observationobservation
ANPC–HII Fairfax agreed stay order: deposit and discharge conditions
Read the anchor · page 1
Exhibit 1 Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 169-1 Filed 04/15/26 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 2505
Context source · CXF-S-87AAB483605F
IP HII EDVA 00483 Doc. 0169 Exhibit 1
SHA-256
87aab483605fc80761eb…4 pages · 252 KBDISTILLATES
What the source contains
Each card carries the governed distillate name from the database. Open the quoted anchor before relying on the interpretation.
claimallegation
EDVA169-1 filedApril15,2026 Exhibit1 contains a FairfaxCL2025-16055 agreed order on partially joint motion to stay. ANPC is judgment credito
EDVA169-1 filedApril15,2026 Exhibit1 contains a FairfaxCL2025-16055 agreed order on partially joint motion to stay. ANPC is judgment creditor,Cyberlux debtor,HII garnishee; agreeing parties are expressly ANPC and HII,not all three captioned parties.
Read the anchor · page 1
Exhibit 1 Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 169-1 Filed 04/15/26 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 2505
claimallegation
The order describes Disputed Funds as$25,769,369.03 less HII recoupment/setoff and less$1,444,543.11 already paid into FairfaxCL2025-3413, t
The order describes Disputed Funds as$25,769,369.03 less HII recoupment/setoff and less$1,444,543.11 already paid into FairfaxCL2025-3413, to be deposited in EDVA3:25-cv-00483. No fixed net recoupment amount is supplied in this order.
Read the anchor · page 2
EDVA3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document169-1 Filed04/15/26 Page2of4 PageID2506. VIRGINIA:IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR FAIRFAX COUNTY. Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation,JudgmentCreditor v.Cyberlux Corporation,JudgmentDebtor,and HII Mission Technologies Corp.,Garnishee. CaseNo.CL2025-16055. CivilProcessing filingstamp2026JAN-2 A11:20;clerk-name line degraded/unreadable. AGREED ORDER ON PARTIALLY JOINT MOTION TO STAY. This matter is before the Court on the motion of Judgment Creditor Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation(ANPC) and Garnishee HII Mission Technologies Corp.(HII,and together withANPC,the AgreeingParties),requesting the Court stay this garnishment proceeding(the Motion). In the Motion,the Parties request a stay,in part,because the funds at issue in this garnishment proceeding are part of funds that Garnishee HII seeks to deposit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in the action brought by HII against Cyberlux,ANPC,and others(CivilActionNo.3:25-cv-00483-JAG)(the InterpleaderAction). The funds are identified in HII’s First Amended Complaint for Interpleader as the amount HII is indebted to Cyberlux(the DisputedFunds),calculated as$25,769,369.03 less recoupment and/or setoff amounts which Cyberlux owes to HII and less$1,444,543.11 paid into this Court by HII in the garnishment action assignedCaseNo.CL2025-3413.
claimallegation
Paragraphs1–2 stay the garnishment subject to the interpleader, for180days after entry OR until HII deposits Disputed Funds in the interplea
Paragraphs1–2 stay the garnishment subject to the interpleader, for180days after entry OR until HII deposits Disputed Funds in the interpleader,whichever occurs first. This is not an unconditional180-day stay regardless of deposit.
Read the anchor · page 3
EDVA169-1 Page3of4 PageID2507. For good cause shown,and with the consent of PlaintiffANPC and GarnisheeHII,the motion is GRANTED as follows: 1.This case is hereby STAYED subject to the Interpleader Action. 2.The stay shall continue for a period of one hundred and eighty(180)days after entry of this Order OR until the deposit of the Disputed Funds by HII in the Interpleader Action whichever comes first. 3.The Parties agree that HII will be discharged from any liability in this action if:(1)HII deposits the Disputed Funds in the Interpleader Action;and(2)HII is discharged in the Interpleader Action.Upon the occurrence of those two events,the parties will submit a proposed final order acknowledging HII’s discharge in the Interpleader Action and in this garnishment action. 4.Upon the conclusion of the stay created by paragraph1 above,the Parties shall report back to the Court and seek further relief or guidance,as necessary,or submit an appropriate order. This the[blank]dayofJanuary,2026. Judicialsignaturemark:Christie Leary;displayeddigitaltimestamp2026.01.13 17:26:32-05:00.FairfaxCountyCircuitCourt. WE ASK FOR THIS:signaturemark over/s/.Joel D. Schwartz(VSB97979),ParkerPoeAdams&BernsteinLLP,9007thStreetNW,Suite700,WashingtonDC20001.Phone2028542811,Fax2022177271,joelschwartz@parkerpoe.com.CounselforANPC.Page2of3.
claimallegation
Paragraph3 conditions HII’s discharge in this action on BOTH depositing Disputed Funds in the interpleader and being discharged there. Upon
Paragraph3 conditions HII’s discharge in this action on BOTH depositing Disputed Funds in the interpleader and being discharged there. Upon both events the parties will submit a proposed final order acknowledging discharge in both proceedings. A deposit alone does not satisfy both conditions.
Read the anchor · page 3
EDVA169-1 Page3of4 PageID2507. For good cause shown,and with the consent of PlaintiffANPC and GarnisheeHII,the motion is GRANTED as follows: 1.This case is hereby STAYED subject to the Interpleader Action. 2.The stay shall continue for a period of one hundred and eighty(180)days after entry of this Order OR until the deposit of the Disputed Funds by HII in the Interpleader Action whichever comes first. 3.The Parties agree that HII will be discharged from any liability in this action if:(1)HII deposits the Disputed Funds in the Interpleader Action;and(2)HII is discharged in the Interpleader Action.Upon the occurrence of those two events,the parties will submit a proposed final order acknowledging HII’s discharge in the Interpleader Action and in this garnishment action. 4.Upon the conclusion of the stay created by paragraph1 above,the Parties shall report back to the Court and seek further relief or guidance,as necessary,or submit an appropriate order. This the[blank]dayofJanuary,2026. Judicialsignaturemark:Christie Leary;displayeddigitaltimestamp2026.01.13 17:26:32-05:00.FairfaxCountyCircuitCourt. WE ASK FOR THIS:signaturemark over/s/.Joel D. Schwartz(VSB97979),ParkerPoeAdams&BernsteinLLP,9007thStreetNW,Suite700,WashingtonDC20001.Phone2028542811,Fax2022177271,joelschwartz@parkerpoe.com.CounselforANPC.Page2of3.
claimallegation
Paragraph4 requires the parties at conclusion of the stay to report to the court and seek further relief/guidance or submit an appropriate o
Paragraph4 requires the parties at conclusion of the stay to report to the court and seek further relief/guidance or submit an appropriate order. No subsequent report,deposit receipt or final discharge order is included.
Read the anchor · page 3
EDVA169-1 Page3of4 PageID2507. For good cause shown,and with the consent of PlaintiffANPC and GarnisheeHII,the motion is GRANTED as follows: 1.This case is hereby STAYED subject to the Interpleader Action. 2.The stay shall continue for a period of one hundred and eighty(180)days after entry of this Order OR until the deposit of the Disputed Funds by HII in the Interpleader Action whichever comes first. 3.The Parties agree that HII will be discharged from any liability in this action if:(1)HII deposits the Disputed Funds in the Interpleader Action;and(2)HII is discharged in the Interpleader Action.Upon the occurrence of those two events,the parties will submit a proposed final order acknowledging HII’s discharge in the Interpleader Action and in this garnishment action. 4.Upon the conclusion of the stay created by paragraph1 above,the Parties shall report back to the Court and seek further relief or guidance,as necessary,or submit an appropriate order. This the[blank]dayofJanuary,2026. Judicialsignaturemark:Christie Leary;displayeddigitaltimestamp2026.01.13 17:26:32-05:00.FairfaxCountyCircuitCourt. WE ASK FOR THIS:signaturemark over/s/.Joel D. Schwartz(VSB97979),ParkerPoeAdams&BernsteinLLP,9007thStreetNW,Suite700,WashingtonDC20001.Phone2028542811,Fax2022177271,joelschwartz@parkerpoe.com.CounselforANPC.Page2of3.
claimallegation
The first order page bears a civil-processing filing stamp January2,2026 11:20AM. The judge signature area displays Christie Leary and digit
The first order page bears a civil-processing filing stamp January2,2026 11:20AM. The judge signature area displays Christie Leary and digital timestamp2026.01.13 17:26:32-05:00 while the printed January day blank remains unfilled. Counsel endorsement marks appear above JoelD.Schwartz for ANPC and ClarkJ.Belote for HII. Filing stamp,signature timestamp and entry date must not be silently equated; the source does not include a separate entry docket.
Read the anchor · page 2
EDVA3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document169-1 Filed04/15/26 Page2of4 PageID2506. VIRGINIA:IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR FAIRFAX COUNTY. Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation,JudgmentCreditor v.Cyberlux Corporation,JudgmentDebtor,and HII Mission Technologies Corp.,Garnishee. CaseNo.CL2025-16055. CivilProcessing filingstamp2026JAN-2 A11:20;clerk-name line degraded/unreadable. AGREED ORDER ON PARTIALLY JOINT MOTION TO STAY. This matter is before the Court on the motion of Judgment Creditor Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation(ANPC) and Garnishee HII Mission Technologies Corp.(HII,and together withANPC,the AgreeingParties),requesting the Court stay this garnishment proceeding(the Motion). In the Motion,the Parties request a stay,in part,because the funds at issue in this garnishment proceeding are part of funds that Garnishee HII seeks to deposit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in the action brought by HII against Cyberlux,ANPC,and others(CivilActionNo.3:25-cv-00483-JAG)(the InterpleaderAction). The funds are identified in HII’s First Amended Complaint for Interpleader as the amount HII is indebted to Cyberlux(the DisputedFunds),calculated as$25,769,369.03 less recoupment and/or setoff amounts which Cyberlux owes to HII and less$1,444,543.11 paid into this Court by HII in the garnishment action assignedCaseNo.CL2025-3413.
entityobservation
Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation
Read the anchor · page 2
EDVA3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document169-1 Filed04/15/26 Page2of4 PageID2506. VIRGINIA:IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR FAIRFAX COUNTY. Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation,JudgmentCreditor v.Cyberlux Corporation,JudgmentDebtor,and HII Mission Technologies Corp.,Garnishee. CaseNo.CL2025-16055. CivilProcessing filingstamp2026JAN-2 A11:20;clerk-name line degraded/unreadable. AGREED ORDER ON PARTIALLY JOINT MOTION TO STAY. This matter is before the Court on the motion of Judgment Creditor Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation(ANPC) and Garnishee HII Mission Technologies Corp.(HII,and together withANPC,the AgreeingParties),requesting the Court stay this garnishment proceeding(the Motion). In the Motion,the Parties request a stay,in part,because the funds at issue in this garnishment proceeding are part of funds that Garnishee HII seeks to deposit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in the action brought by HII against Cyberlux,ANPC,and others(CivilActionNo.3:25-cv-00483-JAG)(the InterpleaderAction). The funds are identified in HII’s First Amended Complaint for Interpleader as the amount HII is indebted to Cyberlux(the DisputedFunds),calculated as$25,769,369.03 less recoupment and/or setoff amounts which Cyberlux owes to HII and less$1,444,543.11 paid into this Court by HII in the garnishment action assignedCaseNo.CL2025-3413.
entityobservation
HII Mission Technologies Corp.
Read the anchor · page 2
EDVA3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document169-1 Filed04/15/26 Page2of4 PageID2506. VIRGINIA:IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR FAIRFAX COUNTY. Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation,JudgmentCreditor v.Cyberlux Corporation,JudgmentDebtor,and HII Mission Technologies Corp.,Garnishee. CaseNo.CL2025-16055. CivilProcessing filingstamp2026JAN-2 A11:20;clerk-name line degraded/unreadable. AGREED ORDER ON PARTIALLY JOINT MOTION TO STAY. This matter is before the Court on the motion of Judgment Creditor Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation(ANPC) and Garnishee HII Mission Technologies Corp.(HII,and together withANPC,the AgreeingParties),requesting the Court stay this garnishment proceeding(the Motion). In the Motion,the Parties request a stay,in part,because the funds at issue in this garnishment proceeding are part of funds that Garnishee HII seeks to deposit in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in the action brought by HII against Cyberlux,ANPC,and others(CivilActionNo.3:25-cv-00483-JAG)(the InterpleaderAction). The funds are identified in HII’s First Amended Complaint for Interpleader as the amount HII is indebted to Cyberlux(the DisputedFunds),calculated as$25,769,369.03 less recoupment and/or setoff amounts which Cyberlux owes to HII and less$1,444,543.11 paid into this Court by HII in the garnishment action assignedCaseNo.CL2025-3413.
entityobservation
Christie Leary
Read the anchor · page 3
EDVA169-1 Page3of4 PageID2507. For good cause shown,and with the consent of PlaintiffANPC and GarnisheeHII,the motion is GRANTED as follows: 1.This case is hereby STAYED subject to the Interpleader Action. 2.The stay shall continue for a period of one hundred and eighty(180)days after entry of this Order OR until the deposit of the Disputed Funds by HII in the Interpleader Action whichever comes first. 3.The Parties agree that HII will be discharged from any liability in this action if:(1)HII deposits the Disputed Funds in the Interpleader Action;and(2)HII is discharged in the Interpleader Action.Upon the occurrence of those two events,the parties will submit a proposed final order acknowledging HII’s discharge in the Interpleader Action and in this garnishment action. 4.Upon the conclusion of the stay created by paragraph1 above,the Parties shall report back to the Court and seek further relief or guidance,as necessary,or submit an appropriate order. This the[blank]dayofJanuary,2026. Judicialsignaturemark:Christie Leary;displayeddigitaltimestamp2026.01.13 17:26:32-05:00.FairfaxCountyCircuitCourt. WE ASK FOR THIS:signaturemark over/s/.Joel D. Schwartz(VSB97979),ParkerPoeAdams&BernsteinLLP,9007thStreetNW,Suite700,WashingtonDC20001.Phone2028542811,Fax2022177271,joelschwartz@parkerpoe.com.CounselforANPC.Page2of3.
entityobservation
Joel D. Schwartz
Read the anchor · page 3
EDVA169-1 Page3of4 PageID2507. For good cause shown,and with the consent of PlaintiffANPC and GarnisheeHII,the motion is GRANTED as follows: 1.This case is hereby STAYED subject to the Interpleader Action. 2.The stay shall continue for a period of one hundred and eighty(180)days after entry of this Order OR until the deposit of the Disputed Funds by HII in the Interpleader Action whichever comes first. 3.The Parties agree that HII will be discharged from any liability in this action if:(1)HII deposits the Disputed Funds in the Interpleader Action;and(2)HII is discharged in the Interpleader Action.Upon the occurrence of those two events,the parties will submit a proposed final order acknowledging HII’s discharge in the Interpleader Action and in this garnishment action. 4.Upon the conclusion of the stay created by paragraph1 above,the Parties shall report back to the Court and seek further relief or guidance,as necessary,or submit an appropriate order. This the[blank]dayofJanuary,2026. Judicialsignaturemark:Christie Leary;displayeddigitaltimestamp2026.01.13 17:26:32-05:00.FairfaxCountyCircuitCourt. WE ASK FOR THIS:signaturemark over/s/.Joel D. Schwartz(VSB97979),ParkerPoeAdams&BernsteinLLP,9007thStreetNW,Suite700,WashingtonDC20001.Phone2028542811,Fax2022177271,joelschwartz@parkerpoe.com.CounselforANPC.Page2of3.
entityobservation
Clark J. Belote
Read the anchor · page 4
EDVA169-1 Page4of4 PageID2508. Endorsementsignaturemarkover/s/.Clark J. Belote(VSB87310),AhmedE.MohamedKhalil(VSB98315),Kaufman&CanolesPC,150W.MainStreet,Suite2100,NorfolkVA23510.Phone7576243000,Fax8883609092,clark.belote@kaufcan.com,ahmed.khalil@kaufcan.com.CounselforGarnisheeHII Mission Technologies Corp.Page3of3.
eventattribution
Christie Leary digital signature area displays January13; entry date separately unverified.
Read the anchor · page 3
EDVA169-1 Page3of4 PageID2507. For good cause shown,and with the consent of PlaintiffANPC and GarnisheeHII,the motion is GRANTED as follows: 1.This case is hereby STAYED subject to the Interpleader Action. 2.The stay shall continue for a period of one hundred and eighty(180)days after entry of this Order OR until the deposit of the Disputed Funds by HII in the Interpleader Action whichever comes first. 3.The Parties agree that HII will be discharged from any liability in this action if:(1)HII deposits the Disputed Funds in the Interpleader Action;and(2)HII is discharged in the Interpleader Action.Upon the occurrence of those two events,the parties will submit a proposed final order acknowledging HII’s discharge in the Interpleader Action and in this garnishment action. 4.Upon the conclusion of the stay created by paragraph1 above,the Parties shall report back to the Court and seek further relief or guidance,as necessary,or submit an appropriate order. This the[blank]dayofJanuary,2026. Judicialsignaturemark:Christie Leary;displayeddigitaltimestamp2026.01.13 17:26:32-05:00.FairfaxCountyCircuitCourt. WE ASK FOR THIS:signaturemark over/s/.Joel D. Schwartz(VSB97979),ParkerPoeAdams&BernsteinLLP,9007thStreetNW,Suite700,WashingtonDC20001.Phone2028542811,Fax2022177271,joelschwartz@parkerpoe.com.CounselforANPC.Page2of3.
inferenceinference
The order temporarily coordinates the state garnishment with federal interpleader and defines a two-event discharge route. It does not itsel
The order temporarily coordinates the state garnishment with federal interpleader and defines a two-event discharge route. It does not itself establish that HII completed either event or fix the state entry date from which180days run.
otherattribution
Complete supplied 4-page source reviewed at SHA-256 87aab483605fc80761eb0569174e8ee7f60f0736f359a81d5ed42831026f1ecc. Source assertions, ori
Complete supplied 4-page source reviewed at SHA-256 87aab483605fc80761eb0569174e8ee7f60f0736f359a81d5ed42831026f1ecc. Source assertions, original visual features, filing/communication context and identified missing attachments are retained. Own all four images read in full. Native only supplied outer filing text; operative pages manually transcribed and checked, with no inference from degraded clerk-name stamp.
Read the anchor · page 1
Exhibit 1 Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 169-1 Filed 04/15/26 Page 1 of 4 PageID# 2505
questionquestion
What entry docket, federal deposit receipt and discharge/final state orders establish completion of the stay and discharge conditions?
distillateallegation
CONNECT
Reviewed relationships
The canvas follows the database: source to DISTIL record, DISTIL record to knowledge object, then reviewed relationship. Position alone means nothing.
Paragraph4 requires the parties at conclusion of the stay to report to the court and seek further relief/guidance or submit an appropriate order. No subsequent report,deposit receipt or final discharge order is included.supportsWhat entry docket, federal deposit receipt and discharge/final state orders establish completion of the stay and discharge conditions?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Paragraphs1–2 stay the garnishment subject to the interpleader, for180days after entry OR until HII deposits Disputed Funds in the interpleader,whichever occurs first. This is not an unconditional180-day stay regardless of deposit.supportsWhat entry docket, federal deposit receipt and discharge/final state orders establish completion of the stay and discharge conditions?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
EDVA169-1 filedApril15,2026 Exhibit1 contains a FairfaxCL2025-16055 agreed order on partially joint motion to stay. ANPC is judgment creditor,Cyberlux debtor,HII garnishee; agreeing parties are expressly ANPC and HII,not all three captioned parties.supportsWhat entry docket, federal deposit receipt and discharge/final state orders establish completion of the stay and discharge conditions?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The order describes Disputed Funds as$25,769,369.03 less HII recoupment/setoff and less$1,444,543.11 already paid into FairfaxCL2025-3413, to be deposited in EDVA3:25-cv-00483. No fixed net recoupment amount is supplied in this order.supportsWhat entry docket, federal deposit receipt and discharge/final state orders establish completion of the stay and discharge conditions?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The first order page bears a civil-processing filing stamp January2,2026 11:20AM. The judge signature area displays Christie Leary and digital timestamp2026.01.13 17:26:32-05:00 while the printed January day blank remains unfilled. Counsel endorsement marks appear above JoelD.Schwartz for ANPC and ClarkJ.Belote for HII. Filing stamp,signature timestamp and entry date must not be silently equated; the source does not include a separate entry docket.supportsWhat entry docket, federal deposit receipt and discharge/final state orders establish completion of the stay and discharge conditions?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The order describes Disputed Funds as$25,769,369.03 less HII recoupment/setoff and less$1,444,543.11 already paid into FairfaxCL2025-3413, to be deposited in EDVA3:25-cv-00483. No fixed net recoupment amount is supplied in this order.supportsWhat entry docket, federal deposit receipt and discharge/final state orders establish completion of the stay and discharge conditions?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The first order page bears a civil-processing filing stamp January2,2026 11:20AM. The judge signature area displays Christie Leary and digital timestamp2026.01.13 17:26:32-05:00 while the printed January day blank remains unfilled. Counsel endorsement marks appear above JoelD.Schwartz for ANPC and ClarkJ.Belote for HII. Filing stamp,signature timestamp and entry date must not be silently equated; the source does not include a separate entry docket.supportsWhat entry docket, federal deposit receipt and discharge/final state orders establish completion of the stay and discharge conditions?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The first order page bears a civil-processing filing stamp January2,2026 11:20AM. The judge signature area displays Christie Leary and digital timestamp2026.01.13 17:26:32-05:00 while the printed January day blank remains unfilled. Counsel endorsement marks appear above JoelD.Schwartz for ANPC and ClarkJ.Belote for HII. Filing stamp,signature timestamp and entry date must not be silently equated; the source does not include a separate entry docket.supportsThe order temporarily coordinates the state garnishment with federal interpleader and defines a two-event discharge route. It does not itself establish that HII completed either event or fix the state entry date from which180days run.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Paragraph4 requires the parties at conclusion of the stay to report to the court and seek further relief/guidance or submit an appropriate order. No subsequent report,deposit receipt or final discharge order is included.supportsThe order temporarily coordinates the state garnishment with federal interpleader and defines a two-event discharge route. It does not itself establish that HII completed either event or fix the state entry date from which180days run.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The order describes Disputed Funds as$25,769,369.03 less HII recoupment/setoff and less$1,444,543.11 already paid into FairfaxCL2025-3413, to be deposited in EDVA3:25-cv-00483. No fixed net recoupment amount is supplied in this order.supportsThe order temporarily coordinates the state garnishment with federal interpleader and defines a two-event discharge route. It does not itself establish that HII completed either event or fix the state entry date from which180days run.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Paragraph3 conditions HII’s discharge in this action on BOTH depositing Disputed Funds in the interpleader and being discharged there. Upon both events the parties will submit a proposed final order acknowledging discharge in both proceedings. A deposit alone does not satisfy both conditions.supportsWhat entry docket, federal deposit receipt and discharge/final state orders establish completion of the stay and discharge conditions?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
EDVA169-1 filedApril15,2026 Exhibit1 contains a FairfaxCL2025-16055 agreed order on partially joint motion to stay. ANPC is judgment creditor,Cyberlux debtor,HII garnishee; agreeing parties are expressly ANPC and HII,not all three captioned parties.supportsWhat entry docket, federal deposit receipt and discharge/final state orders establish completion of the stay and discharge conditions?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Paragraphs1–2 stay the garnishment subject to the interpleader, for180days after entry OR until HII deposits Disputed Funds in the interpleader,whichever occurs first. This is not an unconditional180-day stay regardless of deposit.supportsWhat entry docket, federal deposit receipt and discharge/final state orders establish completion of the stay and discharge conditions?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
EDVA169-1 filedApril15,2026 Exhibit1 contains a FairfaxCL2025-16055 agreed order on partially joint motion to stay. ANPC is judgment creditor,Cyberlux debtor,HII garnishee; agreeing parties are expressly ANPC and HII,not all three captioned parties.supportsThe order temporarily coordinates the state garnishment with federal interpleader and defines a two-event discharge route. It does not itself establish that HII completed either event or fix the state entry date from which180days run.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Paragraph3 conditions HII’s discharge in this action on BOTH depositing Disputed Funds in the interpleader and being discharged there. Upon both events the parties will submit a proposed final order acknowledging discharge in both proceedings. A deposit alone does not satisfy both conditions.supportsThe order temporarily coordinates the state garnishment with federal interpleader and defines a two-event discharge route. It does not itself establish that HII completed either event or fix the state entry date from which180days run.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Paragraphs1–2 stay the garnishment subject to the interpleader, for180days after entry OR until HII deposits Disputed Funds in the interpleader,whichever occurs first. This is not an unconditional180-day stay regardless of deposit.supportsThe order temporarily coordinates the state garnishment with federal interpleader and defines a two-event discharge route. It does not itself establish that HII completed either event or fix the state entry date from which180days run.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Paragraph3 conditions HII’s discharge in this action on BOTH depositing Disputed Funds in the interpleader and being discharged there. Upon both events the parties will submit a proposed final order acknowledging discharge in both proceedings. A deposit alone does not satisfy both conditions.supportsWhat entry docket, federal deposit receipt and discharge/final state orders establish completion of the stay and discharge conditions?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Paragraph4 requires the parties at conclusion of the stay to report to the court and seek further relief/guidance or submit an appropriate order. No subsequent report,deposit receipt or final discharge order is included.supportsWhat entry docket, federal deposit receipt and discharge/final state orders establish completion of the stay and discharge conditions?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
WEIGH
Explained weighting
A score appears only when its components and change threshold are published.
No published WEIGH run
The active Website Edition contains no applied score snapshot for this source or its connected objects. That means not assessed—not zero.