The evidence/GT-S-09D65999D17C

Context source · GT-S-09D65999D17C

Receiver request to add eight creditor matters in series

Original sourceSigned motion seeking expanded collection authority and fee treatment; allegations and proposed sequence not a court-approved distribution.
SHA-256 09d65999d17c4fdec498…0 pages · 256 KB

DISTILLATES

What the source contains

Each card carries the governed distillate name from the database. Open the quoted anchor before relying on the interpretation.

quotationattribution

Receiver concedes his fee is only presumptive and must still be proven at final disbursement.

Read the anchor · page 5
Page 4 of 6 citizen of Texas, and also generally recognize the class of unp aid employees from Cyberlux’s Spring, Texas facility. They seek $2,676,378.58. They jointly are plaintiffs in Cause No. 4:2025cv02770, Tucker, et. al v. Cyberlux Corp. in the United States Federal District Court, Southern District of Texas- Houston Division; (g) The ARG Group, LLC ( “The ARG Group” ) is an North Carolina limited liability company with its principal place of business a registered office at 231 Sloop Point Loop Rd, Hampstead, NC 28443. The ARG Group has pending litigation seeking $13,500,000 for the Disputed Funds, Cause No. 25CV004246-310, styled The ARG Group v. Cyberlux Corp, et. al., in the General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division, in Wake County, North Carolina; and (h) Third Generation Development, L.P., ( “Third Generation” ) is a Texas li mited partnership with its principal place of business in Spring, Texas. Third Generation is the landlord for the Spring, Texas manufacturing facility owed back rent and facing significant cleanup costs, estimated at $342,478.34. 8. The Receiver requests supplement of the Receivership Order dated May 22, 2025 and to add the above-listed judgments and cause numbers for collection in this receivership. III. Receiver’s Fee Structure 9. Due to the complex nature of this collection, requiring years of litigation experience as a receiver, the tenacity and veracity with which Cyberlux has attacked both the receivership and the Receiver personally, expert skill in department of defense work, multiple applicable state and federal laws, and considerable expenses paid by the Receiver in this case, the parties have agreed to the presumptive Receiver’s fees as previously ordered by this Court. The Bergron factors only speak to the effectiveness of receivership, and do not require a lodestar application for fees. This is only a presumptive fee, and must still be proven at the Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 175-15 Filed 04/15/26 Page 5 of 7 PageID# 2811
observationobservation

Proposed list$27,340,291.29 versus expectedcorpus$25,795,303.38; not an allowed-claims schedule.

Read the anchor · page 2
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085 ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC § IN THE DISTRICT COURT and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC., § Plaintiffs, Judgment-Creditors, § § v. § 129TH JUDICIAL COURT § CYBERLUX CORPORATION and § MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually, § IN AND FOR Defendants, Judgment-Debtors. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT RECEIVERSHIP COMES NOW, the Receiver ROBERT BERLETH , as Receiver for CYBERLUX CORPORATION and MARK D. SCHMIDT respectfully requests an order supplementing the original order appointing receiver in this Motion to Supplement Receivership, and for good cause shows the following: I. Procedural History 1. Mr. Berleth was appointed Receiver by the Court over Judgment Debtors CYBERLUX CORPORATION (“Cyberlux”) to collect a judgment owed to ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC in an Order Appointing Receiver (“OAR”). The Receiver has now worked diligently on this case , nearly 24/7 since his appointment. There have literally been hundreds of pages filed by Cyberlux. 2. Soon after his appointment, the Receiver was contacted by multiple debtors of Cyberlux. 3. On June 24, 2025, HII Mission Technologies Corporation (“HII”) filed an Interpleader action, cause no. 3:25 -cv-483, styled HII Mission Tech. Corp. v. Cyberlux, et. al. in the Federal District Court of the Eastern District of Virginia - Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 175-15 Filed 04/15/26 Page 2 of 7 PageID# 2808
claimallegation

EDVA175-15 filed15April2026 reproduces HarrisCounty2024-48085 motion to supplement22May2025receivership. Signature images of TristianHarris

EDVA175-15 filed15April2026 reproduces HarrisCounty2024-48085 motion to supplement22May2025receivership. Signature images of TristianHarris appear onmotion and certificate dated29August2025; no Texas filing stamp or grant order supplied.

Read the anchor · page 1
EXHIBIT 13 Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 175-15 Filed 04/15/26 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 2807
claimallegation

Receiver RobertBerleth describes nearly24/7work, HII interpleader24June2025, expected$25,795,303.38corpus, approximately$300,000HIIlegalfees

Receiver RobertBerleth describes nearly24/7work, HII interpleader24June2025, expected$25,795,303.38corpus, approximately$300,000HIIlegalfees and predicted surplus. Claims Cyberlux seeks to abscond are advocacy, not findings.

Read the anchor · page 2
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085 ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC § IN THE DISTRICT COURT and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC., § Plaintiffs, Judgment-Creditors, § § v. § 129TH JUDICIAL COURT § CYBERLUX CORPORATION and § MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually, § IN AND FOR Defendants, Judgment-Debtors. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT RECEIVERSHIP COMES NOW, the Receiver ROBERT BERLETH , as Receiver for CYBERLUX CORPORATION and MARK D. SCHMIDT respectfully requests an order supplementing the original order appointing receiver in this Motion to Supplement Receivership, and for good cause shows the following: I. Procedural History 1. Mr. Berleth was appointed Receiver by the Court over Judgment Debtors CYBERLUX CORPORATION (“Cyberlux”) to collect a judgment owed to ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC in an Order Appointing Receiver (“OAR”). The Receiver has now worked diligently on this case , nearly 24/7 since his appointment. There have literally been hundreds of pages filed by Cyberlux. 2. Soon after his appointment, the Receiver was contacted by multiple debtors of Cyberlux. 3. On June 24, 2025, HII Mission Technologies Corporation (“HII”) filed an Interpleader action, cause no. 3:25 -cv-483, styled HII Mission Tech. Corp. v. Cyberlux, et. al. in the Federal District Court of the Eastern District of Virginia - Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 175-15 Filed 04/15/26 Page 2 of 7 PageID# 2808
claimallegation

Proposed series:a IRSliens$582,800.38;b SecureCommunity pendingCL24-003910$8,660,739.10;c CaudlejudgmentCL23-07422$9,392.50;d Aerotek24CV034

Proposed series:a IRSliens$582,800.38;b SecureCommunity pendingCL24-003910$8,660,739.10;c CaudlejudgmentCL23-07422$9,392.50;d Aerotek24CV034906-910$344,227.25;e ThinAir1:25-cv-00805$1,224,275.14;f PhillipR.Tucker/NeillWhitely/employees4:2025cv02770$2,676,378.58;g ARGpending25CV004246-310$13,500,000;h ThirdGenerationlandlordestimate$342,478.34. Different source labels distinguish liens, judgments, pendingclaims and estimates.

Read the anchor · page 4
Page 3 of 6 to supplement the OAR to add the additional Judgments in the following series1 to the current receivership: (a) United States Department of Treasury, part of t he United States of America (“United States”) is named as a party defendant pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2410 as it may claim an interest in the Disputed Funds (as defined below) by virtue of federal tax liens asserted by the Internal Revenue Service ( “IRS”) against Cyberlux’s property interests. The IRS holds liens against Cyberlux in the amount of $582,800.38; (b) Secure Community, LLC, ( “Secure Community” ) is a Virginia limited liability company with its principal place of business in Richmond, Virginia. Secure Community is in active litigation against Cyberlux, claiming $8,660,739.10 in Virginia court Cause No. CL-24- 003910, styled Atlantic Waves Holdings, LLC v. Cyberlux Corporation, et. al. , in the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond, Virginia; (c) Caudle & Caudle, P.C. ( “Caudle”) is a judgment creditor for $9,392.50 against Cyberlux for legal services performed, with an address of 1910 Byrd Avenue, Ste. 118, Richmond, Virginia 23230, Cause No. CL23-07422, in the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond, Virginia; (d) Aerotek, Inc. Aerotek, Inc. ( “Aerotek”) is a Maryland stock corporation authorized to do business in Virginia, with its principal place of business in Hanover, Maryland. Aerotek is a judgment creditor for $344,227.25, in Cause No. 24CV034906-910, styled Aerotek, Inc. v. Cyberlux Corporation, et. al. in the General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division, in Wake County, North Carolina; (e) Thin Air Gear, LLC, ( “Thin Air” ) is a Nevada limited liability company with its principal place of business in Colorado Springs, Colorado, and is a judgment creditor for $1,224,275.14 in United States Federal District Court of Colorado, Cause No. 1:25-cv-00805, styled Thin Air Gear, LLC v. Cyberlux Corporation et al., (f) Phillip R. Tucker (“Tucker”) is a natural person and an adult citizen of Texas. Neill Whitely (“Whiteley”) is a natural person and an adult 1 “Series” means that the first judgment is to be paid in full prior to moving to the next. The Receiver should collect his fee on each judgment paid as they resolve. Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 175-15 Filed 04/15/26 Page 4 of 7 PageID# 2810
claimallegation

Footnote defines series as full payment of each judgment before next, with receiver fee collected on each. Prayer asks court to supplement o

Footnote defines series as full payment of each judgment before next, with receiver fee collected on each. Prayer asks court to supplement original order for all eight; source does not establish lawful priority, allowed amounts or that proposed order was entered.

Read the anchor · page 4
Page 3 of 6 to supplement the OAR to add the additional Judgments in the following series1 to the current receivership: (a) United States Department of Treasury, part of t he United States of America (“United States”) is named as a party defendant pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2410 as it may claim an interest in the Disputed Funds (as defined below) by virtue of federal tax liens asserted by the Internal Revenue Service ( “IRS”) against Cyberlux’s property interests. The IRS holds liens against Cyberlux in the amount of $582,800.38; (b) Secure Community, LLC, ( “Secure Community” ) is a Virginia limited liability company with its principal place of business in Richmond, Virginia. Secure Community is in active litigation against Cyberlux, claiming $8,660,739.10 in Virginia court Cause No. CL-24- 003910, styled Atlantic Waves Holdings, LLC v. Cyberlux Corporation, et. al. , in the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond, Virginia; (c) Caudle & Caudle, P.C. ( “Caudle”) is a judgment creditor for $9,392.50 against Cyberlux for legal services performed, with an address of 1910 Byrd Avenue, Ste. 118, Richmond, Virginia 23230, Cause No. CL23-07422, in the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond, Virginia; (d) Aerotek, Inc. Aerotek, Inc. ( “Aerotek”) is a Maryland stock corporation authorized to do business in Virginia, with its principal place of business in Hanover, Maryland. Aerotek is a judgment creditor for $344,227.25, in Cause No. 24CV034906-910, styled Aerotek, Inc. v. Cyberlux Corporation, et. al. in the General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division, in Wake County, North Carolina; (e) Thin Air Gear, LLC, ( “Thin Air” ) is a Nevada limited liability company with its principal place of business in Colorado Springs, Colorado, and is a judgment creditor for $1,224,275.14 in United States Federal District Court of Colorado, Cause No. 1:25-cv-00805, styled Thin Air Gear, LLC v. Cyberlux Corporation et al., (f) Phillip R. Tucker (“Tucker”) is a natural person and an adult citizen of Texas. Neill Whitely (“Whiteley”) is a natural person and an adult 1 “Series” means that the first judgment is to be paid in full prior to moving to the next. The Receiver should collect his fee on each judgment paid as they resolve. Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 175-15 Filed 04/15/26 Page 4 of 7 PageID# 2810
claimallegation

Receiver argues presumptive fees justified by complexity, skill and resistance, claims lodestar not required, but expressly says fee remains

Receiver argues presumptive fees justified by complexity, skill and resistance, claims lodestar not required, but expressly says fee remains to be proven at final disbursement under Bergeron/Moyer/Rohrmoos requirements. No fee amount or invoice schedule attached.

Read the anchor · page 5
Page 4 of 6 citizen of Texas, and also generally recognize the class of unp aid employees from Cyberlux’s Spring, Texas facility. They seek $2,676,378.58. They jointly are plaintiffs in Cause No. 4:2025cv02770, Tucker, et. al v. Cyberlux Corp. in the United States Federal District Court, Southern District of Texas- Houston Division; (g) The ARG Group, LLC ( “The ARG Group” ) is an North Carolina limited liability company with its principal place of business a registered office at 231 Sloop Point Loop Rd, Hampstead, NC 28443. The ARG Group has pending litigation seeking $13,500,000 for the Disputed Funds, Cause No. 25CV004246-310, styled The ARG Group v. Cyberlux Corp, et. al., in the General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division, in Wake County, North Carolina; and (h) Third Generation Development, L.P., ( “Third Generation” ) is a Texas li mited partnership with its principal place of business in Spring, Texas. Third Generation is the landlord for the Spring, Texas manufacturing facility owed back rent and facing significant cleanup costs, estimated at $342,478.34. 8. The Receiver requests supplement of the Receivership Order dated May 22, 2025 and to add the above-listed judgments and cause numbers for collection in this receivership. III. Receiver’s Fee Structure 9. Due to the complex nature of this collection, requiring years of litigation experience as a receiver, the tenacity and veracity with which Cyberlux has attacked both the receivership and the Receiver personally, expert skill in department of defense work, multiple applicable state and federal laws, and considerable expenses paid by the Receiver in this case, the parties have agreed to the presumptive Receiver’s fees as previously ordered by this Court. The Bergron factors only speak to the effectiveness of receivership, and do not require a lodestar application for fees. This is only a presumptive fee, and must still be proven at the Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 175-15 Filed 04/15/26 Page 5 of 7 PageID# 2811
claimallegation

Harris certificate states service29August2025 onallcounsel by listed modalities; creditorGrady and debtorPennetti identified viaTexasE-file.

Harris certificate states service29August2025 onallcounsel by listed modalities; creditorGrady and debtorPennetti identified viaTexasE-file. No actual electronic receipt supplied.

Read the anchor · page 7
Page 6 of 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on Friday, August 29, 2025 , a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing was forwarded to all counsel of record via certified mail, return receipt requested, regular mail, e-mail and/or facsimile. Electronic records were also forwarded in accordance with local rules through the E -file or CM/ECF system. Counsel for Creditor Via Texas E-file Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC Shawn M. Grady SBN 24076411 shawn@gradycollectionlaw.com 2100 West Loop South, Ste. 805 Houston, Texas 77027 Counsel for Debtor, Via Texas E-file Cyberlux Corporation Alexander J. Pennetti State Bar No. 24110208 THOMPSON COBURN LLP 2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 3200 Dallas, Texas 75201 _________________________ Tristian L. Harris Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 175-15 Filed 04/15/26 Page 7 of 7 PageID# 2813Own image supplement: blue TristianHarris signature appears on certificate.
entityobservation

ROBERT BERLETH

Read the anchor · page 2
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085 ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC § IN THE DISTRICT COURT and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC., § Plaintiffs, Judgment-Creditors, § § v. § 129TH JUDICIAL COURT § CYBERLUX CORPORATION and § MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually, § IN AND FOR Defendants, Judgment-Debtors. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT RECEIVERSHIP COMES NOW, the Receiver ROBERT BERLETH , as Receiver for CYBERLUX CORPORATION and MARK D. SCHMIDT respectfully requests an order supplementing the original order appointing receiver in this Motion to Supplement Receivership, and for good cause shows the following: I. Procedural History 1. Mr. Berleth was appointed Receiver by the Court over Judgment Debtors CYBERLUX CORPORATION (“Cyberlux”) to collect a judgment owed to ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC in an Order Appointing Receiver (“OAR”). The Receiver has now worked diligently on this case , nearly 24/7 since his appointment. There have literally been hundreds of pages filed by Cyberlux. 2. Soon after his appointment, the Receiver was contacted by multiple debtors of Cyberlux. 3. On June 24, 2025, HII Mission Technologies Corporation (“HII”) filed an Interpleader action, cause no. 3:25 -cv-483, styled HII Mission Tech. Corp. v. Cyberlux, et. al. in the Federal District Court of the Eastern District of Virginia - Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 175-15 Filed 04/15/26 Page 2 of 7 PageID# 2808
entityobservation

The ARG Group, LLC

Read the anchor · page 5
Page 4 of 6 citizen of Texas, and also generally recognize the class of unp aid employees from Cyberlux’s Spring, Texas facility. They seek $2,676,378.58. They jointly are plaintiffs in Cause No. 4:2025cv02770, Tucker, et. al v. Cyberlux Corp. in the United States Federal District Court, Southern District of Texas- Houston Division; (g) The ARG Group, LLC ( “The ARG Group” ) is an North Carolina limited liability company with its principal place of business a registered office at 231 Sloop Point Loop Rd, Hampstead, NC 28443. The ARG Group has pending litigation seeking $13,500,000 for the Disputed Funds, Cause No. 25CV004246-310, styled The ARG Group v. Cyberlux Corp, et. al., in the General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division, in Wake County, North Carolina; and (h) Third Generation Development, L.P., ( “Third Generation” ) is a Texas li mited partnership with its principal place of business in Spring, Texas. Third Generation is the landlord for the Spring, Texas manufacturing facility owed back rent and facing significant cleanup costs, estimated at $342,478.34. 8. The Receiver requests supplement of the Receivership Order dated May 22, 2025 and to add the above-listed judgments and cause numbers for collection in this receivership. III. Receiver’s Fee Structure 9. Due to the complex nature of this collection, requiring years of litigation experience as a receiver, the tenacity and veracity with which Cyberlux has attacked both the receivership and the Receiver personally, expert skill in department of defense work, multiple applicable state and federal laws, and considerable expenses paid by the Receiver in this case, the parties have agreed to the presumptive Receiver’s fees as previously ordered by this Court. The Bergron factors only speak to the effectiveness of receivership, and do not require a lodestar application for fees. This is only a presumptive fee, and must still be proven at the Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 175-15 Filed 04/15/26 Page 5 of 7 PageID# 2811
entityobservation

Third Generation Development, L.P.

Read the anchor · page 5
Page 4 of 6 citizen of Texas, and also generally recognize the class of unp aid employees from Cyberlux’s Spring, Texas facility. They seek $2,676,378.58. They jointly are plaintiffs in Cause No. 4:2025cv02770, Tucker, et. al v. Cyberlux Corp. in the United States Federal District Court, Southern District of Texas- Houston Division; (g) The ARG Group, LLC ( “The ARG Group” ) is an North Carolina limited liability company with its principal place of business a registered office at 231 Sloop Point Loop Rd, Hampstead, NC 28443. The ARG Group has pending litigation seeking $13,500,000 for the Disputed Funds, Cause No. 25CV004246-310, styled The ARG Group v. Cyberlux Corp, et. al., in the General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division, in Wake County, North Carolina; and (h) Third Generation Development, L.P., ( “Third Generation” ) is a Texas li mited partnership with its principal place of business in Spring, Texas. Third Generation is the landlord for the Spring, Texas manufacturing facility owed back rent and facing significant cleanup costs, estimated at $342,478.34. 8. The Receiver requests supplement of the Receivership Order dated May 22, 2025 and to add the above-listed judgments and cause numbers for collection in this receivership. III. Receiver’s Fee Structure 9. Due to the complex nature of this collection, requiring years of litigation experience as a receiver, the tenacity and veracity with which Cyberlux has attacked both the receivership and the Receiver personally, expert skill in department of defense work, multiple applicable state and federal laws, and considerable expenses paid by the Receiver in this case, the parties have agreed to the presumptive Receiver’s fees as previously ordered by this Court. The Bergron factors only speak to the effectiveness of receivership, and do not require a lodestar application for fees. This is only a presumptive fee, and must still be proven at the Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 175-15 Filed 04/15/26 Page 5 of 7 PageID# 2811
entityobservation

Tristian L. Harris

Read the anchor · page 6
Page 5 of 6 final disbursement in accordance with meeting the Bergeron and Moyer elements and Rohrmoos Venture requirements. IV. Prayer WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, Receiver, Robert Berleth, respectfully requests that the Court enter an order supplementing the judgment from the above-listed cause numbers at ¶7, a-h, into this Receivership, and for any other relief at law or equity, general or specific to which they are justly entitled. Respectfully submitted by: _________________________ BERLETH & ASSOCIATES, PLLC Robert W. Berleth Texas Bar # 24091860 SDOT #: 3062288 E-mail: rberleth@berlethlaw.com Tristian L. Harris Texas Bar # 24134449 SDOT #: 3848849 E-mail: tharris@berlethlaw.com 9950 Cypresswood Dr. Suite 200 Houston, Texas 77070 Tele: 713-588-6900 APPOINTED RECEIVER Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 175-15 Filed 04/15/26 Page 6 of 7 PageID# 2812Own image supplement: blue TristianHarris signature appears on motion signature line.
entityobservation

CYBERLUX CORPORATION

Read the anchor · page 2
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085 ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC § IN THE DISTRICT COURT and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC., § Plaintiffs, Judgment-Creditors, § § v. § 129TH JUDICIAL COURT § CYBERLUX CORPORATION and § MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually, § IN AND FOR Defendants, Judgment-Debtors. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT RECEIVERSHIP COMES NOW, the Receiver ROBERT BERLETH , as Receiver for CYBERLUX CORPORATION and MARK D. SCHMIDT respectfully requests an order supplementing the original order appointing receiver in this Motion to Supplement Receivership, and for good cause shows the following: I. Procedural History 1. Mr. Berleth was appointed Receiver by the Court over Judgment Debtors CYBERLUX CORPORATION (“Cyberlux”) to collect a judgment owed to ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC in an Order Appointing Receiver (“OAR”). The Receiver has now worked diligently on this case , nearly 24/7 since his appointment. There have literally been hundreds of pages filed by Cyberlux. 2. Soon after his appointment, the Receiver was contacted by multiple debtors of Cyberlux. 3. On June 24, 2025, HII Mission Technologies Corporation (“HII”) filed an Interpleader action, cause no. 3:25 -cv-483, styled HII Mission Tech. Corp. v. Cyberlux, et. al. in the Federal District Court of the Eastern District of Virginia - Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 175-15 Filed 04/15/26 Page 2 of 7 PageID# 2808
entityobservation

MARK D. SCHMIDT

Read the anchor · page 2
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085 ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC § IN THE DISTRICT COURT and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC., § Plaintiffs, Judgment-Creditors, § § v. § 129TH JUDICIAL COURT § CYBERLUX CORPORATION and § MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually, § IN AND FOR Defendants, Judgment-Debtors. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT RECEIVERSHIP COMES NOW, the Receiver ROBERT BERLETH , as Receiver for CYBERLUX CORPORATION and MARK D. SCHMIDT respectfully requests an order supplementing the original order appointing receiver in this Motion to Supplement Receivership, and for good cause shows the following: I. Procedural History 1. Mr. Berleth was appointed Receiver by the Court over Judgment Debtors CYBERLUX CORPORATION (“Cyberlux”) to collect a judgment owed to ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC in an Order Appointing Receiver (“OAR”). The Receiver has now worked diligently on this case , nearly 24/7 since his appointment. There have literally been hundreds of pages filed by Cyberlux. 2. Soon after his appointment, the Receiver was contacted by multiple debtors of Cyberlux. 3. On June 24, 2025, HII Mission Technologies Corporation (“HII”) filed an Interpleader action, cause no. 3:25 -cv-483, styled HII Mission Tech. Corp. v. Cyberlux, et. al. in the Federal District Court of the Eastern District of Virginia - Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 175-15 Filed 04/15/26 Page 2 of 7 PageID# 2808
entityobservation

Secure Community, LLC

Read the anchor · page 4
Page 3 of 6 to supplement the OAR to add the additional Judgments in the following series1 to the current receivership: (a) United States Department of Treasury, part of t he United States of America (“United States”) is named as a party defendant pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2410 as it may claim an interest in the Disputed Funds (as defined below) by virtue of federal tax liens asserted by the Internal Revenue Service ( “IRS”) against Cyberlux’s property interests. The IRS holds liens against Cyberlux in the amount of $582,800.38; (b) Secure Community, LLC, ( “Secure Community” ) is a Virginia limited liability company with its principal place of business in Richmond, Virginia. Secure Community is in active litigation against Cyberlux, claiming $8,660,739.10 in Virginia court Cause No. CL-24- 003910, styled Atlantic Waves Holdings, LLC v. Cyberlux Corporation, et. al. , in the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond, Virginia; (c) Caudle & Caudle, P.C. ( “Caudle”) is a judgment creditor for $9,392.50 against Cyberlux for legal services performed, with an address of 1910 Byrd Avenue, Ste. 118, Richmond, Virginia 23230, Cause No. CL23-07422, in the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond, Virginia; (d) Aerotek, Inc. Aerotek, Inc. ( “Aerotek”) is a Maryland stock corporation authorized to do business in Virginia, with its principal place of business in Hanover, Maryland. Aerotek is a judgment creditor for $344,227.25, in Cause No. 24CV034906-910, styled Aerotek, Inc. v. Cyberlux Corporation, et. al. in the General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division, in Wake County, North Carolina; (e) Thin Air Gear, LLC, ( “Thin Air” ) is a Nevada limited liability company with its principal place of business in Colorado Springs, Colorado, and is a judgment creditor for $1,224,275.14 in United States Federal District Court of Colorado, Cause No. 1:25-cv-00805, styled Thin Air Gear, LLC v. Cyberlux Corporation et al., (f) Phillip R. Tucker (“Tucker”) is a natural person and an adult citizen of Texas. Neill Whitely (“Whiteley”) is a natural person and an adult 1 “Series” means that the first judgment is to be paid in full prior to moving to the next. The Receiver should collect his fee on each judgment paid as they resolve. Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 175-15 Filed 04/15/26 Page 4 of 7 PageID# 2810
entityobservation

Caudle & Caudle, P.C.

Read the anchor · page 4
Page 3 of 6 to supplement the OAR to add the additional Judgments in the following series1 to the current receivership: (a) United States Department of Treasury, part of t he United States of America (“United States”) is named as a party defendant pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2410 as it may claim an interest in the Disputed Funds (as defined below) by virtue of federal tax liens asserted by the Internal Revenue Service ( “IRS”) against Cyberlux’s property interests. The IRS holds liens against Cyberlux in the amount of $582,800.38; (b) Secure Community, LLC, ( “Secure Community” ) is a Virginia limited liability company with its principal place of business in Richmond, Virginia. Secure Community is in active litigation against Cyberlux, claiming $8,660,739.10 in Virginia court Cause No. CL-24- 003910, styled Atlantic Waves Holdings, LLC v. Cyberlux Corporation, et. al. , in the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond, Virginia; (c) Caudle & Caudle, P.C. ( “Caudle”) is a judgment creditor for $9,392.50 against Cyberlux for legal services performed, with an address of 1910 Byrd Avenue, Ste. 118, Richmond, Virginia 23230, Cause No. CL23-07422, in the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond, Virginia; (d) Aerotek, Inc. Aerotek, Inc. ( “Aerotek”) is a Maryland stock corporation authorized to do business in Virginia, with its principal place of business in Hanover, Maryland. Aerotek is a judgment creditor for $344,227.25, in Cause No. 24CV034906-910, styled Aerotek, Inc. v. Cyberlux Corporation, et. al. in the General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division, in Wake County, North Carolina; (e) Thin Air Gear, LLC, ( “Thin Air” ) is a Nevada limited liability company with its principal place of business in Colorado Springs, Colorado, and is a judgment creditor for $1,224,275.14 in United States Federal District Court of Colorado, Cause No. 1:25-cv-00805, styled Thin Air Gear, LLC v. Cyberlux Corporation et al., (f) Phillip R. Tucker (“Tucker”) is a natural person and an adult citizen of Texas. Neill Whitely (“Whiteley”) is a natural person and an adult 1 “Series” means that the first judgment is to be paid in full prior to moving to the next. The Receiver should collect his fee on each judgment paid as they resolve. Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 175-15 Filed 04/15/26 Page 4 of 7 PageID# 2810
entityobservation

Aerotek, Inc.

Read the anchor · page 4
Page 3 of 6 to supplement the OAR to add the additional Judgments in the following series1 to the current receivership: (a) United States Department of Treasury, part of t he United States of America (“United States”) is named as a party defendant pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2410 as it may claim an interest in the Disputed Funds (as defined below) by virtue of federal tax liens asserted by the Internal Revenue Service ( “IRS”) against Cyberlux’s property interests. The IRS holds liens against Cyberlux in the amount of $582,800.38; (b) Secure Community, LLC, ( “Secure Community” ) is a Virginia limited liability company with its principal place of business in Richmond, Virginia. Secure Community is in active litigation against Cyberlux, claiming $8,660,739.10 in Virginia court Cause No. CL-24- 003910, styled Atlantic Waves Holdings, LLC v. Cyberlux Corporation, et. al. , in the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond, Virginia; (c) Caudle & Caudle, P.C. ( “Caudle”) is a judgment creditor for $9,392.50 against Cyberlux for legal services performed, with an address of 1910 Byrd Avenue, Ste. 118, Richmond, Virginia 23230, Cause No. CL23-07422, in the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond, Virginia; (d) Aerotek, Inc. Aerotek, Inc. ( “Aerotek”) is a Maryland stock corporation authorized to do business in Virginia, with its principal place of business in Hanover, Maryland. Aerotek is a judgment creditor for $344,227.25, in Cause No. 24CV034906-910, styled Aerotek, Inc. v. Cyberlux Corporation, et. al. in the General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division, in Wake County, North Carolina; (e) Thin Air Gear, LLC, ( “Thin Air” ) is a Nevada limited liability company with its principal place of business in Colorado Springs, Colorado, and is a judgment creditor for $1,224,275.14 in United States Federal District Court of Colorado, Cause No. 1:25-cv-00805, styled Thin Air Gear, LLC v. Cyberlux Corporation et al., (f) Phillip R. Tucker (“Tucker”) is a natural person and an adult citizen of Texas. Neill Whitely (“Whiteley”) is a natural person and an adult 1 “Series” means that the first judgment is to be paid in full prior to moving to the next. The Receiver should collect his fee on each judgment paid as they resolve. Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 175-15 Filed 04/15/26 Page 4 of 7 PageID# 2810
entityobservation

Thin Air Gear, LLC

Read the anchor · page 4
Page 3 of 6 to supplement the OAR to add the additional Judgments in the following series1 to the current receivership: (a) United States Department of Treasury, part of t he United States of America (“United States”) is named as a party defendant pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2410 as it may claim an interest in the Disputed Funds (as defined below) by virtue of federal tax liens asserted by the Internal Revenue Service ( “IRS”) against Cyberlux’s property interests. The IRS holds liens against Cyberlux in the amount of $582,800.38; (b) Secure Community, LLC, ( “Secure Community” ) is a Virginia limited liability company with its principal place of business in Richmond, Virginia. Secure Community is in active litigation against Cyberlux, claiming $8,660,739.10 in Virginia court Cause No. CL-24- 003910, styled Atlantic Waves Holdings, LLC v. Cyberlux Corporation, et. al. , in the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond, Virginia; (c) Caudle & Caudle, P.C. ( “Caudle”) is a judgment creditor for $9,392.50 against Cyberlux for legal services performed, with an address of 1910 Byrd Avenue, Ste. 118, Richmond, Virginia 23230, Cause No. CL23-07422, in the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond, Virginia; (d) Aerotek, Inc. Aerotek, Inc. ( “Aerotek”) is a Maryland stock corporation authorized to do business in Virginia, with its principal place of business in Hanover, Maryland. Aerotek is a judgment creditor for $344,227.25, in Cause No. 24CV034906-910, styled Aerotek, Inc. v. Cyberlux Corporation, et. al. in the General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division, in Wake County, North Carolina; (e) Thin Air Gear, LLC, ( “Thin Air” ) is a Nevada limited liability company with its principal place of business in Colorado Springs, Colorado, and is a judgment creditor for $1,224,275.14 in United States Federal District Court of Colorado, Cause No. 1:25-cv-00805, styled Thin Air Gear, LLC v. Cyberlux Corporation et al., (f) Phillip R. Tucker (“Tucker”) is a natural person and an adult citizen of Texas. Neill Whitely (“Whiteley”) is a natural person and an adult 1 “Series” means that the first judgment is to be paid in full prior to moving to the next. The Receiver should collect his fee on each judgment paid as they resolve. Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 175-15 Filed 04/15/26 Page 4 of 7 PageID# 2810
entityobservation

Phillip R. Tucker

Read the anchor · page 4
Page 3 of 6 to supplement the OAR to add the additional Judgments in the following series1 to the current receivership: (a) United States Department of Treasury, part of t he United States of America (“United States”) is named as a party defendant pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2410 as it may claim an interest in the Disputed Funds (as defined below) by virtue of federal tax liens asserted by the Internal Revenue Service ( “IRS”) against Cyberlux’s property interests. The IRS holds liens against Cyberlux in the amount of $582,800.38; (b) Secure Community, LLC, ( “Secure Community” ) is a Virginia limited liability company with its principal place of business in Richmond, Virginia. Secure Community is in active litigation against Cyberlux, claiming $8,660,739.10 in Virginia court Cause No. CL-24- 003910, styled Atlantic Waves Holdings, LLC v. Cyberlux Corporation, et. al. , in the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond, Virginia; (c) Caudle & Caudle, P.C. ( “Caudle”) is a judgment creditor for $9,392.50 against Cyberlux for legal services performed, with an address of 1910 Byrd Avenue, Ste. 118, Richmond, Virginia 23230, Cause No. CL23-07422, in the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond, Virginia; (d) Aerotek, Inc. Aerotek, Inc. ( “Aerotek”) is a Maryland stock corporation authorized to do business in Virginia, with its principal place of business in Hanover, Maryland. Aerotek is a judgment creditor for $344,227.25, in Cause No. 24CV034906-910, styled Aerotek, Inc. v. Cyberlux Corporation, et. al. in the General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division, in Wake County, North Carolina; (e) Thin Air Gear, LLC, ( “Thin Air” ) is a Nevada limited liability company with its principal place of business in Colorado Springs, Colorado, and is a judgment creditor for $1,224,275.14 in United States Federal District Court of Colorado, Cause No. 1:25-cv-00805, styled Thin Air Gear, LLC v. Cyberlux Corporation et al., (f) Phillip R. Tucker (“Tucker”) is a natural person and an adult citizen of Texas. Neill Whitely (“Whiteley”) is a natural person and an adult 1 “Series” means that the first judgment is to be paid in full prior to moving to the next. The Receiver should collect his fee on each judgment paid as they resolve. Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 175-15 Filed 04/15/26 Page 4 of 7 PageID# 2810
entityobservation

Neill Whitely

Read the anchor · page 4
Page 3 of 6 to supplement the OAR to add the additional Judgments in the following series1 to the current receivership: (a) United States Department of Treasury, part of t he United States of America (“United States”) is named as a party defendant pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2410 as it may claim an interest in the Disputed Funds (as defined below) by virtue of federal tax liens asserted by the Internal Revenue Service ( “IRS”) against Cyberlux’s property interests. The IRS holds liens against Cyberlux in the amount of $582,800.38; (b) Secure Community, LLC, ( “Secure Community” ) is a Virginia limited liability company with its principal place of business in Richmond, Virginia. Secure Community is in active litigation against Cyberlux, claiming $8,660,739.10 in Virginia court Cause No. CL-24- 003910, styled Atlantic Waves Holdings, LLC v. Cyberlux Corporation, et. al. , in the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond, Virginia; (c) Caudle & Caudle, P.C. ( “Caudle”) is a judgment creditor for $9,392.50 against Cyberlux for legal services performed, with an address of 1910 Byrd Avenue, Ste. 118, Richmond, Virginia 23230, Cause No. CL23-07422, in the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond, Virginia; (d) Aerotek, Inc. Aerotek, Inc. ( “Aerotek”) is a Maryland stock corporation authorized to do business in Virginia, with its principal place of business in Hanover, Maryland. Aerotek is a judgment creditor for $344,227.25, in Cause No. 24CV034906-910, styled Aerotek, Inc. v. Cyberlux Corporation, et. al. in the General Court of Justice, Superior Court Division, in Wake County, North Carolina; (e) Thin Air Gear, LLC, ( “Thin Air” ) is a Nevada limited liability company with its principal place of business in Colorado Springs, Colorado, and is a judgment creditor for $1,224,275.14 in United States Federal District Court of Colorado, Cause No. 1:25-cv-00805, styled Thin Air Gear, LLC v. Cyberlux Corporation et al., (f) Phillip R. Tucker (“Tucker”) is a natural person and an adult citizen of Texas. Neill Whitely (“Whiteley”) is a natural person and an adult 1 “Series” means that the first judgment is to be paid in full prior to moving to the next. The Receiver should collect his fee on each judgment paid as they resolve. Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 175-15 Filed 04/15/26 Page 4 of 7 PageID# 2810
eventattribution

Signed certificate states service; receipt not supplied.

Read the anchor · page 7
Page 6 of 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that on Friday, August 29, 2025 , a true and correct copy of the above and foregoing was forwarded to all counsel of record via certified mail, return receipt requested, regular mail, e-mail and/or facsimile. Electronic records were also forwarded in accordance with local rules through the E -file or CM/ECF system. Counsel for Creditor Via Texas E-file Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC Shawn M. Grady SBN 24076411 shawn@gradycollectionlaw.com 2100 West Loop South, Ste. 805 Houston, Texas 77027 Counsel for Debtor, Via Texas E-file Cyberlux Corporation Alexander J. Pennetti State Bar No. 24110208 THOMPSON COBURN LLP 2100 Ross Avenue, Suite 3200 Dallas, Texas 75201 _________________________ Tristian L. Harris Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 175-15 Filed 04/15/26 Page 7 of 7 PageID# 2813Own image supplement: blue TristianHarris signature appears on certificate.
eventattribution

EDVA175-15filed.

Read the anchor · page 1
EXHIBIT 13 Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 175-15 Filed 04/15/26 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 2807
inferenceinference

Eight listed amounts sum$27,340,291.29, exceeding expected$25,795,303.38 by$1,544,987.91 before receiver fees or other claims. Thus predicte

Eight listed amounts sum$27,340,291.29, exceeding expected$25,795,303.38 by$1,544,987.91 before receiver fees or other claims. Thus predicted surplus is not enough to pay all listed amounts at face value; mixed claim validity and priority remain unresolved.

otherattribution

Complete supplied 7-page source reviewed at SHA-256 09d65999d17c4fdec498b923f78b64e564afa4ea39d59699f777d62e9502ec56. Source assertions, ori

Complete supplied 7-page source reviewed at SHA-256 09d65999d17c4fdec498b923f78b64e564afa4ea39d59699f777d62e9502ec56. Source assertions, original visual features, filing/communication context and identified missing attachments are retained. Own exact SHA256 09d65999d17c4fdec498b923f78b64e564afa4ea39d59699f777d62e9502ec56 verified; complete own-source text and all rendered pages read. Page-level corrections explicitly attributed; no absent document or performed act inferred.

Read the anchor · page 1
EXHIBIT 13 Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 175-15 Filed 04/15/26 Page 1 of 7 PageID# 2807
questionquestion

Which listed matters have enforceable judgments, allowed amounts and priority, and what order approved adding them or the proposed series?

questionquestion

What final fee proof and net available corpus support proposed distributions after costs and competing claims?

distillateobservation

CONNECT

Reviewed relationships

The canvas follows the database: source to DISTIL record, DISTIL record to knowledge object, then reviewed relationship. Position alone means nothing.

Proposed series:a IRSliens$582,800.38;b SecureCommunity pendingCL24-003910$8,660,739.10;c CaudlejudgmentCL23-07422$9,392.50;d Aerotek24CV034906-910$344,227.25;e ThinAir1:25-cv-00805$1,224,275.14;f PhillipR.Tucker/NeillWhitely/employees4:2025cv02770$2,676,378.58;g ARGpending25CV004246-310$13,500,000;h ThirdGenerationlandlordestimate$342,478.34. Different source labels distinguish liens, judgments, pendingclaims and estimates.supportsAssessment rows in displayed order: tax940, period2023-12-31, assessed2024-02-26, refile-by2034-03-28, balance254.70; tax941, period2010-06-30, assessed2013-05-13, refile-by2033-06-12, balance46023.00; tax941, period2010-12-31, assessed2011-04-11, refile-by2031-05-11, balance[blank]; tax941, period2010-12-31, assessed2012-09-10, refile-by2032-10-10, balance178708.29; tax941, period2012-12-31, assessed2013-04-01, refile-by2033-05-01, balance334730.87. Printed total $559716.86. A blank row balance is preserved as blank, not zero or a second copy of adjacent amount.

IRS aggregate582800.38equals notices39+41+43(2220.28+20863.24+559716.86); same underlying notices, not independent corroboration or current payoff.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
Receiver RobertBerleth describes nearly24/7work, HII interpleader24June2025, expected$25,795,303.38corpus, approximately$300,000HIIlegalfees and predicted surplus. Claims Cyberlux seeks to abscond are advocacy, not findings.supportsWhat final fee proof and net available corpus support proposed distributions after costs and competing claims?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
Footnote defines series as full payment of each judgment before next, with receiver fee collected on each. Prayer asks court to supplement original order for all eight; source does not establish lawful priority, allowed amounts or that proposed order was entered.supportsWhich listed matters have enforceable judgments, allowed amounts and priority, and what order approved adding them or the proposed series?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
Proposed series:a IRSliens$582,800.38;b SecureCommunity pendingCL24-003910$8,660,739.10;c CaudlejudgmentCL23-07422$9,392.50;d Aerotek24CV034906-910$344,227.25;e ThinAir1:25-cv-00805$1,224,275.14;f PhillipR.Tucker/NeillWhitely/employees4:2025cv02770$2,676,378.58;g ARGpending25CV004246-310$13,500,000;h ThirdGenerationlandlordestimate$342,478.34. Different source labels distinguish liens, judgments, pendingclaims and estimates.supportsWhat does the supplementation motion establish?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
Eight listed amounts sum$27,340,291.29, exceeding expected$25,795,303.38 by$1,544,987.91 before receiver fees or other claims. Thus predicted surplus is not enough to pay all listed amounts at face value; mixed claim validity and priority remain unresolved.supportsWhat final fee proof and net available corpus support proposed distributions after costs and competing claims?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
Receiver argues presumptive fees justified by complexity, skill and resistance, claims lodestar not required, but expressly says fee remains to be proven at final disbursement under Bergeron/Moyer/Rohrmoos requirements. No fee amount or invoice schedule attached.supportsWhat final fee proof and net available corpus support proposed distributions after costs and competing claims?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
Footnote defines series as full payment of each judgment before next, with receiver fee collected on each. Prayer asks court to supplement original order for all eight; source does not establish lawful priority, allowed amounts or that proposed order was entered.supportsWhat does the supplementation motion establish?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
Receiver RobertBerleth describes nearly24/7work, HII interpleader24June2025, expected$25,795,303.38corpus, approximately$300,000HIIlegalfees and predicted surplus. Claims Cyberlux seeks to abscond are advocacy, not findings.supportsEight listed amounts sum$27,340,291.29, exceeding expected$25,795,303.38 by$1,544,987.91 before receiver fees or other claims. Thus predicted surplus is not enough to pay all listed amounts at face value; mixed claim validity and priority remain unresolved.

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
Proposed series:a IRSliens$582,800.38;b SecureCommunity pendingCL24-003910$8,660,739.10;c CaudlejudgmentCL23-07422$9,392.50;d Aerotek24CV034906-910$344,227.25;e ThinAir1:25-cv-00805$1,224,275.14;f PhillipR.Tucker/NeillWhitely/employees4:2025cv02770$2,676,378.58;g ARGpending25CV004246-310$13,500,000;h ThirdGenerationlandlordestimate$342,478.34. Different source labels distinguish liens, judgments, pendingclaims and estimates.supportsWhich listed matters have enforceable judgments, allowed amounts and priority, and what order approved adding them or the proposed series?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
Footnote defines series as full payment of each judgment before next, with receiver fee collected on each. Prayer asks court to supplement original order for all eight; source does not establish lawful priority, allowed amounts or that proposed order was entered.supportsEight listed amounts sum$27,340,291.29, exceeding expected$25,795,303.38 by$1,544,987.91 before receiver fees or other claims. Thus predicted surplus is not enough to pay all listed amounts at face value; mixed claim validity and priority remain unresolved.

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
Proposed series:a IRSliens$582,800.38;b SecureCommunity pendingCL24-003910$8,660,739.10;c CaudlejudgmentCL23-07422$9,392.50;d Aerotek24CV034906-910$344,227.25;e ThinAir1:25-cv-00805$1,224,275.14;f PhillipR.Tucker/NeillWhitely/employees4:2025cv02770$2,676,378.58;g ARGpending25CV004246-310$13,500,000;h ThirdGenerationlandlordestimate$342,478.34. Different source labels distinguish liens, judgments, pendingclaims and estimates.supportsEight listed amounts sum$27,340,291.29, exceeding expected$25,795,303.38 by$1,544,987.91 before receiver fees or other claims. Thus predicted surplus is not enough to pay all listed amounts at face value; mixed claim validity and priority remain unresolved.

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
Eight listed amounts sum$27,340,291.29, exceeding expected$25,795,303.38 by$1,544,987.91 before receiver fees or other claims. Thus predicted surplus is not enough to pay all listed amounts at face value; mixed claim validity and priority remain unresolved.supportsWhat does the supplementation motion establish?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%
Receiver RobertBerleth describes nearly24/7work, HII interpleader24June2025, expected$25,795,303.38corpus, approximately$300,000HIIlegalfees and predicted surplus. Claims Cyberlux seeks to abscond are advocacy, not findings.supportsWhat does the supplementation motion establish?

Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.

50%
Confidence 75%Link weight 50%

WEIGH

Explained weighting

A score appears only when its components and change threshold are published.

No published WEIGH run

The active Website Edition contains no applied score snapshot for this source or its connected objects. That means not assessed—not zero.