Each card carries the governed distillate name from the database. Open the quoted anchor before relying on the interpretation.
claimallegation
The August4 federal Exhibit5 contains Judge David A.Oblon’s signed Fairfax order entered July22,2025 after a July18 hearing in CL2025-3413.
The August4 federal Exhibit5 contains Judge David A.Oblon’s signed Fairfax order entered July22,2025 after a July18 hearing in CL2025-3413. The signature and entry date are visible; the matter expressly continues.
Read the anchor · page 1
EXHIBIT 5
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-5 Filed 08/04/25 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 533
claimallegation
The court grants the payment motion only to the extent of alternate relief requested by creditor and garnishee: HII must implead$1,444,543.1
The court grants the payment motion only to the extent of alternate relief requested by creditor and garnishee: HII must implead$1,444,543.11 into court within30days. It directs a court deposit, not payment of that sum directly to the judgment creditors.
Read the anchor · page 2
THIS MATTER CONTINUES.
Entered this 22nd day of July 2025.
/C)-0- --
----Judge avid A. Oblon
VIRGINIA:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC,
et al.,
Plaintiffs/Judgment Creditors,
)
)
)
)
v. ) CL-2025-3413
)
CYBERLUX CORPORATION,
Defendant/Judgment Debtor,
)
)
)
)
)
HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES )
CORP.,
Garnishee
)
)
ORDER
THIS MATTER came before the Court July 18, 2025, on Plaintiffs' Motion
for Entry of Order of Payment. And, for the reasons stated on the record, it is
ORDERED the Motion is GRANTED to the degree the Court awards the
alternate relief requested by the Judgment Creditor and Garnishee—impleading of
the funds in dispute to the Court. The Garnishee must implead $1,444,543.11 into
the Court within 30 days. Any party may notice a hearing for the disposition of the
impleaded funds after all parties give notice to all other parties of which they are
aware who may have an interest in those funds.
PURSUANT TO RULE 1:13 OF THE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA, ENDORSEMENT OF
THIS ORDER IS WAIVED BY DISCRETION OF THE COURT. ANY DESIRED ENDORSEMENT OBJECTIONS
MAY BE FILED WITHIN TEN DAYS.
Page 1 of 1
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-5 Filed 08/04/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 534
claimallegation
A party may notice a disposition hearing after notice to all other known persons who may hold an interest in the funds. Endorsement is waive
A party may notice a disposition hearing after notice to all other known persons who may hold an interest in the funds. Endorsement is waived under the cited rule and desired endorsement objections may be filed within10days. The order does not determine all competing interests or final allocation.
Read the anchor · page 2
THIS MATTER CONTINUES.
Entered this 22nd day of July 2025.
/C)-0- --
----Judge avid A. Oblon
VIRGINIA:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC,
et al.,
Plaintiffs/Judgment Creditors,
)
)
)
)
v. ) CL-2025-3413
)
CYBERLUX CORPORATION,
Defendant/Judgment Debtor,
)
)
)
)
)
HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES )
CORP.,
Garnishee
)
)
ORDER
THIS MATTER came before the Court July 18, 2025, on Plaintiffs' Motion
for Entry of Order of Payment. And, for the reasons stated on the record, it is
ORDERED the Motion is GRANTED to the degree the Court awards the
alternate relief requested by the Judgment Creditor and Garnishee—impleading of
the funds in dispute to the Court. The Garnishee must implead $1,444,543.11 into
the Court within 30 days. Any party may notice a hearing for the disposition of the
impleaded funds after all parties give notice to all other parties of which they are
aware who may have an interest in those funds.
PURSUANT TO RULE 1:13 OF THE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA, ENDORSEMENT OF
THIS ORDER IS WAIVED BY DISCRETION OF THE COURT. ANY DESIRED ENDORSEMENT OBJECTIONS
MAY BE FILED WITHIN TEN DAYS.
Page 1 of 1
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-5 Filed 08/04/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 534
entityobservation
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC
Read the anchor · page 2
THIS MATTER CONTINUES.
Entered this 22nd day of July 2025.
/C)-0- --
----Judge avid A. Oblon
VIRGINIA:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC,
et al.,
Plaintiffs/Judgment Creditors,
)
)
)
)
v. ) CL-2025-3413
)
CYBERLUX CORPORATION,
Defendant/Judgment Debtor,
)
)
)
)
)
HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES )
CORP.,
Garnishee
)
)
ORDER
THIS MATTER came before the Court July 18, 2025, on Plaintiffs' Motion
for Entry of Order of Payment. And, for the reasons stated on the record, it is
ORDERED the Motion is GRANTED to the degree the Court awards the
alternate relief requested by the Judgment Creditor and Garnishee—impleading of
the funds in dispute to the Court. The Garnishee must implead $1,444,543.11 into
the Court within 30 days. Any party may notice a hearing for the disposition of the
impleaded funds after all parties give notice to all other parties of which they are
aware who may have an interest in those funds.
PURSUANT TO RULE 1:13 OF THE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA, ENDORSEMENT OF
THIS ORDER IS WAIVED BY DISCRETION OF THE COURT. ANY DESIRED ENDORSEMENT OBJECTIONS
MAY BE FILED WITHIN TEN DAYS.
Page 1 of 1
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-5 Filed 08/04/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 534
entityobservation
CYBERLUX CORPORATION
Read the anchor · page 2
THIS MATTER CONTINUES.
Entered this 22nd day of July 2025.
/C)-0- --
----Judge avid A. Oblon
VIRGINIA:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC,
et al.,
Plaintiffs/Judgment Creditors,
)
)
)
)
v. ) CL-2025-3413
)
CYBERLUX CORPORATION,
Defendant/Judgment Debtor,
)
)
)
)
)
HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES )
CORP.,
Garnishee
)
)
ORDER
THIS MATTER came before the Court July 18, 2025, on Plaintiffs' Motion
for Entry of Order of Payment. And, for the reasons stated on the record, it is
ORDERED the Motion is GRANTED to the degree the Court awards the
alternate relief requested by the Judgment Creditor and Garnishee—impleading of
the funds in dispute to the Court. The Garnishee must implead $1,444,543.11 into
the Court within 30 days. Any party may notice a hearing for the disposition of the
impleaded funds after all parties give notice to all other parties of which they are
aware who may have an interest in those funds.
PURSUANT TO RULE 1:13 OF THE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA, ENDORSEMENT OF
THIS ORDER IS WAIVED BY DISCRETION OF THE COURT. ANY DESIRED ENDORSEMENT OBJECTIONS
MAY BE FILED WITHIN TEN DAYS.
Page 1 of 1
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-5 Filed 08/04/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 534
entityobservation
HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES
Read the anchor · page 2
THIS MATTER CONTINUES.
Entered this 22nd day of July 2025.
/C)-0- --
----Judge avid A. Oblon
VIRGINIA:
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF FAIRFAX COUNTY
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC,
et al.,
Plaintiffs/Judgment Creditors,
)
)
)
)
v. ) CL-2025-3413
)
CYBERLUX CORPORATION,
Defendant/Judgment Debtor,
)
)
)
)
)
HII MISSION TECHNOLOGIES )
CORP.,
Garnishee
)
)
ORDER
THIS MATTER came before the Court July 18, 2025, on Plaintiffs' Motion
for Entry of Order of Payment. And, for the reasons stated on the record, it is
ORDERED the Motion is GRANTED to the degree the Court awards the
alternate relief requested by the Judgment Creditor and Garnishee—impleading of
the funds in dispute to the Court. The Garnishee must implead $1,444,543.11 into
the Court within 30 days. Any party may notice a hearing for the disposition of the
impleaded funds after all parties give notice to all other parties of which they are
aware who may have an interest in those funds.
PURSUANT TO RULE 1:13 OF THE RULES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA, ENDORSEMENT OF
THIS ORDER IS WAIVED BY DISCRETION OF THE COURT. ANY DESIRED ENDORSEMENT OBJECTIONS
MAY BE FILED WITHIN TEN DAYS.
Page 1 of 1
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-5 Filed 08/04/25 Page 2 of 2 PageID# 534
inferenceinference
The order preserves the disputed fund for a later noticed allocation decision; it cannot be treated as a final award of the whole garnishmen
The order preserves the disputed fund for a later noticed allocation decision; it cannot be treated as a final award of the whole garnishment amount to AWH.
omissiongap
The hearing reasons, deposit receipt and subsequent disposition order are absent.
Read the anchor · page 1
EXHIBIT 5
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-5 Filed 08/04/25 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 533
otherattribution
Complete supplied 2-page source reviewed at SHA-256 aed52e1f8df729ca3ef98f4ed20671057a34c239b3027c73d154ec28f75e7883. Source assertions, ori
Complete supplied 2-page source reviewed at SHA-256 aed52e1f8df729ca3ef98f4ed20671057a34c239b3027c73d154ec28f75e7883. Source assertions, original visual features, filing/communication context and identified missing attachments are retained. Exact version_a551c02570bc4e6bac0aae78250a1dec; SHA256 aed52e1f8df729ca3ef98f4ed20671057a34c239b3027c73d154ec28f75e7883. Both pages read and full operative page visually inspected, including signature and limited-relief language. Original extraction retained.
Read the anchor · page 1
EXHIBIT 5
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 41-5 Filed 08/04/25 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 533
questionquestion
When and where was the ordered deposit made, and what subsequent order resolved disposition or superseded this instruction?
distillateallegation
CONNECT
Reviewed relationships
The canvas follows the database: source to DISTIL record, DISTIL record to knowledge object, then reviewed relationship. Position alone means nothing.
The court grants the payment motion only to the extent of alternate relief requested by creditor and garnishee: HII must implead$1,444,543.11 into court within30days. It directs a court deposit, not payment of that sum directly to the judgment creditors.qualifiesThe summons states principal$1,572,500, interest$241,742.20, attorneys’ fees$610,346.17, garnishment costs$54,700 and credits$1,034,745.26, correctly producing$1,444,543.11. Judgment-cost and late-fee lines are blank. The printed components are creditor demand figures, not a new adjudication of all fees or a complete payment ledger.
Same demanded amount now directed into court rather than awarded directly to creditors.
The court grants the payment motion only to the extent of alternate relief requested by creditor and garnishee: HII must implead$1,444,543.11 into court within30days. It directs a court deposit, not payment of that sum directly to the judgment creditors.supportsThe hearing reasons, deposit receipt and subsequent disposition order are absent.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The court grants the payment motion only to the extent of alternate relief requested by creditor and garnishee: HII must implead$1,444,543.11 into court within30days. It directs a court deposit, not payment of that sum directly to the judgment creditors.supportsThe order preserves the disputed fund for a later noticed allocation decision; it cannot be treated as a final award of the whole garnishment amount to AWH.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The court grants the payment motion only to the extent of alternate relief requested by creditor and garnishee: HII must implead$1,444,543.11 into court within30days. It directs a court deposit, not payment of that sum directly to the judgment creditors.supportsWhen and where was the ordered deposit made, and what subsequent order resolved disposition or superseded this instruction?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The August4 federal Exhibit5 contains Judge David A.Oblon’s signed Fairfax order entered July22,2025 after a July18 hearing in CL2025-3413. The signature and entry date are visible; the matter expressly continues.supportsThe hearing reasons, deposit receipt and subsequent disposition order are absent.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
A party may notice a disposition hearing after notice to all other known persons who may hold an interest in the funds. Endorsement is waived under the cited rule and desired endorsement objections may be filed within10days. The order does not determine all competing interests or final allocation.supportsDid Fairfax award the garnished sum outright to AWH?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
A party may notice a disposition hearing after notice to all other known persons who may hold an interest in the funds. Endorsement is waived under the cited rule and desired endorsement objections may be filed within10days. The order does not determine all competing interests or final allocation.supportsThe order preserves the disputed fund for a later noticed allocation decision; it cannot be treated as a final award of the whole garnishment amount to AWH.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The court grants the payment motion only to the extent of alternate relief requested by creditor and garnishee: HII must implead$1,444,543.11 into court within30days. It directs a court deposit, not payment of that sum directly to the judgment creditors.supportsDid Fairfax award the garnished sum outright to AWH?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
A party may notice a disposition hearing after notice to all other known persons who may hold an interest in the funds. Endorsement is waived under the cited rule and desired endorsement objections may be filed within10days. The order does not determine all competing interests or final allocation.supportsWhen and where was the ordered deposit made, and what subsequent order resolved disposition or superseded this instruction?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
A party may notice a disposition hearing after notice to all other known persons who may hold an interest in the funds. Endorsement is waived under the cited rule and desired endorsement objections may be filed within10days. The order does not determine all competing interests or final allocation.supportsThe hearing reasons, deposit receipt and subsequent disposition order are absent.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
WEIGH
Explained weighting
A score appears only when its components and change threshold are published.
No published WEIGH run
The active Website Edition contains no applied score snapshot for this source or its connected objects. That means not assessed—not zero.