The evidence/GT-S-011DCB3983C0

Context source · GT-S-011DCB3983C0

Plaintiff's Exhibit

Original sourceexhibit
SHA-256 011dcb3983c0b391da0b…0 pages · 780 KB

DISTILLATES

What the source contains

Each card carries the governed distillate name from the database. Open the quoted anchor before relying on the interpretation.

claimallegation

Payment Default on Accelerated Payment

Cyberlux failed to make the accelerated payment that was due in September 2023, as required under the payment agreement.

Read the anchor · page 1
As to the dispute regarding payments, Cyberlux was to make two (2) monthly payments (one payment for StrikePoint and one for AWH) prior to an accelerated payment due in September 2023. Defendant failed to make the accelerated payment.
claimallegation

No Regular AWH Payments Since October 2023

Cyberlux has made no regular payments to Atlantic Wave Holdings since October 2023.

Read the anchor · page 1
Cyberlux has made no regular payment since October 2023 (AWH) or May 2024 (StrikePoint).
claimallegation

No Regular StrikePoint Payments Since May 2024

Cyberlux has made no regular payments to StrikePoint (Secure Community, LLC) since May 2024.

Read the anchor · page 1
Cyberlux has made no regular payment since October 2023 (AWH) or May 2024 (StrikePoint).
claimallegation

Random Payments Not Accord and Satisfaction

The five random payments Cyberlux made since May 2024 toward the judgment balance do not constitute accord and satisfaction.

Read the anchor · page 1
Since May 2024, Cyberlux has made five (5) random payments towards the judgement balance - none of them is an accord and satisfaction.
claimallegation

Pending Garnishment Action in Virginia

A garnishment action is currently pending in Fairfax County, Virginia.

Read the anchor · page 1
There is a pending garnishment action in Fairfax County, Virginia.
claimallegation

No Interpleader Agreement for $1.44 Million

No agreement has been reached regarding interpleading $1.44 million into the Court Registry for Fairfax County, Virginia.

Read the anchor · page 2
No agreement has been made about interpleading $1.44 million into the Court Registry for Fairfax County, Virginia.
claimallegation

No Notice of Appearance Filed by Defense Counsel

Defendant Cyberlux's counsel has not filed a Notice of Appearance in the Fairfax County action as of the affidavit date.

Read the anchor · page 2
To date, Defendant Cyberlux's counsel has not filed a Notice of Appearance in the Fairfax County action.
entityobservation

J. Chapman Petersen

Virginia-Licensed Attorney working as a Principal attorney at Chap Petersen & Associates, PLC, located at 3970 Chain Bridge Road, Fairfax, VA 22030. Represents Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community, LLC in connection with actions filed in Virginia by or against Cyberlux Corporation.

Read the anchor · page 1
My name is J. Chapman Petersen, and I am a Virginia-Licensed Attorney working as a Principal attorney at Chap Petersen & Associates, PLC, located at 3970 Chain Bridge Road, Fairfax, VA 22030. I represent the plaintiffs, Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC ("AWH"), and Secure Community, LLC (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), in connection with the actions filed in Virginia by or against Cyberlux Corporation ("Cyberlux").
entityobservation

Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC

Plaintiff and judgment creditor represented by J. Chapman Petersen in actions against Cyberlux Corporation. Also referred to as AWH.

Read the anchor · page 1
I represent the plaintiffs, Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC ("AWH"), and Secure Community, LLC (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), in connection with the actions filed in Virginia by or against Cyberlux Corporation ("Cyberlux").
entityobservation

Secure Community, LLC

Plaintiff and judgment creditor represented by J. Chapman Petersen in actions against Cyberlux Corporation. Also referred to as StrikePoint in payment context.

Read the anchor · page 1
I represent the plaintiffs, Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC ("AWH"), and Secure Community, LLC (collectively, "Plaintiffs"), in connection with the actions filed in Virginia by or against Cyberlux Corporation ("Cyberlux").
entityobservation

Cyberlux Corporation

Defendant and judgment debtor in Harris County, Texas case (Cause No. 2024-48085) and subject of actions in Virginia. Failed to make required payments to creditors.

Read the anchor · page 1
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and MARK D. SCHMIDT, Individually, Defendant/Judgment-Debtors
entityobservation

Mark D. Schmidt

Individual defendant and judgment debtor in Harris County, Texas case alongside Cyberlux Corporation.

Read the anchor · page 1
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and MARK D. SCHMIDT, Individually, Defendant/Judgment-Debtors
entityobservation

129th Judicial District Court, Harris County, Texas

Court presiding over Cause No. 2024-48085, with Honorable Michael Gomez as judge. Venue for judgment enforcement proceedings.

Read the anchor · page 1
Honorable Michael Gomez of the 129th Judicial District of Harris County, Texas, dated May 20, 2025 in the above-captioned matter.
eventattribution

September 2023 Accelerated Payment Due

Cyberlux was required to make an accelerated payment in September 2023, but failed to do so. This was in addition to two monthly payments (one for StrikePoint and one for AWH).

Read the anchor · page 1
As to the dispute regarding payments, Cyberlux was to make two (2) monthly payments (one payment for StrikePoint and one for AWH) prior to an accelerated payment due in September 2023. Defendant failed to make the accelerated payment.
eventattribution

Cessation of Regular AWH Payments - October 2023

Cyberlux ceased making regular payments to Atlantic Wave Holdings (AWH) after October 2023.

Read the anchor · page 1
Cyberlux has made no regular payment since October 2023 (AWH) or May 2024 (StrikePoint).
eventattribution

Cessation of Regular StrikePoint Payments - May 2024

Cyberlux ceased making regular payments to StrikePoint (Secure Community, LLC) after May 2024.

Read the anchor · page 1
Cyberlux has made no regular payment since October 2023 (AWH) or May 2024 (StrikePoint).
eventattribution

Five Random Payments Since May 2024

Since May 2024, Cyberlux made five random payments toward the judgment balance, which are characterized as not constituting accord and satisfaction.

Read the anchor · page 1
Since May 2024, Cyberlux has made five (5) random payments towards the judgement balance - none of them is an accord and satisfaction.
eventattribution

Defendants' Letter to Judge Gomez - May 20, 2025

Defendants sent a letter to Honorable Michael Gomez of the 129th Judicial District of Harris County, Texas, prompting this responsive affidavit from plaintiffs' counsel.

Read the anchor · page 1
I am submitting this Affidavit in support of Plaintiffs' response to Defendants' letter to the Honorable Michael Gomez of the 129th Judicial District of Harris County, Texas, dated May 20, 2025 in the above-captioned matter.
eventattribution

Affidavit Execution - May 21, 2025

J. Chapman Petersen executed this affidavit on May 21, 2025, which was notarized in Fairfax, Virginia by Vivian Le Tran.

Read the anchor · page 2
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have caused this Affidavit to be executed on this 21 day of May 2025. J. Chapman Petersen
observationobservation

Payment Structure Before September 2023

Attorney Petersen describes the payment obligation structure: Cyberlux was to make two monthly payments (one for StrikePoint and one for AWH) prior to an accelerated payment due in September 2023.

Read the anchor · page 1
As to the dispute regarding payments, Cyberlux was to make two (2) monthly payments (one payment for StrikePoint and one for AWH) prior to an accelerated payment due in September 2023.
observationobservation

Payment Cessation Timeline

Attorney Petersen states the timeline of payment cessation: Cyberlux has made no regular payment since October 2023 (AWH) or May 2024 (StrikePoint).

Read the anchor · page 1
Cyberlux has made no regular payment since October 2023 (AWH) or May 2024 (StrikePoint).
distillateobservation

CONNECT

Reviewed relationships

The canvas follows the database: source to DISTIL record, DISTIL record to knowledge object, then reviewed relationship. Position alone means nothing.

No public CONNECT relationships are attached to this source.

WEIGH

Explained weighting

A score appears only when its components and change threshold are published.

No published WEIGH run

The active Website Edition contains no applied score snapshot for this source or its connected objects. That means not assessed—not zero.