied 2-page source reviewed at SHA-256 4f27287ea80f8ef25b6fd5d3d2807ad86dbf002fe7f41c6018acf3d54832343b. Source assertions, ori
Complete supplied 2-page source reviewed at SHA-256 4f27287ea80f8ef25b6fd5d3d2807ad86dbf002fe7f41c6018acf3d54832343b. Source assertions, original visual features, filing/communication context and identified missing attachments are retained. Both pages fully read from own images; native extraction contained court overlay only. Complete visible substantive text manually transcribed, preserving both filing identities, d/b/a capacity, A-9 label and electronic clerk execution. Earlier accepted queue55 certification compared only as a distinct dated amount.
Read the anchor · page 1
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 197-10 Filed04/22/26 Page1of2 PageID4349.
Case No.1:25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB Document27 filed08/29/25 USDC Colorado pg1of2. [Exhibit label handwritten A-9.]
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No.25-cv-00805-GPG-MDB
THIN AIR GEAR, LLC, Plaintiff,
v.
CYBERLUX CORPORATION d/b/a CATALYST MACHINEWORKS, LLC, Defendant.
FINAL JUDGMENT
In accordance with the orders filed during the pendency of this case, and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure58(a), the following Final Judgment is hereby entered.
Pursuant to the [D.26] Order entered by Judge Gordon P. Gallagher on August29,2025, it is
ORDERED that the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell [D.25] is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED as an Order of the Court. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment [D.18] is GRANTED. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the parties proposed Order Granting Stipulation for Final Judgment [D.21] is DENIED AS MOOT. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff is awarded $1,224,275.14 in damages. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment is entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant.
This case is closed.
questionquestion
What recommendation, damages evidence and fee/interest orders explain the$1,224,275.14 award and its relation to the earlier certified amoun
What recommendation, damages evidence and fee/interest orders explain the$1,224,275.14 award and its relation to the earlier certified amount?
questionquestion
What payments, amendments or satisfaction entries establish the current balance and any claim on interpleaded funds?
distillateallegation
CONNECT
Reviewed relationships
The canvas follows the database: source to DISTIL record, DISTIL record to knowledge object, then reviewed relationship. Position alone means nothing.
The later final judgment separately reviewed as queue60grants default judgment in the same Colorado case. This affidavit supplies an earlier asserted procedural foundation; it does not independently determine damages or resolve later service/default challenges.referencesPursuant to Judge Gordon P. Gallagher’s August29Order[D.26], the judgment affirms and adopts Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell’s Recommendation[D.25] and grants plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment[D.18]. Those underlying documents are referenced but not attached.
Same Colorado case later grants default judgment; affidavit is earlier procedural foundation.
The judgment awards plaintiff$1,224,275.14 damages against defendant and closes the case. It separately denies the proposed Order Granting Stipulation for Final Judgment[D.21] as moot; that denial does not negate the damages award.supportsWhat does this exhibit establish?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The caption names THIN AIR GEAR, LLC as plaintiff and CYBERLUX CORPORATION d/b/a CATALYST MACHINEWORKS, LLC as defendant. Preserve this pleaded/judgment capacity rather than invent a separate additional judgment debtor.supportsWhat does this exhibit establish?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The judgment awards plaintiff$1,224,275.14 damages against defendant and closes the case. It separately denies the proposed Order Granting Stipulation for Final Judgment[D.21] as moot; that denial does not negate the damages award.supportsWhat payments, amendments or satisfaction entries establish the current balance and any claim on interpleaded funds?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The judgment awards plaintiff$1,224,275.14 damages against defendant and closes the case. It separately denies the proposed Order Granting Stipulation for Final Judgment[D.21] as moot; that denial does not negate the damages award.supportsDefault judgment and denial-as-moot of the proposed stipulation are compatible procedural dispositions; damages remain awarded.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
This judgment contains no itemised damages calculation, separate fee award, interest computation, payment credit or present satisfaction entry. Its adjudicated amount must remain distinct from Thin Air Gear’s earlier$392,563.78 certified claim reviewed in queue55; without a component ledger their relationship cannot be reduced to additive debt or unexplained overstatement.supportsWhat recommendation, damages evidence and fee/interest orders explain the$1,224,275.14 award and its relation to the earlier certified amount?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
This judgment contains no itemised damages calculation, separate fee award, interest computation, payment credit or present satisfaction entry. Its adjudicated amount must remain distinct from Thin Air Gear’s earlier$392,563.78 certified claim reviewed in queue55; without a component ledger their relationship cannot be reduced to additive debt or unexplained overstatement.supportsWhat payments, amendments or satisfaction entries establish the current balance and any claim on interpleaded funds?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The judgment awards plaintiff$1,224,275.14 damages against defendant and closes the case. It separately denies the proposed Order Granting Stipulation for Final Judgment[D.21] as moot; that denial does not negate the damages award.supportsThe larger judicial award and prior certification require a chronology/component comparison, not a second additive claim or an assumed inconsistency in principal.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The judgment awards plaintiff$1,224,275.14 damages against defendant and closes the case. It separately denies the proposed Order Granting Stipulation for Final Judgment[D.21] as moot; that denial does not negate the damages award.supportsWhat recommendation, damages evidence and fee/interest orders explain the$1,224,275.14 award and its relation to the earlier certified amount?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
This judgment contains no itemised damages calculation, separate fee award, interest computation, payment credit or present satisfaction entry. Its adjudicated amount must remain distinct from Thin Air Gear’s earlier$392,563.78 certified claim reviewed in queue55; without a component ledger their relationship cannot be reduced to additive debt or unexplained overstatement.supportsWhat does this exhibit establish?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Pursuant to Judge Gordon P. Gallagher’s August29Order[D.26], the judgment affirms and adopts Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell’s Recommendation[D.25] and grants plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment[D.18]. Those underlying documents are referenced but not attached.supportsDefault judgment and denial-as-moot of the proposed stipulation are compatible procedural dispositions; damages remain awarded.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
This judgment contains no itemised damages calculation, separate fee award, interest computation, payment credit or present satisfaction entry. Its adjudicated amount must remain distinct from Thin Air Gear’s earlier$392,563.78 certified claim reviewed in queue55; without a component ledger their relationship cannot be reduced to additive debt or unexplained overstatement.supportsThe larger judicial award and prior certification require a chronology/component comparison, not a second additive claim or an assumed inconsistency in principal.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Pursuant to Judge Gordon P. Gallagher’s August29Order[D.26], the judgment affirms and adopts Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell’s Recommendation[D.25] and grants plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment[D.18]. Those underlying documents are referenced but not attached.supportsWhat recommendation, damages evidence and fee/interest orders explain the$1,224,275.14 award and its relation to the earlier certified amount?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Pursuant to Judge Gordon P. Gallagher’s August29Order[D.26], the judgment affirms and adopts Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell’s Recommendation[D.25] and grants plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment[D.18]. Those underlying documents are referenced but not attached.supportsWhat does this exhibit establish?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
WEIGH
Explained weighting
A score appears only when its components and change threshold are published.
No published WEIGH run
The active Website Edition contains no applied score snapshot for this source or its connected objects. That means not assessed—not zero.