Context source · CXF-S-99C09ED54352
99c09ed543520a2b56d1…5 pages · 187 KBDISTILLATES
Each card carries the governed distillate name from the database. Open the quoted anchor before relying on the interpretation.
Federal court granted plaintiffs' request for attorney's fees and costs incurred in responding to the second removal
The Second Remand Order also provides: "[Plaintiffs'] request for an award of the attorney's fees and costs incurred in responding to the second removal is granted,"
129th Judicial District Court, Harris County, Texas - State court venue for Case No. 2024-48085
IN THE DISTRICT COURT 129th JUDICIAL DISTRICT HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas - Federal court where judgment-debtors twice removed the case
remove this action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas (Federal Court)
February 12, 2025 - Judgment-debtors filed first notice of removal seeking to remove the action to federal court
On February 12, 2025, Judgment-Debtors Cyberlux Corporation and Mark Schmidt (Judgment-Debtors) filed a notice of removal seeking to remove this action to the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas
February 21, 2025 - Plaintiffs filed motion to remand seeking return of case to state court
Plaintiffs timely filed a motion to remand on February 21, 2025, seeking to remand the action to this Court
March 27, 2025 - Federal court signed order granting motion to remand and remanding action to state court
The Federal Court conducted a hearing on the motion to remand and subsequently signed an order on March 27, 2025 (First Remand Order), granting the motion and remanding the action to this Court
April 11, 2025 - Judgment-debtors filed second notice of removal seeking to remove the action to federal court again
On April 11, 2025, Judgment-Debtors filed a second notice of removal seeking to remove this action to the Federal Court
April 22, 2025 - Plaintiffs filed emergency motion to remand seeking return of case to state court and other relief
Plaintiffs timely filed an emergency motion to remand on April 22, 2025, seeking to remand the action to this Court, among other relief
CONNECT
The canvas follows the database: source to DISTIL record, DISTIL record to knowledge object, then reviewed relationship. Position alone means nothing.
No public CONNECT relationships are attached to this source.
WEIGH
A score appears only when its components and change threshold are published.
The active Website Edition contains no applied score snapshot for this source or its connected objects. That means not assessed—not zero.