Evidence Record

Exhibit 26

2. Judgment in favor of ANPC and against Cyberlux in the amount of $2,926,814.39, as set out in the Verified Complaint, which includes: (1) $2,830,050.00 for the Final Invoice and (2) interest accruing at...

Type
exhibit
Court
EDVA
Case
HII v. Cyberlux interpleader
Docket
3:25-cv-00483
Pages
13
Lines
690
SHA-256
773bda5b50f7

DISTIL analysis

DISTIL Run
Profile
Standard
Version
1
Doc Type
Legal Judgment and Enforcement Documents
Total Nodes
26
Node Legend
Entity (ENT)
Event (EVT)
Claim (CLM)
Anchor (ANC)
Omission (OMI)
Tension (TEN)
Tell (TEL)
Inference (INF)
Hypothesis (HYP)
Stage 1
Index
Orientation · No nodes
Document Classification
Legal Judgment and Enforcement Documents North Carolina Superior Court / Virginia Circuit Courts Contract Dispute / Judgment Collection 2025-07-21 to 2026-01-16
default_judgmentforeign_judgment_registrationgarnishment_actionmulti_jurisdictionaluncontested_proceeding
Analytical Frame
Default judgment enforcement across state lines with garnishment action
Analytical Summary
This exhibit documents a multi-stage legal enforcement action spanning three jurisdictions. Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation (ANPC) obtained a default judgment against Cyberlux Corporation in Durham County, North Carolina on July 21, 2025 for $2,926,814.39, consisting of $2,830,050.00 principal from a final invoice plus 8% interest. ANPC registered this foreign judgment in Richmond City, Virginia on August 21, 2025, then initiated garnishment proceedings in Fairfax County, Virginia on October 24, 2025, targeting HII Mission Technologies Corporation as garnishee under Subcontract No. P000043846. The documents reveal a systematic debt collection strategy moving from judgment to registration to wage/payment garnishment, with Cyberlux failing to defend at any stage.
Key Points
  • Durham County NC default judgment entered July 21, 2025 for $2,926,814.39
  • Principal amount $2,830,050.00 represents unpaid 'Final Invoice' from ANPC to Cyberlux
  • Cyberlux failed to defend, plead, or otherwise appear in North Carolina action
  • Foreign judgment registered in Richmond City VA Circuit Court on August 21, 2025
  • Garnishment summons issued October 24, 2025 in Fairfax County VA targeting HII Mission Technologies
  • Garnishment targets money owed to Cyberlux under Subcontract No. P000043846 with HII
Stage 2
Core — Entities, Events, Claims
12 nodes
ENT-001
Entity
Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation (ANPC)
Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation (ANPC), plaintiff and judgment creditor. Business address: 489 North 8th Street, Suite 203, Hood River, Oregon 97031. Represented by Woods Rogers Vandeventer Black PLC and Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP.
Page 2, 5, 6, 10, 11 — Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation ('ANPC') for Default Judgment... Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation, the plaintiff and judgment creditor, whose address is 489 North 8th Street, Suite 203, Hood River, Oregon 97031
ENT-002
Entity
Cyberlux Corporation
Cyberlux Corporation, defendant and judgment debtor. Business address: 800 Park Offices Drive, Suite 3209, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709. Registered agent: CT Corporation System, 160 Mine Lake Court, Suite 200, Raleigh, North Carolina 27615.
Page 2, 5, 6, 8, 10, 11 — Cyberlux Corporation ('Defendant') on a breach of contract claim... The judgment debtor's, Cyberlux Corporation, last known address is 800 Park Offices Drive, Suite 3209, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. The judgment debtor's registered agent is CT Corporation System, located at 160 Mine Lake Ct., Suite 200, Raleigh, North Carolina 27615
ENT-003
Entity
HII Mission Technologies Corporation
HII Mission Technologies Corporation, garnishee in Fairfax County proceedings. Business address: 8350 Broad Street, McLean, VA 22102. Identified as entity owing money to Cyberlux Corporation under Subcontract No. P000043846.
Page 11 — Garnishee: HII Mission Technologies Corporation 8350 Broad Street McLean, VA 22102... money owed by HII to Cyberlux Corp. pursuant to Subcontract No. P000043846
ENT-004
Entity
Pietro F. Sanitate
Pietro F. Sanitate, Virginia Bar No. 89538, attorney with Woods Rogers Vandeventer Black PLC, 901 East Byrd Street, Suite 1600, Richmond, VA 23219. Represents ANPC in Virginia proceedings. Contact: pietro.sanitate@woodsrogers.com, 804-434-5029.
Page 5, 6, 7, 8 — This day appeared Pietro F. Sanitate, an attorney with the law firm of Woods Rogers Vandeventer Black PLC, 901 East Byrd Street, Suite 1600, Richmond, Virginia 23219. Mr. Sanitate represents Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation
ENT-005
Entity
Joel D. Schwartz
Joel D. Schwartz, Virginia Bar No. 97979, attorney with Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP, 900 7th Street, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20001. Represents ANPC in garnishment proceedings. Contact: (202) 854-2811.
Page 10, 11 — Joel D. Schwartz (Virginia Bar No. 97979) c/o Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP... 900 7th Street, Suite 700 Washington, DC 20001... Telephone No. (202) 854-2811
EVT-001
Event
North Carolina Default Judgment Entry
Durham County Superior Court (NC) entered default judgment in favor of ANPC against Cyberlux on July 21, 2025, in case 25-CVS-005686-310. Judgment entered by Lisa P. Strickland, Assistant Clerk, at 2:45:28 PM. Defendant failed to plead or otherwise defend.
Page 2, 4 — FILED IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION DATE: July 21, 2025... TIME: 2:45:28 PM... 25-CVS-005686-310... Defendant has failed to plead or otherwise defend in this action and a default has been entered... This the 21 day of July 2025. Lisa P. Strickland Clerk, Durham County Superior Court X Assistant Clerk
EVT-002
Event
North Carolina Judgment Exemplification
Durham County Superior Court certified the default judgment on August 1, 2025, with exemplification prepared by Deputy CSC Christen J. Coan-Allen at 2:16:09 PM. Judge certification completed August 6, 2025, at 8:56:50 AM. Final clerk certification by Lynn Vaughan on August 8, 2025.
Page 3 — EXEMPLIFICATION 28 U.S.C. 1738... Date 08/01/2025... Christen J. Coan-Allen 8/1/2025 2:16:09 PM Deputy CSC... Date 8/6/2025 8:56:50 AM Signature Of Judge... Date 8/8/2025... Lynn Vaughan
EVT-003
Event
Richmond City Foreign Judgment Filing
Foreign judgment from North Carolina filed in Richmond City Circuit Court, Virginia on August 21, 2025. Docketed at 3:30 PM. Filing fee $25.00 paid via check #89206 (transaction 25082100029). Notice mailed to Cyberlux same day.
Page 5, 8, 9 — NOTICE OF FILING OF FOREIGN JUDGMENT DATE: AUGUST 21, 2025... DOCKETED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND ON AUG 2 1 2025 AT: 3:30 pm... DATE : 08/21/2025 TIME : 09:44:34 RECEIPT # : 25000024676... CHECK NUMBER : 89206... TOTAL AMOUNT PAID : $ 25.00
EVT-004
Event
Richmond City Writ of Fieri Facias Issuance
Richmond City Circuit Court issued Writ of Fieri Facias on September 23, 2025, in case CM25-361. Writ received and filed September 24, 2025, at 11:41 AM. Commands levy upon goods, chattels, money, and real estate of Cyberlux to satisfy judgment.
Page 10 — WRIT OF FIERI FACIAS... Case No. CM25-361... Jul 9/23/25... RECEIVED AND FILED CIRCUIT COURT 11:41 SEP 2 4 2025... You are commanded to levy upon the goods, chattels, current money, bank notes and real estate of the Defendant(s)
EVT-005
Event
Fairfax County Garnishment Summons Issuance
Fairfax County Circuit Court issued Garnishment Summons on October 24, 2025, in case 2025 16055. Hearing date set for January 16, 2026. Summons targets HII Mission Technologies Corporation as garnishee for money owed to Cyberlux under Subcontract No. P000043846.
Page 11 — GARNISHMENT SUMMONS... Case No. 2025 16055 COUNTY OF FAIRFAX... OCT 0 8 2025... OCT 2 4 2025 DATE OF ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS... Garnishee: HII Mission Technologies Corporation 8350 Broad Street McLean, VA 22102... January 16, 2026 HEARING DATE AND TIME... money owed by HII to Cyberlux Corp. pursuant to Subcontract No. P000043846
CLM-001
Claim
Breach of Contract - Final Invoice Non-Payment
ANPC claims Cyberlux breached contract by failing to pay Final Invoice. Default judgment awarded $2,926,814.39 total: (1) $2,830,050.00 principal for Final Invoice, (2) $96,764.39 interest at 8% legal rate as of July 15, 2025. Post-judgment interest continues accruing at 8% from July 21, 2025.
Page 2, 4 — Judgment in favor of ANPC and against Cyberlux in the amount of $2,926,814.39, as set out in the Verified Complaint, which includes: (1) $2,830,050.00 for the Final Invoice and (2) interest accruing at the legal rate of 8% on the principal amount until the judgment is satisfied, which is $96,764.39 as of July 15, 2025... This Judgment shall accrue post-judgment interest as allowed by law
CLM-002
Claim
Judgment Registration Under Full Faith and Credit
ANPC asserts right to enforce North Carolina judgment in Virginia courts under 28 U.S.C. 1738 (Full Faith and Credit) and Virginia Code Section 8.01-465.3 (foreign judgment registration). Exemplification certified pursuant to federal statute.
Page 3, 6, 8 — EXEMPLIFICATION 28 U.S.C. 1738... AFFIDAVIT PURSUANT TO SECTION 8.01-465.3 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA... PURSUANT TO VIRGINIA CODE SECTION 8.01-465.3, JUDGMENT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA DATED 07/21/2025 HAS BEEN DOCKETED IN THIS COURT
Stage 3
In Situ — Quotations, Tells, Tensions, Questions
8 nodes
QUO-001
Quotation
Default Entry Finding
Court finding that Cyberlux failed to participate in litigation: 'Defendant has failed to plead or otherwise defend in this action and a default has been entered.'
Page 2, 4 — Defendant has failed to plead or otherwise defend in this action and a default has been entered
QUO-002
Quotation
Judgment Enforcement Command
Writ command language: 'You are commanded to levy upon the goods, chattels, current money, bank notes and real estate of the Defendant(s), and to make from those the principal, interest, costs and attorney's fees.'
Page 10 — You are commanded to levy upon the goods, chattels, current money, bank notes and real estate of the Defendant(s), and to make from those the principal, interest, costs and attorney's fees
TLL-001
Tell
Subcontract Relationship Between Cyberlux and HII
Garnishment summons reveals commercial relationship: Cyberlux Corporation has (or had) contractual payment arrangement with HII Mission Technologies under Subcontract No. P000043846. This subcontract is the source of funds ANPC seeks to garnish.
Page 11 — some other debt due or property of the judgment debtor, specifically, money owed by HII to Cyberlux Corp. pursuant to Subcontract No. P000043846 & modified
TLL-002
Tell
Multi-Jurisdictional Enforcement Strategy
Document sequence reveals deliberate enforcement strategy: (1) obtain judgment in North Carolina where contract dispute arose, (2) register in Richmond City where procedural filing occurred, (3) execute garnishment in Fairfax County where garnishee HII is located. Three Virginia jurisdictions involved in single collection effort.
Page 2, 5, 8, 10, 11 — Durham County Superior Court... CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND... COUNTY OF FAIRFAX 4110 Chain Bridge Rd, Fairfax, VA 22030... Garnishee: HII Mission Technologies Corporation 8350 Broad Street McLean, VA 22102
TEN-001
Tension
Complete Non-Participation by Cyberlux
Cyberlux failed to defend at every procedural stage: no answer in North Carolina breach of contract action, no objection to foreign judgment registration in Richmond, no apparent contest to garnishment in Fairfax. This universal non-response creates interpretive tension—is Cyberlux financially collapsed, strategically abandoning defense, or unaware of proceedings despite service on registered agent?
Page 2, 4, 6, 10, 11 — Defendant has failed to plead or otherwise defend in this action... c/o CT Corporation 160 Mine Lake Court, Suite 200 Raleigh, NC 27615... The judgment debtor's registered agent is CT Corporation System
QST-001
Question
What was the underlying contract and Final Invoice?
The judgment refers to 'the Final Invoice' and breach of contract claim filed by 'Verified Complaint,' but this exhibit does not contain the complaint, contract, or invoice details. What goods or services did ANPC provide to Cyberlux? What were the contract terms? When was the Final Invoice issued and what did it cover?
Page 2, 4 — $2,830,050.00 for the Final Invoice... breach of contract claim filed by Verified Complaint
QST-002
Question
What is the relationship between HII subcontract and ANPC contract?
Garnishment targets 'money owed by HII to Cyberlux Corp. pursuant to Subcontract No. P000043846.' Was Cyberlux performing work for HII that related to its contract with ANPC? Was HII the ultimate client? Was this a pass-through arrangement? Understanding this relationship is crucial to assessing collectability and whether funds actually exist.
Page 11 — money owed by HII to Cyberlux Corp. pursuant to Subcontract No. P000043846 & modified
QST-003
Question
Why was judgment filed in Durham County, NC?
The judgment was entered in Durham County, North Carolina, but ANPC is based in Hood River, Oregon and Cyberlux in Research Triangle Park, NC (Durham area). Was Durham County the venue specified in the contract? Was it chosen for Cyberlux's principal place of business? Court selection may indicate contract terms or strategic forum choice.
Page 2, 6 — STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF DURHAM... Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation, whose address is 489 North 8th Street, Suite 203, Hood River, Oregon 97031... Cyberlux Corporation, last known address is 800 Park Offices Drive, Suite 3209, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
Stage 4
Interpretive — Inferences, Omissions, Patterns
6 nodes
INF-001
Inference
ANPC Pursued Expedited Collection Strategy
Timeline suggests aggressive collection posture: judgment July 21, exemplification by August 8, Richmond filing August 21, writ September 23-24, garnishment October 24. ANPC moved through all enforcement mechanisms within approximately 3 months, indicating either urgent financial need or strategic response to Cyberlux's financial distress.
Page 2, 3, 8, 10, 11 — This the 21 day of July 2025... Date 08/01/2025... DOCKETED... ON AUG 2 1 2025... RECEIVED AND FILED... SEP 2 4 2025... OCT 2 4 2025 DATE OF ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS
INF-002
Inference
Cyberlux Likely Experiencing Financial or Operational Collapse
Complete failure to defend combined with $2.83M unpaid invoice suggests Cyberlux may be insolvent, dissolved, or operationally defunct. Alternative explanations (strategic non-participation, service failures) are less plausible given service on registered agent CT Corporation and multi-stage notice process across three courts.
Page 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 — Defendant has failed to plead or otherwise defend... The judgment debtor's registered agent is CT Corporation System... NOTICE MAILED: AUGUST 21, 2025... Copy mailed to judgment debtor
INF-003
Inference
HII Subcontract May Be Collection Target of Last Resort
Garnishment targeting specific subcontract with HII suggests ANPC identified this as potentially the only liquid asset or revenue stream available from Cyberlux. The precision of identifying Subcontract No. P000043846 indicates discovery effort or inside knowledge of Cyberlux's limited financial resources.
Page 11 — money owed by HII to Cyberlux Corp. pursuant to Subcontract No. P000043846 & modified... TOTAL BALANCE DUE $ 2,926,814.39
OMI-001
Omission
No Defense or Counterclaim from Cyberlux
Complete absence of any defensive filing, answer, counterclaim, or objection from Cyberlux across three proceedings. No assertion of payment, contract dispute, quality issues, or other defense. This omission is remarkable for a $2.9M claim and may indicate either acquiescence to liability or inability to mount defense.
Page 2, 4 — Defendant has failed to plead or otherwise defend in this action
OMI-002
Omission
No Details of Underlying Contract or Performance
Exhibit contains no information about what ANPC contracted to provide, contract terms, delivery schedules, acceptance criteria, or why the 'Final Invoice' went unpaid. The Verified Complaint referenced but not included would presumably contain these details. Absence limits assessment of claim validity beyond procedural correctness.
Page 2, 4 — breach of contract claim filed by Verified Complaint... $2,830,050.00 for the Final Invoice
OMI-003
Omission
No Evidence of Payment Disputes or Partial Payments
Neither court documents nor affidavits reference any payment history, partial payments, payment plans, or disputes over invoice amount. The $2,830,050.00 principal is presented as a single unpaid sum without accounting detail, payment credits, or dispute narrative.
Page 2, 4, 10 — $2,830,050.00 for the Final Invoice... Credits $ 6

Extracted text

13 pages · 22823 characters

Exhibit 26 — Formatted Extract

Type: exhibit
Court: EDVA
Matter: HII v. Cyberlux interpleader
Docket: 3:25-cv-00483
Filing Header

Document 175-28 Filed 04/15/26

EXHIBIT 26

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF DURHAM

FILED IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION

DATE: July 21, 2025 25-CVS-005686-310

TIME: 2:45:28 PM

Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation

DURHAM COUNTY CLERK OF SUPERIOR COURT BY: Strickland, Lisa

Plaintiff, )

)

DEFAULT JUDGMENT

-V-

)

)

Cyberlux Corporation

)

) Defendant. )

)

THIS CAUSE coming before the undersigned, upon Motion of Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation ("ANPC") for Default Judgment against Cyberlux Corporation ("Defendant") on a breach of contract claim filed by Verified Complaint. Defendant has failed to plead or otherwise defend in this action and a default has been entered.

Therefore, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that:

1.
The Motion is GRANTED; and
2.
Judgment in favor of ANPC and against Cyberlux in the amount of $2,926,814.39, as set out in the Verified Complaint, which includes: (1) $2,830,050.00 for the Final Invoice and (2) interest accruing at the legal rate of 8% on the principal amount until the judgment is satisfied, which is $96,764.39 as of July 15, 2025; and
3.
This Judgment shall accrue post-judgment interest as allowed by law.

This the 21 day of July 2025. Lisa P. Strickland

Clerk, Durham County Superior Court X Assistant Clerk

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA

In The General Court Of Justice

Durham

County

EXEMPLIFICATION

28
U.S.C. 1738

As a Clerk of the Superior Court of this County, State of North Carolina, I certify that the attached copies of the documents described below are true and accurate copies of the originals now on file in this office.

Number And Description Of Attached Documents

25CV005686-310

Default Judgment

CLERK OF SUPERIOR COURT DURHAM COUNTY

JUDICIAL BRANCHDY NORTH AV RO SEAL

DURHAM COUNTY GENERAL COURTS JUS

Date

08/01/2025

Clerk Of Superior Court

Aminah M. Thompson

Name Of Undersigned Clerk (type or print)

Christen J. Coan-Allen

Signature

Christen Coan- Allen

8/1/2025 2:16:09 PM

:selected: Deputy CSC :unselected: Assistant CSC :unselected: Clerk Of Superior Court

As a Judge of the General Court of Justice, State of North Carolina, I certify that the signature appearing above is that of the Clerk, Assistant Clerk, or Deputy Clerk of Superior Court for this County, who is duly sworn. I further certify that the seal affixed to the certificate appearing above is the seal of this Court and that it has been used here in good form by the proper officer.

Date

8/6/2025 8:56:50 AM

Signature Of Judge

Name Of Judge (type or print)

Jagprank. Dans

As a Clerk of the Superior Court of this County, State of North Carolina, I certify that the signature appearing above is that of a duly sworn Judge of the General Court of Justice, State of North Carolina.

CLERK OF SUPERIOR COURT DURHAM COUNTY

SEAL

* GENERAL COURT,/'JUSTICE .

Date

8/8/2025

Clerk Of Superior Court

Aminah M. Thompson

Name Of Undersigned Clerk (type or print)

Lynn Vaughan

Signature

Ruayh

:selected: Assistant CSC :unselected: Clerk Of Superior Court

PG0087 AUG2183

STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA COUNTY OF DURHAM

FILED

IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION

DATE: July 21, 2025 25-CVS-005686-310

TIME: 2:45:28 PM

Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation

DURHAM COUNTY CLERK OF SUPERIOR COURT BY: Strickland, Lisa

Plaintiff,

)

)

DEFAULT JUDGMENT

-V-

)

)

Cyberlux Corporation

)

)

Defendant.

)

)

THIS CAUSE coming before the undersigned, upon Motion of Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation ("ANPC") for Default Judgment against Cyberlux Corporation ("Defendant") on a breach of contract claim filed by Verified Complaint. Defendant has failed to plead or otherwise defend in this action and a default has been entered.

Therefore, it is ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that:

1.
The Motion is GRANTED; and
2.
Judgment in favor of ANPC and against Cyberlux in the amount of $2,926,814.39, as set out in the Verified Complaint, which includes: (1) $2,830,050.00 for the Final Invoice and (2) interest accruing at the legal rate of 8% on the principal amount until the judgment is satisfied, which is $96,764.39 as of July 15, 2025; and
3.
This Judgment shall accrue post-judgment interest as allowed by law.

This the 21 day of July 2025.

Lisa P. Strickland

Clerk, Durham County Superior Court X Assistant Clerk

Document 175-28 Filed 0812/4921 5

Page 5 of 13 PageID#

NOTICE OF FILING OF FOREIGN JUDGMENT COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

Case. No.

Richmond City

Circuit Court

Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation v. Cyberlux Corporation

JUDGMENT CREDITOR(S)

JUDGMENT DEBTOR(S) Cyberlux Corporation

Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation NAME(S)

NAME(S)

489
North 8th Street, Suite 203
800.
Park Offices Drive, Suite.3209

POST OFFICE ADDRESS

POST OFFICE ADDRESS

Hood River, Oregon 97031

CITY

STATE

ZIP

CITY

STATE

ZIP

Pietro F. Sanitate ATTORNEY(S) FOR JUDGMENT CREDITOR(S)

The address(es) of the attorney(s) for the judgment creditor(s) are:

The name of the court in which the judgment was entered is:

WOODS ROGERS VANDEVENTER BLACK PLC Superior Court for the County of Durham, North Carolina

NAME OF FOREIGN COURT

901
East Byrd Street, Suite 1600, Richmond, VA 23219

25-CVS-005686-310

CASE NUMBER

To the Judgment Debtor(s):

You are hereby notified that a copy of the above-described foreign judgment has been filed in the clerk's office of this court on the date shown below. This judgment may be enforced against you by legal action filed through this court.

It may be in your best interest to consult a lawyer regarding this judgment.

, Clerk

DATE OF FILING

By , Deputy Clerk

This mailing of this notice was noted on the Judgment Lien Docket, Book Page or Instrument Number on , , which is also the date of the mailing of this notice.

, Clerk

, Deputy Clerk by

Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709

VIRGINIA: CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE CITY OF RICHMOND

ADVANCED NAVIGATION & POSITIONING CORPORATION, Plaintiff,

V.

CYBERLUX CORPORATION,

Defendant.

AFFIDAVIT PURSUANT TO SECTION 8.01-465.3 OF THE CODE OF VIRGINIA

Commonwealth of Virginia City of Richmond

This day appeared Pietro F. Sanitate, an attorney with the law firm of Woods Rogers Vandeventer Black PLC, 901 East Byrd Street, Suite 1600, Richmond, Virginia 23219. Mr. Sanitate represents Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation, the plaintiff and judgment creditor, whose address is 489 North 8th Street, Suite 203, Hood River, Oregon 97031.

Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation obtained a judgment against Cyberlux Corporation, as evidenced by the attached certified judgment order entered by the Superior Court for the County of Durham, North Carolina on July 21, 2025. Said judgment was entered in the principal amount of $2,926,814.39, with interest accruing at a rate of eight percent (8%) per annum from July 21, 2025, until paid in full.

The judgment debtor's, Cyberlux Corporation, last known address is 800 Park Offices Drive, Suite 3209, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. The judgment debtor's registered agent is CT Corporation System, located at 160 Mine Lake Ct., Suite 200, Raleigh, North Carolina 27615.

Page 7 of 13 PageID# PG 0090 AUG 21 80

FURTHER, Affiant sayeth not.

Euros

Pietro F. Sanitate (VSB No. 89538) WOODS ROGERS VANDEVENTER BLACK PLC Riverfront Plaza, West Tower 901 East Byrd Street, Suite 1600 Richmond, VA 23219 Telephone: 804-434-5029 pietro.sanitate@woodsrogers.com

Subscribed and sworn to before me this 14 day of August, 2025.

Michelle LeePayne

Notary Public

My Commission Expires:

June 30,2028

Michelle Lee Payne Notary Public Reg #7866633 Commonwealth of Virginia My Commission Expires 6-30-2020

4819-8527-3157, v. 1

PG009 | AUG 211

2979
INTA

SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS

CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND

EDWARD F. JEWETT CLERK

CECELIA M. HARGROVE CHIEF DEPUTY CLERK

NOTICE OF FILING OF FOREIGN JUDGMENT

DATE: AUGUST 21, 2025

NOTICE TO:

CYBERLUX CORPORATION

800
PARK OFFICES DRIVE SUITE 8209

RESEARCH TRIANGLE PARK, NORTH CAROLINA 27709

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE; PURSUANT TO VIRGINIA CODE SECTION 8.01-465.3, JUDGMENT IN THE SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF DURHAM, NORTH CAROLINA DATED 07/21/2025 HAS BEEN DOCKETED IN THIS COURT.

JUDGMENT CREDITOR:

ADVANCED NAVIGATION & POSITIONING CORPORATION

189
NORTH 8" ST, SUITE 203

HOOD RIVER, OREGON 97031

CREDITOR'S ATTORNEY:

PIETRO F SANITATE VSB#89538

WOODS ROGERS VANDEVENTER BLACK PLC

901
EAST BYRD STREET, SUITE 1600

RICHMOND, VA 23219

804-484-5029

EDWARD F. JEWETT, CLERK BY avan D.C. CIRCUIT COURT, CITY OF RICHMOND

NOTICE MAILED: AUGUST 21, 2025

TO THE JUDGMENT DEBTOR(S): YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED THAT A COPY OF THE ABOVE-DESCRIBED FOREIGN JUDGMENT HAS BEEN FILED IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE OF THIS COURT ON THE DATE ABOVE. THIS JUDGMENT MAY BE ENFORCED AGAINST YOU BY LEGAL ACTION FILED THROUGH THIS COURT.

IT MAY BE IN YOUR BEST INTEREST TO CONSULT A LAWYER REGARDING THIS JUDGMENT.

DOCKETED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE CITY OF RICHMOND ON

AUG 2 1 2025 AT: 3:30 pm

JOHN MARSHALL COURTS BUILDING 400 NORTH 9TH STREET RICHMOND, VIRGINIA 23219-1540 (804) 646-6505

Receipt : 25000024676

VIRGINIA SEMPER TYRANNIS

OFFICIAL RECEIPT RICHMOND CITY CIRCUIT COURT MISCELLANEOUS

DATE : 08/21/2025

TIME : 09:44:34

RECEIPT # : 25000024676

TRANSACTION # : 25082100029

CASHIER : AXM

REGISTER # : F145

ACCOUNT OF : WOODSROGERS RECEIVED OF : WOODSROGERS

CHECK : $25.00

CHECK NUMBER : 89206

DESCRIPTION 1 : FOREIGN JUDGMENT

CASE # : 760CGM250003021

FILING TYPE : OTH

TYPE : FULL PAYMENT

ACCOUNT CODE

DESCRIPTION

PAID

DOCUMENT REPRODUCTION COSTS

$0.00

JUDGMENT DOCKET FEE

$20.00

FEES - COPIES

$5.00

ACCOUNT CODE

DESCRIPTION

PAID

MISCELLANEOUS FEES & COMMISSIONS

$0.00

SECURED REMOTE ACCESS

$0.00

TENDERED : $

25.00

AMOUNT PAID : $

25.00

PAYOR'S COPY

CLERK OF COURT : EDWARD F. JEWETT

WRIT OF FIERI FACIAS COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA

Case No. CM25-361

CITY OF RICHMOND

Circuit Court

CITY OR COUNTY

Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation PLAINTIFF(S) V.

Cyberlux Corporation DEFENDANT(S)

Joel D. Schwartz (Virginia Bar No. 97979)

c/o CT Corporation

c/o Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

160
Mine Lake Court, Suite 200 Raleigh, NC 27615
900
7th Street, Suite 700 Washington, DC 20001 Jul 9/23/25

TO ANY AUTHORIZED OFFICER:

Judgment Principal

$ 2,926,814.39

Credits

$

6
% interest from 8/21/25 to

RECEIVED AND FILED CIRCUIT COURT 11:41 SEP 2 4 2025

% interest from to

% interest from to

EDWARD F. JEWETT, CLERK BY (KU D.C.

Costs

$

Attorney's Fees $

[ ] You are commanded to levy upon the goods, chattels, current money, bank notes and real estate of the Defendant(s), and to make from those the principal, interest, costs and attorney's fees, together with such other fees, commissions and other lawful charges incurred in executing this writ, less credits (itemized on attached list) as shown above.

:selected: No levy requested.

You are further commanded to make your return thereon to the Court or Clerk's Office within 90 days of this date, and, if money is recovered under this execution, to notify the person entitled to receive such money if such person is known, as required by law.

Homestead Exemption waived? ] yes :selected: no

] cannot be demanded

DATE

[ ] CLERK [ ] DEPUTY CLERK

GARNISHMENT SUMMONS Commonwealth of Virginia, VA. CODE §§ 8.01-511, -512.3

Case No.

2025
16055

COUNTY OF FAIRFAX 4110 Chain Bridge Rd, Fairfax, VA 22030 COURT ADDRESS OCT 0 8 2025

JUDGMENT CREDITOR:

Advanced Navigation & Positioning Corporation

JUDGMENT DEBTOR:

V.

Cyberlux Corporation

CHRISTOPHER.J .. FALCON.

CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT

c/o CT Corporation

COURT OF FAIRFAX, VA

160
Mine Lake Court, Suite 200

Raleigh, NC 27615

Telephone No.

(202)
854-2811

JUDGMENT CREDITOR'S ATTORNEY:

Soc. Sec. No.

Joel D. Schwartz (Virginia Bar No. 97979)

Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein LLP

900
7th Street, Suite 700, Washington, DC 20001

Telephone No.

(202)
854-2811

Garnishee:

HII Mission Technologies Corporation

8350
Broad Street

McLean, VA 22102

* :selected: January 16, 2026

HEARING DATE AND TIME

This is a garnishment against (check only one) [ ] the judgment debtor's wages, salary or other compensation. :selected: some other debt due or property of the judgment debtor, specifically, money owed by HII to Cyberlux Corp. pursuant to Subcontract No. P000043846 & modified

STATEMENT:

Judgment Principal:

$ 2,926,814.39

Credits

Interest

Judgment Costs

Attorney's Fee

Garnishment Costs

TOTAL BALANCE DUE $

2,926,814.39

The garnishee shall rely on this amount.

MAXIMUM PORTION OF DISPOSABLE EARNINGS SUBJECT TO GARNISHMENT ] Support [ ] 50% [ ] 55% [ ] 60% [ ] 65% (if not specified, then 50%) [ ] state taxes, 100% I

8/21/2025

DATE OF JUDGMENT MAR 1 3 2026

If none of the above are checked, then § 34-29(a) (on reverse) applies.

TO ANY AUTHORIZED OFFICER: You are hereby commanded to serve this summons on the judgment debtor and the garnishee.

TO THE GARNISHEE: You are hereby commanded to (1) file a written answer with this court, or (2) deliver payment to this court, or (3) appear before this court on the return date and time shown on this summons to answer the Suggestion for Summons in Garnishment of the judgment creditor that, by reason of the lien of writ of fieri facias, there is a liability as shown in the statement upon the garnishee.

As garnishee, you shall withhold from the judgment debtor any sums of money to which the judgment debtor is or may be entitled from you during the period between the date of service of this summons on you and the date for your appearance in court, subject to the following limitations: (1) The maximum amount which may be garnished is the "TOTAL BALANCE DUE" as shown on this summons. (2) You shall not be liable to the judgment creditor for any property not specified in this garnishment summons. (3) If the sums of money being garnished are earnings of the judgment debtor, then the provision of "MAXIMUM PORTION OF DISPOSABLE EARNINGS SUBJECT TO GARNISHMENT" shall apply.

If a garnishment summons is served on an employer having one thousand or more employees, then money to which the judgment debtor is or may be entitled from his or her employer shall be considered those wages, salaries, commission or other earnings which, following service on the garnishee-employer, are determined and are payable to the judgment debtor under the garnishee-employer's normal payroll procedure with a reasonable time allowance for making a timely return by mail to this court.

OCT 2 4 2025

CHRISTOPHER J. FALCON, CLERK

Clerk

DATE OF ISSUANCE OF SUMMONS

UCT 2 4 2025

by Janis Clay

DEPUTY CLERK

WRIT OF FIERI FACIAS TO ANY AUTHORIZED OFFICER: You are commanded to execute this writ and to make from the intangible personal estate of the judgment debtor(s) the principal, interest, costs and attorney's fees, less credits, as shown in the Garnishment Summons. You are further commanded to make your return to the clerk's office according to law.

Homestead Exemption Waived? ] Yes ] Cannot be demanded [

:selected: No

Clerk

(

DATE

by

DEPUTY CLERK

DATE OF DELIVERY OF WRIT OF FIERI FACIAS TO SHERIFF IF DIFFERENT FROM DATE OF ISSUANCE OF THIS SUMMONS

FCFruit Court

CIVIL MAIL.

The following statement is not the law but is an interpretation of the law which is intended to assist those who must respond to this garnishment. You many rely on this only for general guidance because the law itself is the final word. (Read the law, § 34-29 of the Code of Virginia, for a full explanation. A copy of § 34-29 is available at the Clerk's office. If you do not understand the law, call a lawyer for help.)

An employer may take as much as 25 percent of an employee's disposable earnings to satisfy this garnishment. But if any employee makes the minimum wage or less for his week's earnings, the employee will ordinarily get to keep 40 times the minimum hourly wage.

But an employer may withhold a different amount of money from that above if:

(1)
The employee must pay child support or spousal support and was ordered to do so by a court procedure or other legal procedure. No more than 65 percent of an employee's earnings may be withheld for support;
(2)
Money is withheld by order of a bankruptcy court; or
(3)
Money is withheld for a tax debt.

"Disposable earnings" means the money an employee makes "after taxes" and after other amounts required by law to be withheld are satisfied. Earnings can be salary, hourly wages, commissions, bonuses, payments to an independent contractor, or otherwise, whether paid directly to the employee or not.

If an employee tries to transfer, assign or in any way give his earnings to another person to avoid the garnishment, it will not be legal; earnings are still earnings.

Financial institutions that receive an employee's paycheck by direct deposit do not have to determine what part of a person's earnings can be garnished.

RECEIVED

DATE AND TIME

SHERIFF

NOTE:

Return of Writ of Fieri Facias to be used if no effects found - otherwise, use appropriate sections of CC-1477, WRIT OF FIERI FACIAS.

[ ] NO EFFECTS FOUND

DATE

SHERIFF

DEPUTY SHERIFF

JUDGMENT DEBTOR Cyberlux Corporation

ADDRESS c/o CT Corporation, 160 Mine Lake Court, Suite 200, Raleigh, NC 27615

[ ] PERSONAL SERVICE

[ ] Being unable to make personal service, a copy was delivered in the following manner:

[ ] Delivered to family member (not temporary sojourner or guest) age 16 or older at usual place of abode of party named above after giving information of its purport. List name, age of recipient, and relation of recipient to party named above.

[ ] Posted on front door or such other door as appears to be the main entrance of usual place of abode, address listed above. (Other authorized recipient not found.)

[ ] Served on Secretary of the Commonwealth.

[ ] Not found

SERVING OFFICER

for

RETURNS: Each garnishee was served as indicated below, unless not found, with a copy of this summons and the exemption claim form.

GARNISHEE HII Mission Technologies Corp

ADDRESS

8350
Broad Street

McLean, VA 22102

TELEPHONE NUMBER:

[ ] PERSONAL SERVICE

[ ] FEDERAL SERVICE*

SERVICE ON AN ENTITY PURSUANT TO § 8.01-513:

[ ] Served on garnishment designee. List name and entity type.

[ ] Certificate filed indicating inability to serve garnishment designee and describing alternative method of service.

SERVICE ON AN INDIVIDUAL:

[ ] Being unable to make personal service, a copy was delivered in the following manner:

[ ] Delivered to family member (not temporary sojourner :selected: or guest) age 16 or older at usual place of abode of party named above after giving information of its purport. List name, age of recipient, and relation of recipient to party named above.

[ ] Posted on front door or such other door as appears to be the main entrance of usual place of abode, address listed above. (Other authorized recipient not found.)

[ ] Served on Secretary of the Commonwealth.

[ ] Copy mailed to judgment debtor after serving the garnishee on date of service below unless a different date of mailing is shown.

DATE OF MAILING

[ ] Not found

SERVING OFFICER

for

DATE

* Federal law, 5 U.S.C. § 5520a(c)(1) and 42 U.S.C. § 659, provides that a federal agency garnishee may be served either personally or by certified mail, return receipt requested.

NOTICE TO JUDGMENT DEBTOR HOW TO CLAIM EXEMPTIONS FROM GARNISHMENT AND LIEN

The attached Summons in Garnishment or Notice of Lien has been issued on request of a creditor who holds a judgment against you. The Summons may cause your property or wages to be held or taken to pay the judgment.

The law provides that certain property and wages cannot be taken in garnishment. Such property is said to be exempted. A summary of some of the major exemptions is set forth in the request for hearing form. There is no exemption solely because you are having difficulty paying your debts.

If you claim an exemption, you should (i) fill out the claim for exemption form and (ii) deliver or mail the form to the clerk's office of this court.

You have a right to a hearing within seven business days from the date you file your claim with the court. If the creditor is asking that your wages be withheld, the method of computing the amount of wages that are exempt from garnishment by law is indicated on the Summons in Garnishment attached. You do not need to file a claim for exemption to receive this exemption, but if you believe the wrong amount is being withheld, you may file a claim for exemption.

On the day of the hearing, you should come to court ready to explain why your property is exempted, and you should bring any documents that may help you prove your case. If you do not come to court at the designated time and prove that your property is exempt, you may lose some of your rights.

If you do not claim an exemption and do not otherwise contest the garnishment, you are not required to appear in court on the return date on the Garnishment Summons.

It may be helpful for you to seek the advice of an attorney in this matter.

THE REQUEST FOR HEARING FORM IS PRINTED ON THE REVERSE OF THIS FORM.

Original source file

No source file is attached yet. The record is ready for the PDF/media link when the attachment importer is connected.
File
ip-hii-edva-00483-doc-0175-exhibit-28.pdf
Source UID
source:773bda5b50f7971896a55c82a2144793a1ec2926b5a6c7aafec3a37475ab3bb1
Full SHA-256
773bda5b50f7971896a55c82a2144793a1ec2926b5a6c7aafec3a37475ab3bb1