Signed Order to Distribute Funds and Terminate Receivership — 3 June 2026
Original sourcesigned_historical_distribution_termination_order
Metadata only
The original file isn’t published in this edition.
The record remains visible so the reader can see that it exists without mistaking metadata for access to the underlying document.
SHA-256 b70a64c3985e9bcdde6e…0 pages · 2 MB
DISTILLATES
What the source contains
Each card carries the governed distillate name from the database. Open the quoted anchor before relying on the interpretation.
observationobservation
Signed entry: 3 June 2026; preceding submission and filing stamps are separate events.
Read the anchor · page 1
5/31/2026 12:14 PM
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County
Envelope No. 115542213
By: Shanelle Taylor
Filed: 6/1/2026 12:00 AM
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC
IN THE DISTRICT COURT
and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC.,
Plaintiffs, Judgment-Creditors,
§ § § § § §
129TH JUDICIAL COURT
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually,
IN AND FOR
Defendants, Judgment-Debtors. §
HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
ORDER TO DISTRIBUTE FUNDS AND TERMINATE RECEIVERSHIP
Following approximately twelve months of receivership by Receiver Robert
Berleth, and after review of the Receiver's Report, relevant statutory and case law,
and the arguments of counsel, the Court is of the opinion that the motion should
be in all things GRANTED. Therefore:
The Court FINDS:
1) That the Receiver's report is whole, complete, and unbiased. The Court
accepts the report as accurate findings and conclusions of law, including the
amounts collected and to be distributed.
2) That the Receiver has fulfilled his oath, by performing his duties in an
economic effective, and efficient manner;
3) That the Receiver's fees and expenses are reasonable and customary for
similar legal services in and around Harris County, Texas. The Moyer
elements are met. The Receiver effectively performed his duty and has met
the Bergeron factors for compensation as a 33% contingency fee;
Atlantic Waves v. Cyberlux
Pg. 1 of 5
Order Terminating Receivership
observationobservation
Court-stated pool $3,083,639.75; reported prior creditor distribution $873,849.02.
Read the anchor · page 3
8) The Court takes judicial notice that the termination of this receivership will animate the next serial receivership. Cyberlux will remain under receivership without interruption pending further orders in that case;
THEREFORE, The Court ORDERS the following:
9) That the Receiver has collected the judgment in full as ordered. The Receiver is entitled to his fees and expenses under Bergeron as requested in the amount of 33% of the amount collected, $3,083,639.75.
10) That the Receivership, and that all duties, rights, and obligations associated therewith, is hereby fully and completely TERMINATED, effective the date of entry below. The Receiver is released;
11) The Court ORDERS that any party appealing this order shall post an appellate (supersedeas) bond in the amount of $150,000.00 (one hundred fifty thousand dollars) to cover anticipated appellate costs, pending appeal. The bond may be posted in cash or by an approved surety authorized to do business in Texas, and shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court within 14 days of this Order. Upon filing of the required bond, the litigation shall be stayed in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 24 and applicable law. The Clerk is authorized to accept the bond, issue any necessary receipts or certificates, and take any administrative action necessary to effectuate the stay; if the Court requires a different form of security, the appealing party is granted leave to post such alternative security in conformity with the Court’s directions.
Atlantic Waves v. Cyberlux — Pg. 3 of 5 — Order Terminating Receivership
[Source watermark: Unofficial Copy Office of Marilyn Burgess District Clerk]
claimallegation
The five-page order bears a 31 May 2026 submission timestamp and a 1 June 2026 midnight filing stamp, but is signed and entered by Judge Mic
The five-page order bears a 31 May 2026 submission timestamp and a 1 June 2026 midnight filing stamp, but is signed and entered by Judge Michael Gomez on 3 June 2026. These are distinct date roles. It concerns cause 2024-48085 in Harris County’s 129th Judicial District Court.
Read the anchor · page 1
5/31/2026 12:14 PM
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County
Envelope No. 115542213
By: Shanelle Taylor
Filed: 6/1/2026 12:00 AM
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC
IN THE DISTRICT COURT
and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC.,
Plaintiffs, Judgment-Creditors,
§ § § § § §
129TH JUDICIAL COURT
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually,
IN AND FOR
Defendants, Judgment-Debtors. §
HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
ORDER TO DISTRIBUTE FUNDS AND TERMINATE RECEIVERSHIP
Following approximately twelve months of receivership by Receiver Robert
Berleth, and after review of the Receiver's Report, relevant statutory and case law,
and the arguments of counsel, the Court is of the opinion that the motion should
be in all things GRANTED. Therefore:
The Court FINDS:
1) That the Receiver's report is whole, complete, and unbiased. The Court
accepts the report as accurate findings and conclusions of law, including the
amounts collected and to be distributed.
2) That the Receiver has fulfilled his oath, by performing his duties in an
economic effective, and efficient manner;
3) That the Receiver's fees and expenses are reasonable and customary for
similar legal services in and around Harris County, Texas. The Moyer
elements are met. The Receiver effectively performed his duty and has met
the Bergeron factors for compensation as a 33% contingency fee;
Atlantic Waves v. Cyberlux
Pg. 1 of 5
Order Terminating Receivership
claimallegation
The order directs $722,728.68 expenses and $1,017,601.11 receiver fees to Berleth & Associates. It assigns the remaining $469,670.21 first t
The order directs $722,728.68 expenses and $1,017,601.11 receiver fees to Berleth & Associates. It assigns the remaining $469,670.21 first to a next receivership, if present, or otherwise to previously unpaid Spring-facility employees within 45 days of the order until exhausted.
Read the anchor · page 4
12)The Clerk is ORDERED to distribute the Receiver's bond back to the receiver
in accordance with normal procedures to:
Berleth & Associates, PLLC
9950 Cypresswood Dr., Ste. 200
Houston, Texas 77070
13) Within 14 days of the expiration of any applicable appellate window, the
Receiver is ORDERED to distribute collected monies as follows:
a. The Receiver has distributed $873,849.02 under previous orders of
the court to Atlantic Waves Holdings, LLC
b. Receiver disburse $722,728.68 to the Berleth & Associates, PLLC as
reasonable and incurred expenses in the prosecution of the
receivership, to be taxed as a cost of court.
c. Receiver disburse $1,017,601.11 to Berleth & Associates, PLLC as the
Receiver's Fee to be taxed as a cost of court.
d. Receiver distribute the remaining funds in the amount of
$469,670.21 in the following order of possibility:
i. Transfer the funds to the next receivership, if present; or then,
ii. Within 45 days of this order, distribute $469,670.21 to the
previous unpaid employees of Cyberlux at the Spring, Texas
manufacturing facility, until the funds are exhausted.
14)Any remaining funds such as fractional cents, interest accrued during
distribution, or small calculation errors shall be forwarded to the Access to
Justice Foundation by the Receiver.
Atlantic Waves v. Cyberlux
Pg.4 of5
Order Terminating Receivership
claimallegation
Paragraph 14 sends incidental remaining amounts, such as fractional cents, interest or small calculation errors, to the Access to Justice Fo
Paragraph 14 sends incidental remaining amounts, such as fractional cents, interest or small calculation errors, to the Access to Justice Foundation. Paragraphs 15–16 deny other relief and declare the order final and appealable.
Read the anchor · page 4
12)The Clerk is ORDERED to distribute the Receiver's bond back to the receiver
in accordance with normal procedures to:
Berleth & Associates, PLLC
9950 Cypresswood Dr., Ste. 200
Houston, Texas 77070
13) Within 14 days of the expiration of any applicable appellate window, the
Receiver is ORDERED to distribute collected monies as follows:
a. The Receiver has distributed $873,849.02 under previous orders of
the court to Atlantic Waves Holdings, LLC
b. Receiver disburse $722,728.68 to the Berleth & Associates, PLLC as
reasonable and incurred expenses in the prosecution of the
receivership, to be taxed as a cost of court.
c. Receiver disburse $1,017,601.11 to Berleth & Associates, PLLC as the
Receiver's Fee to be taxed as a cost of court.
d. Receiver distribute the remaining funds in the amount of
$469,670.21 in the following order of possibility:
i. Transfer the funds to the next receivership, if present; or then,
ii. Within 45 days of this order, distribute $469,670.21 to the
previous unpaid employees of Cyberlux at the Spring, Texas
manufacturing facility, until the funds are exhausted.
14)Any remaining funds such as fractional cents, interest accrued during
distribution, or small calculation errors shall be forwarded to the Access to
Justice Foundation by the Receiver.
Atlantic Waves v. Cyberlux
Pg.4 of5
Order Terminating Receivership
claimallegation
The court grants the motion and finds the receiver’s report whole, complete and unbiased, accepts it as accurate findings and conclusions, f
The court grants the motion and finds the receiver’s report whole, complete and unbiased, accepts it as accurate findings and conclusions, finds the oath fulfilled efficiently and finds fees and expenses reasonable. It invokes Moyer and Bergeron in approving 33% contingency compensation. These are findings of this supplied state-court order.
Read the anchor · page 1
5/31/2026 12:14 PM
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County
Envelope No. 115542213
By: Shanelle Taylor
Filed: 6/1/2026 12:00 AM
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC
IN THE DISTRICT COURT
and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC.,
Plaintiffs, Judgment-Creditors,
§ § § § § §
129TH JUDICIAL COURT
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually,
IN AND FOR
Defendants, Judgment-Debtors. §
HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
ORDER TO DISTRIBUTE FUNDS AND TERMINATE RECEIVERSHIP
Following approximately twelve months of receivership by Receiver Robert
Berleth, and after review of the Receiver's Report, relevant statutory and case law,
and the arguments of counsel, the Court is of the opinion that the motion should
be in all things GRANTED. Therefore:
The Court FINDS:
1) That the Receiver's report is whole, complete, and unbiased. The Court
accepts the report as accurate findings and conclusions of law, including the
amounts collected and to be distributed.
2) That the Receiver has fulfilled his oath, by performing his duties in an
economic effective, and efficient manner;
3) That the Receiver's fees and expenses are reasonable and customary for
similar legal services in and around Harris County, Texas. The Moyer
elements are met. The Receiver effectively performed his duty and has met
the Bergeron factors for compensation as a 33% contingency fee;
Atlantic Waves v. Cyberlux
Pg. 1 of 5
Order Terminating Receivership
claimallegation
Finding 4 states that in May, June and July 2025 the receiver entered the manufacturing facility, took physical possession of K8 drones and
Finding 4 states that in May, June and July 2025 the receiver entered the manufacturing facility, took physical possession of K8 drones and arranged inventory, transport and delivery to a US government facility in sale or contract fulfilment. It states the drones and follow-on sale or fulfilment funds are subject to the receivership order, including receiver fees in the Virginia interpleader.
Read the anchor · page 2
4) Per Court Order, in May, June, and July, 2025, the Receiver entered
Cyberlux manufacturing facility and took physical possession of Cyberlux
manufactured K8 drones. At significant expense and effort, the Receiver
then orchestrated a complete inventory, transport of the drones, and
delivery to a US government facility in sale and/or fulfillment contract for
said drones. Thus, the drones and any follow-on funds from sale or
fulfilment thereof are subject to corresponding Receivership Order,
including the Receiver's fees under Bergeron in the Virginia Interpleader;
5) That no further need for the Receiver is needed due to the reflecting Parties
agreed mutual settlement and release
of all court judgments, between
Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC, Secure Community, LLC, Cyberlux
Corporation, and Mark D. Schmidt. Because the parties have fully, finally,
and completely settled all claims between them, this order deems all
judgments and claims between the parties fully and finally satisfied;
6) No appellate orders have superseded this Court's authority to rule upon the
issues presented The Court retains plenary power to enforce this action;
7) The Receiver's testimony regarding his fees is well taken and found to be
credible
The Receiver's exhibits regarding his necessary expenses are
admitted. Pursuant to the Joint Motion by the Parties, they have fully and
finally settled all claims, and this settlement would not have occurred but for
the actions and efforts by the Receiver;
Atlantic Waves v. Cyberlux
Pg. 2 of 5
Order Terminating Receivership
claimallegation
Finding 5 records a mutual settlement and release among Atlantic Wave Holdings, Secure Community, Cyberlux and Mark Schmidt and deems judgme
Finding 5 records a mutual settlement and release among Atlantic Wave Holdings, Secure Community, Cyberlux and Mark Schmidt and deems judgments and claims between those parties satisfied. It does not state that every third-party creditor claim is settled.
Read the anchor · page 2
4) Per Court Order, in May, June, and July, 2025, the Receiver entered
Cyberlux manufacturing facility and took physical possession of Cyberlux
manufactured K8 drones. At significant expense and effort, the Receiver
then orchestrated a complete inventory, transport of the drones, and
delivery to a US government facility in sale and/or fulfillment contract for
said drones. Thus, the drones and any follow-on funds from sale or
fulfilment thereof are subject to corresponding Receivership Order,
including the Receiver's fees under Bergeron in the Virginia Interpleader;
5) That no further need for the Receiver is needed due to the reflecting Parties
agreed mutual settlement and release
of all court judgments, between
Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC, Secure Community, LLC, Cyberlux
Corporation, and Mark D. Schmidt. Because the parties have fully, finally,
and completely settled all claims between them, this order deems all
judgments and claims between the parties fully and finally satisfied;
6) No appellate orders have superseded this Court's authority to rule upon the
issues presented The Court retains plenary power to enforce this action;
7) The Receiver's testimony regarding his fees is well taken and found to be
credible
The Receiver's exhibits regarding his necessary expenses are
admitted. Pursuant to the Joint Motion by the Parties, they have fully and
finally settled all claims, and this settlement would not have occurred but for
the actions and efforts by the Receiver;
Atlantic Waves v. Cyberlux
Pg. 2 of 5
Order Terminating Receivership
claimallegation
Findings 6–7 say no appellate orders have superseded the court’s authority, retain plenary enforcement power, find the receiver’s fee testim
Findings 6–7 say no appellate orders have superseded the court’s authority, retain plenary enforcement power, find the receiver’s fee testimony credible and admit his necessary-expense exhibits. The finding is specific to those exhibits; it is not a ruling that every separately listed exhibit was admitted.
Read the anchor · page 2
4) Per Court Order, in May, June, and July, 2025, the Receiver entered
Cyberlux manufacturing facility and took physical possession of Cyberlux
manufactured K8 drones. At significant expense and effort, the Receiver
then orchestrated a complete inventory, transport of the drones, and
delivery to a US government facility in sale and/or fulfillment contract for
said drones. Thus, the drones and any follow-on funds from sale or
fulfilment thereof are subject to corresponding Receivership Order,
including the Receiver's fees under Bergeron in the Virginia Interpleader;
5) That no further need for the Receiver is needed due to the reflecting Parties
agreed mutual settlement and release
of all court judgments, between
Atlantic Wave Holdings, LLC, Secure Community, LLC, Cyberlux
Corporation, and Mark D. Schmidt. Because the parties have fully, finally,
and completely settled all claims between them, this order deems all
judgments and claims between the parties fully and finally satisfied;
6) No appellate orders have superseded this Court's authority to rule upon the
issues presented The Court retains plenary power to enforce this action;
7) The Receiver's testimony regarding his fees is well taken and found to be
credible
The Receiver's exhibits regarding his necessary expenses are
admitted. Pursuant to the Joint Motion by the Parties, they have fully and
finally settled all claims, and this settlement would not have occurred but for
the actions and efforts by the Receiver;
Atlantic Waves v. Cyberlux
Pg. 2 of 5
Order Terminating Receivership
claimallegation
Paragraph 8 takes judicial notice that terminating this receivership will animate the next serial receivership and that Cyberlux will remain
Paragraph 8 takes judicial notice that terminating this receivership will animate the next serial receivership and that Cyberlux will remain under receivership without interruption pending further orders in that case. Paragraph 10 terminates this receivership effective the entry date and releases the receiver in this proceeding.
Read the anchor · page 3
8) The Court takes judicial notice that the termination of this receivership will animate the next serial receivership. Cyberlux will remain under receivership without interruption pending further orders in that case;
THEREFORE, The Court ORDERS the following:
9) That the Receiver has collected the judgment in full as ordered. The Receiver is entitled to his fees and expenses under Bergeron as requested in the amount of 33% of the amount collected, $3,083,639.75.
10) That the Receivership, and that all duties, rights, and obligations associated therewith, is hereby fully and completely TERMINATED, effective the date of entry below. The Receiver is released;
11) The Court ORDERS that any party appealing this order shall post an appellate (supersedeas) bond in the amount of $150,000.00 (one hundred fifty thousand dollars) to cover anticipated appellate costs, pending appeal. The bond may be posted in cash or by an approved surety authorized to do business in Texas, and shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court within 14 days of this Order. Upon filing of the required bond, the litigation shall be stayed in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 24 and applicable law. The Clerk is authorized to accept the bond, issue any necessary receipts or certificates, and take any administrative action necessary to effectuate the stay; if the Court requires a different form of security, the appealing party is granted leave to post such alternative security in conformity with the Court’s directions.
Atlantic Waves v. Cyberlux — Pg. 3 of 5 — Order Terminating Receivership
[Source watermark: Unofficial Copy Office of Marilyn Burgess District Clerk]
claimallegation
Paragraph 9 states full collection of $3,083,639.75 and entitlement to fees and expenses with a 33% fee. The stated collected amount is the
Paragraph 9 states full collection of $3,083,639.75 and entitlement to fees and expenses with a 33% fee. The stated collected amount is the fee base, not itself the fee.
Read the anchor · page 3
8) The Court takes judicial notice that the termination of this receivership will animate the next serial receivership. Cyberlux will remain under receivership without interruption pending further orders in that case;
THEREFORE, The Court ORDERS the following:
9) That the Receiver has collected the judgment in full as ordered. The Receiver is entitled to his fees and expenses under Bergeron as requested in the amount of 33% of the amount collected, $3,083,639.75.
10) That the Receivership, and that all duties, rights, and obligations associated therewith, is hereby fully and completely TERMINATED, effective the date of entry below. The Receiver is released;
11) The Court ORDERS that any party appealing this order shall post an appellate (supersedeas) bond in the amount of $150,000.00 (one hundred fifty thousand dollars) to cover anticipated appellate costs, pending appeal. The bond may be posted in cash or by an approved surety authorized to do business in Texas, and shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court within 14 days of this Order. Upon filing of the required bond, the litigation shall be stayed in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 24 and applicable law. The Clerk is authorized to accept the bond, issue any necessary receipts or certificates, and take any administrative action necessary to effectuate the stay; if the Court requires a different form of security, the appealing party is granted leave to post such alternative security in conformity with the Court’s directions.
Atlantic Waves v. Cyberlux — Pg. 3 of 5 — Order Terminating Receivership
[Source watermark: Unofficial Copy Office of Marilyn Burgess District Clerk]
claimallegation
Paragraph 11 requires any appealing party to post $150,000 security in cash or approved surety within 14 days of the order, permits conformi
Paragraph 11 requires any appealing party to post $150,000 security in cash or approved surety within 14 days of the order, permits conforming alternative security if required and states the litigation shall be stayed upon filing the required bond. It does not establish that a bond was filed.
Read the anchor · page 3
8) The Court takes judicial notice that the termination of this receivership will animate the next serial receivership. Cyberlux will remain under receivership without interruption pending further orders in that case;
THEREFORE, The Court ORDERS the following:
9) That the Receiver has collected the judgment in full as ordered. The Receiver is entitled to his fees and expenses under Bergeron as requested in the amount of 33% of the amount collected, $3,083,639.75.
10) That the Receivership, and that all duties, rights, and obligations associated therewith, is hereby fully and completely TERMINATED, effective the date of entry below. The Receiver is released;
11) The Court ORDERS that any party appealing this order shall post an appellate (supersedeas) bond in the amount of $150,000.00 (one hundred fifty thousand dollars) to cover anticipated appellate costs, pending appeal. The bond may be posted in cash or by an approved surety authorized to do business in Texas, and shall be filed with the Clerk of this Court within 14 days of this Order. Upon filing of the required bond, the litigation shall be stayed in accordance with Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 24 and applicable law. The Clerk is authorized to accept the bond, issue any necessary receipts or certificates, and take any administrative action necessary to effectuate the stay; if the Court requires a different form of security, the appealing party is granted leave to post such alternative security in conformity with the Court’s directions.
Atlantic Waves v. Cyberlux — Pg. 3 of 5 — Order Terminating Receivership
[Source watermark: Unofficial Copy Office of Marilyn Burgess District Clerk]
claimallegation
Paragraph 12 orders return of the receiver’s bond. Paragraph 13 directs distribution within 14 days after expiry of any applicable appellate
Paragraph 12 orders return of the receiver’s bond. Paragraph 13 directs distribution within 14 days after expiry of any applicable appellate window and reports $873,849.02 already distributed under prior orders to Atlantic Waves Holdings.
Read the anchor · page 4
12)The Clerk is ORDERED to distribute the Receiver's bond back to the receiver
in accordance with normal procedures to:
Berleth & Associates, PLLC
9950 Cypresswood Dr., Ste. 200
Houston, Texas 77070
13) Within 14 days of the expiration of any applicable appellate window, the
Receiver is ORDERED to distribute collected monies as follows:
a. The Receiver has distributed $873,849.02 under previous orders of
the court to Atlantic Waves Holdings, LLC
b. Receiver disburse $722,728.68 to the Berleth & Associates, PLLC as
reasonable and incurred expenses in the prosecution of the
receivership, to be taxed as a cost of court.
c. Receiver disburse $1,017,601.11 to Berleth & Associates, PLLC as the
Receiver's Fee to be taxed as a cost of court.
d. Receiver distribute the remaining funds in the amount of
$469,670.21 in the following order of possibility:
i. Transfer the funds to the next receivership, if present; or then,
ii. Within 45 days of this order, distribute $469,670.21 to the
previous unpaid employees of Cyberlux at the Spring, Texas
manufacturing facility, until the funds are exhausted.
14)Any remaining funds such as fractional cents, interest accrued during
distribution, or small calculation errors shall be forwarded to the Access to
Justice Foundation by the Receiver.
Atlantic Waves v. Cyberlux
Pg.4 of5
Order Terminating Receivership
entityobservation
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC
Read the anchor · page 1
5/31/2026 12:14 PM
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County
Envelope No. 115542213
By: Shanelle Taylor
Filed: 6/1/2026 12:00 AM
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC
IN THE DISTRICT COURT
and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC.,
Plaintiffs, Judgment-Creditors,
§ § § § § §
129TH JUDICIAL COURT
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually,
IN AND FOR
Defendants, Judgment-Debtors. §
HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
ORDER TO DISTRIBUTE FUNDS AND TERMINATE RECEIVERSHIP
Following approximately twelve months of receivership by Receiver Robert
Berleth, and after review of the Receiver's Report, relevant statutory and case law,
and the arguments of counsel, the Court is of the opinion that the motion should
be in all things GRANTED. Therefore:
The Court FINDS:
1) That the Receiver's report is whole, complete, and unbiased. The Court
accepts the report as accurate findings and conclusions of law, including the
amounts collected and to be distributed.
2) That the Receiver has fulfilled his oath, by performing his duties in an
economic effective, and efficient manner;
3) That the Receiver's fees and expenses are reasonable and customary for
similar legal services in and around Harris County, Texas. The Moyer
elements are met. The Receiver effectively performed his duty and has met
the Bergeron factors for compensation as a 33% contingency fee;
Atlantic Waves v. Cyberlux
Pg. 1 of 5
Order Terminating Receivership
entityobservation
SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC
Read the anchor · page 1
5/31/2026 12:14 PM
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County
Envelope No. 115542213
By: Shanelle Taylor
Filed: 6/1/2026 12:00 AM
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC
IN THE DISTRICT COURT
and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC.,
Plaintiffs, Judgment-Creditors,
§ § § § § §
129TH JUDICIAL COURT
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually,
IN AND FOR
Defendants, Judgment-Debtors. §
HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
ORDER TO DISTRIBUTE FUNDS AND TERMINATE RECEIVERSHIP
Following approximately twelve months of receivership by Receiver Robert
Berleth, and after review of the Receiver's Report, relevant statutory and case law,
and the arguments of counsel, the Court is of the opinion that the motion should
be in all things GRANTED. Therefore:
The Court FINDS:
1) That the Receiver's report is whole, complete, and unbiased. The Court
accepts the report as accurate findings and conclusions of law, including the
amounts collected and to be distributed.
2) That the Receiver has fulfilled his oath, by performing his duties in an
economic effective, and efficient manner;
3) That the Receiver's fees and expenses are reasonable and customary for
similar legal services in and around Harris County, Texas. The Moyer
elements are met. The Receiver effectively performed his duty and has met
the Bergeron factors for compensation as a 33% contingency fee;
Atlantic Waves v. Cyberlux
Pg. 1 of 5
Order Terminating Receivership
entityobservation
CYBERLUX CORPORATION
Read the anchor · page 1
5/31/2026 12:14 PM
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County
Envelope No. 115542213
By: Shanelle Taylor
Filed: 6/1/2026 12:00 AM
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC
IN THE DISTRICT COURT
and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC.,
Plaintiffs, Judgment-Creditors,
§ § § § § §
129TH JUDICIAL COURT
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually,
IN AND FOR
Defendants, Judgment-Debtors. §
HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
ORDER TO DISTRIBUTE FUNDS AND TERMINATE RECEIVERSHIP
Following approximately twelve months of receivership by Receiver Robert
Berleth, and after review of the Receiver's Report, relevant statutory and case law,
and the arguments of counsel, the Court is of the opinion that the motion should
be in all things GRANTED. Therefore:
The Court FINDS:
1) That the Receiver's report is whole, complete, and unbiased. The Court
accepts the report as accurate findings and conclusions of law, including the
amounts collected and to be distributed.
2) That the Receiver has fulfilled his oath, by performing his duties in an
economic effective, and efficient manner;
3) That the Receiver's fees and expenses are reasonable and customary for
similar legal services in and around Harris County, Texas. The Moyer
elements are met. The Receiver effectively performed his duty and has met
the Bergeron factors for compensation as a 33% contingency fee;
Atlantic Waves v. Cyberlux
Pg. 1 of 5
Order Terminating Receivership
entityobservation
MARK D. SCHMIDT
Read the anchor · page 1
5/31/2026 12:14 PM
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County
Envelope No. 115542213
By: Shanelle Taylor
Filed: 6/1/2026 12:00 AM
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC
IN THE DISTRICT COURT
and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC.,
Plaintiffs, Judgment-Creditors,
§ § § § § §
129TH JUDICIAL COURT
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually,
IN AND FOR
Defendants, Judgment-Debtors. §
HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
ORDER TO DISTRIBUTE FUNDS AND TERMINATE RECEIVERSHIP
Following approximately twelve months of receivership by Receiver Robert
Berleth, and after review of the Receiver's Report, relevant statutory and case law,
and the arguments of counsel, the Court is of the opinion that the motion should
be in all things GRANTED. Therefore:
The Court FINDS:
1) That the Receiver's report is whole, complete, and unbiased. The Court
accepts the report as accurate findings and conclusions of law, including the
amounts collected and to be distributed.
2) That the Receiver has fulfilled his oath, by performing his duties in an
economic effective, and efficient manner;
3) That the Receiver's fees and expenses are reasonable and customary for
similar legal services in and around Harris County, Texas. The Moyer
elements are met. The Receiver effectively performed his duty and has met
the Bergeron factors for compensation as a 33% contingency fee;
Atlantic Waves v. Cyberlux
Pg. 1 of 5
Order Terminating Receivership
entityobservation
Robert Berleth
Read the anchor · page 1
5/31/2026 12:14 PM
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County
Envelope No. 115542213
By: Shanelle Taylor
Filed: 6/1/2026 12:00 AM
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC
IN THE DISTRICT COURT
and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC.,
Plaintiffs, Judgment-Creditors,
§ § § § § §
129TH JUDICIAL COURT
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually,
IN AND FOR
Defendants, Judgment-Debtors. §
HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
ORDER TO DISTRIBUTE FUNDS AND TERMINATE RECEIVERSHIP
Following approximately twelve months of receivership by Receiver Robert
Berleth, and after review of the Receiver's Report, relevant statutory and case law,
and the arguments of counsel, the Court is of the opinion that the motion should
be in all things GRANTED. Therefore:
The Court FINDS:
1) That the Receiver's report is whole, complete, and unbiased. The Court
accepts the report as accurate findings and conclusions of law, including the
amounts collected and to be distributed.
2) That the Receiver has fulfilled his oath, by performing his duties in an
economic effective, and efficient manner;
3) That the Receiver's fees and expenses are reasonable and customary for
similar legal services in and around Harris County, Texas. The Moyer
elements are met. The Receiver effectively performed his duty and has met
the Bergeron factors for compensation as a 33% contingency fee;
Atlantic Waves v. Cyberlux
Pg. 1 of 5
Order Terminating Receivership
entityobservation
Berleth & Associates, PLLC
Read the anchor · page 4
12)The Clerk is ORDERED to distribute the Receiver's bond back to the receiver
in accordance with normal procedures to:
Berleth & Associates, PLLC
9950 Cypresswood Dr., Ste. 200
Houston, Texas 77070
13) Within 14 days of the expiration of any applicable appellate window, the
Receiver is ORDERED to distribute collected monies as follows:
a. The Receiver has distributed $873,849.02 under previous orders of
the court to Atlantic Waves Holdings, LLC
b. Receiver disburse $722,728.68 to the Berleth & Associates, PLLC as
reasonable and incurred expenses in the prosecution of the
receivership, to be taxed as a cost of court.
c. Receiver disburse $1,017,601.11 to Berleth & Associates, PLLC as the
Receiver's Fee to be taxed as a cost of court.
d. Receiver distribute the remaining funds in the amount of
$469,670.21 in the following order of possibility:
i. Transfer the funds to the next receivership, if present; or then,
ii. Within 45 days of this order, distribute $469,670.21 to the
previous unpaid employees of Cyberlux at the Spring, Texas
manufacturing facility, until the funds are exhausted.
14)Any remaining funds such as fractional cents, interest accrued during
distribution, or small calculation errors shall be forwarded to the Access to
Justice Foundation by the Receiver.
Atlantic Waves v. Cyberlux
Pg.4 of5
Order Terminating Receivership
entityobservation
Hon. Michael Gomez
Read the anchor · page 5
15) Any and all other relief not expressly granted herein is denied.
16)This order is final and appealable.
SIGNED AND ENTERED:
Sıgned:
6/3/2026
Hon. Michael Gomez
JUDGE PRESIDING
Copy Office of
Atlantic Waves v. Cyberlux
Pg. 5 of 5
Order Terminating Receivership
eventattribution
The clerk header shows submission on 31 May 2026 at 12:14 PM.
Read the anchor · page 1
5/31/2026 12:14 PM
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County
Envelope No. 115542213
By: Shanelle Taylor
Filed: 6/1/2026 12:00 AM
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC
IN THE DISTRICT COURT
and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC.,
Plaintiffs, Judgment-Creditors,
§ § § § § §
129TH JUDICIAL COURT
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually,
IN AND FOR
Defendants, Judgment-Debtors. §
HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
ORDER TO DISTRIBUTE FUNDS AND TERMINATE RECEIVERSHIP
Following approximately twelve months of receivership by Receiver Robert
Berleth, and after review of the Receiver's Report, relevant statutory and case law,
and the arguments of counsel, the Court is of the opinion that the motion should
be in all things GRANTED. Therefore:
The Court FINDS:
1) That the Receiver's report is whole, complete, and unbiased. The Court
accepts the report as accurate findings and conclusions of law, including the
amounts collected and to be distributed.
2) That the Receiver has fulfilled his oath, by performing his duties in an
economic effective, and efficient manner;
3) That the Receiver's fees and expenses are reasonable and customary for
similar legal services in and around Harris County, Texas. The Moyer
elements are met. The Receiver effectively performed his duty and has met
the Bergeron factors for compensation as a 33% contingency fee;
Atlantic Waves v. Cyberlux
Pg. 1 of 5
Order Terminating Receivership
eventattribution
The clerk stamp records filing at midnight on 1 June 2026.
Read the anchor · page 1
5/31/2026 12:14 PM
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County
Envelope No. 115542213
By: Shanelle Taylor
Filed: 6/1/2026 12:00 AM
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC
IN THE DISTRICT COURT
and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC.,
Plaintiffs, Judgment-Creditors,
§ § § § § §
129TH JUDICIAL COURT
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually,
IN AND FOR
Defendants, Judgment-Debtors. §
HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
ORDER TO DISTRIBUTE FUNDS AND TERMINATE RECEIVERSHIP
Following approximately twelve months of receivership by Receiver Robert
Berleth, and after review of the Receiver's Report, relevant statutory and case law,
and the arguments of counsel, the Court is of the opinion that the motion should
be in all things GRANTED. Therefore:
The Court FINDS:
1) That the Receiver's report is whole, complete, and unbiased. The Court
accepts the report as accurate findings and conclusions of law, including the
amounts collected and to be distributed.
2) That the Receiver has fulfilled his oath, by performing his duties in an
economic effective, and efficient manner;
3) That the Receiver's fees and expenses are reasonable and customary for
similar legal services in and around Harris County, Texas. The Moyer
elements are met. The Receiver effectively performed his duty and has met
the Bergeron factors for compensation as a 33% contingency fee;
Atlantic Waves v. Cyberlux
Pg. 1 of 5
Order Terminating Receivership
eventattribution
Judge Michael Gomez signs and enters the termination and distribution order.
Read the anchor · page 5
15) Any and all other relief not expressly granted herein is denied.
16)This order is final and appealable.
SIGNED AND ENTERED:
Sıgned:
6/3/2026
Hon. Michael Gomez
JUDGE PRESIDING
Copy Office of
Atlantic Waves v. Cyberlux
Pg. 5 of 5
Order Terminating Receivership
inferenceinference
The distribution figures total $3,083,849.02, which is $209.27 above the stated $3,083,639.75 collection pool. The order’s incidental-remain
The distribution figures total $3,083,849.02, which is $209.27 above the stated $3,083,639.75 collection pool. The order’s incidental-remainder clause does not identify which principal figure should be corrected. Preserve both values pending the accounting and any corrective order.
inferenceinference
Termination of the named receivership and anticipated uninterrupted serial receivership are expressly distinguished in the order. The docume
Termination of the named receivership and anticipated uninterrupted serial receivership are expressly distinguished in the order. The document is not evidence that corporate assets were released from every receivership.
inferenceinference
The state court’s statement concerning Virginia interpleader funds is a finding and asserted consequence in this order; it is not an indepen
The state court’s statement concerning Virginia interpleader funds is a finding and asserted consequence in this order; it is not an independently supplied Virginia priority or disbursement ruling.
otherattribution
Complete supplied 5-page source reviewed at SHA-256 b70a64c3985e9bcdde6e2f378b706626ba86bb82b28d67ef6fc6a89321cecf2d. Source assertions, ori
Complete supplied 5-page source reviewed at SHA-256 b70a64c3985e9bcdde6e2f378b706626ba86bb82b28d67ef6fc6a89321cecf2d. Source assertions, original visual features, filing/communication context and identified missing attachments are retained. No unexamined later court outcome is inferred.
Read the anchor · page 1
5/31/2026 12:14 PM
Marilyn Burgess - District Clerk Harris County
Envelope No. 115542213
By: Shanelle Taylor
Filed: 6/1/2026 12:00 AM
CAUSE NO. 2024-48085
ATLANTIC WAVE HOLDINGS, LLC
IN THE DISTRICT COURT
and SECURE COMMUNITY, LLC.,
Plaintiffs, Judgment-Creditors,
§ § § § § §
129TH JUDICIAL COURT
CYBERLUX CORPORATION and
MARK D. SCHMIDT, individually,
IN AND FOR
Defendants, Judgment-Debtors. §
HARRIS COUNTY, TEXAS
ORDER TO DISTRIBUTE FUNDS AND TERMINATE RECEIVERSHIP
Following approximately twelve months of receivership by Receiver Robert
Berleth, and after review of the Receiver's Report, relevant statutory and case law,
and the arguments of counsel, the Court is of the opinion that the motion should
be in all things GRANTED. Therefore:
The Court FINDS:
1) That the Receiver's report is whole, complete, and unbiased. The Court
accepts the report as accurate findings and conclusions of law, including the
amounts collected and to be distributed.
2) That the Receiver has fulfilled his oath, by performing his duties in an
economic effective, and efficient manner;
3) That the Receiver's fees and expenses are reasonable and customary for
similar legal services in and around Harris County, Texas. The Moyer
elements are met. The Receiver effectively performed his duty and has met
the Bergeron factors for compensation as a 33% contingency fee;
Atlantic Waves v. Cyberlux
Pg. 1 of 5
Order Terminating Receivership
questionquestion
Which creditor distribution amount is supported by the bank ledger and prior orders, and was the $209.27 allocation discrepancy corrected?
questionquestion
Which successor receivership was present, what order governed its activation, and where did the $469,670.21 actually go?
questionquestion
How were the appellate-window distribution condition and employee fallback within 45 days applied, and was any bond or stay recorded?
questionquestion
What Virginia order, if any, determined the receiver’s fee priority or authorised payment from interpleader funds?
distillateallegation
CONNECT
Reviewed relationships
The canvas follows the database: source to DISTIL record, DISTIL record to knowledge object, then reviewed relationship. Position alone means nothing.
The receiver claims $722,728.68 in expenses and a 33% contingency fee of $1,017,601.11. These are the requested amounts in this verified report; expense invoices and a detailed ledger are not supplied within these eleven pages.referencesThe order directs $722,728.68 expenses and $1,017,601.11 receiver fees to Berleth & Associates. It assigns the remaining $469,670.21 first to a next receivership, if present, or otherwise to previously unpaid Spring-facility employees within 45 days of the order until exhausted.
Expense and fee requests are adopted in the supplied order; actual payment remains unproved.
Robert Berleth reports appointment on 22 May 2025 and recovery of $3,083,639.75, described as full collection of the judgment calculation. The source does not include the underlying bank statements or judgment calculation.referencesThe court grants the motion and finds the receiver’s report whole, complete and unbiased, accepts it as accurate findings and conclusions, finds the oath fulfilled efficiently and finds fees and expenses reasonable. It invokes Moyer and Bergeron in approving 33% contingency compensation. These are findings of this supplied state-court order.
Later court accepts the report; adoption is a judicial act, not independent financial substantiation.
The order directs compliance before seeking protective relief and vests corporate management authority in the receiver, superseding officers for the described assets and functions. Paragraph 18’s “No Serial Receiverships” heading accompanies language deferring this receiver’s action until the existing receivership terminates; it does not prohibit the contemplated succession.referencesParagraph 8 takes judicial notice that terminating this receivership will animate the next serial receivership and that Cyberlux will remain under receivership without interruption pending further orders in that case. Paragraph 10 terminates this receivership effective the entry date and releases the receiver in this proceeding.
Earlier Tucker–Whiteley signed order supplies a deferred serial appointment; later termination order refers generically to a next receivership. These sources alone do not identify actual transfer or prove this was the operative successor.
The receiver requests a $150,000 appellate bond, cash or approved surety, and a stay after the required security is filed. A requested security condition is not evidence that an appellant posted it or that a stay took effect.referencesParagraph 11 requires any appealing party to post $150,000 security in cash or approved surety within 14 days of the order, permits conforming alternative security if required and states the litigation shall be stayed upon filing the required bond. It does not establish that a bond was filed.
Requested $150,000 bond becomes an order condition; no posting or activated stay inferred.
The exhibit table runs from 1 to 38 but entries 14 and 24 are blank, leaving 36 named exhibit entries. Offered, Objection, Admitted and Refused columns are blank. The document supplies a list, not the exhibits or a completed evidentiary ruling.referencesFindings 6–7 say no appellate orders have superseded the court’s authority, retain plenary enforcement power, find the receiver’s fee testimony credible and admit his necessary-expense exhibits. The finding is specific to those exhibits; it is not a ruling that every separately listed exhibit was admitted.
Court expressly admits necessary-expense exhibits; do not promote every listed item to admitted evidence.
The accounting allocates $873,639.75 to the judgment creditor, $722,728.68 to expenses, $1,017,601.11 to the receiver fee and $469,670.21 to employees. Paragraph 8 reports the creditor distribution already made and describes receiver funds held in trust; the wording does not show every proposed distribution completed.contradictsParagraph 12 orders return of the receiver’s bond. Paragraph 13 directs distribution within 14 days after expiry of any applicable appellate window and reports $873,849.02 already distributed under prior orders to Atlantic Waves Holdings.
Motion reports $873,639.75; signed order reports $873,849.02, a $209.27 difference. Underlying ledger and any correction remain required.
Although the accounting associates $469,670.21 with unpaid employees at the Spring facility, the prayer gives the next receivership priority, if present, and only otherwise directs the employee distribution within 45 days of the order. The same figure therefore has a conditional destination.referencesThe order directs $722,728.68 expenses and $1,017,601.11 receiver fees to Berleth & Associates. It assigns the remaining $469,670.21 first to a next receivership, if present, or otherwise to previously unpaid Spring-facility employees within 45 days of the order until exhausted.
Motion prayer and order both prioritise next receivership before employee fallback.
The requested termination and final distribution require a court order. The prayer, accounting and finality request do not themselves execute that order or establish bank-level completion.referencesParagraph 8 takes judicial notice that terminating this receivership will animate the next serial receivership and that Cyberlux will remain under receivership without interruption pending further orders in that case. Paragraph 10 terminates this receivership effective the entry date and releases the receiver in this proceeding.
Later signed order grants termination in the named case while anticipating serial continuation.
Paragraph 12 orders return of the receiver’s bond. Paragraph 13 directs distribution within 14 days after expiry of any applicable appellate window and reports $873,849.02 already distributed under prior orders to Atlantic Waves Holdings.supportsWhich creditor distribution amount is supported by the bank ledger and prior orders, and was the $209.27 allocation discrepancy corrected?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Paragraph 9 states full collection of $3,083,639.75 and entitlement to fees and expenses with a 33% fee. The stated collected amount is the fee base, not itself the fee.supportsWhich creditor distribution amount is supported by the bank ledger and prior orders, and was the $209.27 allocation discrepancy corrected?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The order directs $722,728.68 expenses and $1,017,601.11 receiver fees to Berleth & Associates. It assigns the remaining $469,670.21 first to a next receivership, if present, or otherwise to previously unpaid Spring-facility employees within 45 days of the order until exhausted.supportsThe distribution figures total $3,083,849.02, which is $209.27 above the stated $3,083,639.75 collection pool. The order’s incidental-remainder clause does not identify which principal figure should be corrected. Preserve both values pending the accounting and any corrective order.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The order directs $722,728.68 expenses and $1,017,601.11 receiver fees to Berleth & Associates. It assigns the remaining $469,670.21 first to a next receivership, if present, or otherwise to previously unpaid Spring-facility employees within 45 days of the order until exhausted.supportsHow were the appellate-window distribution condition and employee fallback within 45 days applied, and was any bond or stay recorded?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Paragraph 8 takes judicial notice that terminating this receivership will animate the next serial receivership and that Cyberlux will remain under receivership without interruption pending further orders in that case. Paragraph 10 terminates this receivership effective the entry date and releases the receiver in this proceeding.supportsWhich successor receivership was present, what order governed its activation, and where did the $469,670.21 actually go?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The order directs $722,728.68 expenses and $1,017,601.11 receiver fees to Berleth & Associates. It assigns the remaining $469,670.21 first to a next receivership, if present, or otherwise to previously unpaid Spring-facility employees within 45 days of the order until exhausted.supportsWhich successor receivership was present, what order governed its activation, and where did the $469,670.21 actually go?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Paragraph 9 states full collection of $3,083,639.75 and entitlement to fees and expenses with a 33% fee. The stated collected amount is the fee base, not itself the fee.supportsThe distribution figures total $3,083,849.02, which is $209.27 above the stated $3,083,639.75 collection pool. The order’s incidental-remainder clause does not identify which principal figure should be corrected. Preserve both values pending the accounting and any corrective order.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Paragraph 12 orders return of the receiver’s bond. Paragraph 13 directs distribution within 14 days after expiry of any applicable appellate window and reports $873,849.02 already distributed under prior orders to Atlantic Waves Holdings.supportsThe distribution figures total $3,083,849.02, which is $209.27 above the stated $3,083,639.75 collection pool. The order’s incidental-remainder clause does not identify which principal figure should be corrected. Preserve both values pending the accounting and any corrective order.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Paragraph 11 requires any appealing party to post $150,000 security in cash or approved surety within 14 days of the order, permits conforming alternative security if required and states the litigation shall be stayed upon filing the required bond. It does not establish that a bond was filed.supportsHow were the appellate-window distribution condition and employee fallback within 45 days applied, and was any bond or stay recorded?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Paragraph 12 orders return of the receiver’s bond. Paragraph 13 directs distribution within 14 days after expiry of any applicable appellate window and reports $873,849.02 already distributed under prior orders to Atlantic Waves Holdings.supportsHow were the appellate-window distribution condition and employee fallback within 45 days applied, and was any bond or stay recorded?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The order directs $722,728.68 expenses and $1,017,601.11 receiver fees to Berleth & Associates. It assigns the remaining $469,670.21 first to a next receivership, if present, or otherwise to previously unpaid Spring-facility employees within 45 days of the order until exhausted.supportsWhich creditor distribution amount is supported by the bank ledger and prior orders, and was the $209.27 allocation discrepancy corrected?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Finding 4 states that in May, June and July 2025 the receiver entered the manufacturing facility, took physical possession of K8 drones and arranged inventory, transport and delivery to a US government facility in sale or contract fulfilment. It states the drones and follow-on sale or fulfilment funds are subject to the receivership order, including receiver fees in the Virginia interpleader.supportsWhat Virginia order, if any, determined the receiver’s fee priority or authorised payment from interpleader funds?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Finding 4 states that in May, June and July 2025 the receiver entered the manufacturing facility, took physical possession of K8 drones and arranged inventory, transport and delivery to a US government facility in sale or contract fulfilment. It states the drones and follow-on sale or fulfilment funds are subject to the receivership order, including receiver fees in the Virginia interpleader.supportsThe state court’s statement concerning Virginia interpleader funds is a finding and asserted consequence in this order; it is not an independently supplied Virginia priority or disbursement ruling.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Paragraph 8 takes judicial notice that terminating this receivership will animate the next serial receivership and that Cyberlux will remain under receivership without interruption pending further orders in that case. Paragraph 10 terminates this receivership effective the entry date and releases the receiver in this proceeding.supportsWhat does this signed order establish about termination?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Paragraph 14 sends incidental remaining amounts, such as fractional cents, interest or small calculation errors, to the Access to Justice Foundation. Paragraphs 15–16 deny other relief and declare the order final and appealable.supportsThe distribution figures total $3,083,849.02, which is $209.27 above the stated $3,083,639.75 collection pool. The order’s incidental-remainder clause does not identify which principal figure should be corrected. Preserve both values pending the accounting and any corrective order.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The distribution figures total $3,083,849.02, which is $209.27 above the stated $3,083,639.75 collection pool. The order’s incidental-remainder clause does not identify which principal figure should be corrected. Preserve both values pending the accounting and any corrective order.supportsWhich creditor distribution amount is supported by the bank ledger and prior orders, and was the $209.27 allocation discrepancy corrected?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The state court’s statement concerning Virginia interpleader funds is a finding and asserted consequence in this order; it is not an independently supplied Virginia priority or disbursement ruling.supportsWhat Virginia order, if any, determined the receiver’s fee priority or authorised payment from interpleader funds?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The five-page order bears a 31 May 2026 submission timestamp and a 1 June 2026 midnight filing stamp, but is signed and entered by Judge Michael Gomez on 3 June 2026. These are distinct date roles. It concerns cause 2024-48085 in Harris County’s 129th Judicial District Court.supportsWhat does this signed order establish about termination?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Paragraph 11 requires any appealing party to post $150,000 security in cash or approved surety within 14 days of the order, permits conforming alternative security if required and states the litigation shall be stayed upon filing the required bond. It does not establish that a bond was filed.supportsWhat does this signed order establish about termination?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
The order directs $722,728.68 expenses and $1,017,601.11 receiver fees to Berleth & Associates. It assigns the remaining $469,670.21 first to a next receivership, if present, or otherwise to previously unpaid Spring-facility employees within 45 days of the order until exhausted.supportsWhat does this signed order establish about termination?
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
Paragraph 8 takes judicial notice that terminating this receivership will animate the next serial receivership and that Cyberlux will remain under receivership without interruption pending further orders in that case. Paragraph 10 terminates this receivership effective the entry date and releases the receiver in this proceeding.supportsTermination of the named receivership and anticipated uninterrupted serial receivership are expressly distinguished in the order. The document is not evidence that corporate assets were released from every receivership.
Specifically named source propositions support the bounded distinction or question.
WEIGH
Explained weighting
A score appears only when its components and change threshold are published.
No published WEIGH run
The active Website Edition contains no applied score snapshot for this source or its connected objects. That means not assessed—not zero.