Context source · CXF-S-A3E49E567B38
a3e49e567b3880d866ca…1 pages · 137 KBDISTILLATES
Each card carries the governed distillate name from the database. Open the quoted anchor before relying on the interpretation.
The court's reasons for granting the motion to remand were stated on the record at the March 26, 2025 hearing
For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing on March 26, 2025, the plaintiffs' motion to remand, (Docket Entry No. 4), is granted.
Cyberlux Corporation - defendant entity in federal civil action
CYBERLUX CORPORATION, et al., Defendants.
Senior United States District Judge Lee H. Rosenthal - judicial officer who issued the order
Lee H. Rosenthal Senior United States District Judge
State court to which the case is being remanded
This case is remanded to the 129th Judicial District Court, Harris County, Texas.
Hearing held on March 26, 2025 regarding plaintiffs' motion to remand
For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing on March 26, 2025
Court granted plaintiffs' motion to remand on March 27, 2025
the plaintiffs' motion to remand, (Docket Entry No. 4), is granted.
Case remanded from federal court to 129th Judicial District Court, Harris County, Texas
This case is remanded to the 129th Judicial District Court, Harris County, Texas.
CONNECT
The canvas follows the database: source to DISTIL record, DISTIL record to knowledge object, then reviewed relationship. Position alone means nothing.
No public CONNECT relationships are attached to this source.
WEIGH
A score appears only when its components and change threshold are published.
The active Website Edition contains no applied score snapshot for this source or its connected objects. That means not assessed—not zero.