observationobservation
Displayed wire amount $3,083,639.75; process date 11 June 2025 is not independently confirmed settlement.
Read the anchor · page 1
District Clerk Exhibit A Unofficial Cor
Context source · CXF-S-727CBC251C8E
Exhibit A — $3,083,639.75 wire authorisation, June 2025
SHA-256
727cbc251c8efd48e04a…3 pages · 51 KBDISTILLATES
What the source contains
Each card carries the governed distillate name from the database. Open the quoted anchor before relying on the interpretation.
claimallegation
Exhibit A contains a Southside Bank online-activity image, identified by the visible bank logo, for a domestic wire of $3,083,639.75 to Berl
Exhibit A contains a Southside Bank online-activity image, identified by the visible bank logo, for a domestic wire of $3,083,639.75 to Berleth & Associates. Tracking ID 13691243 is displayed. The source has an Unofficial Copy watermark and redactions; the three pages are a cover and two banking-record pages.
Read the anchor · page 1
District Clerk Exhibit A Unofficial Cor
claimallegation
The record shows creation on 10 June 2025, authorisation at 4:46 PM that day and process date 11 June 2025. The originator wire header is Va
The record shows creation on 10 June 2025, authorisation at 4:46 PM that day and process date 11 June 2025. The originator wire header is Vartabedian Hester & Haynes LLP, from a masked IOLTA account, with the case/debtor message referencing 202448085 and Cyberlux Corporation. It does not name the ultimate client funder, prove the source of client funds or show a completed beneficiary credit.
Read the anchor · page 2
Good Evening, Online Activity TRANSACTION DETAILS DOMESTIC WIRE Berleth & Associates $3,083,639.75 Tracking ID: 13691243 Created Date: 6/10/2025 PAYMENT DETAILS Created By Authorized 06/10/2025 4:46 PM Authorized By Process Date 06/11/2025 Originator Wire Header Vartabedian Hester & Haynes LLP From Account Iolta XXXXXX8861 To Account 386 To Account Type Checking Message to Beneficiary Cause No 202448085 Debtor Cyberlux Corporation RECIPIENT DETAILS Wire Name Account Type Beneficiary FI ID Amount Berleth & Associates 386 093 $3,083,639.75 Recipient Information Wire Name Berleth & Associates Email Address rberleth@berlethlaw.com Address 9950 Cypresswood Dr., Suite 200 City Houston State TX ZIP 77070 UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk [Analyst visual transcription: the top-left bank logo reads SOUTHSIDE BANK.]
claimallegation
The beneficiary is Berleth & Associates, with Frost Bank as beneficiary financial institution. Creator/authoriser and account/routing fields
The beneficiary is Berleth & Associates, with Frost Bank as beneficiary financial institution. Creator/authoriser and account/routing fields are partly blacked out. Visible suffixes and masked fields are retained as supplied; concealed identifiers are not reconstructed. The supplied image does not contain a settlement confirmation, cancellation outcome or beneficiary ledger.
Read the anchor · page 2
Good Evening, Online Activity TRANSACTION DETAILS DOMESTIC WIRE Berleth & Associates $3,083,639.75 Tracking ID: 13691243 Created Date: 6/10/2025 PAYMENT DETAILS Created By Authorized 06/10/2025 4:46 PM Authorized By Process Date 06/11/2025 Originator Wire Header Vartabedian Hester & Haynes LLP From Account Iolta XXXXXX8861 To Account 386 To Account Type Checking Message to Beneficiary Cause No 202448085 Debtor Cyberlux Corporation RECIPIENT DETAILS Wire Name Account Type Beneficiary FI ID Amount Berleth & Associates 386 093 $3,083,639.75 Recipient Information Wire Name Berleth & Associates Email Address rberleth@berlethlaw.com Address 9950 Cypresswood Dr., Suite 200 City Houston State TX ZIP 77070 UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk [Analyst visual transcription: the top-left bank logo reads SOUTHSIDE BANK.]
claimallegation
The amount matches a single instructed wire on this record. It is not independently an order awarding that amount, agreement on each fee com
The amount matches a single instructed wire on this record. It is not independently an order awarding that amount, agreement on each fee component, proof the judgment was satisfied or proof the funds were disbursed to creditors.
Read the anchor · page 2
Good Evening, Online Activity TRANSACTION DETAILS DOMESTIC WIRE Berleth & Associates $3,083,639.75 Tracking ID: 13691243 Created Date: 6/10/2025 PAYMENT DETAILS Created By Authorized 06/10/2025 4:46 PM Authorized By Process Date 06/11/2025 Originator Wire Header Vartabedian Hester & Haynes LLP From Account Iolta XXXXXX8861 To Account 386 To Account Type Checking Message to Beneficiary Cause No 202448085 Debtor Cyberlux Corporation RECIPIENT DETAILS Wire Name Account Type Beneficiary FI ID Amount Berleth & Associates 386 093 $3,083,639.75 Recipient Information Wire Name Berleth & Associates Email Address rberleth@berlethlaw.com Address 9950 Cypresswood Dr., Suite 200 City Houston State TX ZIP 77070 UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk [Analyst visual transcription: the top-left bank logo reads SOUTHSIDE BANK.]
entityobservation
Vartabedian Hester & Haynes LLP
Read the anchor · page 2
Good Evening, Online Activity TRANSACTION DETAILS DOMESTIC WIRE Berleth & Associates $3,083,639.75 Tracking ID: 13691243 Created Date: 6/10/2025 PAYMENT DETAILS Created By Authorized 06/10/2025 4:46 PM Authorized By Process Date 06/11/2025 Originator Wire Header Vartabedian Hester & Haynes LLP From Account Iolta XXXXXX8861 To Account 386 To Account Type Checking Message to Beneficiary Cause No 202448085 Debtor Cyberlux Corporation RECIPIENT DETAILS Wire Name Account Type Beneficiary FI ID Amount Berleth & Associates 386 093 $3,083,639.75 Recipient Information Wire Name Berleth & Associates Email Address rberleth@berlethlaw.com Address 9950 Cypresswood Dr., Suite 200 City Houston State TX ZIP 77070 UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk [Analyst visual transcription: the top-left bank logo reads SOUTHSIDE BANK.]
entityobservation
Berleth & Associates
Read the anchor · page 2
Good Evening, Online Activity TRANSACTION DETAILS DOMESTIC WIRE Berleth & Associates $3,083,639.75 Tracking ID: 13691243 Created Date: 6/10/2025 PAYMENT DETAILS Created By Authorized 06/10/2025 4:46 PM Authorized By Process Date 06/11/2025 Originator Wire Header Vartabedian Hester & Haynes LLP From Account Iolta XXXXXX8861 To Account 386 To Account Type Checking Message to Beneficiary Cause No 202448085 Debtor Cyberlux Corporation RECIPIENT DETAILS Wire Name Account Type Beneficiary FI ID Amount Berleth & Associates 386 093 $3,083,639.75 Recipient Information Wire Name Berleth & Associates Email Address rberleth@berlethlaw.com Address 9950 Cypresswood Dr., Suite 200 City Houston State TX ZIP 77070 UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk [Analyst visual transcription: the top-left bank logo reads SOUTHSIDE BANK.]
entityobservation
FROST BANK
Read the anchor · page 3
Wire Name Account Type Beneficiary FI ID Amount Beneficiary FI Name FROST BANK Beneficiary FI ID 093 Address 111 W Houston St Suite 100 City San Antonio State TX ZIP 78205 UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
eventattribution
The banking record displays authorisation at 4:46 PM; settlement not shown.
Read the anchor · page 2
Good Evening, Online Activity TRANSACTION DETAILS DOMESTIC WIRE Berleth & Associates $3,083,639.75 Tracking ID: 13691243 Created Date: 6/10/2025 PAYMENT DETAILS Created By Authorized 06/10/2025 4:46 PM Authorized By Process Date 06/11/2025 Originator Wire Header Vartabedian Hester & Haynes LLP From Account Iolta XXXXXX8861 To Account 386 To Account Type Checking Message to Beneficiary Cause No 202448085 Debtor Cyberlux Corporation RECIPIENT DETAILS Wire Name Account Type Beneficiary FI ID Amount Berleth & Associates 386 093 $3,083,639.75 Recipient Information Wire Name Berleth & Associates Email Address rberleth@berlethlaw.com Address 9950 Cypresswood Dr., Suite 200 City Houston State TX ZIP 77070 UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk [Analyst visual transcription: the top-left bank logo reads SOUTHSIDE BANK.]
inferenceinference
The record materially advances the funding trail from a bare future intention to a displayed authorised instruction, but actual settlement a
The record materially advances the funding trail from a bare future intention to a displayed authorised instruction, but actual settlement and application still require bank/beneficiary records.
otherattribution
Complete supplied 3-page source reviewed at SHA-256 727cbc251c8efd48e04a7d01253ce9dabfb707c1a1e9e89b87853edca07783d0. Source assertions, ori
Complete supplied 3-page source reviewed at SHA-256 727cbc251c8efd48e04a7d01253ce9dabfb707c1a1e9e89b87853edca07783d0. Source assertions, original visual features, filing/communication context and identified missing attachments are retained. No unexamined later court outcome is inferred.
Read the anchor · page 1
District Clerk Exhibit A Unofficial Cor
questionquestion
Did the authorised wire settle, who supplied the client funds, and how did the beneficiary apply or return them?
distillatequestion
CONNECT
Reviewed relationships
The canvas follows the database: source to DISTIL record, DISTIL record to knowledge object, then reviewed relationship. Position alone means nothing.
The record shows creation on 10 June 2025, authorisation at 4:46 PM that day and process date 11 June 2025. The originator wire header is Vartabedian Hester & Haynes LLP, from a masked IOLTA account, with the case/debtor message referencing 202448085 and Cyberlux Corporation. It does not name the ultimate client funder, prove the source of client funds or show a completed beneficiary credit.referencesThe letter first describes a planned Virginia registry deposit above $1 million and later specifies above $1.4 million: $912,000 plus approximately $500,000 against disputed fees. It promises documentation as soon as the deposit is made. Both formulations are prospective, with no fixed deposit date and no receipt included. The more specific figure is not a contradictory separate deposit.
Earlier proposal was a Virginia registry deposit above $1.4 million; later instruction is $3,083,639.75 to Berleth. Different amount and destination, not automatically the same fulfilled undertaking.
Counsel states Berleth confirmed receipt of $3,083,639.75 on June11 and argues this exceeds proper satisfaction after offsets. He compares Walton’s May15 minimum $912,000 with Cyberlux’s June11 asserted $747,027.73 payoff. Actual credit allocation and a common as-of ledger are not reproduced in the pleading.referencesExhibit A contains a Southside Bank online-activity image, identified by the visible bank logo, for a domestic wire of $3,083,639.75 to Berleth & Associates. Tracking ID 13691243 is displayed. The source has an Unofficial Copy watermark and redactions; the three pages are a cover and two banking-record pages.
Previously reviewed bank record displays3083639.75; preserve source origin and actual-credit limits.
AWH reports Legalist’s initial $3 million March 27, 2024 facility, April 1 Nevada UCC filing, July 13 amended $7 million limit and an approximately April 24, 2025 temporary $12.5 million protective-advance ceiling. It does not dispute entry of the loan documents or the stated Nevada filing, but challenges priority, eligible-order predicates, alleged voidability/estoppel and roughly $3.083 million said to lack contract/collateral connection. Limits and legal objections are not actual balances or rulings.referencesExhibit A contains a Southside Bank online-activity image, identified by the visible bank logo, for a domestic wire of $3,083,639.75 to Berleth & Associates. Tracking ID 13691243 is displayed. The source has an Unofficial Copy watermark and redactions; the three pages are a cover and two banking-record pages.
The $3.083 million challenged component may concern the separately recorded $3,083,639.75 wire, but amount resemblance alone does not prove funding origin, completed receipt or the asserted lack of collateral connection.
Berleth characterises proposed Legalist funding as empty promises, says he spoke with the lender and describes it as reluctant with more than $8 million already owed. He then asserts Legalist has no intention of further lending. This mixes his report of a conversation with his inference about future conduct; no native lender communication or funding decision is attached here.referencesThe record shows creation on 10 June 2025, authorisation at 4:46 PM that day and process date 11 June 2025. The originator wire header is Vartabedian Hester & Haynes LLP, from a masked IOLTA account, with the case/debtor message referencing 202448085 and Cyberlux Corporation. It does not name the ultimate client funder, prove the source of client funds or show a completed beneficiary credit.
Receiver predicts no further Legalist lending; later law-firm wire instruction shows an authorised funding route but does not identify ultimate funder, so cannot alone prove Legalist reversed or disprove its earlier position.
Exhibit A contains a Southside Bank online-activity image, identified by the visible bank logo, for a domestic wire of $3,083,639.75 to Berleth & Associates. Tracking ID 13691243 is displayed. The source has an Unofficial Copy watermark and redactions; the three pages are a cover and two banking-record pages.referencesAll listed amounts sum exactly to the printed $3,083,639.75. Arithmetic consistency does not establish the correct principal after credits, the interest period/rate, fee authority or actual payment. The total is a dated schedule rather than a verified current payoff.
The wire amount exactly matches the schedule total; this reconciles amount, not settlement or legal allowance.
At 2:55 PM Berleth replies “I confirm receipt.” In the same reply he describes his understanding of a 2:00 TRO hearing to extend the receivership for other creditors and expressly says he does not yet know its outcome. Confirmation of receipt is distinct from confirmation of the hearing result.referencesThe record shows creation on 10 June 2025, authorisation at 4:46 PM that day and process date 11 June 2025. The originator wire header is Vartabedian Hester & Haynes LLP, from a masked IOLTA account, with the case/debtor message referencing 202448085 and Cyberlux Corporation. It does not name the ultimate client funder, prove the source of client funds or show a completed beneficiary credit.
Email acknowledgement and previously reviewed wire record concern the June11 transfer context; email has a different confirmation identifier and no amount, so ledger crosswalk remains needed. Bank record names law-firm IOLTA, not ultimate funder.
The record shows creation on 10 June 2025, authorisation at 4:46 PM that day and process date 11 June 2025. The originator wire header is Vartabedian Hester & Haynes LLP, from a masked IOLTA account, with the case/debtor message referencing 202448085 and Cyberlux Corporation. It does not name the ultimate client funder, prove the source of client funds or show a completed beneficiary credit.referencesThe proposed text would find that the receiver’s statutory authority extends only to property needed to satisfy the judgment, that sufficient funds had been tendered and that further possession/sale would exceed that authority. These are requested findings; the filing stamp does not prove the tender amount, source or legal sufficiency.
Wire authorisation is relevant to the draft’s tender assertion, but no beneficiary credit or judicial adoption is supplied.
The record shows creation on 10 June 2025, authorisation at 4:46 PM that day and process date 11 June 2025. The originator wire header is Vartabedian Hester & Haynes LLP, from a masked IOLTA account, with the case/debtor message referencing 202448085 and Cyberlux Corporation. It does not name the ultimate client funder, prove the source of client funds or show a completed beneficiary credit.supportsDid the authorised wire settle, who supplied the client funds, and how did the beneficiary apply or return them?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The beneficiary is Berleth & Associates, with Frost Bank as beneficiary financial institution. Creator/authoriser and account/routing fields are partly blacked out. Visible suffixes and masked fields are retained as supplied; concealed identifiers are not reconstructed. The supplied image does not contain a settlement confirmation, cancellation outcome or beneficiary ledger.supportsDoes this record alone prove the receiver received and distributed $3,083,639.75?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The record shows creation on 10 June 2025, authorisation at 4:46 PM that day and process date 11 June 2025. The originator wire header is Vartabedian Hester & Haynes LLP, from a masked IOLTA account, with the case/debtor message referencing 202448085 and Cyberlux Corporation. It does not name the ultimate client funder, prove the source of client funds or show a completed beneficiary credit.supportsDoes this record alone prove the receiver received and distributed $3,083,639.75?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The beneficiary is Berleth & Associates, with Frost Bank as beneficiary financial institution. Creator/authoriser and account/routing fields are partly blacked out. Visible suffixes and masked fields are retained as supplied; concealed identifiers are not reconstructed. The supplied image does not contain a settlement confirmation, cancellation outcome or beneficiary ledger.supportsThe record materially advances the funding trail from a bare future intention to a displayed authorised instruction, but actual settlement and application still require bank/beneficiary records.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The amount matches a single instructed wire on this record. It is not independently an order awarding that amount, agreement on each fee component, proof the judgment was satisfied or proof the funds were disbursed to creditors.supportsThe record materially advances the funding trail from a bare future intention to a displayed authorised instruction, but actual settlement and application still require bank/beneficiary records.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The amount matches a single instructed wire on this record. It is not independently an order awarding that amount, agreement on each fee component, proof the judgment was satisfied or proof the funds were disbursed to creditors.supportsDid the authorised wire settle, who supplied the client funds, and how did the beneficiary apply or return them?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The beneficiary is Berleth & Associates, with Frost Bank as beneficiary financial institution. Creator/authoriser and account/routing fields are partly blacked out. Visible suffixes and masked fields are retained as supplied; concealed identifiers are not reconstructed. The supplied image does not contain a settlement confirmation, cancellation outcome or beneficiary ledger.supportsDid the authorised wire settle, who supplied the client funds, and how did the beneficiary apply or return them?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The record shows creation on 10 June 2025, authorisation at 4:46 PM that day and process date 11 June 2025. The originator wire header is Vartabedian Hester & Haynes LLP, from a masked IOLTA account, with the case/debtor message referencing 202448085 and Cyberlux Corporation. It does not name the ultimate client funder, prove the source of client funds or show a completed beneficiary credit.supportsThe record materially advances the funding trail from a bare future intention to a displayed authorised instruction, but actual settlement and application still require bank/beneficiary records.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
WEIGH
Explained weighting
A score appears only when its components and change threshold are published.
No published WEIGH run
The active Website Edition contains no applied score snapshot for this source or its connected objects. That means not assessed—not zero.