Texas March 13 nonsuit order — enforcement claims dismissed in this proceeding
Original sourceSigned nonsuit order limited to collection and enforcement in the identified proceeding; no general merits release or debt satisfaction inferred.
Metadata only
The original file isn’t published in this edition.
The record remains visible so the reader can see that it exists without mistaking metadata for access to the underlying document.
SHA-256 8c778fd3f191260deeb8…0 pages · 500 KB
DISTILLATES
What the source contains
Each card carries the governed distillate name from the database. Open the quoted anchor before relying on the interpretation.
claimallegation
Federal Exhibit 19, filed April 15, 2026 as EDVA Document 175-21, contains a nonsuit order in Harris County cause 2024-48085. The Texas fili
Federal Exhibit 19, filed April 15, 2026 as EDVA Document 175-21, contains a nonsuit order in Harris County cause 2024-48085. The Texas filing stamp reads March 9, 2026 at 11:02 AM, and the notice of nonsuit is identified as filed March 9. The populated judicial signature block reads March 13, 2026 despite the blank day in the separate form line.
Read the anchor · page 1
EXHIBIT 19
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 175-21 Filed 04/15/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 2862
claimallegation
The order dismisses Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community LLC’s claims to collect and enforce the underlying judgment in this pro
The order dismisses Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community LLC’s claims to collect and enforce the underlying judgment in this proceeding against Cyberlux Corporation and Mark Schmidt. Its express scope is this collection/enforcement proceeding; it does not say the underlying judgment is vacated, identify a settlement release, or declare all debt paid.
Read the anchor · page 2
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 175-21
Filed 04/15/26
Page 2 of 2 PagelD# 392026 11:02 AM
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County
Envelope No. 112162576
By: Alyssa Henderson
Filed: 3/9/2026 11:02 AM
Pgs-1
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085
4A
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC, and
IN THE DISTRICT COURT
SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC,
Plaintiffs/Judgment-Creditors,
V.
129th JUDICIAL DISTRICT
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and MARK
SCHMIDT, Individually,
Defendants/Judgment-Debtors.
HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
ORDER ON NONSUIT
Pursuant to the Notice of Nonsuit filed on March 9, 2026, the claims of Plaintiffs/Judgment-
Creditors Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC, and Secure Community LLC, to collect and enforce the
underlying judgment in this proceeding against Defendants/Judgment-Debtors Cyberlux
Corporation and Mark Schmidt are hereby DISMISSED. All costs and fees are paid by the parties
that incurred them.
SIGNED on March
O
Signed:
3/13/2026 [signature block date verified from page image; judicial signature present]
Presiding Judge
129th Judicial District Court
Harris County, Texas
Unofficial Copy Office
claimallegation
All costs and fees are to be paid by the parties that incurred them. The order does not identify costs by amount, reallocate them to one sid
All costs and fees are to be paid by the parties that incurred them. The order does not identify costs by amount, reallocate them to one side, or certify that they have already been paid.
Read the anchor · page 2
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 175-21
Filed 04/15/26
Page 2 of 2 PagelD# 392026 11:02 AM
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County
Envelope No. 112162576
By: Alyssa Henderson
Filed: 3/9/2026 11:02 AM
Pgs-1
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085
4A
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC, and
IN THE DISTRICT COURT
SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC,
Plaintiffs/Judgment-Creditors,
V.
129th JUDICIAL DISTRICT
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and MARK
SCHMIDT, Individually,
Defendants/Judgment-Debtors.
HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
ORDER ON NONSUIT
Pursuant to the Notice of Nonsuit filed on March 9, 2026, the claims of Plaintiffs/Judgment-
Creditors Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC, and Secure Community LLC, to collect and enforce the
underlying judgment in this proceeding against Defendants/Judgment-Debtors Cyberlux
Corporation and Mark Schmidt are hereby DISMISSED. All costs and fees are paid by the parties
that incurred them.
SIGNED on March
O
Signed:
3/13/2026 [signature block date verified from page image; judicial signature present]
Presiding Judge
129th Judicial District Court
Harris County, Texas
Unofficial Copy Office
entityobservation
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC
Read the anchor · page 2
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 175-21
Filed 04/15/26
Page 2 of 2 PagelD# 392026 11:02 AM
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County
Envelope No. 112162576
By: Alyssa Henderson
Filed: 3/9/2026 11:02 AM
Pgs-1
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085
4A
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC, and
IN THE DISTRICT COURT
SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC,
Plaintiffs/Judgment-Creditors,
V.
129th JUDICIAL DISTRICT
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and MARK
SCHMIDT, Individually,
Defendants/Judgment-Debtors.
HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
ORDER ON NONSUIT
Pursuant to the Notice of Nonsuit filed on March 9, 2026, the claims of Plaintiffs/Judgment-
Creditors Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC, and Secure Community LLC, to collect and enforce the
underlying judgment in this proceeding against Defendants/Judgment-Debtors Cyberlux
Corporation and Mark Schmidt are hereby DISMISSED. All costs and fees are paid by the parties
that incurred them.
SIGNED on March
O
Signed:
3/13/2026 [signature block date verified from page image; judicial signature present]
Presiding Judge
129th Judicial District Court
Harris County, Texas
Unofficial Copy Office
entityobservation
SECURE COMMUNITY
Read the anchor · page 2
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 175-21
Filed 04/15/26
Page 2 of 2 PagelD# 392026 11:02 AM
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County
Envelope No. 112162576
By: Alyssa Henderson
Filed: 3/9/2026 11:02 AM
Pgs-1
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085
4A
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC, and
IN THE DISTRICT COURT
SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC,
Plaintiffs/Judgment-Creditors,
V.
129th JUDICIAL DISTRICT
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and MARK
SCHMIDT, Individually,
Defendants/Judgment-Debtors.
HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
ORDER ON NONSUIT
Pursuant to the Notice of Nonsuit filed on March 9, 2026, the claims of Plaintiffs/Judgment-
Creditors Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC, and Secure Community LLC, to collect and enforce the
underlying judgment in this proceeding against Defendants/Judgment-Debtors Cyberlux
Corporation and Mark Schmidt are hereby DISMISSED. All costs and fees are paid by the parties
that incurred them.
SIGNED on March
O
Signed:
3/13/2026 [signature block date verified from page image; judicial signature present]
Presiding Judge
129th Judicial District Court
Harris County, Texas
Unofficial Copy Office
entityobservation
CYBERLUX CORPORATION
Read the anchor · page 2
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 175-21
Filed 04/15/26
Page 2 of 2 PagelD# 392026 11:02 AM
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County
Envelope No. 112162576
By: Alyssa Henderson
Filed: 3/9/2026 11:02 AM
Pgs-1
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085
4A
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC, and
IN THE DISTRICT COURT
SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC,
Plaintiffs/Judgment-Creditors,
V.
129th JUDICIAL DISTRICT
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and MARK
SCHMIDT, Individually,
Defendants/Judgment-Debtors.
HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
ORDER ON NONSUIT
Pursuant to the Notice of Nonsuit filed on March 9, 2026, the claims of Plaintiffs/Judgment-
Creditors Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC, and Secure Community LLC, to collect and enforce the
underlying judgment in this proceeding against Defendants/Judgment-Debtors Cyberlux
Corporation and Mark Schmidt are hereby DISMISSED. All costs and fees are paid by the parties
that incurred them.
SIGNED on March
O
Signed:
3/13/2026 [signature block date verified from page image; judicial signature present]
Presiding Judge
129th Judicial District Court
Harris County, Texas
Unofficial Copy Office
entityobservation
MARK
Read the anchor · page 2
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 175-21
Filed 04/15/26
Page 2 of 2 PagelD# 392026 11:02 AM
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County
Envelope No. 112162576
By: Alyssa Henderson
Filed: 3/9/2026 11:02 AM
Pgs-1
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085
4A
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC, and
IN THE DISTRICT COURT
SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC,
Plaintiffs/Judgment-Creditors,
V.
129th JUDICIAL DISTRICT
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and MARK
SCHMIDT, Individually,
Defendants/Judgment-Debtors.
HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
ORDER ON NONSUIT
Pursuant to the Notice of Nonsuit filed on March 9, 2026, the claims of Plaintiffs/Judgment-
Creditors Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC, and Secure Community LLC, to collect and enforce the
underlying judgment in this proceeding against Defendants/Judgment-Debtors Cyberlux
Corporation and Mark Schmidt are hereby DISMISSED. All costs and fees are paid by the parties
that incurred them.
SIGNED on March
O
Signed:
3/13/2026 [signature block date verified from page image; judicial signature present]
Presiding Judge
129th Judicial District Court
Harris County, Texas
Unofficial Copy Office
inferenceinference
Dismissal of this enforcement proceeding and satisfaction of the underlying judgment are distinct propositions; only the former is stated in
Dismissal of this enforcement proceeding and satisfaction of the underlying judgment are distinct propositions; only the former is stated in the supplied order.
omissiongap
Underlying notice of nonsuit and settlement or satisfaction records are not attached.
Read the anchor · page 1
EXHIBIT 19
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 175-21 Filed 04/15/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 2862
otherattribution
Complete supplied 2-page source reviewed at SHA-256 8c778fd3f191260deeb8f708d64fd3dae48eda700918382f61e00fa7d544b376. Source assertions, ori
Complete supplied 2-page source reviewed at SHA-256 8c778fd3f191260deeb8f708d64fd3dae48eda700918382f61e00fa7d544b376. Source assertions, original visual features, filing/communication context and identified missing attachments are retained. Exact version_443fe46198424e69bf372e165a91d2f2; SHA256 8c778fd3f191260deeb8f708d64fd3dae48eda700918382f61e00fa7d544b376. Both pages read in full and both original page images inspected, including signing and filing stamps. No inference of payment from an order.
Read the anchor · page 1
EXHIBIT 19
Case 3:25-cv-00483-JAG Document 175-21 Filed 04/15/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID# 2862
questionquestion
What notice, settlement, payment and satisfaction records explain the nonsuit and establish the continuing status of the underlying judgment
What notice, settlement, payment and satisfaction records explain the nonsuit and establish the continuing status of the underlying judgment?
distillateobservation
CONNECT
Reviewed relationships
The canvas follows the database: source to DISTIL record, DISTIL record to knowledge object, then reviewed relationship. Position alone means nothing.
The order dismisses Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community LLC’s claims to collect and enforce the underlying judgment in this proceeding against Cyberlux Corporation and Mark Schmidt. Its express scope is this collection/enforcement proceeding; it does not say the underlying judgment is vacated, identify a settlement release, or declare all debt paid.referencesThe order grants the judgment creditors’ second amended distribution motion and directs Robert W. Berleth and Berleth & Associates, PLLC to disburse $873,849.02 from non-exempt funds held under the receivership order to Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community, LLC within two business days of signing. The exact instruction is a creditor disbursement, not merely a court deposit.
Same Texas proceeding has earlier distribution command and later nonsuit. Nonsuit does not itself prove performance of the command or amount recovered.
The parties expressly resolve remaining disputes in this Texas enforcement action only. They exclude the Virginia Stock Case CL24-3910 and federal interpleader3:25-cv-00483 from the joint motion’s resolution. Its settlement language is not an omnibus resolution of those separate disputes.referencesThe order dismisses Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community LLC’s claims to collect and enforce the underlying judgment in this proceeding against Cyberlux Corporation and Mark Schmidt. Its express scope is this collection/enforcement proceeding; it does not say the underlying judgment is vacated, identify a settlement release, or declare all debt paid.
Later nonsuit dismisses this enforcement proceeding, not the expressly excluded disputes.
All costs and fees are to be paid by the parties that incurred them. The order does not identify costs by amount, reallocate them to one side, or certify that they have already been paid.supportsWhat notice, settlement, payment and satisfaction records explain the nonsuit and establish the continuing status of the underlying judgment?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The order dismisses Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community LLC’s claims to collect and enforce the underlying judgment in this proceeding against Cyberlux Corporation and Mark Schmidt. Its express scope is this collection/enforcement proceeding; it does not say the underlying judgment is vacated, identify a settlement release, or declare all debt paid.supportsWhat notice, settlement, payment and satisfaction records explain the nonsuit and establish the continuing status of the underlying judgment?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Federal Exhibit 19, filed April 15, 2026 as EDVA Document 175-21, contains a nonsuit order in Harris County cause 2024-48085. The Texas filing stamp reads March 9, 2026 at 11:02 AM, and the notice of nonsuit is identified as filed March 9. The populated judicial signature block reads March 13, 2026 despite the blank day in the separate form line.supportsWhat notice, settlement, payment and satisfaction records explain the nonsuit and establish the continuing status of the underlying judgment?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
All costs and fees are to be paid by the parties that incurred them. The order does not identify costs by amount, reallocate them to one side, or certify that they have already been paid.supportsDismissal of this enforcement proceeding and satisfaction of the underlying judgment are distinct propositions; only the former is stated in the supplied order.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Federal Exhibit 19, filed April 15, 2026 as EDVA Document 175-21, contains a nonsuit order in Harris County cause 2024-48085. The Texas filing stamp reads March 9, 2026 at 11:02 AM, and the notice of nonsuit is identified as filed March 9. The populated judicial signature block reads March 13, 2026 despite the blank day in the separate form line.supportsWhat notice, settlement, payment and satisfaction records explain the nonsuit and establish the continuing status of the underlying judgment?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The order dismisses Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community LLC’s claims to collect and enforce the underlying judgment in this proceeding against Cyberlux Corporation and Mark Schmidt. Its express scope is this collection/enforcement proceeding; it does not say the underlying judgment is vacated, identify a settlement release, or declare all debt paid.supportsWhat notice, settlement, payment and satisfaction records explain the nonsuit and establish the continuing status of the underlying judgment?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The order dismisses Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community LLC’s claims to collect and enforce the underlying judgment in this proceeding against Cyberlux Corporation and Mark Schmidt. Its express scope is this collection/enforcement proceeding; it does not say the underlying judgment is vacated, identify a settlement release, or declare all debt paid.supportsDismissal of this enforcement proceeding and satisfaction of the underlying judgment are distinct propositions; only the former is stated in the supplied order.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
All costs and fees are to be paid by the parties that incurred them. The order does not identify costs by amount, reallocate them to one side, or certify that they have already been paid.supportsUnderlying notice of nonsuit and settlement or satisfaction records are not attached.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
All costs and fees are to be paid by the parties that incurred them. The order does not identify costs by amount, reallocate them to one side, or certify that they have already been paid.supportsWhat notice, settlement, payment and satisfaction records explain the nonsuit and establish the continuing status of the underlying judgment?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Federal Exhibit 19, filed April 15, 2026 as EDVA Document 175-21, contains a nonsuit order in Harris County cause 2024-48085. The Texas filing stamp reads March 9, 2026 at 11:02 AM, and the notice of nonsuit is identified as filed March 9. The populated judicial signature block reads March 13, 2026 despite the blank day in the separate form line.supportsUnderlying notice of nonsuit and settlement or satisfaction records are not attached.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The order dismisses Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC and Secure Community LLC’s claims to collect and enforce the underlying judgment in this proceeding against Cyberlux Corporation and Mark Schmidt. Its express scope is this collection/enforcement proceeding; it does not say the underlying judgment is vacated, identify a settlement release, or declare all debt paid.supportsUnderlying notice of nonsuit and settlement or satisfaction records are not attached.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
WEIGH
Explained weighting
A score appears only when its components and change threshold are published.
No published WEIGH run
The active Website Edition contains no applied score snapshot for this source or its connected objects. That means not assessed—not zero.