Each card carries the governed distillate name from the database. Open the quoted anchor before relying on the interpretation.
claimallegation
Exhibit E encloses Pennetti’s 6 June 2025 6:27 PM email to Robert Berleth and David A. Walton, copying Douglas S. Lang. The subject describe
Exhibit E encloses Pennetti’s 6 June 2025 6:27 PM email to Robert Berleth and David A. Walton, copying Douglas S. Lang. The subject describes a revised Agreed Order concerning a motion to correct and explicitly marks it draft. This is an outgoing request, not a signed agreement.
Read the anchor · page 1
District Clerk
Exhibit E
Unofficial Cor
claimallegation
The attachment list names correspondence about abandoning a motion, an emergency-hearing notice, a June 6 stay/suspension motion, a June 3 m
The attachment list names correspondence about abandoning a motion, an emergency-hearing notice, a June 6 stay/suspension motion, a June 3 motion to exclude Schmidt, his wife and property, another Cyberlux item and a proposed agreed-order DOCX. Those attachments’ contents are not included on the supplied email page.
Read the anchor · page 2
1
Pennetti, Alex
From: Pennetti, Alex
Sent: Friday, June 6, 2025 6:27 PM
To: Robert Berleth; 'David A. Walton'
Cc: Lang, Douglas S.
Subject: Cyberlux/Atlantic Wave - revised Agreed Order re Motion to Correct (draft)
Attachments: RE: Agreed Motion to Abandon; Cyberlux's Notice of Emergency Hearing.pdf;
2025-06-06 Cyberlux's Motion to Stay or Suspend Enforcement of Turnover Order.pdf;
2025.06.03 Defs' Emergency Mot to Correct Order Appointing Receiver to Exclude Mark
Schmidt, his wife & Property from Imposition.pdf; Cyberlux; Proposed Agreed Order on
Motion to Correct or Modify Order Appointing Receiver.docx
Robert and David:
Please see courtesy copies of the attached notice and emergency motions.
Also, per Robert’s email (attached), I added some of the requested language. However, the proposed limitation to
future actions only is inappropriate given that Schmidt should not have been included in the first place. My
proposed additions are in redline. Please confirm whether you are agreed and if we may sign on your behalf.
Best,
Alex Pennetti
apennetti@thompsoncoburn.com
P: 972 629 7168
F: 972 629 7171
Thompson Coburn LLP
2100 Ross Avenue Suite 3200
Dallas, TX 75201
www.thompsoncoburn.comUnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
claimallegation
Pennetti says he incorporated some requested language from Berleth’s attached email but objects to limiting correction to future acts becaus
Pennetti says he incorporated some requested language from Berleth’s attached email but objects to limiting correction to future acts because he says Schmidt should not have been included originally. He describes additions in redline and asks confirmation of agreement and permission to sign for the recipients. No affirmative response, actual redline or signature authorisation is included.
Read the anchor · page 2
1
Pennetti, Alex
From: Pennetti, Alex
Sent: Friday, June 6, 2025 6:27 PM
To: Robert Berleth; 'David A. Walton'
Cc: Lang, Douglas S.
Subject: Cyberlux/Atlantic Wave - revised Agreed Order re Motion to Correct (draft)
Attachments: RE: Agreed Motion to Abandon; Cyberlux's Notice of Emergency Hearing.pdf;
2025-06-06 Cyberlux's Motion to Stay or Suspend Enforcement of Turnover Order.pdf;
2025.06.03 Defs' Emergency Mot to Correct Order Appointing Receiver to Exclude Mark
Schmidt, his wife & Property from Imposition.pdf; Cyberlux; Proposed Agreed Order on
Motion to Correct or Modify Order Appointing Receiver.docx
Robert and David:
Please see courtesy copies of the attached notice and emergency motions.
Also, per Robert’s email (attached), I added some of the requested language. However, the proposed limitation to
future actions only is inappropriate given that Schmidt should not have been included in the first place. My
proposed additions are in redline. Please confirm whether you are agreed and if we may sign on your behalf.
Best,
Alex Pennetti
apennetti@thompsoncoburn.com
P: 972 629 7168
F: 972 629 7171
Thompson Coburn LLP
2100 Ross Avenue Suite 3200
Dallas, TX 75201
www.thompsoncoburn.comUnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
entityobservation
Alex Pennetti
Read the anchor · page 2
1
Pennetti, Alex
From: Pennetti, Alex
Sent: Friday, June 6, 2025 6:27 PM
To: Robert Berleth; 'David A. Walton'
Cc: Lang, Douglas S.
Subject: Cyberlux/Atlantic Wave - revised Agreed Order re Motion to Correct (draft)
Attachments: RE: Agreed Motion to Abandon; Cyberlux's Notice of Emergency Hearing.pdf;
2025-06-06 Cyberlux's Motion to Stay or Suspend Enforcement of Turnover Order.pdf;
2025.06.03 Defs' Emergency Mot to Correct Order Appointing Receiver to Exclude Mark
Schmidt, his wife & Property from Imposition.pdf; Cyberlux; Proposed Agreed Order on
Motion to Correct or Modify Order Appointing Receiver.docx
Robert and David:
Please see courtesy copies of the attached notice and emergency motions.
Also, per Robert’s email (attached), I added some of the requested language. However, the proposed limitation to
future actions only is inappropriate given that Schmidt should not have been included in the first place. My
proposed additions are in redline. Please confirm whether you are agreed and if we may sign on your behalf.
Best,
Alex Pennetti
apennetti@thompsoncoburn.com
P: 972 629 7168
F: 972 629 7171
Thompson Coburn LLP
2100 Ross Avenue Suite 3200
Dallas, TX 75201
www.thompsoncoburn.comUnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
entityobservation
Robert Berleth
Read the anchor · page 2
1
Pennetti, Alex
From: Pennetti, Alex
Sent: Friday, June 6, 2025 6:27 PM
To: Robert Berleth; 'David A. Walton'
Cc: Lang, Douglas S.
Subject: Cyberlux/Atlantic Wave - revised Agreed Order re Motion to Correct (draft)
Attachments: RE: Agreed Motion to Abandon; Cyberlux's Notice of Emergency Hearing.pdf;
2025-06-06 Cyberlux's Motion to Stay or Suspend Enforcement of Turnover Order.pdf;
2025.06.03 Defs' Emergency Mot to Correct Order Appointing Receiver to Exclude Mark
Schmidt, his wife & Property from Imposition.pdf; Cyberlux; Proposed Agreed Order on
Motion to Correct or Modify Order Appointing Receiver.docx
Robert and David:
Please see courtesy copies of the attached notice and emergency motions.
Also, per Robert’s email (attached), I added some of the requested language. However, the proposed limitation to
future actions only is inappropriate given that Schmidt should not have been included in the first place. My
proposed additions are in redline. Please confirm whether you are agreed and if we may sign on your behalf.
Best,
Alex Pennetti
apennetti@thompsoncoburn.com
P: 972 629 7168
F: 972 629 7171
Thompson Coburn LLP
2100 Ross Avenue Suite 3200
Dallas, TX 75201
www.thompsoncoburn.comUnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
entityobservation
David A. Walton
Read the anchor · page 2
1
Pennetti, Alex
From: Pennetti, Alex
Sent: Friday, June 6, 2025 6:27 PM
To: Robert Berleth; 'David A. Walton'
Cc: Lang, Douglas S.
Subject: Cyberlux/Atlantic Wave - revised Agreed Order re Motion to Correct (draft)
Attachments: RE: Agreed Motion to Abandon; Cyberlux's Notice of Emergency Hearing.pdf;
2025-06-06 Cyberlux's Motion to Stay or Suspend Enforcement of Turnover Order.pdf;
2025.06.03 Defs' Emergency Mot to Correct Order Appointing Receiver to Exclude Mark
Schmidt, his wife & Property from Imposition.pdf; Cyberlux; Proposed Agreed Order on
Motion to Correct or Modify Order Appointing Receiver.docx
Robert and David:
Please see courtesy copies of the attached notice and emergency motions.
Also, per Robert’s email (attached), I added some of the requested language. However, the proposed limitation to
future actions only is inappropriate given that Schmidt should not have been included in the first place. My
proposed additions are in redline. Please confirm whether you are agreed and if we may sign on your behalf.
Best,
Alex Pennetti
apennetti@thompsoncoburn.com
P: 972 629 7168
F: 972 629 7171
Thompson Coburn LLP
2100 Ross Avenue Suite 3200
Dallas, TX 75201
www.thompsoncoburn.comUnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
entityobservation
Lang, Douglas S.
Read the anchor · page 2
1
Pennetti, Alex
From: Pennetti, Alex
Sent: Friday, June 6, 2025 6:27 PM
To: Robert Berleth; 'David A. Walton'
Cc: Lang, Douglas S.
Subject: Cyberlux/Atlantic Wave - revised Agreed Order re Motion to Correct (draft)
Attachments: RE: Agreed Motion to Abandon; Cyberlux's Notice of Emergency Hearing.pdf;
2025-06-06 Cyberlux's Motion to Stay or Suspend Enforcement of Turnover Order.pdf;
2025.06.03 Defs' Emergency Mot to Correct Order Appointing Receiver to Exclude Mark
Schmidt, his wife & Property from Imposition.pdf; Cyberlux; Proposed Agreed Order on
Motion to Correct or Modify Order Appointing Receiver.docx
Robert and David:
Please see courtesy copies of the attached notice and emergency motions.
Also, per Robert’s email (attached), I added some of the requested language. However, the proposed limitation to
future actions only is inappropriate given that Schmidt should not have been included in the first place. My
proposed additions are in redline. Please confirm whether you are agreed and if we may sign on your behalf.
Best,
Alex Pennetti
apennetti@thompsoncoburn.com
P: 972 629 7168
F: 972 629 7171
Thompson Coburn LLP
2100 Ross Avenue Suite 3200
Dallas, TX 75201
www.thompsoncoburn.comUnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
eventattribution
The email is dated 6:27 PM; no reply or agreement is included.
Read the anchor · page 2
1
Pennetti, Alex
From: Pennetti, Alex
Sent: Friday, June 6, 2025 6:27 PM
To: Robert Berleth; 'David A. Walton'
Cc: Lang, Douglas S.
Subject: Cyberlux/Atlantic Wave - revised Agreed Order re Motion to Correct (draft)
Attachments: RE: Agreed Motion to Abandon; Cyberlux's Notice of Emergency Hearing.pdf;
2025-06-06 Cyberlux's Motion to Stay or Suspend Enforcement of Turnover Order.pdf;
2025.06.03 Defs' Emergency Mot to Correct Order Appointing Receiver to Exclude Mark
Schmidt, his wife & Property from Imposition.pdf; Cyberlux; Proposed Agreed Order on
Motion to Correct or Modify Order Appointing Receiver.docx
Robert and David:
Please see courtesy copies of the attached notice and emergency motions.
Also, per Robert’s email (attached), I added some of the requested language. However, the proposed limitation to
future actions only is inappropriate given that Schmidt should not have been included in the first place. My
proposed additions are in redline. Please confirm whether you are agreed and if we may sign on your behalf.
Best,
Alex Pennetti
apennetti@thompsoncoburn.com
P: 972 629 7168
F: 972 629 7171
Thompson Coburn LLP
2100 Ross Avenue Suite 3200
Dallas, TX 75201
www.thompsoncoburn.comUnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
inferenceinference
The word Agreed in the subject is a proposed status. The body’s express request for confirmation and signing authority shows those matters a
The word Agreed in the subject is a proposed status. The body’s express request for confirmation and signing authority shows those matters are not established by this email alone.
otherattribution
Complete supplied 2-page source reviewed at SHA-256 76d8cca4df5fd97c567455a9aeadec57b6171d8a938dcb63b9857bc8c0d231ef. Source assertions, ori
Complete supplied 2-page source reviewed at SHA-256 76d8cca4df5fd97c567455a9aeadec57b6171d8a938dcb63b9857bc8c0d231ef. Source assertions, original visual features, filing/communication context and identified missing attachments are retained. No unexamined later court outcome is inferred.
Read the anchor · page 1
District Clerk
Exhibit E
Unofficial Cor
questionquestion
What reply and final executed order resolve retrospective scope and authorisation to sign on behalf of the recipients?
distillateinference
CONNECT
Reviewed relationships
The canvas follows the database: source to DISTIL record, DISTIL record to knowledge object, then reviewed relationship. Position alone means nothing.
The attachment list names correspondence about abandoning a motion, an emergency-hearing notice, a June 6 stay/suspension motion, a June 3 motion to exclude Schmidt, his wife and property, another Cyberlux item and a proposed agreed-order DOCX. Those attachments’ contents are not included on the supplied email page.referencesThe Exhibit C wrapper encloses a three-page Tyler efiling notification addressed to Alex Pennetti, sent 6 June 2025 at 5:54 PM, case 202448085 and envelope 101743796. The submitted time is 5:53 PM CST. Filing type is Motion (No Fee); description is 20250606 Cyberluxs Motion to Stay or Suspend Enforcement of Turnover Order; filer is Lena Brasher.
Email attachment list names the same dated stay motion identified by the notification; underlying contents remain separate.
Berleth alleges failure to notify him through efiling, failure to mention the hearing during conversations and failure to send the emergency motion by email on June 6, despite a courtesy copy of another motion. He relies on non-interference language and service rules. These are contested service/content allegations; the motion itself does not establish what all recipient accounts received or opened.referencesThe attachment list names correspondence about abandoning a motion, an emergency-hearing notice, a June 6 stay/suspension motion, a June 3 motion to exclude Schmidt, his wife and property, another Cyberlux item and a proposed agreed-order DOCX. Those attachments’ contents are not included on the supplied email page.
Receiver alleges no emergency-motion email; June 6 6:27 email to Berleth lists the stay motion and emergency-hearing notice. This conflicts with the broad no-copy account at the recorded-email level, while actual attachment payload and receipt/opening remain unproved.
The attachment list names correspondence about abandoning a motion, an emergency-hearing notice, a June 6 stay/suspension motion, a June 3 motion to exclude Schmidt, his wife and property, another Cyberlux item and a proposed agreed-order DOCX. Those attachments’ contents are not included on the supplied email page.supportsWhat reply and final executed order resolve retrospective scope and authorisation to sign on behalf of the recipients?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Pennetti says he incorporated some requested language from Berleth’s attached email but objects to limiting correction to future acts because he says Schmidt should not have been included originally. He describes additions in redline and asks confirmation of agreement and permission to sign for the recipients. No affirmative response, actual redline or signature authorisation is included.supportsThe word Agreed in the subject is a proposed status. The body’s express request for confirmation and signing authority shows those matters are not established by this email alone.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Pennetti says he incorporated some requested language from Berleth’s attached email but objects to limiting correction to future acts because he says Schmidt should not have been included originally. He describes additions in redline and asks confirmation of agreement and permission to sign for the recipients. No affirmative response, actual redline or signature authorisation is included.supportsWhat reply and final executed order resolve retrospective scope and authorisation to sign on behalf of the recipients?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Pennetti says he incorporated some requested language from Berleth’s attached email but objects to limiting correction to future acts because he says Schmidt should not have been included originally. He describes additions in redline and asks confirmation of agreement and permission to sign for the recipients. No affirmative response, actual redline or signature authorisation is included.supportsDoes this email authorise Pennetti to sign for Berleth or Walton?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Exhibit E encloses Pennetti’s 6 June 2025 6:27 PM email to Robert Berleth and David A. Walton, copying Douglas S. Lang. The subject describes a revised Agreed Order concerning a motion to correct and explicitly marks it draft. This is an outgoing request, not a signed agreement.supportsThe word Agreed in the subject is a proposed status. The body’s express request for confirmation and signing authority shows those matters are not established by this email alone.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
WEIGH
Explained weighting
A score appears only when its components and change threshold are published.
No published WEIGH run
The active Website Edition contains no applied score snapshot for this source or its connected objects. That means not assessed—not zero.