CAUSE NO. 2024-48085
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC § IN THE DISTRICT COURT
and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC., §
Plaintiffs, Judgment-Creditors, §
§
v. § 129TH JUDICIAL COURT
§
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and §
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually, § IN AND FOR
Defendants, Judgment-Debtors. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
RECEIVER’S FIFTH AND FINAL REPORT, FINAL ACCOUNTING,
VERIFIED MOTION FOR DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS,
AND MOTION TO TERMINATE RECEIVERSHIP
NOTICE: IF NO WRITTEN RESPONSE OR OBJECTION TO THE
MOTION IS FILED WITH THE COURT WITHIN FIVE DAYS OF THE
DATE OF SERVICE, THE COURT MAY GRANT THE RELIEF
REQUESTED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE OF HEARING.
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
COMES NOW, Robert W. Berleth, of Berleth, as Receiver, appointed by this
Honorable Court as Receiver on May 22, 2025 hereinafter the “Order” to take and
files this Receiver’s Fifth Final Report, Final Accounting, Verified Motion for
Disbursement of Funds, and Motion to Terminate Receivership, and for good
cause shows the following:
A. REPORT OF RECEIVER
1. The work performed by Receiver in this Receivership to date includes,
without limitation, the following: researching the latest developments in relevant
turnover receivership law, communications with Plaintiff’s counsel,
communications with Defendant’s counsel, communications with other creditors,
5/27/2026 4:03 PM
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County
Envelope No. 115406488
By: Alyssa Henderson
Filed: 5/27/2026 4:03 PM
UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
observationobservation
Conditional remainder: $469,670.21 to a next receivership if present, otherwise employees under the prayer.
Read the anchor · page 3
B. COLLECTIONS ACCOUNTING
6. During the receivership there have been funds totaling
$3,083,639.75 which are being held in trust for this receivership.
7. The Receiver recommends and has disburse funds as follows:
a. $873,639.75 to Plaintiff, reflecting full and final satisfaction of the
Harris county court judgment, Cause No. 2024-48085, styled Atlantic
Waves Holdings, LLC, et al. v. Cyberlux Corporation et al. in the 129th
District Court, Harris County.
b. $722,728.68 to the Receiver as reasonable and incurred expenses in
the prosecution of the receivership, to be taxed as a cost of court.
c. $1,017,601.11 as the Receiver’s Fee to be taxed as a cost of court.
d. $469,670.21 to be disbursed to the employees of Cyberlux, that
remain unpaid.
e. Any incidental interest, fractional cents, or small calculation errors to
be forwarded to the Texas Access to Justice Foundation.
8. As of date of this filing, the Receiver has distributed funds, to the Creditor.
The Receiver’s funds are being held by the Receiver for distribution in trust.
C. APPELLATE BOND
9. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 24 and Texas law, the
Receiver requests that this Court set the supersedeas/appellate bond in the
amount of $150,000.00. The Receiver further requests that the bond be
accepted in cash or by an approved surety and that the Clerk be authorized
UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
claimallegation
The motion is filed in Harris County cause 2024-48085, Atlantic Wave Holdings and Secure Community against Cyberlux and Mark Schmidt, in the
The motion is filed in Harris County cause 2024-48085, Atlantic Wave Holdings and Secure Community against Cyberlux and Mark Schmidt, in the 129th Judicial District Court. The stamp records 27 May 2026 at 4:03 PM and envelope 115406488.
Read the anchor · page 1
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC § IN THE DISTRICT COURT
and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC., §
Plaintiffs, Judgment-Creditors, §
§
v. § 129TH JUDICIAL COURT
§
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and §
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually, § IN AND FOR
Defendants, Judgment-Debtors. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
RECEIVER’S FIFTH AND FINAL REPORT, FINAL ACCOUNTING,
VERIFIED MOTION FOR DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS,
AND MOTION TO TERMINATE RECEIVERSHIP
NOTICE: IF NO WRITTEN RESPONSE OR OBJECTION TO THE
MOTION IS FILED WITH THE COURT WITHIN FIVE DAYS OF THE
DATE OF SERVICE, THE COURT MAY GRANT THE RELIEF
REQUESTED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE OF HEARING.
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
COMES NOW, Robert W. Berleth, of Berleth, as Receiver, appointed by this
Honorable Court as Receiver on May 22, 2025 hereinafter the “Order” to take and
files this Receiver’s Fifth Final Report, Final Accounting, Verified Motion for
Disbursement of Funds, and Motion to Terminate Receivership, and for good
cause shows the following:
A. REPORT OF RECEIVER
1. The work performed by Receiver in this Receivership to date includes,
without limitation, the following: researching the latest developments in relevant
turnover receivership law, communications with Plaintiff’s counsel,
communications with Defendant’s counsel, communications with other creditors,
5/27/2026 4:03 PM
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County
Envelope No. 115406488
By: Alyssa Henderson
Filed: 5/27/2026 4:03 PM
UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
claimallegation
The source contains a signed receiver submission, Robert Berleth’s sworn verification and a signed service certificate. The verification is
The source contains a signed receiver submission, Robert Berleth’s sworn verification and a signed service certificate. The verification is notarised by Sheli Marie Davis on 27 May 2026; the visible notarial commission expires 25 April 2029. Verification establishes the form and attribution of the report, not independent corroboration of each financial assertion.
Read the anchor · page 6
Respectfully submitted by:
BERLETH & ASSOCIATES
Robert W. Berleth
Texas Bar # 24091860
SDOT #: 3062288
rberleth@berlethlaw.com
9950 Cypresswood, Suite 200
Houston, Texas 77070
Tele: 713-588-6900
Fax: 713-481-0894
APPOINTED RECEIVER UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
claimallegation
The automated certificate identifies Sheli Davis filing for Robert Berleth, submission at 4:03:49 PM on 27 May and status as of 8:57 AM CST
The automated certificate identifies Sheli Davis filing for Robert Berleth, submission at 4:03:49 PM on 27 May and status as of 8:57 AM CST on 28 May. The contact rows show SENT and include duplicates. They are not read receipts, recipient agreement or proof that every named recipient personally examined the motion.
Read the anchor · page 9
Automated Certificate of eService
This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system.
The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system
on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing
certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a
certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules.
Sheli Davis on behalf of Robert Berleth
Bar No. 24091860
sdavis@berlethlaw.com
Envelope ID: 115406488
Filing Code Description: Motion (No Fee)
Filing Description: Receivers Fifth and Final Report, Final Accounting,
verified Motion for Disbursement of Funds and Motion to Terminate
Receivership
Status as of 5/28/2026 8:57 AM CST
Case Contacts
Name
Ashish Mahendru
Darren AndrewBraun
M. H. Cersonsky
Evan A.Moeller
Evan A.Moeller
Danielle Butler
LaDonna Arey
Linda Carranza
Elizabeth Myers
Tara Rollin
Robert W.Berleth
David A.Walton
Travis Vargo
Micah Jackson
Brice BBeale
Mary Jahn
Shawn Grady
Shawn Grady
Jeff Brown
Paula Gentry
Bernadette Martin
BarNumber Email
amahendru@thelitigationgroup.com
dbraun@thelitigationgroup.com
mhcersonsky@law-cmpc.com
evan.moeller@arlaw.com
evan.moeller@arlaw.com
dbutler@thelitigationgroup.com
LArey@bellnunnally.com
lcarranza@thompsoncoburn.com
emyers@thompsoncoburn.com
tara.rollin@arlaw.com
rberleth@berlethlaw.com
dwalton@bellnunnally.com
tvargo@vargolawfirm.com
mjackson@berlethlaw.com
beale@hooverslovacek.com
mary.jahn@arlaw.com
shawn@gradycollectionlaw.com
shawn@gradycollectionlaw.com
jbrown@thompsoncoburn.com
pgentry@thompsoncoburn.com
bernadette@gradycollectionlaw.com
TimestampSubmitted
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
Status
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
claimallegation
The submission notice says the motion may be granted unless a written response is filed within five days after service. This is notice langu
The submission notice says the motion may be granted unless a written response is filed within five days after service. This is notice language in a motion; it is not proof of the response deadline calculated for a particular recipient or of an order granting relief.
Read the anchor · page 1
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC § IN THE DISTRICT COURT
and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC., §
Plaintiffs, Judgment-Creditors, §
§
v. § 129TH JUDICIAL COURT
§
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and §
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually, § IN AND FOR
Defendants, Judgment-Debtors. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
RECEIVER’S FIFTH AND FINAL REPORT, FINAL ACCOUNTING,
VERIFIED MOTION FOR DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS,
AND MOTION TO TERMINATE RECEIVERSHIP
NOTICE: IF NO WRITTEN RESPONSE OR OBJECTION TO THE
MOTION IS FILED WITH THE COURT WITHIN FIVE DAYS OF THE
DATE OF SERVICE, THE COURT MAY GRANT THE RELIEF
REQUESTED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE OF HEARING.
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
COMES NOW, Robert W. Berleth, of Berleth, as Receiver, appointed by this
Honorable Court as Receiver on May 22, 2025 hereinafter the “Order” to take and
files this Receiver’s Fifth Final Report, Final Accounting, Verified Motion for
Disbursement of Funds, and Motion to Terminate Receivership, and for good
cause shows the following:
A. REPORT OF RECEIVER
1. The work performed by Receiver in this Receivership to date includes,
without limitation, the following: researching the latest developments in relevant
turnover receivership law, communications with Plaintiff’s counsel,
communications with Defendant’s counsel, communications with other creditors,
5/27/2026 4:03 PM
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County
Envelope No. 115406488
By: Alyssa Henderson
Filed: 5/27/2026 4:03 PM
UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
claimallegation
Robert Berleth reports appointment on 22 May 2025 and recovery of $3,083,639.75, described as full collection of the judgment calculation. T
Robert Berleth reports appointment on 22 May 2025 and recovery of $3,083,639.75, described as full collection of the judgment calculation. The source does not include the underlying bank statements or judgment calculation.
Read the anchor · page 1
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC § IN THE DISTRICT COURT
and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC., §
Plaintiffs, Judgment-Creditors, §
§
v. § 129TH JUDICIAL COURT
§
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and §
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually, § IN AND FOR
Defendants, Judgment-Debtors. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
RECEIVER’S FIFTH AND FINAL REPORT, FINAL ACCOUNTING,
VERIFIED MOTION FOR DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS,
AND MOTION TO TERMINATE RECEIVERSHIP
NOTICE: IF NO WRITTEN RESPONSE OR OBJECTION TO THE
MOTION IS FILED WITH THE COURT WITHIN FIVE DAYS OF THE
DATE OF SERVICE, THE COURT MAY GRANT THE RELIEF
REQUESTED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE OF HEARING.
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
COMES NOW, Robert W. Berleth, of Berleth, as Receiver, appointed by this
Honorable Court as Receiver on May 22, 2025 hereinafter the “Order” to take and
files this Receiver’s Fifth Final Report, Final Accounting, Verified Motion for
Disbursement of Funds, and Motion to Terminate Receivership, and for good
cause shows the following:
A. REPORT OF RECEIVER
1. The work performed by Receiver in this Receivership to date includes,
without limitation, the following: researching the latest developments in relevant
turnover receivership law, communications with Plaintiff’s counsel,
communications with Defendant’s counsel, communications with other creditors,
5/27/2026 4:03 PM
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County
Envelope No. 115406488
By: Alyssa Henderson
Filed: 5/27/2026 4:03 PM
UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
claimallegation
The receiver claims $722,728.68 in expenses and a 33% contingency fee of $1,017,601.11. These are the requested amounts in this verified rep
The receiver claims $722,728.68 in expenses and a 33% contingency fee of $1,017,601.11. These are the requested amounts in this verified report; expense invoices and a detailed ledger are not supplied within these eleven pages.
Read the anchor · page 2
reviewing records concerning Defendant, preparing and filing the Receiver Oath,
posting bond, taking physical possession of the real property, engaging and
supervising the inventory and shipment of goods in a commercially reasonable
manner, receiving and accounting for recovered funds, physical reconnoiter of the
debtors going concerns, and preparing and filing this Receiver’s Verified Motion
for Disbursement and the proposed Order.
2. In accordance with the Order, The Receiver has recovered from the
Debtor $3,083,639.75, the balance owed on the Judgment Calculation.
3. It is the Receiver’s opinion the Receiver’s actions in this receivership
to date were reasonable and necessary. It is the Receiver’s belief all expenses and
fees incurred during the receivership is a customary, reasonable, and necessary fee
for the services rendered in Harris County, Texas. The receiver collected the full
amount of the judgment, and is thus entitled to his presumptive fee of 33% of the
total amount collected.
4. The receiver incurred expenses of $722,728.68. These expenses
were necessary to complete the receivership and shipment of the final inventory.
5. The receiver is aware of several potential TRO/serial receiverships
that will take effect upon the termination of this receivership. UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
claimallegation
The accounting allocates $873,639.75 to the judgment creditor, $722,728.68 to expenses, $1,017,601.11 to the receiver fee and $469,670.21 to
The accounting allocates $873,639.75 to the judgment creditor, $722,728.68 to expenses, $1,017,601.11 to the receiver fee and $469,670.21 to employees. Paragraph 8 reports the creditor distribution already made and describes receiver funds held in trust; the wording does not show every proposed distribution completed.
Read the anchor · page 3
B. COLLECTIONS ACCOUNTING
6. During the receivership there have been funds totaling
$3,083,639.75 which are being held in trust for this receivership.
7. The Receiver recommends and has disburse funds as follows:
a. $873,639.75 to Plaintiff, reflecting full and final satisfaction of the
Harris county court judgment, Cause No. 2024-48085, styled Atlantic
Waves Holdings, LLC, et al. v. Cyberlux Corporation et al. in the 129th
District Court, Harris County.
b. $722,728.68 to the Receiver as reasonable and incurred expenses in
the prosecution of the receivership, to be taxed as a cost of court.
c. $1,017,601.11 as the Receiver’s Fee to be taxed as a cost of court.
d. $469,670.21 to be disbursed to the employees of Cyberlux, that
remain unpaid.
e. Any incidental interest, fractional cents, or small calculation errors to
be forwarded to the Texas Access to Justice Foundation.
8. As of date of this filing, the Receiver has distributed funds, to the Creditor.
The Receiver’s funds are being held by the Receiver for distribution in trust.
C. APPELLATE BOND
9. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 24 and Texas law, the
Receiver requests that this Court set the supersedeas/appellate bond in the
amount of $150,000.00. The Receiver further requests that the bond be
accepted in cash or by an approved surety and that the Clerk be authorized
UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
claimallegation
Although the accounting associates $469,670.21 with unpaid employees at the Spring facility, the prayer gives the next receivership priority
Although the accounting associates $469,670.21 with unpaid employees at the Spring facility, the prayer gives the next receivership priority, if present, and only otherwise directs the employee distribution within 45 days of the order. The same figure therefore has a conditional destination.
Read the anchor · page 3
B. COLLECTIONS ACCOUNTING
6. During the receivership there have been funds totaling
$3,083,639.75 which are being held in trust for this receivership.
7. The Receiver recommends and has disburse funds as follows:
a. $873,639.75 to Plaintiff, reflecting full and final satisfaction of the
Harris county court judgment, Cause No. 2024-48085, styled Atlantic
Waves Holdings, LLC, et al. v. Cyberlux Corporation et al. in the 129th
District Court, Harris County.
b. $722,728.68 to the Receiver as reasonable and incurred expenses in
the prosecution of the receivership, to be taxed as a cost of court.
c. $1,017,601.11 as the Receiver’s Fee to be taxed as a cost of court.
d. $469,670.21 to be disbursed to the employees of Cyberlux, that
remain unpaid.
e. Any incidental interest, fractional cents, or small calculation errors to
be forwarded to the Texas Access to Justice Foundation.
8. As of date of this filing, the Receiver has distributed funds, to the Creditor.
The Receiver’s funds are being held by the Receiver for distribution in trust.
C. APPELLATE BOND
9. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 24 and Texas law, the
Receiver requests that this Court set the supersedeas/appellate bond in the
amount of $150,000.00. The Receiver further requests that the bond be
accepted in cash or by an approved surety and that the Clerk be authorized
UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
claimallegation
The motion describes possible serial receiverships and temporary restraints ready to follow termination. It seeks termination of this receiv
The motion describes possible serial receiverships and temporary restraints ready to follow termination. It seeks termination of this receivership, not a judicial determination that Cyberlux will thereafter be free of receivership.
Read the anchor · page 2
reviewing records concerning Defendant, preparing and filing the Receiver Oath,
posting bond, taking physical possession of the real property, engaging and
supervising the inventory and shipment of goods in a commercially reasonable
manner, receiving and accounting for recovered funds, physical reconnoiter of the
debtors going concerns, and preparing and filing this Receiver’s Verified Motion
for Disbursement and the proposed Order.
2. In accordance with the Order, The Receiver has recovered from the
Debtor $3,083,639.75, the balance owed on the Judgment Calculation.
3. It is the Receiver’s opinion the Receiver’s actions in this receivership
to date were reasonable and necessary. It is the Receiver’s belief all expenses and
fees incurred during the receivership is a customary, reasonable, and necessary fee
for the services rendered in Harris County, Texas. The receiver collected the full
amount of the judgment, and is thus entitled to his presumptive fee of 33% of the
total amount collected.
4. The receiver incurred expenses of $722,728.68. These expenses
were necessary to complete the receivership and shipment of the final inventory.
5. The receiver is aware of several potential TRO/serial receiverships
that will take effect upon the termination of this receivership. UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
claimallegation
The receiver requests a $150,000 appellate bond, cash or approved surety, and a stay after the required security is filed. A requested secur
The receiver requests a $150,000 appellate bond, cash or approved surety, and a stay after the required security is filed. A requested security condition is not evidence that an appellant posted it or that a stay took effect.
Read the anchor · page 3
B. COLLECTIONS ACCOUNTING
6. During the receivership there have been funds totaling
$3,083,639.75 which are being held in trust for this receivership.
7. The Receiver recommends and has disburse funds as follows:
a. $873,639.75 to Plaintiff, reflecting full and final satisfaction of the
Harris county court judgment, Cause No. 2024-48085, styled Atlantic
Waves Holdings, LLC, et al. v. Cyberlux Corporation et al. in the 129th
District Court, Harris County.
b. $722,728.68 to the Receiver as reasonable and incurred expenses in
the prosecution of the receivership, to be taxed as a cost of court.
c. $1,017,601.11 as the Receiver’s Fee to be taxed as a cost of court.
d. $469,670.21 to be disbursed to the employees of Cyberlux, that
remain unpaid.
e. Any incidental interest, fractional cents, or small calculation errors to
be forwarded to the Texas Access to Justice Foundation.
8. As of date of this filing, the Receiver has distributed funds, to the Creditor.
The Receiver’s funds are being held by the Receiver for distribution in trust.
C. APPELLATE BOND
9. Pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 24 and Texas law, the
Receiver requests that this Court set the supersedeas/appellate bond in the
amount of $150,000.00. The Receiver further requests that the bond be
accepted in cash or by an approved surety and that the Clerk be authorized
UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
claimallegation
The requested termination and final distribution require a court order. The prayer, accounting and finality request do not themselves execut
The requested termination and final distribution require a court order. The prayer, accounting and finality request do not themselves execute that order or establish bank-level completion.
Read the anchor · page 5
No. 2024-48085, styled Atlantic Waves Holdings, LLC, et al. v.
Cyberlux Corporation et al. in the 129th District Court, Harris County.
b. Receiver disburse $722,728.68 to the Receiver as reasonable
and incurred expenses in the prosecution of the receivership, to
be taxed as a cost of court.
c. Receiver disburse $1,017,601.11 as the Receiver’s Fee to be
taxed as a cost of court.
d. Receiver disburse the remaining $469,670.21 in the following order
of possibility:
i. Transfer the funds to the next receivership, if present; or then,
ii. Within 45 days of this order, distribute $469,670.21 to the
previous unpaid employees of Cyberlux at the Spring, Texas
manufacturing facility, until the funds are exhausted.
e. The Receivership be terminated; and,
f. Such other and further relief which Receiver is justly entitled.
SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS: UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
entityobservation
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC
Read the anchor · page 1
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC § IN THE DISTRICT COURT
and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC., §
Plaintiffs, Judgment-Creditors, §
§
v. § 129TH JUDICIAL COURT
§
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and §
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually, § IN AND FOR
Defendants, Judgment-Debtors. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
RECEIVER’S FIFTH AND FINAL REPORT, FINAL ACCOUNTING,
VERIFIED MOTION FOR DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS,
AND MOTION TO TERMINATE RECEIVERSHIP
NOTICE: IF NO WRITTEN RESPONSE OR OBJECTION TO THE
MOTION IS FILED WITH THE COURT WITHIN FIVE DAYS OF THE
DATE OF SERVICE, THE COURT MAY GRANT THE RELIEF
REQUESTED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE OF HEARING.
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
COMES NOW, Robert W. Berleth, of Berleth, as Receiver, appointed by this
Honorable Court as Receiver on May 22, 2025 hereinafter the “Order” to take and
files this Receiver’s Fifth Final Report, Final Accounting, Verified Motion for
Disbursement of Funds, and Motion to Terminate Receivership, and for good
cause shows the following:
A. REPORT OF RECEIVER
1. The work performed by Receiver in this Receivership to date includes,
without limitation, the following: researching the latest developments in relevant
turnover receivership law, communications with Plaintiff’s counsel,
communications with Defendant’s counsel, communications with other creditors,
5/27/2026 4:03 PM
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County
Envelope No. 115406488
By: Alyssa Henderson
Filed: 5/27/2026 4:03 PM
UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
entityobservation
SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC
Read the anchor · page 1
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC § IN THE DISTRICT COURT
and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC., §
Plaintiffs, Judgment-Creditors, §
§
v. § 129TH JUDICIAL COURT
§
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and §
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually, § IN AND FOR
Defendants, Judgment-Debtors. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
RECEIVER’S FIFTH AND FINAL REPORT, FINAL ACCOUNTING,
VERIFIED MOTION FOR DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS,
AND MOTION TO TERMINATE RECEIVERSHIP
NOTICE: IF NO WRITTEN RESPONSE OR OBJECTION TO THE
MOTION IS FILED WITH THE COURT WITHIN FIVE DAYS OF THE
DATE OF SERVICE, THE COURT MAY GRANT THE RELIEF
REQUESTED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE OF HEARING.
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
COMES NOW, Robert W. Berleth, of Berleth, as Receiver, appointed by this
Honorable Court as Receiver on May 22, 2025 hereinafter the “Order” to take and
files this Receiver’s Fifth Final Report, Final Accounting, Verified Motion for
Disbursement of Funds, and Motion to Terminate Receivership, and for good
cause shows the following:
A. REPORT OF RECEIVER
1. The work performed by Receiver in this Receivership to date includes,
without limitation, the following: researching the latest developments in relevant
turnover receivership law, communications with Plaintiff’s counsel,
communications with Defendant’s counsel, communications with other creditors,
5/27/2026 4:03 PM
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County
Envelope No. 115406488
By: Alyssa Henderson
Filed: 5/27/2026 4:03 PM
UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
entityobservation
CYBERLUX CORPORATION
Read the anchor · page 1
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC § IN THE DISTRICT COURT
and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC., §
Plaintiffs, Judgment-Creditors, §
§
v. § 129TH JUDICIAL COURT
§
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and §
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually, § IN AND FOR
Defendants, Judgment-Debtors. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
RECEIVER’S FIFTH AND FINAL REPORT, FINAL ACCOUNTING,
VERIFIED MOTION FOR DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS,
AND MOTION TO TERMINATE RECEIVERSHIP
NOTICE: IF NO WRITTEN RESPONSE OR OBJECTION TO THE
MOTION IS FILED WITH THE COURT WITHIN FIVE DAYS OF THE
DATE OF SERVICE, THE COURT MAY GRANT THE RELIEF
REQUESTED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE OF HEARING.
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
COMES NOW, Robert W. Berleth, of Berleth, as Receiver, appointed by this
Honorable Court as Receiver on May 22, 2025 hereinafter the “Order” to take and
files this Receiver’s Fifth Final Report, Final Accounting, Verified Motion for
Disbursement of Funds, and Motion to Terminate Receivership, and for good
cause shows the following:
A. REPORT OF RECEIVER
1. The work performed by Receiver in this Receivership to date includes,
without limitation, the following: researching the latest developments in relevant
turnover receivership law, communications with Plaintiff’s counsel,
communications with Defendant’s counsel, communications with other creditors,
5/27/2026 4:03 PM
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County
Envelope No. 115406488
By: Alyssa Henderson
Filed: 5/27/2026 4:03 PM
UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
entityobservation
MARK D. SCHMIDT
Read the anchor · page 1
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC § IN THE DISTRICT COURT
and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC., §
Plaintiffs, Judgment-Creditors, §
§
v. § 129TH JUDICIAL COURT
§
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and §
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually, § IN AND FOR
Defendants, Judgment-Debtors. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
RECEIVER’S FIFTH AND FINAL REPORT, FINAL ACCOUNTING,
VERIFIED MOTION FOR DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS,
AND MOTION TO TERMINATE RECEIVERSHIP
NOTICE: IF NO WRITTEN RESPONSE OR OBJECTION TO THE
MOTION IS FILED WITH THE COURT WITHIN FIVE DAYS OF THE
DATE OF SERVICE, THE COURT MAY GRANT THE RELIEF
REQUESTED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE OF HEARING.
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
COMES NOW, Robert W. Berleth, of Berleth, as Receiver, appointed by this
Honorable Court as Receiver on May 22, 2025 hereinafter the “Order” to take and
files this Receiver’s Fifth Final Report, Final Accounting, Verified Motion for
Disbursement of Funds, and Motion to Terminate Receivership, and for good
cause shows the following:
A. REPORT OF RECEIVER
1. The work performed by Receiver in this Receivership to date includes,
without limitation, the following: researching the latest developments in relevant
turnover receivership law, communications with Plaintiff’s counsel,
communications with Defendant’s counsel, communications with other creditors,
5/27/2026 4:03 PM
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County
Envelope No. 115406488
By: Alyssa Henderson
Filed: 5/27/2026 4:03 PM
UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
entityobservation
Robert W. Berleth
Read the anchor · page 1
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC § IN THE DISTRICT COURT
and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC., §
Plaintiffs, Judgment-Creditors, §
§
v. § 129TH JUDICIAL COURT
§
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and §
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually, § IN AND FOR
Defendants, Judgment-Debtors. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
RECEIVER’S FIFTH AND FINAL REPORT, FINAL ACCOUNTING,
VERIFIED MOTION FOR DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS,
AND MOTION TO TERMINATE RECEIVERSHIP
NOTICE: IF NO WRITTEN RESPONSE OR OBJECTION TO THE
MOTION IS FILED WITH THE COURT WITHIN FIVE DAYS OF THE
DATE OF SERVICE, THE COURT MAY GRANT THE RELIEF
REQUESTED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE OF HEARING.
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
COMES NOW, Robert W. Berleth, of Berleth, as Receiver, appointed by this
Honorable Court as Receiver on May 22, 2025 hereinafter the “Order” to take and
files this Receiver’s Fifth Final Report, Final Accounting, Verified Motion for
Disbursement of Funds, and Motion to Terminate Receivership, and for good
cause shows the following:
A. REPORT OF RECEIVER
1. The work performed by Receiver in this Receivership to date includes,
without limitation, the following: researching the latest developments in relevant
turnover receivership law, communications with Plaintiff’s counsel,
communications with Defendant’s counsel, communications with other creditors,
5/27/2026 4:03 PM
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County
Envelope No. 115406488
By: Alyssa Henderson
Filed: 5/27/2026 4:03 PM
UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
entityobservation
Sheli Davis
Read the anchor · page 9
Automated Certificate of eService
This automated certificate of service was created by the efiling system.
The filer served this document via email generated by the efiling system
on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing
certificates of service have not changed. Filers must still provide a
certificate of service that complies with all applicable rules.
Sheli Davis on behalf of Robert Berleth
Bar No. 24091860
sdavis@berlethlaw.com
Envelope ID: 115406488
Filing Code Description: Motion (No Fee)
Filing Description: Receivers Fifth and Final Report, Final Accounting,
verified Motion for Disbursement of Funds and Motion to Terminate
Receivership
Status as of 5/28/2026 8:57 AM CST
Case Contacts
Name
Ashish Mahendru
Darren AndrewBraun
M. H. Cersonsky
Evan A.Moeller
Evan A.Moeller
Danielle Butler
LaDonna Arey
Linda Carranza
Elizabeth Myers
Tara Rollin
Robert W.Berleth
David A.Walton
Travis Vargo
Micah Jackson
Brice BBeale
Mary Jahn
Shawn Grady
Shawn Grady
Jeff Brown
Paula Gentry
Bernadette Martin
BarNumber Email
amahendru@thelitigationgroup.com
dbraun@thelitigationgroup.com
mhcersonsky@law-cmpc.com
evan.moeller@arlaw.com
evan.moeller@arlaw.com
dbutler@thelitigationgroup.com
LArey@bellnunnally.com
lcarranza@thompsoncoburn.com
emyers@thompsoncoburn.com
tara.rollin@arlaw.com
rberleth@berlethlaw.com
dwalton@bellnunnally.com
tvargo@vargolawfirm.com
mjackson@berlethlaw.com
beale@hooverslovacek.com
mary.jahn@arlaw.com
shawn@gradycollectionlaw.com
shawn@gradycollectionlaw.com
jbrown@thompsoncoburn.com
pgentry@thompsoncoburn.com
bernadette@gradycollectionlaw.com
TimestampSubmitted
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
5/27/2026 4:03:49 PM
Status
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
SENT
UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
eventattribution
The receiver reports appointment on 22 May 2025.
Read the anchor · page 1
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC § IN THE DISTRICT COURT
and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC., §
Plaintiffs, Judgment-Creditors, §
§
v. § 129TH JUDICIAL COURT
§
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and §
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually, § IN AND FOR
Defendants, Judgment-Debtors. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
RECEIVER’S FIFTH AND FINAL REPORT, FINAL ACCOUNTING,
VERIFIED MOTION FOR DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS,
AND MOTION TO TERMINATE RECEIVERSHIP
NOTICE: IF NO WRITTEN RESPONSE OR OBJECTION TO THE
MOTION IS FILED WITH THE COURT WITHIN FIVE DAYS OF THE
DATE OF SERVICE, THE COURT MAY GRANT THE RELIEF
REQUESTED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE OF HEARING.
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
COMES NOW, Robert W. Berleth, of Berleth, as Receiver, appointed by this
Honorable Court as Receiver on May 22, 2025 hereinafter the “Order” to take and
files this Receiver’s Fifth Final Report, Final Accounting, Verified Motion for
Disbursement of Funds, and Motion to Terminate Receivership, and for good
cause shows the following:
A. REPORT OF RECEIVER
1. The work performed by Receiver in this Receivership to date includes,
without limitation, the following: researching the latest developments in relevant
turnover receivership law, communications with Plaintiff’s counsel,
communications with Defendant’s counsel, communications with other creditors,
5/27/2026 4:03 PM
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County
Envelope No. 115406488
By: Alyssa Henderson
Filed: 5/27/2026 4:03 PM
UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
eventattribution
The motion is filed and the verification notarised on 27 May 2026.
Read the anchor · page 1
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC § IN THE DISTRICT COURT
and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC., §
Plaintiffs, Judgment-Creditors, §
§
v. § 129TH JUDICIAL COURT
§
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and §
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually, § IN AND FOR
Defendants, Judgment-Debtors. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
RECEIVER’S FIFTH AND FINAL REPORT, FINAL ACCOUNTING,
VERIFIED MOTION FOR DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS,
AND MOTION TO TERMINATE RECEIVERSHIP
NOTICE: IF NO WRITTEN RESPONSE OR OBJECTION TO THE
MOTION IS FILED WITH THE COURT WITHIN FIVE DAYS OF THE
DATE OF SERVICE, THE COURT MAY GRANT THE RELIEF
REQUESTED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE OF HEARING.
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
COMES NOW, Robert W. Berleth, of Berleth, as Receiver, appointed by this
Honorable Court as Receiver on May 22, 2025 hereinafter the “Order” to take and
files this Receiver’s Fifth Final Report, Final Accounting, Verified Motion for
Disbursement of Funds, and Motion to Terminate Receivership, and for good
cause shows the following:
A. REPORT OF RECEIVER
1. The work performed by Receiver in this Receivership to date includes,
without limitation, the following: researching the latest developments in relevant
turnover receivership law, communications with Plaintiff’s counsel,
communications with Defendant’s counsel, communications with other creditors,
5/27/2026 4:03 PM
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County
Envelope No. 115406488
By: Alyssa Henderson
Filed: 5/27/2026 4:03 PM
UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
inferenceinference
The four allocation figures sum exactly to $3,083,639.75. At the stated pool, 33% is $1,017,601.1175, conventionally rounded to $1,017,601.1
The four allocation figures sum exactly to $3,083,639.75. At the stated pool, 33% is $1,017,601.1175, conventionally rounded to $1,017,601.12, one cent above the requested fee. This is a transparent arithmetic comparison, not an allegation of overpayment.
inferenceinference
Employee payment is subordinate to the next-receiver branch in the prayer; an unconditional employee payout cannot be inferred from the acco
Employee payment is subordinate to the next-receiver branch in the prayer; an unconditional employee payout cannot be inferred from the accounting label.
otherattribution
Complete supplied 11-page source reviewed at SHA-256 19775b522d827a8c446338e4d0b7c650d1807fb8103268a60e53a8ea7986531e. Source assertions, or
Complete supplied 11-page source reviewed at SHA-256 19775b522d827a8c446338e4d0b7c650d1807fb8103268a60e53a8ea7986531e. Source assertions, original visual features, filing/communication context and identified missing attachments are retained. No unexamined later court outcome is inferred.
Read the anchor · page 1
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC § IN THE DISTRICT COURT
and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC., §
Plaintiffs, Judgment-Creditors, §
§
v. § 129TH JUDICIAL COURT
§
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and §
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually, § IN AND FOR
Defendants, Judgment-Debtors. § HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
RECEIVER’S FIFTH AND FINAL REPORT, FINAL ACCOUNTING,
VERIFIED MOTION FOR DISBURSEMENT OF FUNDS,
AND MOTION TO TERMINATE RECEIVERSHIP
NOTICE: IF NO WRITTEN RESPONSE OR OBJECTION TO THE
MOTION IS FILED WITH THE COURT WITHIN FIVE DAYS OF THE
DATE OF SERVICE, THE COURT MAY GRANT THE RELIEF
REQUESTED WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICE OF HEARING.
TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:
COMES NOW, Robert W. Berleth, of Berleth, as Receiver, appointed by this
Honorable Court as Receiver on May 22, 2025 hereinafter the “Order” to take and
files this Receiver’s Fifth Final Report, Final Accounting, Verified Motion for
Disbursement of Funds, and Motion to Terminate Receivership, and for good
cause shows the following:
A. REPORT OF RECEIVER
1. The work performed by Receiver in this Receivership to date includes,
without limitation, the following: researching the latest developments in relevant
turnover receivership law, communications with Plaintiff’s counsel,
communications with Defendant’s counsel, communications with other creditors,
5/27/2026 4:03 PM
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County
Envelope No. 115406488
By: Alyssa Henderson
Filed: 5/27/2026 4:03 PM
UnofficialCopyOfficeofMarilynBurgessDistrictClerk
questionquestion
Which bank statements, expense ledger and prior distribution orders support the pool and the reported $873,639.75 creditor payment?
questionquestion
Was a successor receivership present when the distribution obligation arose, and what payment or transfer actually followed?
questionquestion
What order was entered, and was the requested appellate bond posted or any stay activated?
distillateallegation
CONNECT
Reviewed relationships
The canvas follows the database: source to DISTIL record, DISTIL record to knowledge object, then reviewed relationship. Position alone means nothing.
The receiver claims $722,728.68 in expenses and a 33% contingency fee of $1,017,601.11. These are the requested amounts in this verified report; expense invoices and a detailed ledger are not supplied within these eleven pages.referencesThe order directs $722,728.68 expenses and $1,017,601.11 receiver fees to Berleth & Associates. It assigns the remaining $469,670.21 first to a next receivership, if present, or otherwise to previously unpaid Spring-facility employees within 45 days of the order until exhausted.
Expense and fee requests are adopted in the supplied order; actual payment remains unproved.
Robert Berleth reports appointment on 22 May 2025 and recovery of $3,083,639.75, described as full collection of the judgment calculation. The source does not include the underlying bank statements or judgment calculation.referencesThe court grants the motion and finds the receiver’s report whole, complete and unbiased, accepts it as accurate findings and conclusions, finds the oath fulfilled efficiently and finds fees and expenses reasonable. It invokes Moyer and Bergeron in approving 33% contingency compensation. These are findings of this supplied state-court order.
Later court accepts the report; adoption is a judicial act, not independent financial substantiation.
Daniel Ardmore is identified as plaintiffs’ counsel. Robert W. Berleth is defined as receiver and an agent of the court, not an attorney for any party. The definitions also contain personal identifiers; these remain in the internal source, not repeated as analytical findings.referencesRobert Berleth reports appointment on 22 May 2025 and recovery of $3,083,639.75, described as full collection of the judgment calculation. The source does not include the underlying bank statements or judgment calculation.
Same receiver appears in different proceedings; capacities and activation dates remain separate.
The receiver requests a $150,000 appellate bond, cash or approved surety, and a stay after the required security is filed. A requested security condition is not evidence that an appellant posted it or that a stay took effect.referencesParagraph 11 requires any appealing party to post $150,000 security in cash or approved surety within 14 days of the order, permits conforming alternative security if required and states the litigation shall be stayed upon filing the required bond. It does not establish that a bond was filed.
Requested $150,000 bond becomes an order condition; no posting or activated stay inferred.
The accounting allocates $873,639.75 to the judgment creditor, $722,728.68 to expenses, $1,017,601.11 to the receiver fee and $469,670.21 to employees. Paragraph 8 reports the creditor distribution already made and describes receiver funds held in trust; the wording does not show every proposed distribution completed.contradictsParagraph 12 orders return of the receiver’s bond. Paragraph 13 directs distribution within 14 days after expiry of any applicable appellate window and reports $873,849.02 already distributed under prior orders to Atlantic Waves Holdings.
Motion reports $873,639.75; signed order reports $873,849.02, a $209.27 difference. Underlying ledger and any correction remain required.
Although the accounting associates $469,670.21 with unpaid employees at the Spring facility, the prayer gives the next receivership priority, if present, and only otherwise directs the employee distribution within 45 days of the order. The same figure therefore has a conditional destination.referencesThe order directs $722,728.68 expenses and $1,017,601.11 receiver fees to Berleth & Associates. It assigns the remaining $469,670.21 first to a next receivership, if present, or otherwise to previously unpaid Spring-facility employees within 45 days of the order until exhausted.
Motion prayer and order both prioritise next receivership before employee fallback.
The requested termination and final distribution require a court order. The prayer, accounting and finality request do not themselves execute that order or establish bank-level completion.referencesParagraph 8 takes judicial notice that terminating this receivership will animate the next serial receivership and that Cyberlux will remain under receivership without interruption pending further orders in that case. Paragraph 10 terminates this receivership effective the entry date and releases the receiver in this proceeding.
Later signed order grants termination in the named case while anticipating serial continuation.
Although the accounting associates $469,670.21 with unpaid employees at the Spring facility, the prayer gives the next receivership priority, if present, and only otherwise directs the employee distribution within 45 days of the order. The same figure therefore has a conditional destination.supportsDoes this report prove that all funds had been distributed and the receivership had ended?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The accounting allocates $873,639.75 to the judgment creditor, $722,728.68 to expenses, $1,017,601.11 to the receiver fee and $469,670.21 to employees. Paragraph 8 reports the creditor distribution already made and describes receiver funds held in trust; the wording does not show every proposed distribution completed.supportsWhich bank statements, expense ledger and prior distribution orders support the pool and the reported $873,639.75 creditor payment?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The receiver requests a $150,000 appellate bond, cash or approved surety, and a stay after the required security is filed. A requested security condition is not evidence that an appellant posted it or that a stay took effect.supportsWhat order was entered, and was the requested appellate bond posted or any stay activated?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Although the accounting associates $469,670.21 with unpaid employees at the Spring facility, the prayer gives the next receivership priority, if present, and only otherwise directs the employee distribution within 45 days of the order. The same figure therefore has a conditional destination.supportsEmployee payment is subordinate to the next-receiver branch in the prayer; an unconditional employee payout cannot be inferred from the accounting label.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The motion describes possible serial receiverships and temporary restraints ready to follow termination. It seeks termination of this receivership, not a judicial determination that Cyberlux will thereafter be free of receivership.supportsWas a successor receivership present when the distribution obligation arose, and what payment or transfer actually followed?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The accounting allocates $873,639.75 to the judgment creditor, $722,728.68 to expenses, $1,017,601.11 to the receiver fee and $469,670.21 to employees. Paragraph 8 reports the creditor distribution already made and describes receiver funds held in trust; the wording does not show every proposed distribution completed.supportsEmployee payment is subordinate to the next-receiver branch in the prayer; an unconditional employee payout cannot be inferred from the accounting label.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Robert Berleth reports appointment on 22 May 2025 and recovery of $3,083,639.75, described as full collection of the judgment calculation. The source does not include the underlying bank statements or judgment calculation.supportsThe four allocation figures sum exactly to $3,083,639.75. At the stated pool, 33% is $1,017,601.1175, conventionally rounded to $1,017,601.12, one cent above the requested fee. This is a transparent arithmetic comparison, not an allegation of overpayment.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The receiver claims $722,728.68 in expenses and a 33% contingency fee of $1,017,601.11. These are the requested amounts in this verified report; expense invoices and a detailed ledger are not supplied within these eleven pages.supportsWhich bank statements, expense ledger and prior distribution orders support the pool and the reported $873,639.75 creditor payment?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The requested termination and final distribution require a court order. The prayer, accounting and finality request do not themselves execute that order or establish bank-level completion.supportsWas a successor receivership present when the distribution obligation arose, and what payment or transfer actually followed?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Robert Berleth reports appointment on 22 May 2025 and recovery of $3,083,639.75, described as full collection of the judgment calculation. The source does not include the underlying bank statements or judgment calculation.supportsWhich bank statements, expense ledger and prior distribution orders support the pool and the reported $873,639.75 creditor payment?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The accounting allocates $873,639.75 to the judgment creditor, $722,728.68 to expenses, $1,017,601.11 to the receiver fee and $469,670.21 to employees. Paragraph 8 reports the creditor distribution already made and describes receiver funds held in trust; the wording does not show every proposed distribution completed.supportsDoes this report prove that all funds had been distributed and the receivership had ended?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The requested termination and final distribution require a court order. The prayer, accounting and finality request do not themselves execute that order or establish bank-level completion.supportsDoes this report prove that all funds had been distributed and the receivership had ended?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The receiver claims $722,728.68 in expenses and a 33% contingency fee of $1,017,601.11. These are the requested amounts in this verified report; expense invoices and a detailed ledger are not supplied within these eleven pages.supportsThe four allocation figures sum exactly to $3,083,639.75. At the stated pool, 33% is $1,017,601.1175, conventionally rounded to $1,017,601.12, one cent above the requested fee. This is a transparent arithmetic comparison, not an allegation of overpayment.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The accounting allocates $873,639.75 to the judgment creditor, $722,728.68 to expenses, $1,017,601.11 to the receiver fee and $469,670.21 to employees. Paragraph 8 reports the creditor distribution already made and describes receiver funds held in trust; the wording does not show every proposed distribution completed.supportsThe four allocation figures sum exactly to $3,083,639.75. At the stated pool, 33% is $1,017,601.1175, conventionally rounded to $1,017,601.12, one cent above the requested fee. This is a transparent arithmetic comparison, not an allegation of overpayment.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Although the accounting associates $469,670.21 with unpaid employees at the Spring facility, the prayer gives the next receivership priority, if present, and only otherwise directs the employee distribution within 45 days of the order. The same figure therefore has a conditional destination.supportsWas a successor receivership present when the distribution obligation arose, and what payment or transfer actually followed?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The requested termination and final distribution require a court order. The prayer, accounting and finality request do not themselves execute that order or establish bank-level completion.supportsWhat order was entered, and was the requested appellate bond posted or any stay activated?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
WEIGH
Explained weighting
A score appears only when its components and change threshold are published.
No published WEIGH run
The active Website Edition contains no applied score snapshot for this source or its connected objects. That means not assessed—not zero.