The evidence/CXF-S-F2B0B1737F71

Context source · CXF-S-F2B0B1737F71

June 27 receiver email maintains July 1 production date pending appellate ruling

Original sourceSingle printed receiver email, not the underlying production order or appellate ruling.
Open full document ↗
SHA-256 f2b0b1737f71607a2b15…2 pages · 294 KB

DISTILLATES

What the source contains

Each card carries the governed distillate name from the database. Open the quoted anchor before relying on the interpretation.

claimallegation

Exhibit 8 contains Berleth’s June 27, 2025 4:05 PM email to Pennetti, copied to Douglas Lang, about documents ordered delivered in Cyberlux/

Exhibit 8 contains Berleth’s June 27, 2025 4:05 PM email to Pennetti, copied to Douglas Lang, about documents ordered delivered in Cyberlux/Atlantic Wave. No prior messages or attachments appear.

Read the anchor · page 1
EXHIBIT 8 UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
claimallegation

Berleth says the extended production time expires Tuesday July 1, 2025 barring an appellate ruling on the response-brief due date, which he

Berleth says the extended production time expires Tuesday July 1, 2025 barring an appellate ruling on the response-brief due date, which he calls highly unlikely. He asks counsel to plan production by July 1. The extension and operative production order are not attached, and this email does not establish whether an appellate ruling or production followed.

Read the anchor · page 2
Pennetti, Alex From: Robert Berleth <rberleth@berlethlaw.com> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2025 4:05 PM To: Pennetti, Alex Cc: Lang, Douglas S. Subject: RE: Cyberlux/Atlantic Wave - Documents Ordered to be Delivered RECEIVED FROM EXTERNAL SENDER - USE CAUTION Mr. Pennetti, Barring a ruling by the appellate court on the due date of the response brief (which is highly unlikely), your extended time to produce the ordered documents will expire on Tuesday of next week. Please plan on turning over the production as ordered by July 1, 2025. Have a nice weekend. Warmly, Robert Berleth Attorney-at-Law 9950 Cypresswood Dr., Ste. 200 Houston, Texas 77070 E-mail: rberleth@berlethlaw.com Tele: 713-588-6900 Fax: 713-481-0894 www.berlethlaw.com UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
entityobservation

Robert Berleth

Read the anchor · page 2
Pennetti, Alex From: Robert Berleth <rberleth@berlethlaw.com> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2025 4:05 PM To: Pennetti, Alex Cc: Lang, Douglas S. Subject: RE: Cyberlux/Atlantic Wave - Documents Ordered to be Delivered RECEIVED FROM EXTERNAL SENDER - USE CAUTION Mr. Pennetti, Barring a ruling by the appellate court on the due date of the response brief (which is highly unlikely), your extended time to produce the ordered documents will expire on Tuesday of next week. Please plan on turning over the production as ordered by July 1, 2025. Have a nice weekend. Warmly, Robert Berleth Attorney-at-Law 9950 Cypresswood Dr., Ste. 200 Houston, Texas 77070 E-mail: rberleth@berlethlaw.com Tele: 713-588-6900 Fax: 713-481-0894 www.berlethlaw.com UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
entityobservation

Pennetti, Alex

Read the anchor · page 2
Pennetti, Alex From: Robert Berleth <rberleth@berlethlaw.com> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2025 4:05 PM To: Pennetti, Alex Cc: Lang, Douglas S. Subject: RE: Cyberlux/Atlantic Wave - Documents Ordered to be Delivered RECEIVED FROM EXTERNAL SENDER - USE CAUTION Mr. Pennetti, Barring a ruling by the appellate court on the due date of the response brief (which is highly unlikely), your extended time to produce the ordered documents will expire on Tuesday of next week. Please plan on turning over the production as ordered by July 1, 2025. Have a nice weekend. Warmly, Robert Berleth Attorney-at-Law 9950 Cypresswood Dr., Ste. 200 Houston, Texas 77070 E-mail: rberleth@berlethlaw.com Tele: 713-588-6900 Fax: 713-481-0894 www.berlethlaw.com UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
entityobservation

Lang, Douglas S.

Read the anchor · page 2
Pennetti, Alex From: Robert Berleth <rberleth@berlethlaw.com> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2025 4:05 PM To: Pennetti, Alex Cc: Lang, Douglas S. Subject: RE: Cyberlux/Atlantic Wave - Documents Ordered to be Delivered RECEIVED FROM EXTERNAL SENDER - USE CAUTION Mr. Pennetti, Barring a ruling by the appellate court on the due date of the response brief (which is highly unlikely), your extended time to produce the ordered documents will expire on Tuesday of next week. Please plan on turning over the production as ordered by July 1, 2025. Have a nice weekend. Warmly, Robert Berleth Attorney-at-Law 9950 Cypresswood Dr., Ste. 200 Houston, Texas 77070 E-mail: rberleth@berlethlaw.com Tele: 713-588-6900 Fax: 713-481-0894 www.berlethlaw.com UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
inferenceinference

Berleth treats the pending appellate request as leaving the document-production obligation in place unless affirmative relief issues. His fo

Berleth treats the pending appellate request as leaving the document-production obligation in place unless affirmative relief issues. His forecast of an unlikely ruling is a prediction, not knowledge of judicial action.

omissiongap

Prior extension, underlying order, appellate response and production evidence are absent.

Read the anchor · page 1
EXHIBIT 8 UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
otherattribution

Complete supplied 2-page source reviewed at SHA-256 f2b0b1737f71607a2b1598b905233ca6b8f8629068738d94146bcadd7bdc6813. Source assertions, ori

Complete supplied 2-page source reviewed at SHA-256 f2b0b1737f71607a2b1598b905233ca6b8f8629068738d94146bcadd7bdc6813. Source assertions, original visual features, filing/communication context and identified missing attachments are retained. Exact version_f6f3ddd472e44a66b761e08626cb6320; SHA256 f2b0b1737f71607a2b1598b905233ca6b8f8629068738d94146bcadd7bdc6813. Both pages read; substantive email visually checked. Original extraction preserved.

Read the anchor · page 1
EXHIBIT 8 UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
questionquestion

What extension, appellate order and production receipt establish the actual July 1 obligation and compliance?

distillatequestion

CONNECT

Reviewed relationships

The canvas follows the database: source to DISTIL record, DISTIL record to knowledge object, then reviewed relationship. Position alone means nothing.

Berleth says the extended production time expires Tuesday July 1, 2025 barring an appellate ruling on the response-brief due date, which he calls highly unlikely. He asks counsel to plan production by July 1. The extension and operative production order are not attached, and this email does not establish whether an appellate ruling or production followed.supportsWhile the emergency motion is pending, the order expressly says nothing in it should be construed as preventing further trial-court proceedings, including determining whether the judgment has been satisfied and how money should be disbursed. This order does not grant the requested stay or decide satisfaction, disbursement or termination.

Consistent with proceedings not automatically stopped by June24 order; that order does not independently establish this production extension.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
Berleth says the extended production time expires Tuesday July 1, 2025 barring an appellate ruling on the response-brief due date, which he calls highly unlikely. He asks counsel to plan production by July 1. The extension and operative production order are not attached, and this email does not establish whether an appellate ruling or production followed.supportsPrior extension, underlying order, appellate response and production evidence are absent.

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
Berleth says the extended production time expires Tuesday July 1, 2025 barring an appellate ruling on the response-brief due date, which he calls highly unlikely. He asks counsel to plan production by July 1. The extension and operative production order are not attached, and this email does not establish whether an appellate ruling or production followed.supportsWhat deadline does Berleth communicate?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
Berleth says the extended production time expires Tuesday July 1, 2025 barring an appellate ruling on the response-brief due date, which he calls highly unlikely. He asks counsel to plan production by July 1. The extension and operative production order are not attached, and this email does not establish whether an appellate ruling or production followed.supportsWhat extension, appellate order and production receipt establish the actual July 1 obligation and compliance?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
Exhibit 8 contains Berleth’s June 27, 2025 4:05 PM email to Pennetti, copied to Douglas Lang, about documents ordered delivered in Cyberlux/Atlantic Wave. No prior messages or attachments appear.supportsPrior extension, underlying order, appellate response and production evidence are absent.

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
Berleth says the extended production time expires Tuesday July 1, 2025 barring an appellate ruling on the response-brief due date, which he calls highly unlikely. He asks counsel to plan production by July 1. The extension and operative production order are not attached, and this email does not establish whether an appellate ruling or production followed.supportsBerleth treats the pending appellate request as leaving the document-production obligation in place unless affirmative relief issues. His forecast of an unlikely ruling is a prediction, not knowledge of judicial action.

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
Exhibit 8 contains Berleth’s June 27, 2025 4:05 PM email to Pennetti, copied to Douglas Lang, about documents ordered delivered in Cyberlux/Atlantic Wave. No prior messages or attachments appear.supportsWhat extension, appellate order and production receipt establish the actual July 1 obligation and compliance?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%

WEIGH

Explained weighting

A score appears only when its components and change threshold are published.

No published WEIGH run

The active Website Edition contains no applied score snapshot for this source or its connected objects. That means not assessed—not zero.